Achieving AIRS Standards with The AIRS / 211 LA Taxonomy Cathleen Kelly, CRS, CIRS CDK Consulting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
1 of 17 Information Strategy The Features of an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy The.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
The Resource Department Your Agencys Silver Lining: Cathleen Dwyer Kelly, CRS, CIRS Principal, CDK Consulting
2-1-1 Disaster Data Management System AIRS Conference – New Orleans 2 nd Session May 23, 2012.
Program and Implementation. Plans for the next 90 minutes and beyond! Define quality assurance for a program Implementation plans Utilization of.
AIRS Standards A Comprehensive Overview Building a Quality I&R Program AIRS Conference-Reno, Nevada June 2, 2009 Presenters Charlene Hipes, Chief Operating.
Creating a Resource Specialist Training Manual AIRS Conference June 1, 2009.
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Targeted Case Management
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Functional Areas & Positions
World’s Largest Educational Community
The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration State Care Coordination 1.
Build a Better Mousetrap: Quality Assurance and Call Specialist Performance Evaluation.
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
Campus Improvement Plans
Software Quality Assurance Plan
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Standards for Internal Control in the.
Examine Quality Assurance/Quality Control Documentation
Purpose of the Standards
Understanding Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Understanding Multiagency Coordination.
Unit 3: Command & Control IC/IMT Interface
Information Retrieval for High-Quality Systematic Reviews: The Basics 6.0.
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
CHAPTER 5 Infrastructure Components PART I. 2 ESGD5125 SEM II 2009/2010 Dr. Samy Abu Naser 2 Learning Objectives: To discuss: The need for SQA procedures.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Changes in 2013 – Revised AIRS Standards And Quality Indicators for Professional Information and Referral Version 7.0 Blazing the Trail in I&R AIRS Conference.
Module 4: Association Personnel – The Executive Director Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
1 Records Inventory & Data Classification Workshop Data Classification Project Note: This is an example of one agency’s approach to meeting the state records.
Implementing State Health Reform: Lessons for Policymakers Webinar for State Officials April 8, 2010.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Ensuring the Fundamentals of Care in Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services MODULE 2 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES Development of Work-Based Learning Programs Unit 6-- Developing and Maintaining Community and Business Partnerships.
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Maintaining and Sustaining System Integrity Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Configuration management (CM) describes a series.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Link to Permanent Housing (Link) Overview At least 5% of a rental development’s total units are set-aside for ELI households with Special Needs that are.
ADRC of Oregon Call Module Introduction. Today’s Agenda: Welcome and Introductions Slide Presentation Demo Videos Information Only Call Referral With.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Disaster and Emergency Planning
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Charlene Hipes – AIRS & Faed Hendry – Findhelp Information Services
Data Driven Taxonomy Management
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Achieving AIRS Standards with The AIRS / 211 LA Taxonomy Cathleen Kelly, CRS, CIRS CDK Consulting

Objectives Review Standards What are they Why do we care Note instances where the AIRS/211LA Taxonomy can help us to achieve the standards (and quality indicators) Tips and tricks from you all…

Introductions Who are you Why are you here What do you want to learn What do the Standards mean to you How important are the Standards to your organization

AIRS Standards Comprehensive document Based on best practices First version, 1973 Major revisions in 2008 – Version 6.0 Cornerstone of accreditation Free download –

AIRS Standards Newest version written by Accreditation Committee (now Commission), Faed Hendry, Chair Diane Gatto Barrett Linda S. Daily Anne Walsh Fogoros Charlene Hipes Clive Jones Cathleen Kelly Fred Koss Charlotte McHenry Robert McKown Randall S. Nicklaus Georgia Sales Beth Wick

AIRS Standards define information and referral process in concrete terms; address all aspects of an I&R services operation establish criteria for database development; mandate support for community planning activities; incorporate a broad view of collaboration describe the role of information and referral services in times of disaster.

AIRS/211 LA Taxonomy Do you use it How long have you been using it Do you use it in addition to keywords

BEWARE Taxonomy use is often dictated by software package Some softwares handle the taxonomy better than others

Benefits of the Taxonomy Taxonomy allows us to search for services Allows all I&Rs to speak the same language Enables specialists to understand unfamiliar databases I&Rs dont have to create their own classification system

Benefits of the Taxonomy What benefits can you think of? Any drawbacks to using? Other thoughts…

Standard 1: Assessment and Referral Provision Effectively utilize their resource information system to identify resources to meet the inquirers needs; Where possible and practical, provide at least three referrals to give the inquirer a choice

Assessment and Referral Provision Taxonomy allows us to search for referrals Easy method of finding what the inquirer needs Save referrals including service terms to create reports

Standard 5: Follow-Up The I&R service shall have a policy that addresses the conditions under which follow-up must be conducted. The policy shall mandate follow-up, when feasible, with inquirers in endangerment situations and in situations where the specialist believes that inquirers do not have the necessary capacity to follow through and resolve their problems. Additional assistance in locating or accessing services

Standard 5: Follow-Up If the inquirer has not received services or the need has not been met, the I&R service determines whether there is still a need and makes additional appropriate referrals. The I&R service also determines whether the inquirer has additional, new needs and makes appropriate referrals prior to completing the contact.

