Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.

Published byAlaina Randall Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005.

2 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 2 Outline: II.Hadron collisions: how can we model them?  Describing soft hadronic interactions. IV. LHC predictions; V. Conclusions. III. The underlying event in jet analysis; I. LHC and ATLAS;

3 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 3 Outline: II.Hadron collisions: how can we model them?  Describing soft hadronic interactions IV. LHC predictions; V. Conclusions. III. The underlying event in jet analysis I. LHC and ATLAS;

4 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 4

5 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 5 p-p√s = 14TeV  p-p collisions at √s = 14TeV  low-luminosity: L ≈ 2 x 10 33 cm -2 s -1 ( L ≈ 20 fb -1 /year)  high-luminosity: L ≈ 10 34 cm -2 s -1 ( L ≈ 100 fb -1 /year) Proton-proton collisions at the LHC p p quarksgluons Essentially all physics at LHC are connected to the interactions of quarks and gluons (small & large transferred momentum).  Hard processes (high-pT)  Hard processes (high-pT) : well described by perturbative QCD  Soft interactions (low-pT) (strong coupling constant,  s (Q 2 ), saturation effects,… )  Soft interactions (low-pT) : require non-perturbative phenomenological models (strong coupling constant,  s (Q 2 ), saturation effects,… ) underlying event “soft” The underlying event is dominated by “soft” partonic interactions.

6 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 6 Models for soft hadronic interactions Uncorrelated soft scatter Uncorrelated soft scatter – HERWIG/UA5 model (S.U.E.) (http://hepwww.rl.ac.uk/theory/seymour/herwig/ )http://hepwww.rl.ac.uk/theory/seymour/herwig/ Questionable modelling for: 1.Energy dependence; 2.Minimum-bias and UE hard component; Multiple interactions: Multiple interactions: Soft partonic scatters matched to hard 2  2 scatters: PYTHIA PYTHIA ( several options ) (http://www.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/Pythia.html)http://www.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/Pythia.html pt0pt0 n ~ σ int ↓ pt 0 ↑ n (and vice-versa) PHOJET PHOJET ( based on DPM ) (http://www-ik.fzk.de/%7Eengel/phojet.html)http://www-ik.fzk.de/%7Eengel/phojet.html JIMMY JIMMY ( multiple parton interactions – b-space picture ) (http://jetweb.hep.ucl.ac.uk/JIMMY/index.html )

7 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 7 II.Hadron collisions: how can we model them?  Describing soft hadronic interactions IV. LHC predictions; V. Conclusions. III. The underlying event in jet analysis I. LHC and ATLAS;

8 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 8 Underlying event in charged jet evolution (CDF analysis – Run I data) It is not  It is not only minimum bias event!  Sometimes, the underlying event can also be defined as everything in the collision except the hard process.  The underlying event has hard (multiple “semi-hard” parton scatterings) and soft components (beam-beam remnants).  ljet CDF analysis: charged particles: p t >0.5 GeV and | η | 0.5 GeV and | η | <1 cone jet finder: UE is defined as the Transverse Region except  All particles from a single particle collision except the process of interest. Phys. Rev. D, 65 092002 (2002)

9 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 9 distributions (particles from different angular regions) distributions (particles from different angular regions) - event - event - leading jet - leading jet - away region - away region - UE - UE Phys. Rev. D, 65 092002 (2002)

10 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 10 and distributions (particles from the underlying event) and distributions (particles from the underlying event) Average p T sum (GeV) of charged particles in the underlying event associated to a leading jet with P t ljet (GeV). Average multiplicity of charged particles in the underlying event associated to a leading jet with P t ljet (GeV). dN chg /dη ~ 10 Central Region (min-bias data dN chg /dη ~ 4) ~ 3 GeV ~ 3 GeV ~ 1.3 GeV ~ 1.3 GeV Central Region (min-bias data ~ 0.5 GeV )

11 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 11 Tuning models to the underlying event Small, dense core-size generates more multiplicity in the UE. Similarly to the observed for min-bias distributions, varying the lower p T cut-off also changes the particle density (and p T density) in the UE. Particle density in the UE decreases as p T min rises!

12 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 12 p T ljet > 5 GeV p T ljet > 30 GeV ~ 3GeV CDF analysis – Run I data Phys. Rev. D, 65 092002 (2002) Measurements recently made available for tuning models

13 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 13 maximum parton virtuality allowed in showers Q 2 scale of the hard scattering is multiplied by a factor to define the maximum parton virtuality allowed in showers. = 4 = 4 harder p T spectrum =1 =1 p T ljet > 30 GeV

14 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 14 PYTHIA6.2 tunings PHOJET1.12 Examples of MC tunings for the UE Used for DC2 production…

15 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 15 HERWIG6.5 + JIMMY4.1 tunings Transverse P t (leading jet in GeV) Ratio (MC/Data) JIMMY4.1 – Tuning A Proton radius shrunk by 1.73 JIMMY4.1 – Tuning B Transverse Ratio (MC/Data) P t (leading jet in GeV) (http://jetweb.hep.ucl.ac.uk/) p T min reduced from its default value

