Consolidation Communicable Diseases User Stories: Meeting Agenda 1.News from other domains 2.Recap of a previous meeting 3.Consolidation of three more.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

PH Reporting Health IT Standardization Framework Proposal for Review S&I PH Reporting Initiative-Call 10/12.
Adverse Events Consolidated User Story 1: Healthcare Provider Reporting User Story Names: Actors: Flow of Events: Pre-condition Post-condition Preferred.
Consolidated User Story 1: Chronic Diseases (cancer, occupational health) Chronic Diseases, Outpatient Flow Patient, Provider/Physician, Laboratory, PH.
Ideal Practice Workflow Revenue Maximization and Cost Efficiency Contact us : 2222 Morris Ave. 2nd Floor, Union, NJ Ph: (908)
Workflow Redesign for Behavioral Health Providers
Solano County Health and Social Services PH Lab HIE project Linking 4 County PH Labs and linking reports to hospitals Stephan Betz, Ph.D. Assistant Director.
Better Outcomes. Delivered. Organization Overview January 2013 Copyright © 2013 Indiana Health Information Exchange, Inc.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Automated Influenza and Pneumonia Reporting.
Massachusetts: Transforming the Healthcare Economy John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Use Case 7 IHE Profiles & Actors Care Theme: Leveraging Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Use Case: Optimizing Cancer Care Coordination Leveraging.
Public Health Reporting Initiative January 11, 2012.
Care Coordination and Information Exchange Integration of Health Information Exchange with Primary Care Provider Work Flow.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
MONDAY, 3:30 – 3:50 PM Bryant T. Karras, MD, Public Health Informatics Officer, Sr Epidemiologist, State of Washington, Department of Health Rebecca A.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
E-Referral enabled collaborative health care Opportunities and considerations Presented by: Sasha Bojicic Emerging Technology Group Canada Health Infoway.
Florida HIE Overview Child Development Screening Task Force March 23, 2012.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
WHY is EHDI a part of the HIT conversation A first encounter between providers and public health As an encounter, communication becomes essential Communication.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
ONC Standard and Interoperability (S&I) Public Health Reporting Initiative (PHRI) Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH; CDC ONC S&I PHRI Co-Lead November 8, 2012.
Incorporating Health Data from Electronic Health Record Systems and Administrative Data Sets into Public Health Systems for Administrative Uses – A Landscape.
NEDSS National Electronic Disease Surveillance System ( National Base System( NBS))
Parent checks in/Regsiters- updated demographics, insurance is collected) Encounter Formsent to Nurses Station Nursepulls chart, encounter form, anticipatory.
Indiana State Department of Health Meaningful Use Chris Mickens, CTCO March 16, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Interoperability Showcase In collaboration with IHE Use Case 3 Care Theme: Leveraging National Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Biosurveillance Monitoring.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
Public Health Reporting Initiative January 4, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 8 th, 2016.
Primary Goal: To support case detection and investigation for the reportable infectious diseases (conditions) using electronic information exchanges between.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 12 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 5 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 29 th, 2016.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
You receive a paper CASE report from a provider Reportable disease in KY? If no, don’t put the case report in NBS. You should have a procedure for handling.
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Vibrio Reporting and Surveillance in Louisiana
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Component 11/Unit 7 Implementing Clinical Decision Support
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
Arizona House Calls CareLink
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Arizona House Calls CareLink
Positive Health Services Jan 30/13
OLD PROCESS FLOW FOR NEW PATIENT REGISTRATION
Presentation transcript:

Consolidation Communicable Diseases User Stories: Meeting Agenda 1.News from other domains 2.Recap of a previous meeting 3.Consolidation of three more stories 4.Making a consolidated story

Consolidated User Story: Child Health, Inpatient Setting Child Health Patient, physician, clinician, public health program staff 1.Patient comes to Physician for a general check-up and he/she is due for 2.Physician orders 3.Clinician administers an immunization or conducts hearing test> 4.Clinician enter data on the in the EHR database 5.Clinician sends report to the PH IS directly or via HIE 6.PH program IS receives notification of report availability 7.PH program staff reviews the report and updated PH IS 8.PH IS sends Acknowledgement of Receipt of the Report to provider EHR directly or via HIE. Use Case Name: Actors: Flow of Events: Pre-Conditions: Post-Conditions: Preferred Timing for Data exchange EHR System, Health Information Exchange (HIE) Public Health Information System Daily updates Data Categories 1. Demographics, Consent 2. Test Order, Referral 3. Test Results 4. Test Results 5. Initial PH Report 6. Notification of Report Availability 7. Updated PH Record 8. Acknowledgement of receipt

Initial Public Health Reporting: Communicable Diseases Scenario: Identifying patients that satisfy reporting criteria for communicable diseases and submitting initial reporting to public health agencies. User Story 1. Initial report from the EHR system Setting 1: Outpatient Visit Setting 2: Inpatient Visit User Story 2. Initial report that is based on laboratory results (from Laboratory)

Consolidated User Story 2: Communicable Diseases, Reporting from EHR Initial report from the EHR system (Communicable Diseases) Patient, Provider (Hospital, Physicians office), Laboratory, PH agency 1.Patient was admitted to a hospital ER or came to a providers office 2.Provider provided clinical examination and assessed medical history. (same info used for reporting to 2 different programs) 1.[trigger: all ED records sent] If clinician assessment indicates that Patient has symptoms that should be reported through Syndromic Surveillance (SS) system, a SS report was sent to PH agency. Electronic confirmation was sent from PH agency /SS system to Provider. 2.[trigger: clinically significant symptoms of reportable communicable disease – sent before lab results are obtained] If patients symptoms require a specific communicable disease PH reporting w/o waiting lab results, a preliminary report was sent to PH agency 3.Provider ordered lab tests. Provider staff took samples and sent them to Laboratory. 4. Laboratory performed the ordered tests on received specimens. Laboratory send results to Provider and PH agency (if needed) 6.Provider re-examined clinical findings and lab results; he sent a communicable disease preliminary report to a PH agency (some initial reports require clinical and lab component). 7.Electronic message was validated by PH agency/information system 8.Electronic confirmation was sent from PH agency to Provider User Story Names: Actors: Flow of Events: Pre-condition Post-condition Preferred Timing for Each Event Type EHR System, Health Information Exchange (HIE) Public Health Agencys Information System

Consolidated User Story : Communicable Diseases, Reporting from Electronic Laboratory System Initial report from the Laboratory system (Communicable Diseases) Laboratory, PH agency, Provider 1. Laboratory performed the ordered tests on received specimens. Laboratory send results to Provider and positive results to PH agency 2. Electronic message was validated by PH agency/information system 3. Electronic confirmation was sent from PH agency to Laboratory User Story Names: Actors: Flow of Events: Pre-condition Post-condition Preferred Timing for Each Event Type Electronic Laboratory System Public Health Agencys Information System