Follow-up Mark what services we want to follow-up on by service term Search database for new referrals by service term

Standard 5: Follow-Up Information gathered during the follow-up process is also used as a further means of evaluating the effectiveness of existing community service providers and for identifying gaps in community services.

Follow-up Using the taxonomy allows us to roll up lower terms to assist with reporting Saving follow-ups with taxonomy terms allows us to create standardized reports Reports using taxonomy terms can be combined with other organizations

Standard 9: Classification System/Taxonomy The I&R service shall use the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services to index and facilitate retrieval of resource information

Standard 9: Classification System/Taxonomy The I&R service customizes the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy to adapt it to the community's size, nature, and organizational needs; and documents the customization rules to ensure ongoing consistency in customization decisions.

Standard 9: Classification System/Taxonomy Local modifications are reported to the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy editor to consider for inclusion in the master system. The I&R service has a current Taxonomy license.

Standard 9: Classification System/Taxonomy The I&R service has procedures in place to update and integrate Taxonomy additions and changes according to a regular schedule, and completely updates their version of the Taxonomy at least once every 18 months.

Standard 9: Classification System/Taxonomy The I&R service uses I&R software that supports the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services and the functionality needed for the Taxonomy to meet the needs of I&R staff. This functionality includes incorporating the complete field structure of a Taxonomy record (including definitions, use references, see also references and related concepts), the ability to search and display Taxonomy records in a variety of ways, and the ability to customize the Taxonomy to meet internal needs.

Classification System / Taxonomy Flexible structure allows you to customize for your area and your inquirers After customizing, report to LA Many affiliates and/or states require 211 centers to utilize the Taxonomy Taxonomy helps with training

Classification System / Taxonomy Taxonomy makes searching easier Use references See alsos Related concepts System is maintained for you Dont need to make up terms Saves time and money

Standard 10: Content Management and Indexing I&R service shall ensure through procedures and supervision that resource specialists organize information about organizations into database records that accurately and concisely reflect the agency, its locations and its services/programs; index the services provided beach organization using the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services in accordance with recognized and consistently applied practices; and assign other search keys in a way that accurately reflects the conditions under which services are available.

Standard 10: Content Management and Indexing Resource specialists use program names and service group names properly

Standard 10: Content Management and Indexing Resource specialists develop rules for indexing database records using the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services, and consistently apply the rules when indexing. They: Index all relevant services. Choose Taxonomy terms within their customized list that accurately reflect the type of service. Choose Taxonomy terms within their customized list that accurately reflect targets for service, when applicable. Use target terms to modify service terms, never as stand alone concepts representing a service.

Standard 10: Content Management and Indexing Consistently use the same Taxonomy terms to index the same services and the same target populations. Avoid using terms from multiple levels on the same Taxonomy branch. Only index primary services. Avoid indexing secondary, ancillary, phantom and indirect services.

Content Management and Indexing Indexing principles Choose most specific and accurate term found in your customized taxonomy Only index primary services Do not double code (use terms from two levels in the same branch)

Content Management and Indexing Taxonomy is a constantly changing document Terms are updated whenever necessary Filters allow you to set custom service sets Each term is detailed with change information and dates

Content Management and Indexing Need dedicated resource staff who keep abreast of changes in the taxonomy Resource staff need to understand how to recode services when changes occur Entire taxonomy must be updated at least once per 18 months Staff need to know how to incorporate changes as necessary

Standard 11: Database Search Methods Information in the resource database shall be accessible in ways that support the I&R process including search and retrieval by organization, site and program name and by the type of service available. It shall be possible to narrow service searches by target population, geographic area served, proximity to the inquirers location and other filters such as age, gender or languages that are relevant in a particular community.

Standard 11: Database Search Methods Information in the resource database is retrievable by the following: Organization, site and program name and related AKAs; Services provided (using Taxonomy service terms including use references and see also references); Target population served, where applicable; Area served.

Database Search Methods Taxonomy can help with program names Search by service term Search by target term

Standard 13: Inquirer Data Collection The I&R service shall establish and use a secure, computerized system for collecting and organizing inquirer data and related management information that facilitate appropriate referrals and provide a basis for describing requests for service and unmet needs, identifying service gaps and overlaps, assisting with needs assessments, supporting the development of products, identifying issues for staff training and facilitating the expansion of the resource database

Standard 13: Inquirer Data Collection Inquirer data collection and reporting activities facilitate the analyses needed to support: The human service needs of inquirers; Community needs assessment; Community planning; Allocation of funding; and Research.

