The Content Literacy Continuum: A Framework for Helping Struggling Adolescent Learners Don Deshler University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Advertisements

Strategic Instruction Model Adolescent Reading Program High School Achievement Breakfast Forum June 14, 2005 Don Deshler University of Kansas Center for.
When Students Can’t Read…
Kindergarten Reading at PS 11
The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning
SIM Professional Development Leader
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Center for Research on Learning
Wilson Reading System -Barbara A. Wilson Collingwood MS Key 2008/09
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts
LUPE LLOYD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
June 19, 2008 Maurice McInerney, Daryl Mellard Presented at: National High School Center’s Summer Institute Washington, D.C. June 19, 2008 Tiered Intervention.
Secondary Applications of RTI: A Guided Discussion Donald D. Deshler University of Kansas Joseph F. Kovaleski Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
High School Literacy Don Deshler. LANGUAGE SKILLS STRATEGIES SUBJECT MATTER Building Blocks for Content Literacy HIGHER ORDER.
5 Characteristics of Low Achieving Students
Communication Difficulties Oral Expression & Listening Comprehension.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
WHAT WORKS IN LITERACY INSTRUCTION High-Quality Literacy Framework.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Virginia’s State Improvement Grant and State Personnel Development Grant The Content Literacy Continuum & Response to Intervention.
Chapter 15: Informational Reading
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Using Learning Strategies to Improve How Students Learn and Perform Don Deshler University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning August 8, 2006 Portland,
Adolescent Literacy Peggy McCardle, Ph.D., MPH National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH Archived Information.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
VIRGINIA CLC Demonstration Site BOTETOURT COUNTY.
Fluency in the Foundation Skills ACADEMY OF READING®
Exploring Literacy, RTI and SIM March 25, 2009 Barb Vallejo MN SIM Professional Developer
The Strategic Instruction Model (SIM) The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
1 RTI IN MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL: HOW WILL THE GAME PLAY OUT? Charlie Hughes Penn State University Don Deshler University of Kansas Charlie Hughes Penn.
Effective Literacy Instruction. Problem Solving Process.
The Course Organizer Routine
The Concept Comparison Routine
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS): Focus on English, Language Arts & Literacy Presented by Jane Cook to the East Hartford High School.
Literacy Programs System 44 Exit Criteria: SPI Advancing, 40+ Fluency Score, series 13 + READ 180 Exit Criteria: SRI 4th 595; 5th 760;
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Chris Hamiel a framework for SCHOOL CHANGE and INCREASED LITERACY.
Skilled Reading for New Teachers. Focus Questions What general principles seem to hold true regardless of the subject matter we are teaching? What general.
Developing English Language and Literacy. Demographics.
Archived Information About the KU-CRL Founded in 1978 Mission: Dramatically improve the performance of at-risk students through research-based interventions.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
A Primer on Reading Terminology. AUTOMATICITY Readers construct meaning through recognition of words and passages (strings of words). Proficient readers.
Developing Capacity to Support Middle Grades Literacy Instruction Don Deshler University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning National Governors Association.
+ Literacy Curriculum Development: Differentiation within a UbD Framework Presented by: Bob O’Donnell, Joyce Young Hempfield School District.
Jeopardy Theoretical Perspectives Early LiteracyElements of Literacy Teaching Reading Potpourri Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300.
Components of a literacy program November 21, 2008.
CHAPTER 6: Reading Comprehension Strategies for Teaching Learners with Special Needs Tenth Edition Edward A. Polloway James R. Patton Loretta Serna Jenevie.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
LITERACY IS A TOUGH JOB. School-wide change It’s a lot like herding cats …
Schoolwide Reading: Day Instructional Priorities
Zenex Foundation RESEP 24 May Presentation Introduce Zenex & rationale for our focus on Literacy Tracing our intervention journey Design, roll-out.
EDSS 540: Literacy in Secondary Schools Kelli Burns.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Map the critical content Map the critical content ”If I stopped one of your students in the hallway as they left your class after taking the unit test.
The Performance Gap Skills / Demands Years in School
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Strategies to Improve Content Enhancement
Supporting All Readers in Small Group Instruction Providing Equity in Literacy Instruction Beth Estill.
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
IES Recommendations Explicit vocabulary instruction
Zenex Foundation RESEP 24 May 2016.
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning
Specialized Instruction at KMS
Section VI: Comprehension
The FRAME Routine Essential details
Strategies Knowledge Habits of learning
Presentation transcript:

The Content Literacy Continuum: A Framework for Helping Struggling Adolescent Learners Don Deshler University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning August 8, 2006 Portland, Oregon

How many words a year do 5 th graders read who read at the 50 th percentile? (A) 250,000 (B) 400,000 (C) 600,000 (D) 900,000

How many words a year do 5 th graders read who read at the 10 th percentile? (A) 60,000 (B) 100,000 (C) 180,000 (D) 250,000

