LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Advertisements

1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Reading LibQUAL+ Results The University of Chicago Library LibQUAL+™ Survey Supervisors’ Meeting June 16, 2004.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
LibQUAL Report Ferdinand Postma Library What is LibQUAL+TM LibQual+TM is a questionnaire that was developed by the Association of Research Libraries.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
 For core questions, respondents had to rank minimum, perceived and desired expectations on a scale from 1 to 9  How do we interpret these scores?
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Your LibQUAL+ ® Community: A Results Meeting American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference Washington, DC June 25, 2007 Martha Kyrillidou, Director.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
LibQual Survey. The CUC Group Resp.% Calvin College & Theological Seminary1, % Cedarville University Centennial Library % Geneva College %
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Reading Radar Charts.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2007
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec

LibQual Survey Core categories: Affect of Service Information Control Library as Place Other categories: Questions shared among all Canadian university libraries participating in the surveys Information literacy Satisfaction Use of libraries and search gateways Demographics

LibQual Survey For each question asked from a core category and the CARL questions, respondents are asked to rank on a scale of 1 (low) to 9 (high) their: Minimum service level Desired service level Perceived service performance

Methodology Everyone was invited to participate UCS sent out 43,228 s (excluding undelivered): Students: 39,685 Faculty: 1,414 Staff: 2,129 Response rate: 9.5%

Responses We received 4,103 completed questionnaires 78% Undergraduate students 17% Graduate students 3% Faculty members 2% Staff members

Interpreting the results Minimum service level Number we don’t want to go below Desired service level Measure of importance to the user, potential goal Perceived service performance User perception of how we are doing

Reading the Radar Charts Above minimum expectations Below minimum expectations

RESULTS BY USER GROUPS Core Category

Results by User Groups UndergraduateGraduateFaculty

Undergraduates Most desired: Library as Place Lowest score: Library as Place Highest score: Affect of Service

Undergraduates: Top 4 Desired 1.Employees who have knowledge to answer users questions ( in the blue) 2.Library space that inspires study and learning ( in the red) 3.A comfortable and inviting location ( in the red) 4.A library website enabling me to locate information on my own ( in the blue)

Graduates Most desired: Information Control Lowest score: Library as Place Highest score: Affect of Service

Graduates: Top 4 Desired 1.Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office ( in the red) 2.A library website enabling me to locate information on my own ( in the blue) 3.Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own ( in the blue) 4.Employees who have the knowledge to answer user questions ( in the blue)

Faculty Most desired: Information Control Lowest score: Information Control Highest score: Affect of Service

Faculty: Top 4 Desired 1.Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work ( in the red) 2.A library website enabling me to locate information on my own ( in the red) 3.Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office ( in the red) 4.Readiness to respond to users’ questions ( in the blue)

TRENDS: 2007, 2010, 2013

Undergraduates Library as Place has overtaken Information Control as most desired dimension

Graduates and Faculty Information Control is most desired For both of these user groups the gap between minimum level and desired level is getting smaller.

OTHER QUESTIONS LQ Canada, Use of Libraries, Satisfaction, Information Literacy

LibQual Canada Questions 1.Ability to navigate library Web pages easily 2.Adequate hours of service 3.Ease and timeliness in getting materials from other libraries 4.Making me aware of library resources and services 5.Teaching me how to access, evaluate, and use information

Concordia responses Undergraduates: Very happy with hours of service Graduates: Most satisfied with “Teaching me how to access, evaluate and use information” and hours of service Satisfied with ILL Least satisfied with the web pages Faculty: Very happy with “Teaching me how to access, evaluate and use information” Least satisfied with the web pages

How often do you access library resources through a library Web page?

How often do you use resources on library premises?

WRITTEN COMMENTS

Comments by category

Nature of Comment

Number of comments by user group

Undergraduate

Graduate

Faculty