Standard 13: Inquirer Data Collection Service requests; Unmet needs (gathered through the original contact, follow-up and customer satisfaction/quality assurance surveys); Trends in community service provision and/or gaps in service; Demographic data

Standard 13: Inquirer Data Collection The total number and types of problems/needs presented by inquirers. Some organizations also distinguish the number of individuals represented within each inquiry and the problems/needs presented by each.

Inquirer Data Collection Taxonomy service terms are linked to the AIRS problems/needs table Allows higher level reporting Can link service terms to client records

Standard 14: Data Analysis and Reporting The I&R service shall utilize inquirer data and/or data from the resource database to support community planning activities (or planning at other levels), internal analysis for management purposes and system advocacy.

Standard 14: Data Analysis and Reporting The I&R service shall utilize inquirer data and/or data from the resource database to support community planning activi­ties (or planning at other levels), internal analysis for management purposes and system advocacy. inquirer data collection and community reporting

Data Analysis and Reporting Service terms and problems/needs allow standardized reporting Organizations using the taxonomy can combine data to participate in system advocacy Standardized terms can assist with mapping

Standard 15: Cooperative Relationships Within the I&R System The I&R service shall develop cooperative working relationships to build a coordinated I&R system, … avoids duplication of effort and encourages seamless access to community resource information.

Standard 15: Cooperative Relationships Within the I&R System The I&R service works cooperatively to identify changing community needs and to respond to those needs in a timely and appropriate fashion. The I&R service participates in community-wide data collection, analysis and reporting activities. A comprehensive I&R service, for example, can combine its inquirer data with that collected by specialized I&R programs to provide a more comprehensive picture of service requests throughout the system; or a comprehensive, specialized or service may contribute its data for inclusion in a statewide/province-wide data report

Cooperative Relationships Within the I&R System Using a standard set of terms enables tracking over time to see what changes Unmet needs can be tracked to see trends and changes Combining and comparing data is critical to community and system wide information and trends

Standard 19: Disaster Resources The I&R service shall develop, maintain, and/or use an accurate, up-to-date computerized resource database that contains information about available community resources that provide services in times of disaster. Database records shall include descriptions of the services organizations provide and the conditions under which services are available; and shall be indexed and accessed using the Disaster Services section of the AIRS 211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services.

Standard 19: Disaster Resources The I&R service adds information about organizations that have no formal role in emergency response but emerge in the context of a particular disaster, specific relief and recovery services that come to life in response to the specific needs of the community, and information about specific services (and their locations) offered by agencies in the permanent disaster database (such as Red Cross Service Centers). The I&R service enables staff from other agencies to use the resource database to provide service delivery or resource database maintenance support by using the Disaster Services section of the AIRS/211 LA County Taxonomy of Human Services to index disaster- related services. Additional classification structures such as keywords may supplement the Taxonomy, but must be connected to the Taxonomy rather than functioning as independent indexing systems.

Disaster Resources Anyone who understands the taxonomy can use it no matter what database it is in Being familiar with the taxonomy will aid in data entry Disaster section is very detailed – no need to guess at or have to add terms Can have many resources in database before disaster occurs

Standard 25: Personnel Administration The I&R service shall provide a framework and mechanisms for program and personnel management and administration that guarantee the continuity and consistency required for effective service delivery.

Standard 25: Personnel Administration Succession Planning: The I&R service has a process in place for systematically and deliberately preparing for future changes of leadership in key positions within the organization. The process may identify potential replacements and provide strategies for developing and/or hiring individuals to meet future needs. Succession planning is designed to ensure the continued effective performance of an organization by making provision for the development and replacement of key people over time.

Personnel Administration Taxonomy is an external system Customization decisions should be documented Inclusion/Exclusion criteria should be documented All documents assist with succession planning

Standard 25: Personnel Administration Database Review: Review of a specified number of database records for: Compliance with the I&R services inclusion/exclusion criteria. Accuracy, currency and consistency. Appropriate Taxonomy indexing

Personnel Administration Taxonomy training is a must Read the Standards and the articles in the library section of Supervisors should have some taxonomy knowledge in order to ascertain whether coding is correct

Standard 26: Staff Training The I&R service shall have a training policy and make training available to employees and volunteers. Training for resource staff overview of the local community service delivery system inclusion/exclusion criteria for the resource database data elements Taxonomy indexing database maintenance procedures use of the I&R services software development and distribution of database products

Staff Training Taxonomy specifically mentioned Resources include Taxonomy listserv Library section of 211Taxonomy.org Essential Learning classes Affiliate conferences National conference

Summary Taxonomy is one of the keys to consistency in a database Taxonomy is found in many more standards than you might think