Benchmarking the Preservation Process for Electronic Scholarly Journals Brian Lavoie Office of Research OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. DLF Fall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Małgorzata Rychlik, Emilia Karwasińska 2009 Poznań University Library.
Advertisements

Current State of Play in Digital Preservation Peter B. Hirtle Cornell University Library Society of American Archivists.
Permanent access to the records of science: The e-Depot at the Koninklijke Bibliotheek Current Status & Developments Erik Oltmans Manager e-Depot Koninklijke.
Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
The Incentives to Preserve Digital Materials: Roles, Scenarios, and Economic Decision-making Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC Research CNI Spring Task.
The Incentives to Preserve Digital Materials: Roles, Scenarios, and Economic Decision-making Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC Research OCLC Digital.
Long-Term Preservation. Technical Approaches to Long-Term Preservation the challenge is to interpret formats a similar development: sound carriers From.
ICDL-Contentra Workshop 29 th November /11/2013 Contentra Technologies Confidential (RajuB)1.
An Introduction June 17, 2013 Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
Institutional Repositories It’s not Just the Technology New England Archivists Boston College March 11, 2006 Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Tufts.
Digital Preservation - Its all about the metadata right? “Metadata and Digital Preservation: How Much Do We Really Need?” SAA 2014 Panel Saturday, August.
Common Use Cases for Preservation Metadata Deborah Woodyard-Robinson Digital Preservation Consultant Long-term Repositories:
1 Planning And Electronic Records Issues For Electronically Enhanced Courses Jeremy Rowe Nancy Tribbensee
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,
Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS Presented by Randy Fischer, Programmer, Florida Center for Library Automation, University of Florida DigCCurr2007.
Statewide Digitization and the FCLA Digital Archive Priscilla Caplan, Florida Center for Library Automation Statewide Digitization Planners Meeting OCLC,
Digitization of the Federal Depository Library Program Judith C. Russell Superintendent of Documents & Managing Director, Information Dissemination “Electronic.
San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California, San Diego Preservation Research Roadmap Reagan W. Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center
OAIS Open Archival Information System. “Content creators, systems developers, custodians, and future users are all potential stakeholders in the preservation.
Relationships July 9, Producers and Consumers SERI - Relationships Session 1.
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State Priscilla Caplan, Florida Center for Library Automation DCC Workshop on Long-term Curation within Digital Repositories.
Libraries, Archives, and Digital Preservation: The Reality of What We Must Do Leslie Johnston Acting Director, National Digital Information Infrastructure.
Use & Access 26 March Use “Proof of Concept” Model for General Libraries & IS faculty Model for General Libraries & IS faculty Test bed for DSpace.
BUILDING ON COMMON GROUND: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIVES AND DATA CURATION Lizzy Rolando & Wendy Hagenmaier 6/3/2015IASSIST 2015.
The Canadian Information Network for Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities Tim Au Yeung and Mary Westell Libraries.
Digital preservation activities at the NLW Sally McInnes 18 September 2009.
E.Soundararajan R.Baskaran & M.Sai Baba Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
Digital library infrastructure -- systems Repositories for storing digital resources protect, manage, deliver, and preserve digital resources over time.
Integrating metadata schema registries with digital preservation systems to support interoperability Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath, UK
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center The ‘Hows’ and ‘Whys’ of Preserving Digital Materials Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC CARL program: “Here Today,
Funded by: © AHDS Preservation in Institutional Repositories Preliminary conclusions of the SHERPA DP project Gareth Knight Digital Preservation Officer.
Digital Preservation across the technologies, strategies, open standards & interoperability aspects including the legal issues Pratik Shrivastava Scientist.
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation (FCLA)
Corporation For National Research Initiatives Technical Issues in Electronic Publishing Corporation for National Research Initiatives William Y. Arms.
1 BCS, Oxfordshire, 19 February, 2004 WEB ARCHIVING issues and challenges Deborah Woodyard Digital Preservation Coordinator.
M-1 INGEST OVERVIEW Don Sawyer National Space Science Data Center NASA/GSFC October 13, 1999.
Digitization & Digital Preservation
The OAIS Reference Model Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath Reference Models meeting,
Portico’s “d-collections” preservation service Stephanie Orphan Positive trends in sustainability? Emerging approaches to archiving commercial databases.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 15, 2004 Preservation Metadata.
Open Access & Institutional Repositories, Accra June 2007 Metadata and e-preservation Dr D Peters DISA: Digital Innovation South Africa.
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
The OAIS model SEEDS meeting May 5 th, 2015, Lausanne Bojana Tasic.
Cedars work on metadata Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath Cedars Workshop Manchester, February 2002.
An overview of the Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University.
Digital Asset Management Systems and Digital Preservation EUAN COCHRANE – DIGITAL PRESERVATION MANAGER YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Data Management and Digital Preservation Carly Dearborn, MSIS Digital Preservation & Electronic Records Archivist
Preservation Functionality in a Digital Archive Erik Oltmans Koninklijke Bibliotheek Raymond J. van Diessen IBM Business Consulting Services Hilde van.
OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer. Representation Information Data Object Information Object Interpreted using its Yields.
Data Stewardship Lifecycle A framework for data service professionals Protectors of data.
Digital Preservation Initiatives in the United States A Summary Deanna B. Marcum.
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS
DAITSS: Dark Archive in the Sunshine State
Statewide Digitization and the FCLA Digital Archive
Data stewardship life cycle
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Research data preservation in Canada
A Tale of Two Archives: Notes from the Dark Side
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
The Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking the Preservation Process for Electronic Scholarly Journals Brian Lavoie Office of Research OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. DLF Fall Forum - November 19, 2000

