© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY THIRD LECTURE OIL POLLUTION LIABILITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secretariat of the Basel Convention United Nations Environment Programme Regional Workshop Aimed at Promoting Ratification of the Basel Protocol on Liability.
Advertisements

Civil liability system in the Republic of Latvia.
Basel Convention Secretariat United Nations Environmental Programme ___________________________________ Key Elements of the Protocol Laura Thompson Legal.
Dr T H Moller Technical Team Manager INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMPENSATION CONVENTIONS.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Alla Pozdnakova Post. doc. Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law A comparative study of safety at sea regulation.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Sjøsikkerhetsseminaret Lysebu, 29 January 2008 Alla Pozdnakova Post. doc. NIFS Russian shipping safety regulation:
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Sjøsikkerhetsseminaret Lysebu, 29 January 2008 Eve de Coning Stipendiat NIFS ’IDENTIFYING THE RESPONSIBLE.
PEOPIL ANNUAL CONFERENCE MALAGA 2013 SILINA PAVLAKIS PAVLAKIS-MOSCHOS & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICE PIRAEUS - GREECE Cruise liner liability.
BELÉN GARCÍA ÁLVAREZ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF COMMERCIAL LAW UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO (SPAIN) ROTTERDAM SEPTEMBER OF 2014 VIII ECMLR.
AIDA XIV World Congress 2014 Rom, 30 th September 2014 Marine Insurance WP “Sue and labour expenses – H&M on German terms or P&I?” Dr. Maximilian Guth,
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Owners’ liability EVE DE CONING Room 561, Domus Nova.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY FOURTH LECTURE LIABILITY FOR COLLISIONS.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY SECOND LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
The Interrelationship between the Maritime Liability Conventions Måns Jacobsson Director.
Axel Luttenberger, Ph.D., Full Professor Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka DRIVES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE.
Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution. Developments in the International Legal Framework.
THE INTERNATIONAL REGIME GOVERNING COMPENSATION FOR TANKER OIL SPILLS Måns Jacobsson Former Director International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds Baltic.
University of Tromsø Intervention when causalities pose threat of pollution.
Singapore’s Actions Against Oil Pollution
Raymond P. Hayden “The Changing Rules on the Playground” President The Maritime Law Association of the U.S.
CMI AND PLACES OF REFUGE presented by Stuart Hetherington.
Consequences of Fukushima accident on international framework for nuclear liability and compensation Open lecture, Higher School of Economics, National.
1 HNSC: Insurers and Insurance Certificates Professor Erik Røsæg Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law, Oslo Tel
SHIP AND LIABILITY – an introduction to Norwegian Maritime Law
Oil Pollution and Compensation an overview of oil the international oil spill compensation regimes Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental.
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 08 OCTOBER 2013.
IAEA 1 Liability During Transport: Principles of Nuclear Liability Law Steven McIntosh Chairman, International Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX)
Maritime Liability and Compensation Conventions
Hanne Sofie Logstein, NIFS LIABILITY Spring 2007 Faculty of Law, University of Oslo Research fellow Hanne Sofie Logstein (based on the material worked.
NEW AMENDMENTS TO THE CROATIAN MARITIME CODE Koper, 30 May 2013 Jasenko Marin University of Zagreb Faculty of Law.
International Treaties on Insurance and Liability related to Nuclear Accidents Michel Vandersmissen Attorney-at-law, Brussels Bar AEEC, 23 November 2009.
Chinese Tort Law: Theory and Practice Rui Liu associate professor Chinese Academy of Governance , (U.S)
RECOVERING AND REMOVAL OF WRECKS AND SUNKEN OBJECTS Dr. sc. Adriana Vincenca Padovan ADRIATIC INSTITUTE OF THE CROATIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS European.
The International Regime for Compensation for Tanker Oil Spills Working Group on Integrated Maritime Policy 24 March 2011 Måns Jacobsson Former Director,
INTERSPILL 2012 Bunkers Convention 2001 LLMC Conventions Jonathan Hare
José Maura International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds Maritime Institute of Technolgoy and Graduate Studies Maryland, 6 June 2011 Addressing Potential.
