Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
Advertisements

Employability and Employer Engagement
European Universities Charter on Lifelong learning Bologna employability seminar Luxembourg, November Howard Davies, senior adviser, EUA.
Lifelong learning: Taking Bologna to the labour market Lars Lynge Nielsen President of EURASHE Leuven Ministerial Conference 28 April 2009.
Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeen City November 2008.
Students without Borders : international student mapping project Mike Heffron Policy Assistant NUS Scotland/sparqs.
Towards an Inclusive Culture: Engaging Students in Institutional Enhancement Dr Helen May Senior Adviser Higher Education Academy.
Theology and Religious Studies Looking Outwards A workshop on knowledge transfer as a strategy for learning and assessment in the TRS curriculum.
What is quality?. sparqs Our aim is to enhance student engagement in Scotland. We are funded by the Scottish Funding Council and managed by the sector.
“The GMC aims to encourage a culture where the patient and public perspective is sought and recognised across the spectrum of medical education” Paragraph.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN VET LUGANO MEETING
Engaging Students in the Quality of Learning and Teaching [Your name] [Your role]
Delivering Validation Existing practices and methods in the United Kingdom The WEA is committed to equality of opportunity and inclusive learning.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Student Induction Student Representation
Performance management guidance
UELSU reps conference Student Engagement: What does is mean for you?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Supporting international students Module 4: International Students and the Quality Enhancement Framework.
Evaluating the impact of careers guidance for continuous improvement
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ RV/29/04/2004 Connecting Policy & Practice / Informing & Influencing Policy Development Raimo Vuorinen Researcher, Institute for.
1 A proposed skills framework for all 11- to 19-year-olds.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeenshire November 2008.
Final Year Curriculum Design Principles Conceptualising a capstone experience for law students The Australian Learning and Teaching Council has received.
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
@sparqs_scotland #AFA14 Student engagement in articulation Hannah Clarke Development Advisor.
Introduction to sparqs Hannah Clarke sparqs Development Advisor Heeding the Student Voice at universities Friday 15 th May 2015.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
JISC Regional Support Centres – Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning May 2, 2008 | slide 1 JISC Regional Support Centres – Stimulating and.
The link between staff development and student engagement The Robert Gordon University Thursday 4 February 2010 sparqs Student Engagement Series.
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Learning From Assessment: Evaluating the Benefits of DALI (Diagnostic Assessment Learning Interface) Hershbinder Mann & Guinevere Glasfurd-Brown, University.
Student Voice in Academic Audit Dr Jan Cameron Director Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities May 2015.
Quality Assurance in Staff Development Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
Engaging Students in the Quality of Learning and Teaching [Your name] [Your role]
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Website: Bologna Secretariat The Bologna Process and Student Centered Learning Ligia DECA Head of the 2010.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS & DISABILITY CODE OF PRACTICE 2015 HOW THIS APPLIES TO FURTHER EDUCATION.
Council of Europe Forum Strasbourg, September 2006 Norman Sharp OBE Director, QAA Scotland
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Student Partnership Agreements: Impact and Change
Student engagement in quality: an introduction for staff
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
International Practice Scotland
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Student/Staff Strategic Analysis Session Eve Lewis Director.
Creating a learning community for online and distance students
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Eve Lewis Director.
Student engagement in QA in Scotland
Personal Academic Tutoring
OTLA Report Writing Training
Hannah Clarke, sparqs Steph Kirkham, sparqs
Presentation transcript:

Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs

Aims Aims of the session: →Understand how student involvement can improve the student experience →Appreciate different ways of involving students in quality of teaching and learning →Appreciate the challenges of involving students and how these might be overcome

sparqs Student Participation in Quality Scotland was created in 2003 and is funded by the Scottish Funding Council Work with: All Universities throughout Scotland Individual staff and students Aim to enhance the involvement of learners in their learning and institutional decisions by: Training Events / sharing practise Consultancy

