ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION Background: Georgia rates the quality of early childcare learning centers using a tiered quality improvement system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Home and pre-school influences on early language and reading Evidence from the Effective Pre-school, Primary and Secondary Education (EPPSE) project.
Advertisements

Children’s subjective well-being Findings from national surveys in England International Society for Child Indicators Conference, 27 th July 2011.
Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
Massachusetts Early Care and Education and School Readiness Study
Dan Fasano & Kevin McGoey
A Weighty Proposition What is Known Regarding Childhood Obesity Learning Session #1.
Maria Cristina Matteucci, Dina Guglielmi
Stand-Out Sport Athletes’ Attitudes Toward Physical Education Timothy M. Church Department of Physical Education and Health Education INTRODUCTION Assumptions.
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
The Effect of Predisposing Factors and Concussion Rate on DIII College Football Players: A Retrospective Study Jon Purvis, Robert Blume, Jenna Chinburg,
CHAPTER 6: Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
Understanding The Early Years Niagara College ECE Program  October 2007 Glory Ressler, B.A., Dip. GIT Coordinator, Understanding the Early Years Niagara.
Assessment in the early years © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Resilience in Aboriginal Children and Adolescents in Out-of-Home Care: A Test of an Initial Explanatory Model Katharine M. Filbert School of Psychology.
Introduction: While factors within the classroom no doubt play a major part in students’ academic achievement, there is growing interest in how psychosocial.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
Department of Early Education and Care Rate Reform/Cost of Quality Discussion November 2011.
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
Oregon’s Quality Rating and Improvement System and Education Service Districts OAESD Spring Conference May 15, 2015.
Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning
Patterns in Child Outcomes Summary Data: Cornelia Taylor, Lauren Barton, Donna Spiker September 19-21, 2011 Measuring and Improving Child and Family Outcomes.
Michelle Koford Summer Topics Discussed Background Purpose Research Questions Methods Participants Procedures Instrumentation Analysis.
Accountability: Alignment and Assessment of Birth through Five Early Learning Standards 2008 National OSEP Early Childhood Conference Cynthia Ramagos.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
1 Clinical Investigation and Outcomes Research Research Using Existing Databases Marcia A. Testa, MPH, PhD Department of Biostatistics Harvard School of.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
EDU 262 NC Star Rated Licensing. History In September 2000, the Division issued star rated licenses to all eligible Child Care Centers and Family Child.
Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN Does Place Matter For Healthy Early Child Care Environments?
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Early Childhood Advisory Council. “ “ “ “ “ “ CECC Brief History … a vehicle for bringing together many community members to support issues of importance.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Activity Planning and Assessment
ABSTRACT Diabetes is a public health issue of growing magnitude. It currently ranks among the top ten leading causes of death in the United States. To.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
Dads Do Matter: Adolescents’ Relationships With Dads Predicting Later Rejection Sensitivity I would like to thank the William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer.
V v References 1. Ladd, G. W., Birch, H. S., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's Social and Scholastic Lives in Kindergarten: Related Spheres of Influence?
Printed by The Aftercare and School Observation System: Characteristics of out-of-home contexts and young children’s behavior problems.
An exploratory analysis of Latino risk and protective health factors in a community sample Julie Gast, PhD, MSCHES, Terry Peak, MSW, PhD, & Jason J. Leiker,
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
Results Baseline Differences Between Groups No significant differences were found between ethnic groups on baseline levels of Praise (F = 2.006, p>.05),
Small Wins Charlene Walker EDU 697 Capstone: A Project Approach September 13, 2015.
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
 By preschool age, boys and girls show marked differences on a number of emotional, social, and behavioral outcomes (Ruble et al., 2006). Some gender.
IMPORTANCE OF STATISTICS MR.CHITHRAVEL.V ASST.PROFESSOR ACN.
J. Aaron Johnson, PhD 1 and J. Paul Seale, MD 2 1 Institute of Public and Preventive Health and Department of Psychology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta,
School of Nursing Health Literacy Among Informal Caregivers of Persons With Memory Loss Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN; Jennifer H. Lingler, PhD, RN; Lisa.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Jessica Bustamante, Jennie Chen, Kevin Tom, and Oveyaa Vignesh University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Effect of Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation.
Sociocultural Influences Related to Language, Cognition, and Social Emotional Developmental Relationships Presenters: Kimberly Sharkins & Dr. James Ernest.
Project VIABLE - Direct Behavior Rating: Evaluating Behaviors with Positive and Negative Definitions Rose Jaffery 1, Albee T. Ongusco 3, Amy M. Briesch.
Prepared for the Office of Head Start by ICF International School Readiness Goals: Using Data to Support Child Outcomes.
Comparing Year 9 and Year 10 May, Background Assessment and Action Record Interviews (AAR’s) are completed annually with all children and youth.
