R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2017/3/25 Test Case Upgrade from “Test Case-Training Material v1.4.ppt” of Testing basics Authors: NganVK Version: 1.4 Last Update: Dec-2005.
Advertisements

FUNCTION FITTING Student’s name: Ruba Eyal Salman Supervisor:
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Weather Forecasting This chapter discusses: 1.Various weather forecasting methods, their tools, and forecasting accuracy and skill 2.Images for the forecasting.
The use of Doppler radar products for nowcasting tornadoes DWD workshop on tornado forecasting, February 24th 2005, Langen 1. introduction 2. products.
Trends in Estimated Mixing Depth Daily Maximums R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River.
21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Credit hours: 4 Contact hours: 50 (30 Theory, 20 Lab) Prerequisite: TB143 Introduction to Personal Computers.
Designing Services for Grid-based Knowledge Discovery A. Congiusta, A. Pugliese, Domenico Talia, P. Trunfio DEIS University of Calabria ITALY
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.
2. The WAM Model: Solves energy balance equation, including Snonlin
Introduction to Metview
ECMWF Training Course 2005 slide 1 Forecast sensitivity to Observation Carla Cardinali.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
ZMQS ZMQS
Paolo Tuccella, Gabriele Curci, Suzanne Crumeyrolle, Guido Visconti
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
May, 2002Numerical Weather Prediction 1 Robert R. Gotwals, Jr. (Bob2) Computational Science Educator The Shodor Education Foundation, Inc.
Electric Bus Management System
A Winter Season Physical Evaluation of the Effects of Cloud Seeding in the Colorado Mountains William R. Cotton, Ray McAnelly, and Gustavo Carrió Colorado.
Chapter 11: The X Window System Guide To UNIX Using Linux Third Edition.
We are learning how to read the 24 hour clock
Motion in Two and Three Dimensions
Development of Data Assimilation Systems for Short-Term Numerical Weather Prediction at JMA Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA) Y. Honda, Y. Ikuta, J. Fukuda, Y.
Use of Lidar Backscatter to Determine the PBL Heights in New York City, NY Jia-Yeong Ku, Chris Hogrefe, Gopal Sistla New York State Department of Environmental.
25 seconds left…...
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
1 Atmospheric models for damage costs TRADD, part 2 Ari Rabl, ARMINES/Ecole des Mines de Paris, November 2013 There are many different models for atmospheric.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Fluidyn FLOWCOAST FLOOIL 3D Fluid Dynamics Model to Simulate Oil slick movement in coastal waters or rivers FLOOIL.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
James Cogan, Robert Dumais, and Yansen Wang
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Influence functions for the WLEF tower (z=400m) for the June, July, August and September 2000 Simulation: RAMS v4.3 with two nested grids (Δx=100km and.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
Part 4: Local scale dispersion calculation
SRNS-F Comparison of Parameters for Modeling Tritium Dispersion Accident Analyst Nuclear & Criticality Safety Engineering Savannah River.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
EFCOG Safety Analysis Working Group May 10, 2012 Jeremy Rishel Bruce Napier Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Safety Analyses: GENII.
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
Stephan F.J. De Wekker S. Aulenbach, B. Sacks, D. Schimel, B. Stephens, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO; T. Vukicevic,
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 … Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 …
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Adaptation and Installation of the software “TRACE_WIN” and “NOSTRADAMUS” Modeling airborne radiological dispersion and contamination for radiation hazardous.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
HYSPLIT/ALOHA Demonstration Glenn Rolph OAR Air Resources Laboratory June 21, 2016.
Oil Spill Model Systems
Overview of Deterministic Computer Models
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Presentation transcript:

R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport Modeling System 1

2 Savannah River Site (SRS): DOE facility containing waste- processing, chemical hazards, etc. covering ~800 km 2 BACKGROUND

3 BACKGROUND (cont) Weather INformation and Display (WIND) System designed for emergency response (1) Network of computers and instruments to collect meteorological data (2) Graphical/tabular display (updated every 15 minutes) (3) Supplies data to Gaussian dispersion models This work utilizes these data in an advanced atmospheric transport model

4 PURPOSE/IMPORTANCE This work utilizes the WINDS tower data in an advanced atmospheric (Lagrangian) transport model. SRS tower observations are blended with mesoscale simulated wind fields. This results in improved transport prediction capabilities.