Digital Archiving Digital Archiving: outcome of processes carried out to effect long-term retention of digital objectsDigital Archiving: outcome of processes carried out to effect long-term retention of digital objects Digital Archiving Service: specification of:Digital Archiving Service: specification of: –expected outcome (digital objects future state) –processes required to achieve expected outcome Minimum Level of Archiving Service: combination of services sufficient to meet minimum requirements collectively articulated by stakeholders:Minimum Level of Archiving Service: combination of services sufficient to meet minimum requirements collectively articulated by stakeholders: –electronic scholarly journal publishers (information producers) –libraries (information consumers) –scholars (information producers and consumers)

Benchmark Services To ensure that minimum requirements are met:To ensure that minimum requirements are met: –stakeholders must clearly describe their core archiving requirements (minimum archiving service level) –digital archival repository must clearly describe the services it will supply (processes/outcome) Suggests a need for common ground: menu of benchmark services 1) a digital archival repository might supply, or 2) stakeholders might requireSuggests a need for common ground: menu of benchmark services 1) a digital archival repository might supply, or 2) stakeholders might require Starting point for discussion among stakeholders, from which a well-defined minimum archiving service level can emergeStarting point for discussion among stakeholders, from which a well-defined minimum archiving service level can emerge Blueprint for archival repositoriesBlueprint for archival repositories

Vault Services Bit Preservation Bit Rendering Intellectual Content Look and Feel Benchmark Digital Archiving Services

Vault Service How and in what form digital objects will be delivered to the vault serviceHow and in what form digital objects will be delivered to the vault service Storage media used by the vault serviceStorage media used by the vault service Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object at time of ingest (at a minimum, unique identifiers sufficient to locate deposited objects on behalf of the depositor)Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object at time of ingest (at a minimum, unique identifiers sufficient to locate deposited objects on behalf of the depositor) Inventory and validation proceduresInventory and validation procedures Storage conditions, disaster recovery strategiesStorage conditions, disaster recovery strategies Access procedures for depositorsAccess procedures for depositors

Bit Preservation Storage media refreshment and migration policiesStorage media refreshment and migration policies Responsibility for initiating refreshment or migration: service, data producer, fixed schedule, other? Criteria governing discretionary refreshment/migration?Responsibility for initiating refreshment or migration: service, data producer, fixed schedule, other? Criteria governing discretionary refreshment/migration? Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object (at a minimum, metadata supplied to vault service, plus administrative/structural metadata to document refreshment/migration activity)Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object (at a minimum, metadata supplied to vault service, plus administrative/structural metadata to document refreshment/migration activity) Validation procedures to document authenticity in concert with refreshment and migrationValidation procedures to document authenticity in concert with refreshment and migration Redundant, offsite storage or data vaulting facilitiesRedundant, offsite storage or data vaulting facilities

Bit Rendering Access policies for authorized usersAccess policies for authorized users Security measures to implement access restrictions (passwords, IP address filters)Security measures to implement access restrictions (passwords, IP address filters) Enforcement of copyright and license provisionsEnforcement of copyright and license provisions Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object (at a minimum, metadata supplied to bit preservation service, plus metadata for resource discovery and data rendering and interpretation)Documentation and metadata to accompany digital object (at a minimum, metadata supplied to bit preservation service, plus metadata for resource discovery and data rendering and interpretation) Finding aids and user support servicesFinding aids and user support services Ordering and dissemination mechanismsOrdering and dissemination mechanisms

Bit Rendering: Intellectual Content Acceptable digital object formats at time of ingestAcceptable digital object formats at time of ingest Format migration policies (e.g., frequency of migration, specification of new formats)Format migration policies (e.g., frequency of migration, specification of new formats) Characterization of the digital objects intellectual content that must be preserved despite change in formatCharacterization of the digital objects intellectual content that must be preserved despite change in format Back-up procedures supporting format migrationBack-up procedures supporting format migration –reversible format migration (original object recoverable from current format) –preserve copy of original digital object at all times

Bit Rendering: Look and Feel Specification of hardware/software environments supported by the bit rendering serviceSpecification of hardware/software environments supported by the bit rendering service –application –operating system –hardware configuration Strategies for preserving these environments (emulation?)Strategies for preserving these environments (emulation?) Policies for amending the list of supported environments: by whose discretion and by what criteria changes to the list are permitted?Policies for amending the list of supported environments: by whose discretion and by what criteria changes to the list are permitted?

Conclusions Objective: benchmark the broad classes of service a digital archival repository might supplyObjective: benchmark the broad classes of service a digital archival repository might supply –menu of possible services –common ground for discussion among stakeholders to achieve consensus on minimum service level Services collectively represent full spectrum of archiving activity:Services collectively represent full spectrum of archiving activity: –minimum service level may extend to all or part of spectrum –minimum does not mean minimal Services constituting minimum requirements may be:Services constituting minimum requirements may be: –provided by a single entity –de-centralized across multiple entities