Parental Feeding Behavior: Influences on Elementary Children Health Georgia Southern University 2014 Research Symposium Cydni Martin and Jennifer Paquin,
Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Presentation of Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Cynthia K. Buettner, Ph.D. July 25, 2006.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Work Interventions:
Child Caregiver Interaction Scale (CCIS)
Paranormal Experiences are Predictive of Poorer Mental Health
LIMITATIONS & FUTURE STUDIES
Brotherson, S., Kranzler, B., & Zehnacker, G.
Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data
Monitoring Children’s Progress
A holistic approach to child development: factors influencing overall development in children in care in Ontario, Canada Meagan Millera, Barbara Greenberga,
Study Design/Methods Used
CHAPTER 6: Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
Assessment of the Selection Process for the 2004 National List for Essential Drugs (NLED) of Thailand Yoongthong W1, Kunaratanapruk S1, Sumpradit N1,
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION Background: Georgia rates the quality of early childcare learning centers using a tiered quality improvement system. Georgia’s Quality Rated system (QR) designates a star level, (one star, two stars or three stars) to each center based on a portfolio of QR standards and an onsite assessment by Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning (DECAL). Methods: The Bracken School Readiness Assessment-3 rd Edition (BSRA-3) was administered to children in various one-star (N=2), two-star(N=4) and three-star (N=6) childcare learning centers in Georgia. Results: Significant differences were found in school readiness scores based on quality rating with two and three star centers scoring higher than one star centers. Conclusions: Higher levels of quality in QR childcare centers displayed more school readiness than centers with lower levels of quality. Future studies should examine differences in higher quality centers to further explore the influence of QR programs on school readiness. Participants 12 Quality Rated childcare learning centers in Georgia. One- star (N=2), 2-star (N=4) and 3-star (N=6). Age : M = 4.16 years (SD = 0.78) 137 males and 121 females Materials School readiness was measured using The Bracken School Readiness Assessment-3 rd Edition (BSRA-3) which is a reliable and valid standardized assessment. The BSRA-3 consists of 85 items measuring a child’s knowledge of academic domains such as recognition of colors, numbers and letters, counting ability, standard and geometric shapes, and the ability to compare and contrast items. Procedure Children’s height and weight were recorded. Children completed a brief two step color blindness screen. Children who did not pass the color blindness screen were not administered the color subtest of BSRA-3. BSRA-3 was individually administered in a quiet testing environment. BACKGROUND School Readiness Early childcare is essential to school readiness, which indicates a child’s preparedness to begin a formal curriculum based educational program. Alongside quality, the health of a child impacts school readiness and children with better physical and emotional health perform better in school. The relationship between Quality Rated star level and school readiness outcomes was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the alpha level set at.05. QR star level significantly influenced school readiness, (F (2, 255) = 3.66, p =.027). Children in childcare centers at the one-star level ( M = 95.00, SD = 16.80) performed lower than children in childcare centers at the two-star level (M = , SD = 16.55) and three-star level (M = , SD = 14.35). Multiple comparison tests did not reveal differences between two star and three star level centers. Quality Rated Childcare Learning Centers in Georgia as of July 21, 2015 One Star138 Two Star225 Three Star78 Total Programs441 Dena Phillips 1 and Nancy C. Webb, Ph.D. 2 1 Georgia Regents University, 2 Georgia Regents University Institute of Public and Preventative Health Overall, level of quality influenced school readiness outcomes when distinguishing between lower and higher levels of quality. Limitations include the number and distribution of childcare learning centers, however the data collection phase is ongoing. Future studies should investigate cumulative effects of Quality Rated standards on school readiness to further identify how the factors may prepare children academically. Additional data is also needed to further examine differences among higher quality centers. References available upon request BACKGROUND Variability in standards set by providers influence the quality of childcare from one setting to the next. The quality of an early learning environment influences children’s self-regulation abilities, long-term academic success, emotional development and physical health. Quality Rated (QR) is the system Georgia developed to rank the quality of childcare centers and licensed homes by assigning stars to the respective levels of quality. Childcare centers applying for QR status first submit a portfolio documenting how their practices align with QR standards centered on staff qualifications; child health, nutrition and physical activity; family engagement; holistic curricula and teacher-to-student ratios. Additionally, an assessment of the center is performed by Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning (DECAL) using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale– Revised (ECERS-R). Scores on the portfolio and ECERS-R are combined to create a star rating. Centers implementing a few QR standards with average ECERS-R scores receive a one-star rating. Centers implementing multiple QR standards with above average ECERS-R scores receive a two-star rating. Centers implementing the most QR standards with ECERS-R scores well above average receive a three- star rating. Children per Quality Rated Childcare Center One Star27 Two Star109 Three Star122 Total Children258