16 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 16 LHC predictions: JIMMY4.1 Tunings A and B vs. PYTHIA6.214 – ATLAS Tuning Transverse P t (leading jet in GeV) Tevatron LHC x 4 x 5 x 3

17 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 17 Predictions for the UE: from Tevatron to LHC energies Measurement JIMMY4.1PYTHIA6.214 PHOJET1.12Data Tuning ATuning BATLAS TuningCDF Tuning pT ljet > 10 GeV 2.42.32.42.32.1 2.3 pT ljet > 10 GeV 2.52.12.32.62.0 2.6 pT ljet > 10 GeV 12.29.26.64.73.0“?” pT ljet > 10 GeV 11.58.57.56.53.5“?” Tevatron LHC x 3x 2 LHC x 5x 4 x 1.5 x “?”

18 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 18  Two cones in  space are defined:  =  ljet (same as the leading jet)  =  ljet ± 90° R=0.7 P T 90max P T 90min P T 90max and P T 90min “MAX/MIN analysis” CDF analysis – Run I data The underlying event in Hard Interactions at the Tevatron ppbar collider, CDF Collaboration, PRD 70, 072002 (2004). Measurements recently made available for tuning models

19 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 19 “MAX/MIN analysis” CDF analysis – Run I data 630 GeV and 1800 GeV  The underlying event is measured for jet events at two different colliding energies: 630 GeV and 1800 GeV. energy extrapolation  This will provide important information on how to model the energy extrapolation in UE models.  s = 630 GeV  s = 1.8 TeV  s = 14 TeV   ?

20 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 20Conclusions: PYTHIA, PHOJET and HERWIG+JIMMY Current underlying event data can be described with appropriate tunings ( PYTHIA, PHOJET and HERWIG+JIMMY ). There are sizeable uncertainties in LHC predictions generated by different models. We need to understand better how to tune the energy dependence of the event activity: multiple parton scattering rate? (e.g. PYTHIA6.3) New MC models (e.g. PYTHIA6.3) and measurements can provide us with more tools to understand minimum-bias and the UE, and also to estimate more precisely this physics at the LHC. At the LHC, the best chance to the UE is at the low (very low?) luminosity runs. We are currently studying strategies to perform these measurements at ATLAS.

21 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 21 Backup…

22 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 22 Dijet azimuthal decorrelation Jets are defined in the central region using seed- based cone algorithm (R=0.7) leading jet p T max > 75 GeV second leading jet p T max > 40 GeV both leading p T jets: |y jet | < 0.5  dijet  jet1  jet2  =  Dijet production in hadron-hadron collisions result in  dijet  jet1  jet2  =  in the absence of radiative effects.  dijet  =   dijet  =   exactly two jets, no further radiation  dijet  small deviations from   dijet  small deviations from   additional soft radiation outside the jets  dijet  as small as 2    dijet  as small as 2    one additional high-p T jet small  dijet  – no limit small  dijet  – no limit  multiple additional hard jets in the event hep-ex/0409040 Sep. 2004

23 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 23 hep-ex/0409040 Sep. 2004  dijet  =  2     dijet     dijet  ~ 2       dijet   2  

24 IOP Conference, 21 st – 23 rd March 2005 A. M. Moraes 24 Dijet azimuthal decorrelation: ISR PARP(67) defines the maximum parton virtuality allowed in ISR showers (PARP(67) x hard scale Q 2 ) PARP(67)=1 (default): distributions underestimate the data! Need to increase the decorrelation effect, i.e. increase radiative and multiple interaction effects. Increasing PARP(67) (from 1 to 4) the azimuthal decorrelation is increased. Best value is somewhere between PARP(67)= 1 and 4!

Download ppt "The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March."

Similar presentations

Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July 6 - 12, 2003.

Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April 15 2004 The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,
 gg→H for different MCs: uncertainties due to jet veto G. Davatz, ETH Zurich.

 gg→H for different MCs: uncertainties due to jet veto G. Davatz, ETH Zurich.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
IMFP2006 - Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.

IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.
Oregon Terascale Workshop March 7, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Northwest Terascale Workshop Modeling Min-Bias and the Underlying Event Rick.

Oregon Terascale Workshop March 7, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Northwest Terascale Workshop Modeling Min-Bias and the Underlying Event Rick.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.

November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.

ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.
HEP Seminar - Baylor Waco, January 21, 2014 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV 900.

HEP Seminar - Baylor Waco, January 21, 2014 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV 900.
University of Toronto March 18, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.

University of Toronto March 18, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
University of California, Berkeley January 13, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University.

University of California, Berkeley January 13, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 

2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
IPPP Seminar Durham, September 8, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.

IPPP Seminar Durham, September 8, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.

Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.

Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.

Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 29, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.

Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 29, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
2015 London, September 1, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.

2015 London, September 1, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.
D0 Meeting September 6, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an antiproton.

D0 Meeting September 6, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an antiproton.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google