MONITORING AND EVALUATION A GENERAL OVERVIEW A PRESENTATION AT ISSER 28 June, 2013 By Bruno B. Dery.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Advertisements

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
PERSONAL ACTION PLAN – Paul Amevor (OICI-GH) Presentation Outline Review of current OICI M&E System Review of current OICI M&E System Key lessons learnt.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
IFAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION HOTEL, ACCRA DEC August 7,
MDBS Annual Review: 2010 Results: National Development Agenda M&E Sector Working Group May 2011.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
CONCEPT NOTE SUPPORT FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF IMPROVED RICE TECHNOLOGIES MOFA/CARD/GHANA/CONCEPT NOTE/MAY11 1 TEAM MEMBERS:  GORDON EKEKPI – MOFA/RSSP.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 M&E SUPPORT TO PLANNING & BUDGET IN GHANA Presentation by CAPT. P.I DONKOR (rtd) National Development Planning Commission, Ghana.
MAF’s M & E System Development Achievements and Ways Forward SWG-ARD, September 30, 2014 DoPC, MAF By: Somphathay Liengsone Deputy Director of Project.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITISATION OF USER NEEEDS Norah Madaya RRSF Meeting, Kigali, Rwanda August 2011.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Results-Based Management
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 17 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Evaluation of sector programmes and budget support operations in the context of EU development cooperation 1 st M&E Network Forum 07 to 08 November 2011.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Socioeconomic and Policy Research Program (SEPRP) - ICARDA Roberto Telleria, Agricultural.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Building Capacity for effective government wide Monitoring and Evaluation Mr Oliver Seale M&E Learning Network Tuesday, 15 May 2007.
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Independent Evaluation Group World Bank November 11, 2010 Evaluation of Bank Support for Gender and Development.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Consultative Group Meeting M&E Sector Working Group.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
IFPRI INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Mutual Accountability and Joint Sector Reviews in the Implementation of CAADP Godfrey Bahiigwa – IFPRI/ReSAKSS.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Provincial M&E Forum 18 August 2011 The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Draft National Evaluation Policy Framework.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Social Analysis Workshop on Country Analytical Work June 19, 2001 Anis Ahmad Dani World Bank, Social Development Department.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
DECENTRALISED MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROCESS IN GHANA UNDER THE GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY (GPRS II) AfCOP Annual Meeting MAURITIUS,
The AUC TVET Strategy for Youth Employme nt Windhoek, April 2014 Prudence Ngwenya Department for Human Resources Science & Technology.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation A useful Tool for Research Projects’ Administrators and Managers Folajogun V. Falaye. (Professor of Educational Research.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Community Score Card as a social accountability Approach Methodology and Applications March 2015.
Country Level Programs
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
Mrs.Dharshana Senanayake Director General
Presentation transcript:

MONITORING AND EVALUATION A GENERAL OVERVIEW A PRESENTATION AT ISSER 28 June, 2013 By Bruno B. Dery

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW PROJECT M&E SETTING UP AN M&E SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION

PROJECT M&E 1.BRAINSTORMING 2.M&E MAP 3.M&E LINKAGES AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL 4.M&E LINKAGES AT THE PROJECT LEVEL 5.UNDERSTANDING KEY CONCEPTS – Monitoring – Evaluation – PM&E OVERVIEW

POLICY, PLAN, M&E &BUDGET POLICY GSGDA POLICY GSGDA PLAN DISTRICT & SECTOR PLANS PLAN DISTRICT & SECTOR PLANS M&E DISTRICT&SECTOR M&E PLANS M&E DISTRICT&SECTOR M&E PLANS NATIONAL BUDGET

M&E CORE VALUES BUILD PARTNERSHIP AND OWNERSHIP Learn from Experience Increase Transparency and Accountabily More Informed Policies and Decisions Improve Goods and Service Delivery

1. MONITORING “A continuing function that uses systematic collection of data on specified indicators to provide management and the main stakeholders of an on-going development intervention with indications of the extent of progress and achievement of objectives and progress in the use of allocated funds”. (OECD, 2002) WHAT IS IT ?

3. Evaluation “The systematic and objective assessment of an on-going or completed project, programme or policy, its design, implementation and results in relation to specified evaluation criteria”. What is it ?

Distinguish M from E CriterionMonitoringEvaluation RationaleProvides basis for corrective action Provides assessment of continued relevance Focus  Was delivery according to plan?  What were the deviations?  Were they justifiable?  Relevance  Efficiency  Effectiveness  Impact  Sustainability Timing On-going during the life span of the intervention  Before, mid-point and at the end of the intervention  Impact evaluation – some years afterwards Indicators Often describes expected results for individual cases Often aggregates data giving an overview of many cases Number of people involved Many people or several organizations involved Limited number of people involved in short-term events Information sources Routine systems, field observations, progress reports, rapid assessments Mostly surveys and studies Undertaken byInternal managersMostly external evaluator

2. Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation is defined as a process where primary stakeholders actively participate in tracking progress towards the achievement of self-selected or jointly agreed results to draw actionable conclusions What is it ?