Bologna Process University governance: →Students are full partners in higher education governance. (Berlin, 2003) →The necessary ongoing reform of higher education systems and policies (…) will require full participation of students and staff. (Leuven, 2009) Social dimension: →making quality higher education equally accessible to all, (…) the need for appropriate conditions for students so that they can complete their studies without obstacles related to their social and economic background. The social dimension includes (…) provide them with guidance and counselling services (Bergen, 2005)

Bologna Process (2) Students at the centre: →Student-centred learning (…) will help students develop the competences they need in a changing labour market and will empower them to become active and responsible citizens. (…) →Student-centred learning requires empowering individual learners, new approaches to teaching and learning, effective support and guidance structures and a curriculum focused more clearly on the learner. (Leuven, 2009) Quality Assurance: →Quality assurance systems should include: Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results. (Berlin, 2003) →We ask the higher education institutions to pay particular attention to improving the teaching quality of their study programmes at all levels. (Leuven, 2009)

Student Involvement To talk of student involvement is to recognise that students are active participants in and directors of their own learning experience. Student involvement in quality assurance implies a high level of association, responsibility, empowerment and control afforded to the learner. Student Involvement: Is both involvement of the individual student and involvemen of student representatives taking on a greater role at programme, faculty and university level.

Student Involvement (2) Student involvement is not an end in itself – improving the student learning experience is the aim, student engagement is just the process. Why student involvement? ‘’Universities are communities of learning achieved through a partnership between staff and students. A committed partnership between students, as active participants, and the staff at an institution will open up possibilities for authentic and constructive dialogue, offering the opportunity for more holistic and reflective feedback and enhancement of learning.’’ (ref. Cross Sector group on student engagement England & Northern Ireland).

Discussion 1. What, in your view, is effective student involvement? 2. Does your department/faculty agree on what student involvement means, and how to achieve it?

Learner engagement: which areas? The Student Journey 1. Curriculum 2. Learning resources and their deployment 3. Teaching and Learning 4. Assessment and Achievement 5. Student Progression And Outcomes 6. Quality and Standards

involving students: the how actor expert partner information provider a completer of surveys collector & analyst of feedback recognised as experts in learning authentic & constructive dialogue

What’s the most accurate description of student involvement in your institution? A: Information provider (completer of surveys) B: Actor (analyst of feedback/recognised as expert) C: Partner (authentic & constructive dialogue)

Agree or disagree? Effective student engagement implies students are involved in all stages of decision making processes related to teaching and learning.

Student engagement: in what stage? Establish Needs Scoping /preparation Planning/ design Implementation/ action Analysis /Reflection Dissemination Monitor /review

Student engagement: programme level? New curriculum ? Scoping /preparation Design curriculum Implementation Analysis first cohort Discussion on improvements Continuous monitoring

Student - Point of View Overarching barriers and issues: Students need to be sufficiently aware of what student involvement means for them and how it will improve their overall experience Effective student involvement is largely dependant on how effectively staff can encourage and inform students throughout their entire student journey Correct conditions (policies, processes, buy-in, relationships) so that students can effectively be involved in QA processes In many cases students will need the opportunity and assistance to effectively reflect upon their learning in order to be able to comment on it successfully

Staff – Point of view Overarching barriers and issues: Student involvement means different things to different people and therefore achieving student involvement won’t necessarily be the same for all Uncertain about how to get the most out of student involvement both at the individual and representative level Past successes or failures with students can have an impact on how staff view student involvement Difficulty in attracting students to take on representative roles and maintaining student involvement

Areas to think about Are the right conditions in place for individual learner engagement – policies, procedures, opportunities Are different types of opportunities for engagement available for different types of learners? Do learners have the correct information or knowledge to be effectively engaged Is the timing of engagement right? Are learners building on their experience of being engaged and having the opportunity to develop as co-creators or active learners?

Final word Student involvement is an effective mechanism to enable students to experience success in their entire learning journey and achieve their full potential.

Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Questions