NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Measurement and Verification Standards for Demand Response in Wholesale Electric Markets September 30, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project Manager, Demand.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 30, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
NAESB UPDATE MEETING MAY 30, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
Reliability in the International Arena Alberta Perspective
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
July 14, 2009 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board NAESB Review with the Demand Response Coordinating.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Development Project April 21, 2008 Paul Wattles, ERCOT Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO New England.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Amount and cost of losses June 11 th Florence School of Regulation Jose Luis Mata.
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
An Overview of the Australian National Electricity Market Brian Spalding Chief Operating Officer.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Consumer Empowerment Consumer Empowerment May 15, 2012 Presented by: Alparslan Bayraktar Commissioner Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EPDK)
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Updated 1/28/2011.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
NAESB Wholesale Demand Response Standards 1/14/09 NAESB Wholesale Electric Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO-New.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
Guatemala: El Canada Hydroelectric Project Meth Panel decision on its proposed baseline methodologies May 2003.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM)
NAESB Conference Call October 10, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Principles, criteria and methods Part 1 Quality management Produced in Collaboration between.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
AEMO: DR Mechanism Baseline Methodology DRM Working Group July 2013.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 14, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
Northwest Demand Response Symposium
Regional Transmission Organizations
(Additional materials)
DR Measurement & Verification

Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO-New England Donna Pratt, New York ISO
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and BPS Subcommittees
Presentation transcript:

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update

Activities 11 - Conference calls/WebEx Two day meeting in Baltimore One every other week Good participation form group members and industry experts Two day meeting in Baltimore Discuss approach and matrix 1 WEQ Leadership/NAESB Board meeting

Approach for Retail Standard Determine that the RTO draft recommendation could apply to the retail draft recommendation with proper wording changes Determine that the RTO draft recommendation provides a framework for the retail draft recommendation, but more detail is necessary Determine that the retail draft recommendation needs to be more prescriptive than the wholesale draft recommendation.

Model Business Practice Measurement and Verification (M&V) standards are intended to facilitate Demand Response in retail electricity markets by providing a common framework for the following: Transparency: accessible and understandable M&V requirements for Demand Response products Accountability: criteria that will enable the Program Administrator to accurately measure performance of Demand Response resources Consistency: standards applicable across retail electricity markets Comprehensive: strives to cover all forms of Demand Response

Applicability Model Business Practices should cover Dispatchable and non-Dispatchable programs Dispatchable Capacity Programs: Direct Load Control Firm Service Level Guaranteed Load Drop Critical Peak Pricing Ancillary Service Programs: Spinning Reserve Non Spinning Reserve Regulation Services Energy Service Programs Dispatched for economic reasons Non Dispatchable – need to define

Coordination Working closely with Wholesale standards group to maintain consistency with current approved standard NERC to insure consistency with reliability standards AEIC as they develop load research standards with regards to M&V Industry groups and Market Participants involved in providing or evaluating demand response programs such as EPRI, EnerNoc, Comverge, GoodCents

Scope Limited to Demand Response programs only: Does not include Measurement and Verification of energy efficiency programs or for permanent load reductions. Confined to the retail markets. If a utility has programs that are bid into and operate in the wholesale markets then the wholesale standard will take precedence. Standards are voluntary across state jurisdictions. They can be adopted by individual state regulators Program Administrator has significant flexibility to adopt more stringent requirements in most areas to meet regional needs.

Product Categories Wholesale group developed model business practice for each of 4 Product types: Energy Services Capacity Services Reserve Services Regulation Services Retail group is developing one model business practice to cover all Demand Resource products in the retail space

NERC Diagram

Performance Evaluation A performance evaluation methodology is used to determine the Demand Reduction Value provided by a Demand Resource. The standards include descriptions of acceptable Baselines and alternative performance measurements. Maximum Base Load Meter Before / Meter After Baseline Metering Generator Output Note: Eliminated the distinction of Type I and Type II for Baseline

Definition of Terms Definition of Terms was developed to clarify specific meanings of terms while providing consistency and conformance where possible to: Wholesale Standard FERC NERC AEIC Currently working through the NAESB glossary committee to adopt definitions – may take several more meetings to complete

Demand Response Event Timing

Key Definitions Demand Resource: A Load or aggregation of Loads capable of measurably and verifiably providing Demand Response. Demand Response: Changes in electric use by demand-side resources from their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of electricity, or to incentive payments designed to induce lower electricity use at times of high wholesale market prices or when system reliability is jeopardized.

Key Definitions Program Administrator: An investor owned utility, governmental or cooperative utility or independent aggregator of demand response programs who has responsibility for developing and operating demand response programs identified in this standard. The Program Administrator shall have regulatory reporting responsibility to the utility regulatory body in the jurisdiction of the retail load and reporting responsibility to NERC

Key Definitions Baseline: A method of estimating the electricity that would have been consumed by a Customer or Demand Resource in the absence of a Demand Response Event. It may be calculated using interval metering and/or statistical sampling techniques. The figure below illustrates the concept of Baseline relative to a Demand Response Event.

Baseline Conceptualization

General Characteristics Advance Notification (remote switch vs no switch) Deployment Time Reduction Deadline Ramp Period determined by Program Administrator Release/Recall Normal Operations Demand Resource Availability Measurement Aggregation Transparency of Requirements

After-The-Fact Criteria After-the-Fact Metering Requirement Meter Accuracy Details of Meter/Equipment Standards Meter Data Reporting Deadline Meter Data Reporting Interval Clock / Time Accuracy Validating, Editing & Estimating (VEE) Method On-Site Generation Meter Requirement

Performance Evaluation Methodologies Maximum Base Load Meter Before / Meter After Baseline Metering Generator Output

Maximum Base Load: A performance evaluation methodology based solely on a Demand Resource’s ability to reduce to a specified level of electricity Demand, regardless of its electricity consumption or Demand at Deployment.

Maximum Base Load:

Meter Before / Meter After: A performance evaluation methodology where electricity Demand over a prescribed period of time prior to Deployment is compared to similar readings during the Sustained Response Period.

Meter Before / Meter After:

Baseline: A method of estimating the electricity that would have been consumed by a Customer or Demand Resource in the absence of a Demand Response Event. It may be calculated using interval metering and/or statistical sampling techniques. The figure below illustrates the concept of Baseline relative to a Demand Response Event.

Baseline:

Metering Generator Output: A performance evaluation methodology, used when a generation asset is located behind the Demand Resource’s revenue meter, in which the Demand Reduction Value is based on the output of the generation asset.

Next Steps Complete the glossary committee definition review – estimate 2 meetings Review document for consistency Move information and graphics in definition section to appropriate section in the document Remove any unused definitions Review document flow Plan is to present Model Business Practice at the next NAESB meeting in July