CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,

Advertisements

IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.

Oregon Terascale Workshop March 7, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Northwest Terascale Workshop Modeling Min-Bias and the Underlying Event Rick.

November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.

ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.

HEP Seminar - Baylor Waco, January 21, 2014 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV 900.

University of Toronto March 18, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.

University of California, Berkeley January 13, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University.

2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 

Cambridge Workshop July 18, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Sources of b-Quarks at the Tevatron  Important to have good leading (or leading-log)

IPPP Seminar Durham, September 8, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.

Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.

Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.

Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 29, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.

2015 London, September 1, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.

D0 Meeting September 6, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an antiproton.

C2CR07-Lake Tahoe February 28, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 C2CR07 Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF Collaboration) CDF Run 2 Min-Bias.

Workshop on Early LHC Physics May 6, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC Rick Field University of.

LPC CMS Workshop June 8, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CMSPage 1 LPC Mini-Workshop on Early CMS Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for the.

MC4LHC Workshop July 17-26, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 Monte Carlos for the LHC Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 MC4LHC Tuning the Monte-Carlo.

Perugia, Italy October 27, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of.

LHC2010 Conference at Michigan Ann Arbor MI, December 12, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 LHC First Data Rick Field University of Florida Outline.

St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.

MCnet07 - Durham - Part 1 April 18-20, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Physics and Techniques of Event Generators Rick Field University of Florida.

The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.

PIC 2011, Vancouver August 29, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Physics in Collision Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Examine.

Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.

CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.

LPCC MB&UE Meeting CERN June 17, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS ATLAS.

University of Virginia April 10, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 a Rick Field University of Florida Outline  How Universal are the QCD MC Model.

UE&MB Working Group Meeting LPCC May 31, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Early LHC Measurements Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk.

2010 Glasgow, November 30, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk  Discuss the.

ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.

TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 20, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 TeV4LHC Workshop Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 Talk #1.

ISMD2004 July 27, 2004 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Rick Field (theorist?) “Jet Formation in QCD”

Cambridge Workshop July 20, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an.

Energy Dependence of the UE

“softQCD” and Correlations Rick Field & Nick Van Remortel

Physics and Techniques of Event Generators

Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

Lake Louise Winter Institute

MB&UE Working Group Meeting UE Lessons Learned & What’s Next

PHZ 6358 Fall 2011 The Modeling of the Underlying Event Rick Field

A Closer Look at the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF

The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)

MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1

Predicting MB & UE at the LHC

Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC

Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009

Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC

“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at CDF

Monte-Carlo Generators for CMS

Min-Bias and the Underlying Event in Run 2

Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

The Tevatron Connection

“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC

XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics

The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile

The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF

CDF Run 2 Monte-Carlo Tunes

International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics

“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC

Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

QCD Monte-Carlo Generators in Run 2 at CDF

The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes

Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity

PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II

Rick Field - Florida/CDF

The “Underlying Event” at CDF and CMS

Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

Presentation transcript:

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”. Outline of Talk  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with the properties of the “calorimeter jets” as measured in Run 2.  Use PYTHIA Tune A to correct the Run 2 data from measured to “true”.  Compare PYTHIA Tune A before and after CDFSIM. Construct “correction factors”! JetClu R = 0.7

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 2 “Underlying Event” as defined by “Charged particle Jets”  Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle  relative to the leading charged particle jet.  Define |  | 120 o as “Away”.  All three regions have the same size in  -  space,  x  = 2x120 o = 4  /3. Charged Particle  Correlations P T > 0.5 GeV/c |  | < 1 Toward-side “jet” (always) Away-side “jet” (sometimes) Perpendicular to the plane of the 2-to-2 hard scattering “Transverse” region is very sensitive to the “underlying event”! Look at the charged particle density in the “transverse” region!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 3 Tuned PYTHIA Run 1 Tune A  Compares the average “transverse” charge particle density (|  | 0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#1) and the P T distribution of the “transverse” and “Min-Bias” densities with the QCD Monte-Carlo predictions of a tuned version of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0, CTEQ5L, Set A). Set A Min-Bias = 0.24 Describes “Min-Bias” collisions! Describes the “underlying event”! “Min-Bias” Set A P T (charged jet#1) > 30 GeV/c “Transverse” = 0.60 Describes the rise from “Min-Bias” to “underlying event”!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 4 “Transverse” Charged Particle Density “Transverse” Charged Particle Density  Shows the data on the average “transverse” charge particle density (|  | 0.5 GeV) as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged particle jet from Run 1.  Compares the Run 2 data (Min-Bias, JET20, JET50, JET70, JET100) with Run 1. The errors on the (uncorrected) Run 2 data include both statistical and correlated systematic uncertainties. “Transverse” region as defined by the leading “charged particle jet” Excellent agreement between Run 1 and 2! PYTHIA Tune A was tuned to fit the “underlying event” in Run I!  Shows the prediction of PYTHIA Tune A at 1.96 TeV after detector simulation (i.e. after CDFSIM).

