International Reading Association Webinar Series on RTI Guiding Principle #3: Assessment RTI Commission Members Karen Wixson Sheila Valencia Carol Connor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Curriculum Based Measurements
Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Cautions & Recommendations Karen Wixson, Univ. of Michigan Sheila Valencia. Univ. of Wash. IRA, Toronto, May, 2007.
RtI Response to Intervention
PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Fluency Assessment Bryan Karazia.
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
The School District of Philadelphia
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Academy 2: Using Data to Assess Student Progress and Inform Educational Decisions in Culturally Responsive RTI Models Academy 2: Culturally Responsive.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Response to Intervention (RtI)
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Reading Fluency Intervention Strategies and Techniques 1. Does repeated reading alone show students gaining at least 10% reading comprehension skills of.
Table of Contents Summative Assessments Formative Assessment Why Teachers Use Assessments Definitions You may browse through this book by using the arrows.
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
RtI: The Key to “All” is Every RtI Basics in BASD.
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
ASSESSMENT: IDENTIFYING LEVELS ADMINISTERING AND SCORING AN INFORMAL READING INVENTORIES (IRI) Chapters 1 and 2.
Reading Horizons Discover Assessment Stacy Hurst November 29, 2012.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Mary Beth Allen East Stroudsburg University.  What is the major purpose of RtI?  What are the goals of RtI?  What are the benefits of implementing.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Dr. Kelley. Share LiveText Assignment Discuss at table (rubric, typed AIP, student assessments):  The assessment tools you used.  What you learned.
Balanced Literacy and Data Collection – Making Informed Instructional Decisions Dr. Roseanne K. Meyer Calallen ISD April 3, 2009.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Session 5 – Small Group Instruction   Guided Reading – purpose  Preparing for the small group  Book Orientations  Reading and conferencing  Book.
Angela is a 6 th grader in a k-8 schools. She hit her reading benchmarks in K, 1 st and 2 nd Grade. She was proficient on state testing in 3 rd grade,
Elementary Special Education © June PLAAFP Data Sources:  Benchmarks  Released TAKS tests  Data Binders  Monitoring Notebooks  DRA  TPRI 
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Data Analysis: Literacy NC Content Literacy Continuum Fall Symposium High Point University October 15-16, 2014.
Outcomes Identify the various types of assessments used in a comprehensive RTI program Understand the purpose of each type of assessment in an RTI framework.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
RDG 567 & RDG 568 (East Lyme Cohort) Session 3.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Universal Screening Rosemary Santos John Staumont Lydia Narcisse Sylvia Cadena.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
“Keeping Our Promise” “We believe that supporting policies that enhance the teacher as the key provider and decision maker in reaching all students with.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
ELLA Module 3 Assessments and Interventions. Goals for Today: Participants will be able to: Identify the four purposes for assessment. Align DIBELS assessments.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Reading 3D teacher tool assessment inform and change instruction to meet the child’s needs on-going.
ASSESSMENT: IDENTIFYING LEVELS ADMINISTERING AND SCORING AN INFORMAL READING INVENTORIES (IRI) Chapters 1 and 2.
Four Blocks Literacy Framework  What is the Four Blocks program?  How does it work?  How do Big Blocks/Four Blocks compare?  Assessment  Why did we.
Easy Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM). What is Easy CBM? EasyCBM® was designed by researchers at the University of Oregon as an integral part of an.
Qualitative Reading Inventory
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Portfolio By: Fatima Henriquez. Balanced Literacy  Identify and explain the components of a balanced literacy program. Balanced Literacy is a framework.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Data-Driven Decision Making
Progress monitoring Is the Help Helping?.
Phonological Awareness Decoding Sight Word Knowledge Fluency & Context
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
RtI Strategies and Interventions
Presentation transcript:

International Reading Association Webinar Series on RTI Guiding Principle #3: Assessment RTI Commission Members Karen Wixson Sheila Valencia Carol Connor May 11, 2010

Quick review of RTI and IRA RTI Principle #3 (go to RTI) 2 Key ideas for RTI Assessment Implementing RTI Assessments Thinking through an RTI System Chat Overview

New (alternative) process for identifying specific learning disabilities Origins - Presidents Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002) o Children with LD should first be considered general education students; o Special education should embrace a model of prevention as opposed to failure. Background

1.Instruction 2.Responsive Teaching & Differentiation 3.Assessment 4.Collaboration 5.Systemic & Comprehensive 6.Expertise Guiding Principles Reading.org – insert RTI in search

Principle 3 An RTI approach demands assessment that can inform language and literacy instruction meaningfully. Multiple purposes for assessment should be clearly identified and appropriate tools and techniques employed. Not all available tools and techniques are appropriate for all purposes.

