Repositories for research – contributing to the Knowledge Cycle Pauline Simpson National Oceanography Centre, Southampton JIBS Conference 15 Sep 2005 British.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

University of Warwick 4 th March Developing.
Creating a Multidisciplinary Institutional Repository Using EPrints Software JISC Conference, Birmingham, UK 12 th April 2005
E-Print Repositories for Research Visibility: T ime to Deposit Pauline Simpson and Jessie Hey 06/11/03.
Southampton University Research e-Prints- a growing archive Health Care Innovation Unit 16 Dec 2004 Jessie Hey Southampton University.
University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository – an Update Post Compulsory Education and Training, School of Education 12 Oct 2005
Southampton Institutional Research Repository University Medical School Librarians Group (UMSLG) 7-8 July 2005 University of Edinburgh Pauline Simpson.
Open Access Institutional Repositories (OA IRs): Leadership, Direction and Launch University of Southampton. 25th and 26th January, 2005
Institutional Repositories an opportunity for IAMSLIC Pauline Simpson Southampton Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, UK
TARDis Targeting Academic Research for Deposit and Disclosure at the University of Southampton Pauline Simpson Project Manager TARDis Head of Information.
Embedding our Institutional Repository into the institutional research culture Institutional Repositories and Research Assessment (IRRA) British Computer.
E-Print Repositories for Research Visibility: T ime to Deposit Pauline Simpson and Jessie Hey 17/10/03.
Southampton University Research e-Prints: e-Prints Soton School of Medicine Discussion 19 Jan 2005 Pauline Simpson Elizabeth.
Southampton University Research e-Prints: e-Prints Soton Southampton University Library Schools Liaison Review 30 Nov 2004 Pauline.
E-Print Repositories for Research Visibility: T ime to Deposit Pauline Simpson and Jessie Hey 30/10/03.
Southampton University Research Repository POETS discussion on Open Access Pauline Simpson and Jessie Hey 23 September 2004.
Southampton University Research e-Prints - an opportunity for Chemistry School of Chemistry Away Day at Chilworth 7 th April.
Gaining Content experiences at the University of Southampton Pauline Simpson Head of Information Services Southampton Oceanography Centre OdinPubAfrica.
Open Access & Institutional Repositories Sophia Jones SHERPA University of Nottingham The Library, University of Warwick 18 March 2008.
Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and Self-Archiving Crisis? What Crisis? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Open Access - Where are we so far? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional repositories and SHERPA Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Electronic Theses - The Next Stage Institutional Repositories: A view from SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
Practical Issues for Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Enlighten: Glasgows Universitys online institutional repository Morag Greig University Library.
FAIR – Focus on Access to Institutional Resources William J Nixon DAEDALUS Project, University of Glasgow e-libraries for e-learning.
Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Repository Development: where are we now and where are we going? Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Developing Open Access with Institutional Repositories in the UK Conferência sobre o Acesso Livre ao Conhecimento Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
CLADDIER project fundamentals Citation, Location and Deposition in Discipline and Institutional Repositories Sam Pepler Project Manager BADC CLADDIER workshop,
Preservation for Institutional Repositories: practical and invisible Jessie M.N. Hey 1, Steve Hitchcock, Tim Brody, Leslie A. Carr Intelligence, Agents,
© S.J. Coles 2006 Digital Repositories as a Mechanism for the Capture, Management and Dissemination of Chemical Data Simon Coles School of Chemistry, University.
CURRENT ISSUES Current contents Over 3,000 items open access, 42% reports and working papers, 21% journal articles, 21% conference items, 7% book chapters,
Institutional repositories: Author behaviour Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK Key Perspectives Ltd.
Southamptons Institutional Repository, e-Prints and the Research Context LASS ICT for Research Network Seminar Series 20 th June 2005
© S.J. Coles 2006 Digital Repositories as a Mechanism for the Capture, Management and Dissemination of Chemical Data Simon Coles School of Chemistry, University.
RCUK, Octiber Archiving research data and research publications. Dr Leslie Carr, Intelligence, Agents Multimedia, University of Southampton Dr Simon.
Institutional Repositories: Laying Foundations for a New Era of Scholarly Communication? Jessie Hey Online Information London, UK 1 Dec 2004 A practical.
Policy Development for TARDis at the University of Southampton: Dr. Jessie Hey University Library and School of Electronics and Computer Science, University.
UKOLN is supported by: Emergent technologies & digitisation: the institutional impact. Liz Lyon & Kevin Edge VCs Retreat, October a.
EBank UK CCLRC Workshop February eBank and CCLRC Workshop February 2005 University of Bath.
Digital Repositories: interoperability & common services Closing Remarks Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DigCCur2007 Symposium, Chapel Hill, N.C., April 18-20, 2007 Co-operation for digital preservation.
Royal Holloway Information Services Welcomes the ICT4D partners December 2007.
Sunday October 28, www.eprints.org Tim Brody - Stevan Harnad -
Mark Toole 25 March “the principle that the results of research that has been publicly funded should be freely accessible in the open domain is.
The Culture, Care and Content (Feeding) of Institutional Repositories “Preserving our Institutional Intellectual Property” Panel discussion at IAMSLIC.
Self-archiving at Southampton a case study University of Cambridge 10 January Wendy White Hartley Library University of.
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
Open archiving in UK universities Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Supporting further and higher education The UK FAIR Programme: OAI in context Chris Awre OAI3, CERN, February 2004.
Maynooth’s ePrints & eTheses archive Health Sciences Libraries Group Suzanne Redmond Maloco eprints.nuim.ie.
Digital/Open Access repositories Paul Sheehan Director of Library Services DCU HEAnet National Networking Conference Athlone 11 th November 2005.
The access to information divide: Breaking down barriers Bas Savenije Director General KB, National Library of the Netherlands Stellenbosch Symposium /
BMC Open Access Colloquium, 8 February Morgan: "Open Access Repositories"
DAEDALUS Project: Building Institutional Repositories for Glasgow William J Nixon Service Development Morag Mackie Advocacy.
UKOLN is supported by: Introduction to UKOLN Dr Liz Lyon, Director UKOLN, University of Bath, UK Grand Challenge Meeting, June a centre.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
UKOLN is supported by: Library futures in the new research landscape. Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK CURL Members Meeting October 2004, London.
Joint Information Systems Committee Repositories Support Project Summer School 2008 Amber Thomas, JISC.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Institutional Repository and Friends
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Presentation transcript:

