1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grant review at NIH for statistical methodology Jeremy M G Taylor Michelle Dunn Marie Davidian.
Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
B IOMEDICAL E NGINEERING Significance & Innovation Dawn M Elliott, PhD.
What’s NIH? National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst. National Human Genome Research Inst National Institute.
Website: where you can find all necessary forms! NIH Grant Writing 101 ASCEND March 2015.
Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015.
Significance and Innovation Significance- The positive effect something is likely to have on other things Innovation- A new and substantially different.
American Heart Association Research Funding Opportunities 1.
Grant Writing Thomas S. Buchanan NIH Review Process Study Sections Review Criteria Summary Statement Responding to a Review.
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Grants Facilitation -UCD SOM Office of Research Grant Research and Navigation Team Jeffrey Elias PhD - Erica Chedin PhD - Betty Guo PhD
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Essential Elements in Preparing a Program Project or an Individual Research Proposal 如何撰寫整合性研究計畫 何英剛 國家衛生研究院 副院長.
Overall Impact versus Significance
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
New Investigator (NI)  Has not been PI on a significant NIH research grant (R01)  Can have obtained small research grants (e.g., R03, R21), previous.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Dissertation awards. R36 To support dissertation research costs of students in accredited research doctoral programs in the United States (including Puerto.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
A Review of Recent Changes to NIH Forms & Instructions Jane Tolbert ORPA December 15, 2009.
Avrom Caplan, PhD Associate University Dean for Research
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
R01 NIH Grants John E. Lochman, PhD, ABPP Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems Department of Psychology Psychosocial Development, Risk and.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
NIH ROADMAP FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH RESEARCH TEAMS OF THE FUTURE.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
G RANTSMANSHIP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) PAUL NIETERT, PHD SCTR LUNCH-N-LEARN DECEMBER 9, 2015.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Grant Writing: Specific Considerations in Clinical Studies Ravi Retnakaran MD MSc FRCPC Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital University.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
University of Virginia Innovation – How to Make Your Grant New and Unique Grant Writing Workshop American Association for Thoracic Surgery David R. Jones.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
What is a Grant? A description of a research project you want to do? A thoughtful explication of a great new research idea? An intellectual magnum opus.
HIP Buffet: Mapping Your Career with NIH
NIH Fellowships Overview
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Writing that First Research Grant
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 3, Approach
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Opportunity fund grants at COM
Presentation transcript:

1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013

2 Predoctoral Research Support Grants, commonly require citizenship or permanent residency status  NIH  NSF Postdoctoral Research Support Grants, commonly do not require citizenship or permanent residency status Mentored Research Development Award (K01, K08, K25 etc.) Pathway to Independence Award (K99/R00) Type of Grants

3 Statistical Methodology Grants (R03, R21, R01, P01)  See Professor Marie Davidian and Jeremy Taylor’s slides. See Review Criteria at a glance.  Significance: Address important problems that will significantly move biostatistical science and practice and the substantive health science forward? Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? Type of Grants

4  Innovation: Is the work novel, original rather than just straightforwardly extending previous work? Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed? Type of Grants

5  Approach: Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Type of Grants

6  Investigators: Are the PD/PIs, collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? Type of Grants

7  Environment: Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements? Type of Grants

8 Collaborative Grants as Statistician  See Professor Amy Herring’s slides  Statistical Design: Clearly lay out type of designs (case- control, cohort or clinical trials) clearly define outcome and exposure variables, randomization, adequate sample size and power on the primary hypotheses  Data Management Plan: data entry and collection, quality control and cleaning, and confidentiality.  Statistical Analysis Plan: Appropriate analytic models (survival, binary, continuous outcomes) with appropriate consideration for correlated, longitudinal, multi-level and missing data?  Typically focused on one or two types of design and models in a grant

9 Type of Grants Data Coordinating Center Grants  Typically multi-center cohort studies or clinical trials  Sophisticated data management systems by collaborating with computer scientists: web based data entry, quality control, periodical data edits and reports etc.  A team of statisticians with various backgrounds, integrated applications and developments of various statistical methods in a single grant Biostatics Cores in Other Center Grants (Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Center for AIDS Research, Center for Aging Research etc.)

Final Comments 10 Like publications, if you keep writing and revising, you will get your own grants!