Dr. Matthew Hipsey School of Earth & Environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploring transient phytoplankton spring blooms across lakes to understand the significance and control of temporal patterns in freshwater bacteria Bertilsson,
Advertisements

Geographical Information System & Modelling LIFE02/ENV/P/
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Delta TRIM Hydrodynamic modeling in CASCaDE Nancy Monsen USGS/Menlo Park IEP Modeling Workshop Tuesday, May 26, 2009.
SUSANNA SCOTT MIAMI UNIVERSITY Ecosystem Metabolism: Response to Storm Events.
WP12. Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal-shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Why? (in addition to the call text) Need to relate “today’s”
What Needs to be Done? Environmental Impacts Carol Turley and Jerry Blackford Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK CCS R & D Workshop, Royal Academy of Engineering,
Integrated sensing and modeling on a sensor node Yeonjeong Park and Tom Harmon UC Merced Environmental Systems program.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
7/18/05 Interdisciplinary Modeling for Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop Water Quality Modeling John J. Warwick, Director Division of.
Draft Hydrology science questions for WATER HM Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Water HM.
Development of a Community Hydrologic Information System Jeffery S. Horsburgh Utah State University David G. Tarboton Utah State University.
Temporal and Spatial Variability of Physical and Bio-optical Properties on the New York Bight Inner Continental Shelf G. C. Chang, T. D. Dickey Ocean Physics.
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
The new ECOOP suggestion from Norway (Met.no, NERSC, IMR) Why new? Because: Too little focus on clear objectives and specific products Products and services.
Upstream Engineering Centre Ocean predictions and the oil and gas industry - room for improvement? Colin Grant Metocean Technical Authority.
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SD RAS, Novosibirsk Mathematical models for ecological prognosis, design and monitoring.
Dr. Sarawut NINSAWAT GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST Development of OGC Framework for Estimating Near Real-time Air.
The CLW Aquatic Systems Modelling Team Barbara Robson 20 May 2009.
4. CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK With the knowledge library developed within this research we are establishing a new integrated watershed modeling approach.
1 Using Multi-temporal MODIS 250 m Data to Calibrate and Validate a Sediment Transport Model for Environmental Monitoring of Coastal Waters.
A T HREE- D IMENSIONAL W ATER Q UALITY M ODEL OF S OUTHERN P UGET S OUND Greg Pelletier, P.E., Mindy Roberts, P.E., Skip Albertson, P.E., and Jan Newton,
Continuous Water-Quality Field Methods Micelis Doyle & Joe Rinella U.S. Geological Survey &
Water quality and river plume monitoring in the Great Barrier Reef: an overview of methods based on ocean colour satellite data Michelle Devlin 1, Caroline.
Interdisciplinary Integration and Research Directions CMOP possesses a wide range of interdisciplinary research assets - Biological - Chemical - Physical.
Regional Advanced School on Physical and Mathematical Tools for the study of Marine Processes of Coastal Areas Physical and Biogeochemical Coupled Modelling.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
1 Some Context for NMFS Ecosystem Modeling Ned Cyr NMFS Office of Science and Technology.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
SCCOOS Goals and Efforts Within COCMP, SCCOOS aims to develop products and procedures—based on observational data—that effectively evaluate and improve.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Modelling 1: Basic Introduction. What constitutes a “model”? Why do we use models? Calibration and validation. The basic concept of numerical integration.
Anoxia in Narragansett Bay Can we predict it?.
1 Enviromatics Environmental sampling Environmental sampling Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
TRANCAT Fifth Framework Programme ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2nd - 3rd October 2003: SECOND TRANSCAT MEETING ARPAL Regional.
Lake Pusiano field experiment: first preliminary results Greg Attwater & Diego Copetti, Supervisors: Giannni Tartari & Jorg Imberger.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate a suite of management scenarios to address the Old Tampa Bay issues using integrated modeling tools.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
Introduction to Ecosystem Monitoring and Metabolism
DataONE: Preserving Data and Enabling Data-Intensive Biological and Environmental Research Bob Cook Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National.
2006 OCRT Meeting, Providence Assessment of River Margin Air-Sea CO 2 Fluxes Steven E. Lohrenz, Wei-Jun Cai, Xiaogang Chen, Merritt Tuel, and Feizhou Chen.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Hydrodynamic, Water Quality, and Ecological Modeling to Assess System-wide Impacts.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Regional Advanced School on Physical and Mathematical Tools for the study of Marine Processes of Coastal Areas A new Mechanistic Modular Ecological Model:
Ghent University, Renard Centre of Marine Geology Management Unit of the Mathematical Models of the North Sea Catholic University Leuven, Hydraulics Laboratory.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
WLRD Science Seminar Sammamish River Water Quality Model Status Report November 19, 2002.
An amphipod that couldn’t escape our nets. Figure 1: This screenshot shows the controlling page for running model animations. The boxes indicate areas.
David J. Schwab NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
Nam Songkhram model application and field work MRCS WUP-FIN.
Towards a network of automatic lake water quality monitoring buoys in the UK Background Microbial growth and physical processes, such as mixing events,
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
US Environmental Protection Agency
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
AquaSpace Case Study Houtman – Abrolhos Archipelago, Western Australia: Issues and Tools The research leading to these results has been undertaken as.
Discussion Session: FAMOS, Oct. 2013
D. Green1, C. Brown1, F. Aikman1, A. Siebers1, H. Tolman1, M. Ji1, D
Eutrophication indicators PSA & EUTRISK
CRITICAL GAPS: OCEANS IN THE EARTH SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Adaptive modelling of water quality using real time data from lake observatories - can we do it? Dr. Matthew Hipsey School of Earth & Environment University of Western Australia GLEON8: New Zealand, Feb 2009.

