Norwalk’s New SRT Process and Documentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

tiers of the SRBI framework
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
REM Shelby County Schools School Year. Current Federal/State Law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reauthorization of.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Omaha Public Schools Behavior Consultation Team Program Supporting Children with Challenging Behaviors Kylee Starmer – Behavior Consultant Omaha Public.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Implementing a Diagnostic Reading Assessment Grades 4-8
Step by Step of RTI Joan Vanderslice Jenni Briggs.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Understanding Response to Intervention (RtI) : What it Is & How it Works in Midway ISD.
Data Teams and TIPS Processes Multi-Tiered System of Support.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Eric Hamilton, Assistant Principal of Curriculum & Instruction Paul Wakefield, Network Engineer Alice Schmitz, Instructional Technologist S.T.A.R. = Name.
Intervention and Referral Services Linda Remolino, LPC, NCC Director of School Counseling North Plainfield School District.
Response to Intervention RTI September 2014 STAT Training.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Growing & Glowing with RTI Camden County Schools.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
A Presentation by Jeff Starr & Patrick Winters APRIL 5, 2012.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
RTI Implantation Guide Overview Fall Before we begin… Student Intervention Planning is not a pre-referral process. It is the process of collaborating.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Pitt County Schools’ TAT/PSM Process using Ezrti Sylvia Bjorkman School Psychologist II. TAT/RTI Contact Revised September 9,2011.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Formative Assessments and the Challenges of a Small District McKenzie School District Sally Storm Lane Tompkins Kevin Moore.
The A.I.M. Team Canton Area Elementary School Prereferral Intervention Process.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Presented by Dr. Quentina Pruitt Staff Development Specialist.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Response to Intervention
Tier 2 & Tier 3 Meetings. MTSS Focus Team The purpose of the MTSS Focus Team: To analyze school-wide and class-wide data for attendance, behavior, and.
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Welcome. BSI Parent Night September 19, 2017 Mrs
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
2016 Fall Parent Meeting TAG
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
The ABCs of Student Support Services
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Supporting our students in ocsu
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
ABC Unified School District
Presentation transcript:

Norwalk’s New SRT Process and Documentation Learning the new mechanism for moving individual students through the three tiers of the SRBI framework

What you will need for today A student in mind from your grade level who is currently in the SRT process or who will soon be entered into the SRT process (along with his/her key academic information/scores, the interventions that have taken place in the classroom, and any supplemental services inside or outside the classroom being given). We will work together in grade level teams to complete a sample Form A – “Request for Assistance” in the new SRT process (using the SRBI framework) during the middle of this workshop.

Overview of today’s presentation Overview of SRBI showing how the new SRT forms fit into the SRBI framework How were the new SRT forms and process created and refined? What are the criteria for starting a student in the new SRT process? The new SRT process (SRBI Framework) – reviewing the flowchart Viewing Form A along with a sample student Form A Filling out Form A “Request for Assistance” using a current student from your grade level Viewing Forms B-D along with sample student information filled in on Form B How will our school transition to the new SRT process? (Form E) How will these new SRT forms help us if we have to refer a child to the special education process? How will this process work at our school?

Overview of SRBI showing how the new SRT forms fit into the SRBI framework. As a district, we have received Professional Development on the “big picture” of Scientific Research-based Interventions (SRBI) which is Connecticut’s version of Response to Intervention (RtI). We have all seen the pyramid showing the three tiers of the SRBI framework, a regular education initiative.

The focus of the PD we have received has primarily been on the “bottom of the SRBI pyramid”, the school-wide and district-wide interventions that we have been working on regularly at each of our schools.

The Norwalk ’s “new SRT process” and the new SRT forms that we are discussing today will be used to implement the “top of the SRBI pyramid”. They focus in on the transitions of individual students in the “new SRT process” from Tier I to Tier II to Tier III interventions.

When both parts of the pyramid are placed together (school and district-wide interventions and individual Tier II and Tier III interventions for “new SRT process” students), we have the means to implement the entire SRBI framework in Norwalk.

How were the new SRBI forms and process created and refined? Last school year Wolfpit Elementary School staff received a day long SRBI training from SERC trainer AnnMarie Dubuque. A core SRBI team from Wolfpit met again for an additional day of training with Ms. Dubuque and created the forms and flowchart that were initially used to create what you will see today. This school year, the forms have been utilized in a pilot of the new SRT process (using the SRBI framework) at Wolfpit School as they transitioned from the older SRT process to the new process. A district-wide “new SRT forms and process” committee has been working throughout this school year, utilizing forms from Nathan Hale Middle School, and many elementary schools in Norwalk that have been working on implementing the SRBI framework. Final forms were created for the entire K-12 system incorporating input from each of these schools, members of the forms committee, many other K-12 staff members, as well as each SRT coordinator and administrative team member. Today, we are presenting the new forms and the new SRT process for all schools in Norwalk to transition to by July 1, 2010.

