Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Advertisements

EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
WMO Monitoring & Evaluation System (Measuring our Performance/Success)
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
1 policy preparation policy formulation policy execution policy evaluation Indicators The Policy Cycle.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Planning & Budgeting 24 th August 2011 Dave Hastings.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Success factors that govern the compilation of indicators An efficient model for change PART 3.
Ref: Youth Peer Education toolkit: Standard of Peer Education Programmes, 2005.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
The Low Emission Budget Marking And Scoring System FPA Ramadhan Harisman Ministry of Finance, Indonesia Songdo, Incheon, 3 December 2013.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
The Measurement and Evaluation of the PPSI Oregon Pilot Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Portland, Oregon December 10, 2009 Matt Keene Office.
An Integrated Control Framework & Control Objectives for Information Technology – An IT Governance Framework COSO and COBIT 4.0.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
Elements of poverty reduction program monitoring and evaluation Sophisticated development context: the Kazakh experience Ayse Kudat Social Assessment 2004.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
1 CORAT AFRICA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP FOR IMBISA/AMECEA COMMUNICATION COORDINATORS, MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT: MAKING THE LINK Dr. Rasheed Draman.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Strategic Planning Crossing the ICT Bridge Project Trainers: Lynne Gibb Sally Dusting-Laird.
Presenting the AGENDA FOR TRANSFORMATION (AfT) Engaging the CSOs on AfT Monitoring from HRBA Approach Ministry of Planning Republic of Liberia.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Measuring Institutional Capacity for Sustainability Mark D. Bardini, Ph.D. Chemonics International AEA Webinar September 15, 2011.
Preparation of Drought Vulnerability Assessment Study to Develop Iraq National Framework for Integrated Drought Risk Management (DRM) PAVING THE WAY FOR.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Module 2 National IEA Process Design and Organization Stakeholder’s consultative workshop/ Training on Integrated assessments methodology ECONOMIC VALUATION.
Building an ENI CBC project
Performance Indicators
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Country Level Programs
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Tracking development results at the EIB
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Monitoring & Reporting 2019
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Monitoring and evaluation Part 1 Lecture 10. Appraisal Vs Evaluation  Appraisal is before an activity takes place  Evaluation after the activity has.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Project Design and Implementation: Developing a Useful Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level To help ensure the project achieves expected environmental benefits Can be useful for guiding project progress Assure monies properly spent Bring insights to project manager to build his/her capacity for better project implementation

What constitutes project success? Training complete, Strategy and Action Plan Developed New Methodology produced, Publications produced, Network Established, PROJECT SUCCESS? but …… Success to whom? Of what environmental value? economic and political realities

Monitoring Project Performance Examples of Performance Indicators - quantitative + qualitative - Performance must show actual environmental benefit measured by hectares conserved, quantified greenhouse gas emission reductions, etc. Other Performance indicators could include performance in relation to relevance Relevance of outputs to stakeholders/users Relevance of work to national development Utility of output in achieving environmental change on the ground

Developing a M&E Plan How does an M&E plan get developed? Performance indicator should be developed with stakeholders/clients Monitoring indicator achievement – how?: analysis of views of stakeholders who should/could be using project’s outputs, through interviews with informants, through surveys….. Normally monitoring stays within a closed system yet outputs are relevant to a wider audience. .…….

COMMON WEAKNESSES IN M&E PLANS NO MONITORING OF INDICATORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, UTILITY OF OUPUTS, UTILITY OF CAPACITY GAINED, …..; NO ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNTABILITIES & RESPONSIBILITIES; NO POST-PROJECT MONITORING

Monitoring and Evaluation Project Plan M&E Plan, covering monitoring and evaluation at three levels: execution performance, output delivery, project impact.

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Execution Performance: Management and Supervision of project Responsibility of project management unit Supervision by the Steering Committee Responsibility of project manager

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Output delivery Timing of outputs e.g. publications, etc Quantity Quality: Peer review process Distribution Responsibilities

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Project Impact Measuring outcomes Log frame: Indicators How to measure indicators Target values for each year Source of data : baseline + current Responsibilities for measurement – who does it? Process Indicators – peer reviewed assessment; Stress Reduction Indicators – priorities to replicate best practice identified; Legal framework established; Environmental Status Indicators - actual measurable environmental change; activities to replicate methodology Or best practices under implementation.

Impact indicators Pressure-state-effect-response (causal chain) what measures are taken in which part of the chain?

Issues related to project impact monitoring Monitoring system to be included in the project - is it budgeted for? Baseline setting - who pays and how? Target setting - how? Capacity building impacts - what indicators and how to measure?