How many words a year do 5 th graders read who read at the 90 th percentile? (A) 1,800,000 (B) 2,500,000 (C) 3,000,000 (D) 4,000,000

Students who are successful during their 9 th grade year are ___ times as likely to graduate? (A) 2.0 (B) 2.5 (C) 3.0 (D) 3.5

Exhibit #1

Information Explosion/ Instructional Time Dilemma Time Content

Triple jeopardy for teachers! Teach more content Teach content to higher level of proficiency Teach classes with greater diversity of students

We know that in secondary schools standardized tests… Increase in –Length –Question number and complexity Require students to be proficient in… –Complex thinking (inference, summarization) –Vocabulary –Background knowledge

Exhibit #1 ( “ Raise the bar ” )

Exhibit #2

Unsat. Basic Proficient Advanced Exemplary WLPB-R: Struggling and Good Readers Listen Comp N Mean %tile N Mean %tile N Mean %tile N Mean %tile N Mean %tile % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % th %tile th %tile nd %tile st %tile th %tile % % % % Letter- Wd ID Reading Comprehension Read Skills Broad Read Vocab Word Attack Pass Comp % % % % % % % % % % POOR READERS GOOD READERS

Word Attack Examiner points and says: “I want you to read some words that are not real words. Tell me how they sound.” Examples: nat; knoink; paraphonity “How does this word sound?” Poor Readers Good Readers SS of SS of 85 SS of 115

Passage Comprehension Examiner points to the pictures, sentences, or passages and says: “Read this sentence to yourself and tell me one word that goes in the space.” Examples: The bird is ______. Also, word passages. [Cloze procedure] Poor Readers Good Readers SS of SS of 85 SS of 115

Overall Reading Comprehension A composite score of passage comprehension and vocabulary. A good indicator of overall reading proficiency. Poor Readers Good Readers SS of SS of 85 SS of 115

Reading Component Profile List Comp Word ID Word Att Vocab Passage Comp Reading Comp Mean Standard Scores ◊ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ∆ Proficient ◊ Not proficient

Exhibit #2 ( “ Close the gap ” )

So …. How can secondary schools respond to these “ competing ” realities????

Begin by …. Getting a profile of the literacy performance of all students in your school

Adolescent Reading Model Language Comprehension Background Knowledge Syntax Vocabulary Text Structures Reading Comprehension: Comprehension comes from integrating prior knowledge with new information from the text. This new knowledge facilitates deeper thinking about the text and can be applied to learn new information and solve problems. Word Recognition Phonological Awareness Decoding Sight Word Reading Fluency Executive Processes Cognitive Strategies Metacognitive Strategies KU-CRL Hock & Deshler, 2006 Integration

Then ask …. Five important questions about literacy supports!

1.What happens for those students who are reading below the 4th grade level?

2.What is in place across a school staff to ensure that students will get the “critical” content in spite of their literacy skills?

3. What happens for students who know how to decode but can’t comprehend well?

4. What steps have been taken to ensure that powerful learning strategies are embedded across the curriculum?

5. What happens for students who have language problems?

Finally …. Use a “ content literacy ” framework to determine an action plan

The listening, speaking, reading and writing skills and strategies necessary to learn in each of the academic disciplines.

is the door to content acquisition & higher order thinking.

A Continuum of Literacy Instruction (Content Literacy Continuum -- CLC) Level 1:Enhance content instruction (mastery of critical content for all regardless of literacy levels) Level 2:Embedded strategy instruction (routinely weave strategies within and across classes using large group instructional methods) Level 3:Intensive strategy instruction (mastery of specific strategies using intensive-explicit instructional sequences) Level 4:Intensive basic skill instruction (mastery of entry level literacy skills at the 4th grade level) Level 5:Therapeutic intervention (mastery of language underpinnings of curriculum content and learning strategies)

LANGUAGE SKILLS STRATEGIES SUBJECT MATTER Building Blocks for Content Literacy HIGHER ORDER

The CLC says… There are unique (but very important) roles for each member of a secondary staff relative to literacy instruction –Every teacher is not a reading teacher, and literacy coaches may be necessary but aren’t sufficient! Some students require more intensive, systematic, explicit instruction of content, strategies, and skills

The Muskegon High School Story

North Central Accreditation visitNorth Central Accreditation visit

The Muskegon High School Story North Central Accreditation visit School-wide reading screening

The Muskegon High School Story North Central Accreditation visit School-wide reading screening Intensive word identification intervention (Level 4)

Word Identification Intervention at MHS

The Muskegon High School Story North Central Accreditation visit School-wide reading screening Intensive word identification intervention Reading comprehension strategies class (Level 3)

Strategic Reading Class at Muskegon High School Grade Level Scores on GMRT-Comprehension Subtest