Repositories for research – contributing to the Knowledge Cycle Pauline Simpson National Oceanography Centre, Southampton JIBS Conference 15 Sep 2005 British Geological Survey, Nottingham

JIBS 2005 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton NOC is one of the worlds leading centres for research and education in marine and earth sciences, for the development of marine technology and for the provision of large scale infrastructure and support for the marine research community Joint Venture between Natural Environment Research Council and the University of Southampton Research-led multidisciplinary university: 20,000 students 5000 staff (3000 researchers)

JIBS 2005 Outline Open Access Context The Southampton Route Building on Institutional Repositories –Contributing to the Knowledge Cycle

JIBS 2005 Open Access Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. OA should be immediate, rather than delayed, and OA should apply to the full-text, not just to abstracts or summaries. OA removes price barriers (subscriptions, licensing fees, pay- per-view fees) and permission barriers (most copyright and licensing restrictions). See JISC briefing paper on Open Access April

JIBS 2005 Open Access to Research 27 Jun 1994 Stevan Harnads Subversive Proposal leading to the open access vision for scholarly material ( Faustian Bargain with publishers – a price tag barrier to research) – Harnad, S. (1995) A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell (Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: a Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research Libraries, June – In an ideal world of scholarly communication – all research should be freely available -

JIBS 2005 But journals still becoming more and more expensive (serials crisis) journals are the primary research publication channel journal publishing is dominated by commercial ventures Researchers write papers for journals (free or page charges!) Researchers transfer copyright to publishers (free) Researchers on Editorial Board (free) Researchers review papers (free) BUT Libraries pay huge subscriptions to publishers to access the paper(and electronic) and universities pay more than once: subscription, photocopying license and for study packs Or possibly they cannot afford the subscription Journal price inflation+291% Retail price index + 70% Journal price inflation+291% Retail price index + 70%

