National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: Resources and Technical Assistance Shelley Zion Project Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audience: Local school/PTA leaders (PTA president, school principal, school board members, PTA board) Presenter: State/district PTA leader.
Advertisements

Bridging Race, Income and Cultural Differences to Support Student Success.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Disproportionality and the Family-School Connection Barbara Leach, Family Support Network of North Carolina Teresa Dais, Ph.D., NC Department of Public.
JoEtta Gonzales, Director The Equity Alliance at ASU February 15, 2011.
NYCDOE TAC-D OVERVIEW Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools Technical Assistance Center on Disproportionality
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
1 Connecting Policy, Programs, and Practice in Closing Achievement Gaps Denise Alston, Ph.D. Linda Bacon NEA Human & Civil Rights NCCRESt Conference February.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Parent Leadership Lisa Brown and Lisa Conlan Family Resource Specialists Technical Assistance Partnership.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Wazz up with Education : Looking at Challenges, Contexts, and Complexities Elizabeth B. Kozleski Arizona State University.
National Institute for Urban School Improvement Synergy Site Meeting May, 2005.
2 Partnerships with professionals. Partnerships and Collaboration Partnerships with other professionals are ongoing long- term relationships based on.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Project ELITE Overview August Project Overview A model demonstration project sponsored by the Office of Special Education Programs. GOAL: Assist.
NCCREST 3.3: Evidencing Change for Culturally Responsive Systems Lecturette 3.3 Developing Culturally Responsive Educational Systems, Resources, and Practices.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
SWIFT Center Policy Alignment Influence on Building Capacity and Sustainability in Schoolwide Transformation Jenny Stonemeier, TASH.
A system of resources for addressing disproportionality at the classroom, school and district levels: Shelley Zion, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
NCCREST 3.3: Evidencing Change for Culturally Responsive Systems Lecturette 3.3 Providing Culturally Responsive Technical Assistance and School Improvement.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
OHIO HSTW and ASCD WEBSITES GOLD MINES FOR RESOURCES.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
EMR Principal Forum Term 3, EMR Forward Directions The Forward Directions outlines three interlinked priority areas that are the focus for EMR schools.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Lecturette 2: Planning Change
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: Resources and Technical Assistance Shelley Zion Project Coordinator

Purpose The National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems provides technical assistance and professional development to close the achievement gap between students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and their peers, and reduce inappropriate referrals to special education.

Mission Supporting state education agencies and local school systems to assure a quality, culturally responsive education for all students

NCCRESt’s Work Reduce Disproportionality Networking and Dissemination Research and Development Continuous Improvement Professional Development

Continuous Improvement Accessible and Accurate Data State level planning for PD, TA & Information Networks Annual Continuous Improvement Cycles of Reflection/Planning/Action/Reflection Planning and Implementation Coherence

Technical Assistance RFP for level one state activities Memorandum of partnerships Quarterly teleseminars National Conferences

Annual National Conferences on Disproportionality Level One States- direct and intensive work with 8-12 States Partnerships with Regional Resource Centers, National TA Centers, Presentations at National Conferences

Needs Assessment Survey to State Directors/Team Leaders - The purpose of this survey is to collect information about state capacity to provide technical assistance in the area of disproportionality, to identify areas of need that NCCRESt can support, and to target our resource development and dissemination to best assist states in their planning. Follow up survey to meeting participants - This survey will collect information about the benefits of the meeting, the progress the team has made toward their identified goals, and identify gaps in the services provided by NCCRESt. Technical Papers - NCCRESt is developing a series of technical papers, to be co-authored by regional and state participants that will directly address state identified needs and topics. Stories from the Classroom- NCCRESt is developing a forum on the website where practitioners can submit examples of best practices that are culturally responsive and contribute to the achievement of all students. Upcoming Activities

High Leverage Analysis Questions CONTROL: To what degree is this something we have control to change or address? IMPACT: How likely are we to make a significant difference for students by addressing this challenge? TREND: Based on the data, is this challenge likely to get worse, stay the same or get better? What is the potential cost of not addressing it now? SCOPE: What is the breadth and depth of benefits of addressing this challenge? How many students would benefit if you addressed this challenge? Which students would benefit? URGENCY: What relevance does this challenge have to your school’s current goals or needs? PRIORITY: How would students/family/community members rank this challenge in terms of priority? PRACTICALITY: What is the likelihood of success? Does your team have access to known solutions? Is there expertise or support available to address this challenge? BIG PICTURE: To what extent will addressing this challenge prepare your state to take on more systemic or long-term goals?

