Www.franklinengineering.com FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro 615-591-0058.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSW NESHAP Control Requirements Contains the same requirements as NSPS/EG. Requires gas collection and control system (GCCS) for same landfill as NSPS/EG.
Advertisements

METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous & Explosive Chemicals Operating Procedures, Safety Procedures & Training.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis A Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tabulates failure modes of equipment and their effects on a system or plant.
Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
Process Hazard Analysis Revalidations If you’d like to reach SCS Engineers, Tracer Environmental Division please contact us at:
Effective Workplace Safety Inspections OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS PREVENTION UNIT.
Control of Hazardous Energy – Lockout/Tagout 29 CFR
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Controlling Risk by Managing Change Jessica Blaydes & Gary Fobare Honeywell Aerospace 2013 Region IX Workshop.
Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous & Explosive Chemicals Contractor Pre-Qualification, Emergency Preparedness, Incident Investigation, Audits.
Secondary Aluminum NESHAP 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR Example Malfunction Plan for Plant ABC Final April 3, 2003 Information Transfer and Program Integration.
Elements of Process Safety Management
Lockout/Tagout Authorized Employee Slide Show Notes
Process Safety Management
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Company duties under the ISM Code
ISO OPERATIONAL CONTROL
Procedure Writing Basics Mr. Richard Crisler Spring-2006.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,
Presented by: Meg Boyd The Blue Mountains Drinking Water System: DWQMS Overview.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Mechanical Integrity Written Procedures. Lesson Objectives  Describe Required Written Procedures for Establishing an MI Program  List Acceptable Sources.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training Session 9: Stores and Supplies Management.
Important informations
Ergonomics Regulatory Requirements Bawan Saravanabawan, Labour Program, HRSDC February 4, 2008.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 2 Prepare and supply washed and.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis A Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tabulates failure modes of equipment and their effects on a system or plant.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
06/01/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2002:1 Use of pressure equipment.
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
2011 PLANT OPERATIONS MODULE 8 Maintain Bulk Plant Systems and Equipment.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
DOCUMENTATION ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Documentation.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Lockout/Tagout Authorized Employee.
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
- HEMIC Facility Inspections. Common Losses A fire breaks out in a 16 story office building An employee had the tips of two fingers amputated Could these.
Lockout/tagout for authorized employee
Personnel.
Preparing for Permit Review
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Management of Change Report Errors to Management.
leaks thru rupture sticks open closed
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro Ext. 236

Why do we Prepare Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plans (SSMP)? SSMPs are required under General Provisions for MACT standards (40 CFR Part 63), specifically §63.6(e)(3)(i), which states: The owner or operator of an affected source must develop a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction; and a program of corrective action for malfunctioning process, air pollution control, and monitoring equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. Sections that address SSM requirements are: §63.6(e)(3) - Requirements to develop SSMP §63.10(b)(2) - Recordkeeping §63.10(d)(5) - Reporting Note…CFR citations are from e-CFR at FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

The purpose of the SSMP is to minimize emission during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions. Ensure proper operation and maintenance to satisfy the general duty clause to minimize emissions Ensure that malfunctions are addressed as soon as practicable after they occur in order to minimize emissions Reduce the reporting burden associated with SSM events FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Definitions Startup means the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown means the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Malfunction means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner which causes, or has the potential to cause, the emission limitations in an applicable standard to be exceeded. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

How do we develop an SSMP? Contents of the Document General description of affected system   Block diagram or P&ID of affected system   What is covered and what isn’t covered Regulatory checklist   Lists all SSM requirements in 63.6 and 63.10, as well as any in the specific MACT standard   Specify where the requirement is documented (SSMP section, SOP #, etc.) Procedures   Incorporate existing procedures by reference to the extent possible FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

How do we develop an SSMP? (Cont’d) Contents of the Document General descriptions of events (SSM)   Define when startup and shutdown events start and are completed from an SSMP standpoint   Define what can and can’t be done during startup and shutdown   Include (or reference) flowcharts if appropriate   Discuss startup, shutdown and malfunctions checklists and include as attachments to SSMP   Discuss and include emergency shutdown procedures Malfunctions and Correctives Measures Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements   Clearly define requirements   Include example forms to use in reports FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Startup and Shutdown Most facilities have existing startup and shutdown procedures Do not reinvent the wheel … reference existing procedures if applicable FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Malfunctions Our approach is similar to a Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) review approach used for Process Hazards Analysis (PHA), except that the evaluation is focused on events that can cause potential excess emissions instead of events that can result in a safety hazard. Participants should include: Coordinator Scribe EHS Staff Operations Staff Maintenance Staff Engineering FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