JIBS 2005 Two Complementary Solutions Open Access Repositories articles, conference papers, reports, theses, learning objects, multimedia etc. deposited in open electronic archives/repositories which conform to Open Archives Initiative (OAI) standards Open-Access Journals: Journals will not charge subscriptions or fees for online access. Instead, they should look to other sources to fund peer-review and publication (e.g., publication charges) No payment by author = open access or subscription Publishing model – author pays = OA

JIBS 2005 Repository Development ArXiv (from 1991 at Los Alamos now at Cornell) for high energy physics community (incl Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Math, Computing Science and Nonlinear Science). Despite success of ArXiv and others - RePEc (Economics), Cogprints (Cognitive Psychology), Mathematics, etc – varying success by other subject communities (Chemistry Preprints Server now finished) 2000 onwards complementary implementation of Institutional repositories fuelled by project funding eg Mellon Foundation, Howard Hughes, Open Society Institute, JISC UK FAIR Programme and powered by the Information Community 2002 = 112 (TARDis Subject Categorization Survey) 2005 = 466 (from Institutional Archives Registry)

JIBS

JIBS 2005

/ Main Partners: Lund University Univ of Nottingham)

JIBS 2005 Increasing numbers – Repository choices Subject - arXiv, Cogprints, RePEC, Institutional – Southampton, Glasgow, Nottingham (SHERPA), MBA UK National - DARE (all universities in the Netherlands), Scotland, British Library (proposal) National / Subject - ODINPubAfrica International - Internet Archive Universal, OAIster Regional - White Rose UK Consortia - SHERPA-LEAP (London E-prints Access Project) Funding Agency – NIH (PubMed), Wellcome Trust (UK PubMed), NERC Project - Public Knowledge Project EPrint Archive Conference - 11th Joint Symposium on Neural Computation, May Personal – peer to peer Media Type - VCILT Learning Objects Repository, NTDL (Theses) Publisher – journal archives Data Repositories/Archives - NODC, BODC, DOD, JODC, BADC etc ***** Problem is that the above are not mutually exclusive

JIBS 2005 Dilemma for Researcher Mandates from major funding agencies now require grantees to deposit research output in a designated repository or any –Wellcome Trust (UK PubMed) - £400 million producing 3500 papers per year –RCUK Where should the full text of their research be deposited Researcher wants to enter metadata and deposit only once Situation at present –Harvesting, but harvester is not the choice of the depositor –Duplicate keying metadata into repositories of choice –Cannot target multiple repositories with one exercise Does it matter where it is deposited since Google Scholar, Yahoo, Scopus, will pick it up wherever it is?

JIBS 2005 Why it should be Institutional Repositories Institutions are logical implementers of repositories because they can take responsibility for: – Centralising a distributed activity – Framework and Infrastructure – Permanence that can sustain changes – Stewardship of Digital assets – Preservation policy – Provide central digital showcase for the research, teaching and scholarship of the institution Subject or project repositories often linked to an individual or a group – can be transitory - collection at risk

JIBS 2005

Southamptons Route 2002 – 2005 built on Southampton visions TARDis Project (Targetting Academic Research for Deposit and Disclosure) funded by JISC FAIR Programme : collaboration of The University Library, School of Electronics and Computer Science, and Information Systems Services alongside academics as one institution –EPrints software had been created at School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton to enable Harnads self archive vision. – ECS already used the software for a publications database – now a sustainable repository - National Oceanography Centre was an early e-Print adopter

JIBS 2005 TARDis Progression Original intent to provide secure storage for the full text of Southampton research output (including post refereed pre published versions of papers deposited by researchers) Feedback: from our advocacy, pilot and full service was that e- Prints Soton would provide maximum benefit if the service also assisted researchers with time consuming research metrics Evolved to hybrid publications database for all research output with full text where available

JIBS 2005 Evolution from Project to e-Prints Soton : Achieving a slower but more sustainable model – the TARDis road To achieve the original vision we are moving around the clock face Collaborating with academics to provide tailored valued services for different disciplines (needing extra functionality) Aided by a fast moving shared international movement All rising to great place is by a winding stair Francis Bacon