Models as Virtual Environmental Laboratories Reconcile theory with observation Improve system understanding: Quantify processes and controls on variabilities Risk assessments Conduct system budgets (eg. nutrients, metals) Assess management interventions (eg. scenarios): Flushing/diversions Chemical amelioration Engineering interventions Real-time prediction: Alerts Fore-casting

Model Diversity Physical, chemical, ecological Spatial dimension: 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D Structured / Un-structured domains Data-driven, conceptual, process-based, hybrid …

Hydrodynamic Models

CAEDYM Computational Aquatic Ecosystem Dynamics Model Developed since 1998 A generic & versatile water quality model: Process-based Couples to 1, 2 & 3D hydrodynamic models Modular, easily extensible Large international user-base, research and industry

Numerical Models DYRIM DYRESM Quasi 2D: Rivers/ Floodplains 1D: Lakes / Reservoirs / Wetlands CAEDYM Water Quality DIVAST 2D: Rivers/ Floodplains Freeware All models written in Fortran 95 Models run on Windows, Linux and MacOSX ELCOM 3D: Estuaries / Lakes / Coastal Oceans

CAEDYM v3 Computational Aquatic Ecosystem Dynamics Model Suspended sediment (SS) Oxygen (DO) Organic nutrients (POM, DOM) Inorganic nutrients (NH4, NO3, PO4, SiO2, DIC) Heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) Phytoplankton (Chl-a/C, internal nutrients, metabolites) Higher biology (zooplankton, fish, larvae) Benthic biology (macroalgae, clams, seagrasses) Pathogens & microbial indicators (crypto, coliforms, viruses) Geochemistry (pH, major ions, minerals, metals) Sediment diagenesis

Coupling Hydrodynamic Driver Scalar transport Thermodynamics Mixing Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions File Input / Output Data Storage Wetting and Drying CAEDYM Water Quality Surface Oxygen Dynamics Suspended Solids Extinction Coefficient Density

The Importance of Monitoring Monitoring data is critical for establishing the baseline condition of an environmental system, and to observe how it is changing due to multiple pressures Critical for the success of any modelling study - “rubbish in = rubbish out” Studies conducted with a paucity of available data are more uncertain Most ‘routine’ monitoring programs are good for long-term ecosystem observing, but poor for developing process understanding, or validating models - mismatch in time and space scales of the processes of interest and the observations Strategic (‘targeted’) monitoring is necessary for process understanding and more useful for model validation (and parameterisation)

Required Data Inflow/Outflows: Meteorological Data: WQ Parameter Data: River inflows, water quality Groundwater contribution Tide (if connected to ocean) Extractions Meteorological Data: Solar radiation; Long-wave Radiation Wind speed and direction Air temperature & humidity WQ Parameter Data: SOD, nutrient fluxes Phyto assemblage Organic Matter Validation Data: Water levels Temp, Salinity, DO Nutrients, Chemistry Chl-a

(Near-) Real-time Monitoring Large array of sensors for in situ (and real-time) environmental measurements Physical: T, S Velocity Water levels etc. Chemical: Nutrients, DO, pH Bio-sensors: metals, contaminants Biological: Not much … chl-a Remote Sensing: Temp, Chl-a, Colour/Turbidity

WQ Model Validation Models are complex assemblies of multiple, constituent hypotheses that must be tested against field data Large models and large data-sets make validation difficult Multi-parameter optimisation Under-determined system Data aliasing Mis-match of temporal and spatial scales Current approach: Ad hoc manual calibration Mathematic optimisation routines Split hind-cast into “training” and “testing” Fixed parameters values over the life of a simulation

Model Evaluation

Strategic Approach to Validation Identify available data Fix ‘universal’ parameters Measure site-specific parameters Cross-system validation Assimilate available real-time data (‘machine-learning’)

Examples: Yeates and Imberger (2008) Adiyanti et al (2007) Thermistor chain assimilation into ELCOM to improve predictions of stratification and internal wave climate Adiyanti et al (2007) Changes in thermal structure linked to optical properties and used to back-calculate pigment densitiies High resolution oxygen sensor data assimilation Respiration and photosynthesis estimates

Real-time Management Systems A Real-time Management Systems is the coordinator of the numerous data types (real and virtual) and provides a means of integrating diverse data sets into a central relational database Automate the collection, storage and management of real-time data Provide high temporal resolution environmental data Interface with non-real-time data to provide common repository for all data Can be used to prepare model files and run simulations Calculate environmental and sustainability indices Online visualisation for all data and models Set-up to provide email/SMS alerts and other useful information

Real-time Management Systems

‘Hybrid’ Systems Data sensors Data assimilation and transmission Data checking, processing and in-filling Data visualisation (local and online) Virtual domains: Models Alerts, forecasts, summary reports Data and Model Integration Data ‘drives’ models Model results used to adjust sampling Real-time data assimilated using computational intelligence algorithms to improve models Knowledge discovery (‘Hydro-informatics’) Online system configuration (and potentially control) System optimisation

Adaptive Management

Current Frontiers Improved sensing: Chemical Biological (eg. cytometry) Improved mechanistic basis for process descriptions: Phytoplankton physiology Bacteria and micro-zooplankton – the microbial loop Meso-zooplankton and fish – agent based models Sediment-water interaction Benthic ecology linkages ‘Hybrid’ management systems Hydro-informatics - learning from enormous volumes of data Dozens of simulated variables – maybe up to 10 measured at one or two locations … Managing uncertainty Interfacing science with social and environmental management objectives Adaptive control