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 5 “Transverse” Charged PTsum Density “Transverse” Charged PTsum Density  Shows the data on the average “transverse” charged PTsum density (|  | 0.5 GeV) as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged particle jet from Run 1.  Compares the Run 2 data (Min-Bias, JET20, JET50, JET70, JET100) with Run 1. The errors on the (uncorrected) Run 2 data include both statistical and correlated systematic uncertainties. “Transverse” region as defined by the leading “charged particle jet” Excellent agreement between Run 1 and 2!  Shows the prediction of PYTHIA Tune A at 1.96 TeV after detector simulation (i.e. after CDFSIM). PYTHIA Tune A was tuned to fit the “underlying event” in Run I!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 6 “Underlying Event” as defined by “Calorimeter Jets”  Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle  relative to the leading JetClu jet.  Define |  | 120 o as “Away”.  All three regions have the same size in  -  space,  x  = 2x120 o = 4  /3. Charged Particle  Correlations P T > 0.5 GeV/c |  | < 1 Away-side “jet” (sometimes) Perpendicular to the plane of the 2-to-2 hard scattering “Transverse” region is very sensitive to the “underlying event”! Look at the charged particle density in the “transverse” region!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 7 “Transverse” Charged Particle Density  Shows the data on the average “transverse” charge particle density (|  | 0.5 GeV) as a function of the transverse energy of the leading JetClu jet (R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 2) from Run 2.  Compares the “transverse” region of the leading “charged particle jet”, chgjet#1, with the “transverse” region of the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu R = 0.7), jet#1., compared with PYTHIA Tune A after CDFSIM. “Transverse” region as defined by the leading “calorimeter jet”

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 8 “Transverse” Charged PTsum Density  Shows the data on the average “transverse” charged PTsum density (|  | 0.5 GeV) as a function of the transverse energy of the leading JetClu jet (R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 2) from Run 2.  Compares the “transverse” region of the leading “charged particle jet”, chgjet#1, with the “transverse” region of the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu R = 0.7), jet#1., compared with PYTHIA Tune A after CDFSIM. “Transverse” region as defined by the leading “calorimeter jet”

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 9 “Transverse” Charged Particle Density  Shows the data on the average “transverse” charge particle density (|  | 0.5 GeV) as a function of the transverse energy of the leading JetClu jet (R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 2) from Run 2.  Shows the generated prediction of PYTHIA Tune A before CDFSIM., compared with PYTHIA Tune A after CDFSIM. “Transverse” region as defined by the leading “calorimeter jet”  Shows the ratio CDFSIM/Generated for PYTHIA Tune A. Small correction (about 10%) independent of E T (jet#1)!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 10 The Leading “Charged Particle” Jet  Shows the data on the average number of charged particles within the leading “charged particle jet” (|  | 0.5 GeV, R = 0.7) as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading “charged particle jet” from Run 1.  Compares the Run 2 data (Min-Bias, JET20, JET50, JET70, JET100) with Run 1. The errors on the (uncorrected) Run 2 data include both statistical and correlated systematic uncertainties. Excellent agreement between Run 1 and 2! PYTHIA produces too many charged particles in the leading “charged particle jet”!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 11 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet  Shows the Run 2 data on the average number of charged particles (|  | 0.5 GeV, R = 0.7) within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu R = 0.7, |  (jet)|< 0.7) as a function of the transverse energy of the leading “calorimeter jet”.  Compares the number of charged particles within the leading “charged particle jet”, chgjet#1, with the number of charged particles within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu R = 0.7), jet#1. PYTHIA produces too many charged particles in the leading “calorimeter jet”!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 12 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet Charged Particle Multiplicity  Shows the Run 2 data on the average number of charged particles (|  | 0.5 GeV, R = 0.7) within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu R = 0.7, |  (jet)|< 0.7) as a function of E T (jet#1) compared with PYTHIA Tune A after CDFSIM.  Shows the generated prediction of PYTHIA Tune A before CDFSIM.  Shows the ratio CDFSIM/Generated for PYTHIA Tune A. Correction becomes large for E T (jet#1) > 100 GeV and depends on E T (jet#1)!  Shows “corrected” Run 2 data compared with PYTHIA Tune A (uncorrected). Multiply data by the “unfolding function” (i.e. Generated/CDFSIM) determined from PYTHIA Tune A to get “corrected” data.