5 RAMS LOCAL GRID SYSTEM 3-D finite-difference numerical model, originally developed at Colorado State University Initial/lateral boundary conditions obtained from Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) Typical configuration: Nested horizontal grid spacing 6 hour forecast window Updated every 3 hours

6 TIMING ASPECTS Time window for emergency response needs. Hindcast ~12 to 24 hrs Persist 6 hours into the future (steady-state) after final forecast hour Blend SRS tower horizontal winds into local 3-D forecast fields as they become available (Archived).

7 BLENDING Use horizontal wind fields from SRS towers. Barnes objective analysis: computationally simple, Gaussian weighted- average technique For a station, i, assign a weight, W, which is a function of distance from the station to a gridpoint, d, and the radius of influence, R Give strong relative weighting to SRS winds (within 50 km of towers) Technique not valid for locations far from SRS

8 METHODOLOGY Scripts/shell commands provide automation of RAMS forecasts on UNIX Workstations Transport calculations performed using batch scripts and graphical user interface (GUI) on a PC Software component functions: 1. Input conditions for transport calculation (GUI) 2. Execute LPDM 3. Generate graphical output 4. Provide user choices to examine/archive graphical output (GUI)

9 LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE DISPERSION MODEL (LPDM) Particles released in three-dimensions and time Advect, disperse using winds and turbulence from RAMS Track particle position in space (Lagrangian) Depletion mechanisms: radioactive decay, wet and dry deposition (dry deposition incorporated as partially reflecting surface boundary condition)

10 WET/DRY DEPOSITION REMOVAL MECHANISMS Types WET: Precipitation involved (rainout, washout). Use first-order DECAY process: scavenging coefficient DRY: No precipitation, near surface. Use concept of dry DEPOSITION VELOCITY (v D ): F D surface FLUX Calculate in two ways: Simple: v D, CONSTANT (v D ~ 0.1 to 1.0 cm s -1, ~ s -1 ) Complex: v D, VARY with conditions o v D based on RESISTANCE METHOD o based on PRECIPITATION INTENSITY

11 OUTPUT PRODUCTS Instantaneous surface concentration [pCi/m 3 ] (animated) Integrated surface deposition [pCi/m 2 ] (animated) Dose quantities [rem]: Initial exposure dose:(inhalation + cloud shine) 4-day total dose: (inhalation + cloud shine + ground shine) Dose rate: (ground shine only) 1-year total dose: (ground shine only) 2-year total dose: (ground shine only) Results shown for each isotope, or for sum over all isotopes

12 Surface Concentration: 06-January UTC (0800 LST) APPLICATION #1: Graniteville Train Collision

13 APPLICATION #2: Emergency Response Exercise 22-June-2005 Use Meteorology from 2-grid local simulation (6-hr duration: 12 UTC (08 EDT), 22-Jun to 18 UTC, 22-Jun, Run LPDM assuming the following: 15-min surface release starting at 12:06 UTC, 22-Jun from H-area (Pu 238 ) Plot integrated surface deposition at 18 UTC for 2 cases: Blending of SRS tower information at 13:45 UTC Blending of SRS tower information at 17:00 UTC

14 Plume Comparisons (22-June-2005 Emergency Response Exercise) Blending at 13:45 UTC Blending at 17:00 UTC

15 Simulation –vs- Observations: Example #2

16 APPLICATION #3: Emergency Response Exercise 30-March-2004 Use Meteorology from 2-grid local simulation (6-hr duration: 18 UTC (14 EDT), 30-Mar to 23 UTC, 30-Mar, 2004). Run LPDM assuming the following: 15-min surface release starting at 18:03 UTC, 30-Mar from H-area ( Ci of tritium oxide, HTO) Plot integrated surface deposition at 30-min intervals for two cases: No blending of SRS tower information (forecast only) Blending of SRS tower information up to 21 UTC

17 Simulation –vs- Observations: Example #3

18 CONCLUSIONS Emergency response tool previously developed using 3-D winds and turbulence at fine-scale resolution Horizontal wind fields are blended with local tower observations to improve predictive transport capabilities. Technique demonstrated in various onsite exercises, as well as during the Graniteville train collision.