RTI Assessment Requirements: Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals Intent: To use assessment information to differentiate instruction in order to make it more responsive to students needs and more likely to accelerate reading growth

Two Big RTI Assessment Ideas Different assessments for different purposes Inquiry-oriented assessment

Screening Progress monitoring Intervention The Typical Assessment Approach

Screening Formative Progress Monitoring Interim-Benchmark Progress Monitoring Intervention/Instruction Diagnostic The Expanded Assessment Approach

Types & Purposes for Assessments TypePurposeFrequencyScope Screening/ Summative Identify level of performance Once a yearVery broad DiagnosticIdentify focus of intervention Once a year or more as needed Specific strengths & needs FormativeInform ongoing instruction OngoingFine-tuned, aligned with lessons Interim/ Benchmark Monitor overall progress 3-4 times a year Broad

Teacher knowledge and ability to identify and administer powerful assessment tools & techniques, and use the results to make informed instructional decisions. Differentiated instruction An RTI approach demands assessment that can inform language and literacy instruction meaningfully.

Teacher knowledge and ability to identify and administer powerful assessment tools & techniques, and use the results to make informed instructional decisions. Inquiry-Oriented Assessment All assessment information is viewed as a springboard to understanding student learning--not as static facts.

Cautions for Screening/Interim Differences across screening/interim assessments False negatives & positives on screening Ceilings and floors on screening & interim Problem of using screening & interim results to determine instructional focus to meet students needs

Types of Screening/Interim Measures CBM/DIBELS - Oral reading fluency Norm-referenced or state-referenced tests (Gates, ITBS) Phonological awareness Word reading PALS Letter sound fluency MAP

No RiskAt Risk Acceptable Performance True Negative (Specificity) False Positive Poor Performance False NegativeTrue Positive (Sensitivity) Screen C r i t er i o n M e as ur e

False Negatives Using WCPM Measures 15% to as high as 47%, depending on the benchmarks used (Schilling et al., 2007; Jenkins, et al., 2007; Pressley, et al., 2005; Reidel, 2007; Valencia et al., 2010).

False Negatives % of students identified as low risk on WCPM using DIBELS cut scores who scored below 50 th %ile on NRT of comprehension: EL English-Only Grade 261%12% Grade 429% 0% Grade 658%22%

Ceilings & Floors in Testing

Grade 4 Student Profiles H & T %ileCWPMAcc(%)Exp.(1-4)CompITBS%ile > DIBELS No Risk At Risk

Bringing Inquiry to Screening/Interim What does this assessment measure? How does that fit with our broad goals for students reading? Which kids performed differently than we would have predicted (better than or worse than we thought)? What additional information do we need to help me plan instruction?

Diagnostic Purpose Strategies Types of measures Who to assess Cautions

The many uses of IRI-like procedures: Much more than a set of scores Qualitative Analysis –Comprehension Oral reading, silent reading, listening Literal & inferential comprehension questions Retellings Think-alouds –Word recognition Comparison of word rec in and out of context Word recognition skills & strategies –Vocabulary- listening & reading –Fluency - expression, prosody, rate

Spentspin Neat--- Knocknocked(sc) SquishSquash -3 Softsuf(sc) Showshin Sweptsweeped - 2 accuracy = frustration wcpm = some risk comprehension = instructional

Two Types of Progress Monitoring Interim/benchmark assessment Formative classroom assessment

Formative Classroom Progress Monitoring Implemented during instruction to monitor and adjust Examples of assessments –Running records –Think alouds –Samples of student work –Logs –Anecdotal records Frequency & focus of assessment will depend on the child and her needs

Key features of formative classroom progress monitoring Proximity to initial learning (issue of transfer & application, teachable moment) Ability to adjust to individual students Provides specific feedback to kids Engages students in assessment Teacher expertise & interpretation

Student Work: An Example

Probing Strategy Usage with Think Aloud S: (reads title) Space Ship Earth T: What were you thinking when you read the title? S: A space trip to earth. (Reads text haltingly). Boy! I had a lot of trouble with that. T: What makes you think you had trouble? S: I kept messing up. T: What do you mean by messing up?

S: I kept reading sentences over. T: What do you think caused you to read over like that? S: Not understanding it. T: OK, did any of the words give you trouble? S: No

Types & Purposes for Assessments TypePurposeFrequencyScope Screening/ Summative Identify level of performance Once a yearVery broad DiagnosticIdentify focus of intervention Once a year or more as needed Specific strengths & needs FormativeInform ongoing instruction OngoingFine-tuned, aligned with lessons Interim/ Benchmark Monitor overall progress 3-4 times a year Broad