SSMP Malfunctions Analysis The SSMP should define: Potential causes of malfunctions Potential malfunctions (only as specific as necessary) Measures to minimize the frequency of malfunctions Measures to minimize the severity of malfunctions FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

First Define Potential Causes of Malfunctions Examples: Failure of plant utility (steam, air, water, power, etc.) Mechanical failure of rotating equipment Electrical failure of instrumentation Plugging of lines/nozzles Mechanical or electrical failure of actuated valves or dampers Failure of control system Physical failure of internal equipment FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Define Major Category Items for Review Each unit operation needs to be shown on flow diagram General facility events (e.g., loss of plant electrical supply or loss of steam supply) Specific unit operations, both emission source and control equipment, for example:   Tank   Combustion chamber   Baghouse   Scrubber

Define Unit Operation-Specific Malfunctions Use causes identified above, and identify whether the cause is applicable to the unit operation (using the flow diagram or P&ID) For each identified potential cause, how can the cause manifest as a malfunction? (complex process will require a P&ID) Do not consider mitigating factors at this point For each identified potential cause, can the identified malfunctions result in an emissions excursion? If not, it should not be addressed in the SSMP. FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Define Unit Operation-Specific Malfunctions (Cont’d) Example – Packed Column Scrubber: A loss of city water results in a loss of makeup water to the packed column scrubber The loss of makeup water results in less efficient acid gas scrubbing Less efficient acid gas scrubbing could result in an emissions exceedance FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Define Measures to Minimize Frequency of Malfunctions Well trained and qualified operations and maintenance personnel System design consistent with good engineering practice Appropriate operating and maintenance practices and procedures Appropriate setpoints for alarms and interlocks Failure positions for critical equipment FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Well trained and qualified operations and maintenance personnel Design of system (i.e., redundant equipment and instrumentation) Alarms and interlocks Failure positions for critical equipment FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Define Measures to Minimize Severity of Malfunctions

Develop a Program of Corrective Action for Malfunctions For each malfunction identified, provide a list of corrective steps to be taken Example: 5.1Loss of Plant Water Flow to Scrubber 5.1.1In case of loss of plant water supply, see item In case of plugging/mechanical failure of line or line component: Identify the location of plugging or line failure Clear line plugging and/or service/replace faulty line components, as needed In case of mechanical/electrical failure of actuated valve: Identify cause of actuation failure Service/replace electrical and/or pneumatic components, as needed Service/replace actuator and/or valve components, as needed In case of physical/electrical failure of control system component: Identify faulty control system component Service/replace control system components, as needed. FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Implementation USE CHECKLISTS FOR SSM EVENTS! Startup checklist items Date, time, and duration List of operational steps with a checkbox for each step Statement as to whether actions were consistent with procedure(s) If actions were not consistent with procedure(s), what actions were taken Signature of operator(s) FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Implementation (Cont’) USE CHECKLISTS FOR SSM EVENTS! Shutdown checklist items Same as startup checklist except that operational steps are for shutting the equipment down Malfunctions checklist items Date, time, and duration Description of the malfunction and the cause, if known Description of the operator’s response and corrective actions taken Statement as to whether actions were consistent with procedure(s) and SSMP If actions were not consistent with procedure(s) and SSMP, what actions were taken FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Recordkeeping Occurrence and duration of startup/shutdown if an emission exceedance occurs Occurrence and duration of each malfunction Maintenance records for air pollution control and monitoring equipment Actions taken during SSM inconsistent with SSMP Records to demonstrate conformance with SSMP Use checklists for SSM events to meet these requirements FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Reporting Periodic SSM Reports are required semi-annually and must include a summary of the records collected for SSM events during the previous 6 months. Immediate SSM Reports are required within 2 days (verbal or fax), followed by a letter within 7 days, if actions during startup or shutdown are inconsistent with SSMP and excess emissions occurred. Immediate SSM Reports are also required any time actions during a malfunction are inconsistent with the SSMP. FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.

Final Thoughts SSMP is a living document and needs to be revised as process changes are implemented SSMP should be reviewed regularly by operations staff and EHS staff for correctness and completeness (once a year may be sufficient) If facility uses a Management of Change (MOC) program, consider including SSMP as an item in MOC reviews to ensure that it is updated when a process change is made FRANKLIN engineering group, inc.