John Marshall, Chief Justice Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801 Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” By doing so, Marshall enlarged federal power to an extraordinary degree

Marshall’s Major Goals A. Increase the powers of the national govt at the expense of the state legislatures B. Diminish the powers of the states & encourage the Federalist principle of centralization of gov’t C. Strengthen the Court at the expense of Congress/Presidency D. Property rights of individuals need to be protected from government interference E. Advance the interests of the propertied class/commerce class – (Protect free enterprise from state control – promote industrialization and economic growth)

Research the following Marshall Court Cases…. FOR EACH What was the case? What was the decision of the court? What was the Court’s reasoning? What was the long-range significance of the case? Marbury v. Madison 1803 Fletcher v. Peck 1810 McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Dartmouth College v. Woodward - 1819 Gibbons v. Ogden 1824

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Background Constitutional Issue “Midnight Judge” Marbury asked Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his commission as a federal judge (according to the Judiciary Act of 1789) Constitutional Issue The Judiciary Act of 1789 added the power of the writ of mandamus to the original powers in the Constitution

Marbury v. Madison Decision Importance Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because it added instances of original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court that were not in the Constitution Importance Supreme Court established the precedent of JUDICIAL REVIEW – the power of the court to declare a law unconstitutional

Fletcher v. Peck (1810) Background: Georgia legislature was involved in a fraudulent land deal. A new legislature revoked the sale of the land. Mr. Peck bought land from original company and sold it to Mr. Fletcher. Mr. Fletcher wanted his contract with Mr. Peck to be declared null & void and his money returned because Mr. Peck did not have clear title to the land when it was sold.

(Fletcher v. Peck) Issue: Decision Can a contract be invalidated by a new law passed by the legislature? Decision Original land grant was valid even though the legislature was corrupt. Cannot cancel the sale ex post facto Importance: States cannot pass a law impairing the terms of a contract Supreme Court declared a state law unconstitutional

Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) Background In Colonial days, Dartmouth was chartered as a private college run by a board of trustees In 1816, the State of New Hampshire passed a law converting it to a state-run college without the consent of the college board of trustees Constitutional Issue Did the N.H. law violate the Constitutional provisions protecting private property and the sanctity of contracts?

Dartmouth College v. Woodward Decision Actions of N.H. legislature were unconstitutional. The charter was considered to be a contract and could not be broken by the state Importance Supreme Court reversed the decision of the state court. It guaranteed the protection of contracts from government actions, and defined a corporation as an “artificial being”.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Background Maryland imposed a tax on the Bank of the US branch office in Maryland in an attempt to force the BUS out of business in Maryland Constitutional Issue Was the BUS properly created through the use of the elastic clause? Can the state tax a federal agency like the BUS?

McCulloch v. Maryland Decision Importance Upheld the Constitutionality of the BUS Ruled the states cannot tax the federal government because “the power to tax is the power to destroy” Importance ↑ power of the national gov’t through use of elastic clause Limited power of states

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Background Constitutional Issue 2 men operating competing steamboats in the waters between NY & NJ Ogden – exclusive license by NY Gibbons – license from federal gov’t Constitutional Issue Could NY authorize exclusive rights to the waters between NY & NJ?

Gibbons v. Ogden Decision Importance Operation of steamboats was interstate commerce; Congress, not states, regulates interstate commerce Importance Defined interstate commerce to include transportation (eventually railroads, airlines, trucking companies) Expanded role of federal gov’t

Worcester v. Georgia (1832) Background Constitutional Issue 2 missionaries refused to obey the Georgia law requiring all whites living in Cherokee territory to obtain a license. Missionaries were sentenced to 4 years hard labor for violating the state law Constitutional Issue Can the state pass laws concerning the Indian Nations or are the Indian Nations sovereign?

Worcester v. Georgia Decision Importance The state has no power to pass any laws affecting the Cherokees because it was federal jurisdiction Importance Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries Pres. Jackson disagreed, refused to enforce; Cherokees won case but lost land (“Trail of Tears”)