JIBS 2005 Changing paradigms from now Open Access little known –Open access publishing –Open access repositories –High level support UK Science and Technology Committee Scientific Publications - free for all Copyright transfer –License to Publish Publishers –Changing policies –New publishing models Software, few options –Multiple, open source Funding Agency - no support –Declarations on Open Access signatories –Mandate deposit Wellcome Trust RCUK Authors non acceptance –Surveys - JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey (3000 researchers) 69% would deposit in IR if required by employer 3% would not be prepared to do so 66% thought archiving in IR important 60% thought publishers should allow it Of Course Researchers still have concerns : Discipline differences workload, status quo; content quality control; authentication, versioning control and of course Copyright

JIBS 2005 Benefits of Institutional Repositories Organization / University profile to Funding opportunities School and Discipline visibility Researcher profile Full text content freely accessible Link to learning and teaching Links to projects and web pages Secure storage of publications –including theses and dissertations, technical reports Stewardship of digital assets Demonstrates Interdisciplinary research Increased citations –Lawrence, Brody Research reporting

JIBS 2005 New JISC Project to design RAE module for use within EPrints and DSpace software (Southampton and Edinburgh) Institutional Repositories and Research Assessment (IRRA) html html RAE management potential functionality – demo but planned enhancement

JIBS 2005 Southampton Press Release 15 Dec 2004 University funded service managed by the University Library 'We see our Institutional Repository as a key tool for the stewardship of the University's digital research assets,' said Professor Paul Curran, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of the University. 'It will provide greater access to our research, as well as offering a valuable mechanism for reporting and recording it.

JIBS 2005 Repositories - a building block The Knowledge Cycle Encompassing experimentation, analysis, publication, research, learning Joined up research - Linking text and data An audit trail from whatever point of access

JIBS 2005 Knowledge Cycle – linking IRs and Data Grid E-Scientists Entire Knowledge Cycle Encompassing experimentation, analysis, publication, research, learning 5 Institutional Archive Local Web Publisher Holdings Digital Library E-Scientists Graduate Students Undergraduate Students Virtual Learning Environment E-Experimentation E-Scientists Technical Reports Reprints Peer- Reviewed Journal & Conference Papers Preprints & Metadata Certified Experimental Results & Analyses Data, Metadata & Ontologies

JIBS 2005 Learning & Teaching workflows Research & e-Science workflows Aggregator services Repositories : institutional, e-prints, subject, data, learning objects Institutional presentation services: portals, Learning Management Systems, u/g, p/g courses, modules Harvesting metadata Data creation / capture / gathering: laboratory experiments, Grids, fieldwork, surveys, media Resource discovery, linking, embedding Deposit / self- archiving Peer-reviewed publications: journals, conference proceedings Publication Validation Data analysis, transformation, mining, modelling Resource discovery, linking, embedding Deposit / self- archiving Learning object creation, re-use Searching, harvesting, embedding Quality assurance bodies Validation Presentation services: subject, media-specific, data, commercial portals Resource discovery, linking, embedding From: Lyon : CNI - JISC - SURF Conference, May 2005

JIBS 2005 CLADDIER Project ** ( Citation, Location And Deposition in Discipline and Institutional Repositories) The CLADDIER system will be a step on the road to a situation where (in this case, environmental) scientists will to be able to move seamlessly from information discovery (location), through acquisition to deposition of new material, with all the digital objects correctly identified and cited. The lessons learned will be of applicability for the relationships between other discipline based repositories and institutional repositories. **JISC Digital Repositories Programme

JIBS 2005 Persistent identifiers Dataset Citations Automated Linking both ways

JIBS 2005 A Plus for Researchers One outcome of CLADDIER Project pull = Harvesting push = CLADDIER outcome –Enable researcher to deposit in one repository and choose to upload (push) the metadata to another repository of choice –redundancy of records does it matter?

JIBS 2005 Building on TARDis (the sequel(s) TARDis completed its transition to invisibility early in 2005 –CLADDIER (Citation, Location and Deposition in Discipline and Institutional Repositories) Linking e-Research. – partnering CCLRC, Reading, NERC –PRESERV (Preservation Services for EPrints) - partnering with National Archives File Format Registry (PRONOM) and the British Library, Oxford University –GRADE (Geospatial Repositories …) – partnering EDINA et al Back to the Future !!

JIBS 2005 Thank You Pauline Simpson (