The Muskegon High School Story North Central Accreditation visit School-wide reading screening Intensive word identification intervention Reading comprehension strategies classes Writing strategies as a part of English classes (Level 2)

State Writing Assessment

The Muskegon High School Story North Central Accreditation visit School-wide reading screening Intensive word identification intervention Reading comprehension strategies classes Writing strategies as a part of English classes Engaging content teachers in solving the literacy problem (Level 1)

NAME DATE The Unit Organizer BIGGER PICTURE LAST UNIT/Experience CURRENT UNIT NEXT UNIT/Experience UNIT SELF-TEST QUESTIONS UNIT RELATIONSHIPS UNIT SCHEDULEUNIT MAP CURRENT UNIT

Elida Cordora NAME DATE The Unit Organizer BIGGER PICTURE LAST UNIT/Experience CURRENT UNIT NEXT UNIT/Experience UNIT SELF-TEST QUESTIONS UNIT RELATIONSHIPS UNIT SCHEDULEUNIT MAP CURRENT UNIT /22 The roots and consequences of civil unrest. The Causes of the Civil War Growth of the Nation The Civil War 1/22 Cooperative groups - over pp /28 Quiz 1/29 Cooperative groups - over pp "Influential Personalities" projectdue 1/30 Quiz 2/2 Cooperative groups - over pp /6 Review for test 2/7 Review for test 2/6 Test is about... Sectionalism pp Areas of the U.S. Differences between the areas Events in the U.S. Leaders across the U.S. was based on emerged because of became greater with was influenced by descriptive cause/effect compare/contrast What was sectionalism as it existed in the U. S. of 1860? How did the differences in the sections of the U.S. in 1860 contribute to the start of the Civil War? What examples of sectionalism exist in the world today? ORGANIZATION KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURE GUIDING QUESTIONS

Comparison Table 1 Concept 1 2 Overall Concept 3 Characteristics 3 4 Like Characteristics 9 Extensions Communicate Targeted Concepts Obtain the Overall Concepts Make lists of Known Characteristics Pin down Like Characteristics Assemble Like Categories Record Unlike Characteristics Identify Unlike Categories Nail Down a Summary Go Beyond the Basics COMPARINGCOMPARING 5 Like Categories 7 Unlike Categories 6 Unlike Characteristics 6 8 Summary

Comparison Table 1 Concept 1 2 Overall Concept 3 Characteristics 3 4 Like Characteristics 9 Extensions Communicate Targeted Concepts Obtain the Overall Concepts Make lists of Known Characteristics Pin down Like Characteristics Assemble Like Categories Record Unlike Characteristics Identify Unlike Categories Nail Down a Summary Go Beyond the Basics COMPARINGCOMPARING 5 Like Categories 7 Unlike Categories 6 Unlike Characteristics 6 8 Summary Economic Causes of Sectionalism in the U.S. in 1860 Economic conditions in the North Economic conditions in the South Good ports Good natural resources Immigrants in labor force Profit from industries Good land transportation Good credit with other countries Good ports Good natural resources Slaves in labor force Profit from growing cotton Poor land transportation Good credit with other countries Study the economic conditions of the West in 1860, and create a list of characteristics to be compared to the North & South. Good ports Good natural resources Good credit with other countries Quality of ports Quality of natural resources Quality of credit Immigrants in labor force Profit from industries Good land transportation Slaves in labor force Profit from growing cotton Poor land transportation Primary source of labor Source of profits Quality of land transportation Economic conditions in the North and South in 1860 were alike because both had good natural resources, ports, and credit. Their primary sources of labor and profits were different, as was the quality of their land transportation. CATEGORIZATION Strategic thinking prompts FACTS

Let’s pause for a moment….. What factors do you think accounted for the success story at MHS?

Another question….. Where would you begin to embed the continuum of content literacy instruction in your school?

Intense-Explicit Instruction LEVEL 1 Cue Do Review LEVEL 2 “I do it!” (Learn by watching) “We do it!” (Learn by sharing) “Ya’ll do it!” (Learn by sharing) “You do it! (Learn by practicing) LEVEL 3/4/5 PretestPretest DescribeDescribe –Commitment (student & teacher) –Goals –High expectations ModelModel Practice and quality feedbackPractice and quality feedback –Controlled and advanced Posttest & reflectPosttest & reflect Generalize, transfer, applyGeneralize, transfer, apply

Content Literacy “Synergy” Improved Literacy CONTENT CLASSES Level 1. Enhanced Content Instruction CONTENT CLASSES Level 2. Embedded Strategy Instruction Level 3. Intensive Strategy Instruction strategy classes strategic tutoring Level 4. Intensive Basic Skill Instruction KU-CRLCLC- Lenz, Ehren, &Deshler, 2005 Level 5. Therapeutic Intervention Foundational language competencies

Contact Don Deshler Patty Graner