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 13 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet Charged P T Distribution  Shows the transverse momentum distribution of charged particles (|  |<1) within the leading “charged particle jet” compared with PYTHIA Tune A. The plot shows dN chg /dz with z = P T /P T (chgjet#1) for the range 30 < P T (chgjet#1) < 70 GeV/c.  Shows the transverse momentum distribution of charged particles (|  |<1) within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu, R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 0.7) compared with PYTHIA Tune A. The plot shows dN chg /dz with z = P T /E T (jet#1) for the range 30 < E T (jet#1) < 70 GeV. PYTHIA produces too many “soft” charged particles within the leading “jet”! The integral of F(z) is the average number of charged particles within the leading “charged particle jet”. PYTHIA produces too many “soft” charged particles within the leading “jet”!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 14 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet Charged PT sum & PT max Fraction  Shows average charged PTsum fraction, PTsum/E T (jet#1), and the average charged PTmax fraction, PTmax/E T (jet#1), within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu, R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 0.7) compared with PYTHIA Tune A.  Shows distribution of the charged PTsum fraction, z = PTsum/E T (jet#1), and the distribution of charged PTmax fraction, z = PTmax/E T (jet#1), within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu, R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 0.7) for the range 95 < E T (jet#1) < 130 GeV compared with PYTHIA Tune A. PYTHIA does okay on the charged PTmax fraction! But PYTHIA does not do well on the charged PTsum fraction! But PYTHIA does not do as well on the charged PTsum fraction!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 15 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet Charged PT sum Fraction  Shows average charged PTsum fraction, PTsum/E T (jet#1), within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu, R = 0.7, |  (jet)| < 0.7) compared with PYTHIA Tune A after CDFSIM.  Shows the generated prediction of PYTHIA Tune A before CDFSIM.  Shows the ratio CDFSIM/Generated for PYTHIA Tune A. Very large correction that depends on E T (jet#1)!  Shows “corrected” Run 2 data compared with PYTHIA Tune A (uncorrected). Multiply data by the “unfolding function” (i.e. Generated/CDFSIM) determined from PYTHIA Tune A to get “corrected” data.

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 16 Proton-AntiProton Collisions  Draw an R = 0.7 cone around the leading calorimeter jet (JetClu, R = 0.7).  Look at charged particles within R = 0.7 of the leading calorimeter jet. Momentum perpendicular to the jet axis Momentum perpendicular to the beam axis

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 17 The Leading “Calorimeter” Jet Charged K T Distribution  Shows the average momentum perpendicular to the jet axis for charged particles (P T > 0.5 GeV/c, |  |<1) within the leading “calorimeter jet” (JetClu, R = 0.7) compared with PYTHIA Tune A.  Shows the distribution of momentum perpendicular to the jet axis for charged particles within the leading “calorimeter jet” compared with PYTHIA Tune A. The plot shows dN chg /dK T for the range 30 < E T (jet#1) < 70 GeV and 95 < E T (jet#1) < 130 GeV. Increases as E T (jet#1) increases!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 18 Inclusive Jet Cross Section  Shows the uncorrected inclusive “calorimeter jet” cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM).  Shows the ratio of the uncorrected inclusive “calorimeter jet” cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042) to PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM). Very similar to Frank Chlebana’s “corrected” plots! Data and theory are normalized to agree at this one point. This fixes the normalization for all the other plots presented in this talk!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 19 Inclusive Cross-Section “Correction Factors”  Shows PYTHIA Tune A + CDFSIM inclusive “calorimeter jet” cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7) compared with the “true” cross-section where “true” is the PT sum of all hadrons (partons) with P T > 0 in R = 0.7 cone around JetClu. Measured “True” Correction factors! “True”

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 20 Jet Cross Sections  Shows the Run 2 uncorrected inclusive “calorimeter jet” cross-section and the leading “calorimeter jet” cross-section (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042).  Shows the ratio of the leading jet cross section to the inclusive jet cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM). Measures how much cross-section comes from >1 jet!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 21 Jet Cross Sections  Shows the uncorrected inclusive jet cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM).  Shows the ratio of the uncorrected inclusive jet cross-section for (JetClu, R = 0.7, energy scale factor of 1.042) to PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM). Tansverse momentum of the hard 2-to-2 parton-parton collision!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 22 Leading “Charged Particle Jet” Cross Section  Shows the uncorrected leading “charged particle jet” cross-section for (P T > 0.5 GeV/c, |  |<1) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM).  Shows the ratio of the uncorrected leading “charged particle jet” cross-section for (P T > 0.5 GeV/c, |  |<1) to PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM). Compares data/theory for the leading charged particle jet and the leading calorimeter jet!

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 23 Summary & Conclusions PYTHIA Tune A  PYTHIA Tune A does a good job of describing the “underlying event” in the Run 2 data as defined by “charged particle jets” and as defined by “calorimeter jets”. HERWIG Run 2 comparisons will be coming soon!  PYTHIA Tune A does a fairly good job (although not perfect) describing the properties of the “calorimeter jets” in Run 2 (in the central region!).  I am hoping we can use the QCD Monte-Carlo models (PYTHIA & HERWIG) to correct the data from measured to “true” by constructing “correction factors” for every observable of interest. This is a different method from the “jet energy corrections” used in Run 1!