Professional Development On-going professional development, with support, is key to the promotion of culturally responsive practice. Professional development must be supported at multiple levels, with everyone “on the same page”—we advocate top down support for bottom up reform (Darling-Hammond & McLaughlin, 1995). Yet change can be difficult—practitioners work in complex cultural milieus and, thus, the acquisition of new research knowledge requires that they change what they think and do and transform the contexts in which they work. Teacher beliefs, feelings of self-efficacy, attitudes, and perceptions all affect the extent to which they try new strategies and persist in using them even when confronted with challenges (Artiles, 1996; Sparks, 1988).

Professional Development Networks of Schools Whole School Improvement Culturally Responsive Focused on Practice Based in Inquiry Linked to Student learning Preservice to Retirement Professional Identity and Goals Ongoing and job embedded

PD Modules Introduction: Leadership Academy Manual Systemic Change Conceptual Framework for Addressing Disproportionality Culturally Responsive Educational Systems Literacy Practices Early Intervention PBIS Differentiated Instruction Collection and Use of Evidence Impact of Urban Culture on Teachers and Students Building Capacity Through Family Voice and Participation The Special Education Referral Process and Pre-Referral Strategies Students

PD ContentCoaching Networking & DisseminationInformation Systems To provide coaching and support to district staff and others who are providing technical assistance to the schools adopting inclusive practices and partnering with the National Institute. To actively support inquiry practices, provide high quality data, support for data analysis and adjustments, and communication with parents and the community. To explore collaborative opportunities, build a common language, create a collaborative atmosphere for change. To develop learning communities at multiple levels, ensure embedded professional development, and support the system to maintain a rich repertoire of research-based, inclusive educational practices.

Research & Development Practitioners Community Members Families Researchers Policy Makers and Influencers

R & D Products Practitioners Practitioner Briefs 1. A Historical Perspective 2. Measurement Issues 3. SPED Process 4. Legal Regulations and Rights 5. Guidelines for Parents * Solutions 6. CR Pedagogy 7. CR Teacher Education 8. Literacy for AA Learners 9. Parent Involvement 10. Prereferral Interventions 11. Governance/Administrative Issues 12. Discipline & Race Researchers/Policymakers Journal Special Issues Culturally Responsive (CR) Literacy Practices: African American Students Culturally Responsive (CR) Literacy Practices: English Language Learners Culturally Responsive Practices: American Indians Interdisciplinary Views on Culture in Learning Positive Behavioral Support Models Culture and Equity in the Special Education Process Equity Implications of Reforms for SPED Students Culturally Responsive Research to Practice

R & D Products Assessment Tool 1. Assess problem: Risk index and odds ratio 2. Five domains: (a) Governance, Organization, Policy and Climate (b) Family Involvement (c) Curriculum (d) Organization of Learning (e) Special Education Processes and Programs On Line Meta-Tag Library Research Studies 1.Analysis of state placement: Colorado 2. The social contexts of the construction of competence: Opportunity to learn, referral, & placement processes Extending the Discourse Series Alternative Viewpoints: Explanations of Racial Minority Placement in Sped Conference, Book, and Journal Issue: Struggling ELL - Language Acquisition or LD? Co-Sponsored by CEC and NABE* Topics: Theoretical & methodological issues, population, pre-referrals/referral, assessment, instruction, future directions Confirmed authors: J. Abedi, L. Baca, J. Cummins, E. Garcia, J. MacSwan, R. Rueda?, N. Ruiz, D. Haager, K. Escamilla, S. Vaughn

Networking and Dissemination Sharing of information across community, professional, advocacy and policy organizations Information dissemination to our expanding network Enews and Web Site development From the Tipping Point ( Gladwell, 2002 ) –Mavens (Opinion Leaders) –Connectors –Agents –Stickiness