SETTING UP AN M&E SYSTEM 1.PRECONDITIONS FOR A CREDIBLE NATIONAL M&E SYSTEM 2.NATIONAL M&E ARCHITECTURE 3.KEY COMPONENTS OF ANY M&E SYSTEM 4.THE M&E PLAN 5.RESULTS OF AN M&E SYSTEM – The M&E Results Chain – M&E Results from National to Project Level e.g. APRs and Evaluation Reports OVERVIEW

1.Credible, legitimate political leadership (Building a results-based M&E system is first and foremost a political process with technical dimensions) 2.Strong human, institutional, and management capacity in the public sector 3.Public service known for integrity, honesty, and professionalism 4.Well-developed financial, budgetary, and accounting systems 5.A tradition of accountability and transparency PRECONDITIONS FOR A CREDIBLE NATIONAL M&E SYSTEM

NATIONAL M&E INSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECTURE Prepare guidelines & training manuals Build M&E capacity Create the necessary conditions for M&E Institute rewards & sanctions Etc. Guide districts to develop and implement M&E Plans Coordinate district M&E activities Prepare Regional APRs, Etc. Prepare & implement M&E Plans Collect, Collate & Analyse Data Prepare District APRs Etc. M&E Division of NDPC PPMEDs Cross-Sectoral Planning Group CSOs, private sector actors, Etc. RPCU Members other sector agencies representatives of CSOs Private sector actors Etc. DPCU Members other sector agencies representatives of TAs and CSOs Private sector actors Etc. MDA RPCU MDA Regional Director DPCU MDA District Director Information Flow and Feedback Key ActorsRoles PRESIDENT PARLIAMENT

M&E System An M&E system is the continuous monitoring and periodic assessments of the implementation of a policy through projects or programmes and the processes that transform inputs into outputs and outcomes What is it ?

Stakeholders Analysis Assessing Needs and Conditions Indicators, Matrix, Calendar & Budget Data Collection Data Analysis and Use Participatory PM&E Other Studies & Evaluations M&E Reports & Dissemination COMPONENTS OF AN M&E SYSTEM

PROJECT M&E PLAN The M&E plan is a concise document that provides a roadmap for how M&E will be conducted. It assists project managers to measure progress toward achievement of the project goals and objectives in a structured way It provides a clear direction on how specific activities and expected results of the project will be utilised It incorporates components that makes it possible to understand the project, reflect and learn lessons from its implementation. The process of developing the plan must be as participatory and collaborative as possible WHAT IS IT ?

M&E PLANS NDPC MDAs RPCUs DPCUs Project Managers Body Responsible M&E Plans

INPUTS Financial, human, and material resources ACTIVITIES Actions taken or work performed OUTPUTS goods and services which result from action OUTCOMES Access, awareness, understanding, skills, attitudes, behaviour change, etc. IMPACTS Poverty and mortality reduction, employment, food security, etc. RESULTS OF AN M&E SYSTEM

1.DATA AND REPORT FORMATS – (In M&E Guidelines) 2.FIELD VISIT REPORTS 3.INSPECTION REPORTS 4.QUARTERLY REPORTS 5.ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS – (Project, District, Sector, National) 6.EVALUATION REPORTS EXAMPLES OF TANGIBLE M&E RESULTS

NATIONAL ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS ( ) CITIZENS’ ASSESSMENT REPORTS (2003 & 2005 & 2008) DISTRICT AND SECTOR ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS DISSEMINATION OF APRs AND CITIZENS’ ASSESSMENT REPORTS M&E RESULTS AND DISSEMINATION

1.Limited financial resources 2.Limited M&E competencies and high M&E staff attrition rate 3.The lack of or non-functional M&E Information Systems 4.Inadequate field work 5.Weak reporting and/or unreliable results 6.Non-compliance with M&E requirements (guidelines, formats, reporting timelines, etc.) Risks of an National M&E System

DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION 1.What is Development Evaluation? 2.Purpose of an Evaluation 3.Classification of Evaluations 4.Steps to Conducting an Evaluation OVERVIEW

The process of making judgments about a policy, plan, programme or project, before, on-going or completed based on systematic and objective collection and analysis of data and information relative to such issues as effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, sustainability and impact for its stakeholders. Depending upon the type of evaluation, the assessment could cover the design, implementation and results of the policy, plan, project or programme (OECD, 2002). DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION

The principal aim of an evaluation is to improve decision making, resource allocation and accountability. Other reasons include the following: 1.To provide management with relevant information 2.To determine strengths and weaknesses 3.To determine relevance, effectiveness and efficiency 4.To determine impact and sustainability 5.To assist a thorough review and re-thinking 6.To document and explain the causes of success or failure Purpose of an Evaluation

Evaluations could be grouped under four main categories based on: 1.The objectives of the evaluation 2.The timing of the evaluation 3.The ‘evaluator’ or who is conducting the evaluation 4.The technical specification and scope (IOM, 2006) Classification of Evaluations

1.Review the policy, programme or project documents 2.Assess the need for an evaluation 3.Define the purpose of the evaluation 4.Identify and analyse the stakeholders 5.Develop the evaluation questions 6.Determine the type and scope of the evaluation 7.Decide on the evaluation design and methods 8.Prepare the evaluation work plan and budget 9.Prepare a follow-up and utilization action plan 10.Prepare the evaluation Terms of Reference (TOR) 11.Recruit the evaluator – an individual consultant, a team or firm 12.Determine data requirements and sources 13.Select data analysis methods 14.Determine the reports to generate 15.Formulate dissemination and communication strategy Steps to Conducting an Evaluation

THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION There is Room for Everyone!