Members of the District-wide “New SRT Forms and Process” Committee Tony Daddona, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction Carol Marinaccio, Director of Elementary Education Marilyn Liberatore, Former Interim Director of Elementary Education and Former Principal of Columbus Elementary School Robin Ives, Principal of Cranbury Elementary School Karen Ockasi, Principal of Naramake Elementary School Christopher Weiss, Assistant Principal, Wolfpit Elementary School Deborah Bell-Johnson, Assistant Principal, Nathan Hale Middle School Michael Pisseri, Assistant Principal, Ponus Ridge Middle School

What are the criteria for starting a student in the new SRT process? At each of our schools, all adults focused on instruction or behavior are involved in the success of each student in their care. When a student falls significantly behind in grade level expectations for his or her academics or behavior, interventions are provided in the classroom to assist the student in making progress back to grade level expectations whenever possible. When interventions are not effective or show only limited progress, (or when parents express major concerns for their children that cannot be remediated) then a teacher or guidance counselor will need to start the process of collecting data and documenting that individual student Tier II or Tier III interventions may be necessary. They start to fill out Form A for the new SRT Process, the “Request for Assistance” Form.

There are two main documents that drive the new SRT process… Form A – The “Request for Assistance” Form (to be double sided) is filled out by the classroom teacher/guidance counselor when Tier II/III interventions (to be monitored in the new SRT process) may be needed for a student. If the form is approved, then the student enters this new SRT process. Form B – The “Action Plan for Intervention” (to be double sided) is filled out at the first SRT meeting and is modified (using a new Form B) an each additional SRT meeting after sufficient progress monitoring. Note: We will also be discussing the formation of our SRT team(s) and possible meeting times after we review the forms in this presentation. You can now take out the full page “New SRT Process Flowchart” (from your packet) to follow along with the slides.

SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools The new SRT process (SRBI Framework) – reviewing the flowchart (top half) SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Teacher/Guidance Counselor/Parent has concern(s). Parent contacted by teacher/guidance counselor about concern(s) by phone or in person – note in Request for Assistance - Form A. Teacher completes Request for Assistance– Form A. An administrator a) asks teacher to continue interventions, b) sends back, or c) accepts form First SRT meeting scheduled, then held. Interventions identified and Action Plan for Intervention developed–Form B. Parent notified about the plan by letter–Form C, teacher/ guidance counselor makes copy of the letter for SRT folder, parent returns receipt & can meet with teacher/guidance counselor.

The new SRT process (SRBI Framework) – reviewing the flowchart (bottom half) Action Plan for Intervention implemented with integrity. Progress monitoring (Form D-optional) Review SRT held. Eval. of outcomes (update Form B). Parent contacted by teacher/counselor about progress. Goal has been met. Goal has not been met. Do we need to maintain the plan-Form B? Making expected progress Slow progress Do we continue plan as is-Form B? Revisit selection of strategies-Form B Revisit focus area-Form B No progress No – Close the plan-Form B Yes – Embed strategy into universal practice

Viewing Form A along with a sample with student information filled in The next set of PowerPoint slides show Form A in sections. Each section of the Request for Assistance (Form A) is shown with sample student information filled following it for your review. The new SRT flowchart will then follow each form to indicate when the form will be used. You can now follow along by having the full Form A (from your packet) in front of you placed side by side for comparison with the Form A student sample.

SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Where does the Request for Assistance – Form A fit into the SRT process? SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Teacher/Guidance Counselor/Parent has concern(s). Parent contacted by teacher/guidance counselor about concern(s) by phone or in person – note in Request for Assistance - Form A. Teacher completes Request for Assistance– Form A. An administrator a) asks teacher to continue interventions, b) sends back, or c) accepts form First SRT meeting scheduled, then held. Interventions identified and Action Plan for Intervention developed–Form B. Parent notified about the plan by letter–Form C, teacher/ guidance counselor makes copy of the letter for SRT folder, parent returns receipt & can meet with teacher/guidance counselor.

Additional Resources (one set per school) to use during the Form A work session RtI Strategies (overview of implementing RtI/SRBI and the three tiers) Intervention Strategies Guide (very specific suggestions) Behavior Guide (very specific suggestions) RtI Wheel for Academic and Behavioral Domains (suggestions for implementing RtI/SRBI)

Filling out Form A “Request for Assistance” using a current student from your grade level. Now it is your turn to complete a “Request for Assistance” - Form A for a current SRT student in your grade level. Members of the presentation team will come around to assist you and help answer any questions. You will have approximately 45 minutes to work on this project. At the end, each group should share some of the highlights and/or challenges of their work on Form A and participants can ask questions and provide feedback.

Viewing Forms B-D along with sample student information filled in on Form B The next set of PowerPoint slides show each of the new forms B-D in sections. Each section of the Action Plan for Intervention (Form B) is shown with sample student information filled in for your review. The new SRT flowchart will follow each form to indicate when the form will be used. You can now follow along by having the full forms B-D (from your packet) in front of you with Form B side by side for comparison with the Form B student sample.

SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Where does the Action Plan for Intervention – Form B fit into the SRT process? SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Teacher/Guidance Counselor/Parent has concern(s). Parent contacted by teacher/guidance counselor about concern(s) by phone or in person – note in Request for Assistance - Form A. Teacher completes Request for Assistance– Form A. An administrator a) asks teacher to continue interventions, b) sends back, or c) accepts form First SRT meeting scheduled, then held. Interventions identified and Action Plan for Intervention developed–Form B. Parent notified about the plan by letter–Form C, teacher/ guidance counselor makes copy of the letter for SRT folder, parent returns receipt & can meet with teacher/guidance counselor.

Where does the Action Plan for Intervention – Form B fit into the SRT process (continued throughout)… Action Plan for Intervention implemented with integrity. Progress monitoring (Form D-optional) Review SRT held. Eval. of outcomes (update Form B). Parent contacted by teacher/counselor about progress. Goal has been met. Goal has not been met. Do we need to maintain the plan-Form B? Making expected progress Slow progress Do we continue plan as is-Form B? Revisit selection of strategies-Form B Revisit focus area-Form B No progress No – Close the plan-Form B Yes – Embed strategy into universal practice

SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Form C – The Parent Notification Letter is filled out by the classroom teacher/guidance counselor and sent home after the first SRT SRT Process (SRBI Framework) – Norwalk Public Schools Teacher/Guidance Counselor/Parent has concern(s). Parent contacted by teacher/guidance counselor about concern(s) by phone or in person – note in Request for Assistance - Form A. Teacher completes Request for Assistance– Form A. An administrator a) asks teacher to continue interventions, b) sends back, or c) accepts form First SRT meeting scheduled, then held. Interventions identified and Action Plan for Intervention developed–Form B. Parent notified about the plan by letter–Form C, teacher/ guidance counselor makes copy of the letter for SRT folder, parent returns receipt & can meet with teacher/guidance counselor.

The Monitoring Plan - Form D (optional), or other methods of demonstrating progress, can be used for progress monitoring Action Plan for Intervention implemented with integrity. Progress monitoring (Form D-optional) Review SRT held. Eval. of outcomes (update Form B). Parent contacted by teacher/counselor about progress. Goal has been met. Goal has not been met. Do we need to maintain the plan-Form B? Making expected progress Slow progress Do we continue plan as is-Form B? Revisit selection of strategies-Form B Revisit focus area-Form B No progress No – Close the plan-Form B Yes – Embed strategy into universal practice

How will our school transition to the new SRT process? If any current SRTs can be closed out, we can do so by the end of the year. Any students with a Request for Assistance-Form A approved this year can start in the new SRT process. Any students still in the older SRT process will have the End of School Year Transition Document-Form E filled out for them by the end of the school year. At the start of next school year, these students can be either closed out by the new teacher/guidance counselor if possible or have a Request of Assistance-Form A approved for them by October 15, 2010. As noted in the box at the bottom of your copy of the New SRT Process Flowchart: Note: End of School Year Transition Document-Form E should be utilized May/June 2010 to assist the following year(s) teachers/counselors with students who were not exited out of the older SRT process. Students still in older SRT process by October 15th of 2010 either need to have Request for Assistance-Form A filled out to move them to the new SRT process (SRBI framework), or they need to be exited from the SRT process completely. The End of School Year Transition Document-Form E is shown next.

How will these new SRT forms help us if we have to refer a child to the special education process? The state of Connecticut has issued Reading, Math, and Writing worksheets to be filled out before referring a student to the PPT process (see in your packet). These forms are to “document that a student has received appropriate instruction and interventions” using the SRBI model and the three tiers of intervention before the referral. These forms tie in with the SRBI triangle presented earlier, with Special Education referrals being noted on the far left side and in the top left box in the diagram.

How will this process work at our school? Who will be on our SRT team(s) (a regular education initiative)? Usually an administrator, a literacy specialist, the classroom teacher/guidance counselor, and at least one other regular education teacher. Social workers and other staff can be invited to specific SRT meetings to assist with the discussion and planning. When will the team(s) meet? To be determined in our building. Options could include a set time every two weeks, a data team time, a meeting time, or a Wednesday professional activity time. How will the SRTs be scheduled and held? Our SRT coordinators will schedule and arrange SRT meetings once Form A for each student has been approved by an administrator. How will our school transition from the old SRT to the new SRT? As mentioned earlier, if any current SRTs can be closed out, we can do so by the end of the year. Any students with a Request for Assistance - Form A approved this year can start in the new SRT process. Any students still in the older SRT process at the start of next school year can be either closed out by the new teacher/guidance counselor or have a Request of Assistance approved for them by October 15, 2010. Other Questions?

This PowerPoint presentation was created by Christopher Weiss along with the members of the Norwalk Public Schools (CT) “New SRT Forms and Process” committee with feedback from each school’s SRT coordinator(s) and administrative team – February/March 2010. One final note…