Access to Justice Development of Green Bench in the Court of Justice October 2005 : The Green Bench, a specialized division was officially set up at the.
OCEAN HULL COMMITTEE WORKSHOP MONDAY 25 SEPTEMBER – HRS A COMPARISON OF THE NORWEGIAN REGIME AND THAT OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS IN RESPECT.
SHIPPING and the LAW Managing the Risks THE LIABILITY OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES Siccardi Bregante & C.1.
International Group of P&I Clubs Presentation to EU Transport Attachés Third Maritime Safety Package – Civil Liability of Shipowners Directive Brussels.
Introduction Marine pollution by ships The extent of compensation by the polluter The consequences when not fully compensated Four areas of discussion.
International Conventions which apply to ships  the 1910 and 1952 Brussels Conventions on collision between vessels  the 1989 London Convention on Salvage.
The Development of Environmental Salvage and Review of the Salvage Convention 1989 Archie Bishop Holman Fenwick Willan.
INTERTANKO ATHENS TANKER EVENT THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Jonathan Hare Skuld Colin de la Rue Ince & Co April 2005.
Hanne Sofie Logstein, NIFS LIABILITY Spring 2007 Faculty of Law, University of Oslo Research fellow Hanne Sofie Logstein (based on the material worked.
WALA Conference, Ciudad Real, 18/19 May 2009 Damages to third parties on the surface Update of Rome Convention Heinz Dillmann Vice President Special Legal.
Raets P&I RaetsPandi.com KNOW MORE The power of knowledge of the client’s business Raets Network Seminar 2008 Risk Management & Loss Prevention Jeroen.
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 30 JULY 2013.
MCGILL CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY & INSURANCE Liability for Acts of Terrorism: The New Unlawful Interference Convention General The.
POLLUTION FROM SHIPS Legal Developments and Handling of Incidents
Marine Pollution Professor Harry Roque Public International Law Mangaban, Ma. Lourena M. 3-E.
New York 5 May 2016 Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
Chapter 5 Maritime Lien. 一、 Definition of maritime liens(ML) : CMC Art. 21 A maritime lien is the right of the claimant, subject to the provisions of.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
LAW AND THE ENVIRONMENT 2016 THURSDAY 21 APRIL 2016 THE HNS CONVENTION AND THE NEW EU DRIVE TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION HELEN NOBLE.
Liability and Compensation
ADRIATIC MARITIME LAW CONFERENCE MARINE POLLUTION FROM
THIRD LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
Eastern Mediterranean University
Ships, Nationality and Registration
New York 5 May 2016   Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| May 24th 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
General (Global) Limitation of Liability System
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
Carriage of Goods by Sea – liability of a carrier
Maritime Law General introduction Chapter1.
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
RATIFICATION TO THE HAZARDOUS AND NOXIOUS SUBSTANCE BY SEA CONVENTION 2010 PRESENTATION TO NCOP:SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.
1996/2010 HNS Convention.
Presentation transcript:

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY THIRD LECTURE OIL POLLUTION LIABILITY

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Chapter 10 ’Oil Pollution and Environmental Liability’ Overview: 1.Background 2.Norwegian rules: a) convention based liability, b) non-convention based liability, c) chapter 9 liability, and d) liability in terms of the Petrolium Act 3. International developments: a) HNS Convention 1996, and b) Bunkers Convention 2001

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background 1.Large threat posed by shipping industry 2.Two types: a) oil spills, and b) operational discharge 3. Three-fold intervention: a) prevention, b) response, and c) liability (including compensation)

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background (cont.) International oil pollution liability regime: a) inadequacy of the global limitation regime b) international response: i.1969 Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Convention (CLC): 1976 CLC Protocol, (1984 CLC Protocol), and 1992 CLC Protocol (with 2000 amendment) ii Fund Convention: 1976 Fund Protocol, (1984 Fund Protocol), 1992 Fund Protocol (with 2000 amendment), and 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol iii.Voluntary agreements STOPIA (Small Tanker Oil Pollution Agreement) TOPIA (Tanker Oil Pollution Agreement)

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background (cont.) Tier system: First tier: CLC Liability and STOPIA Second tier: 1992 Fund Third tier: 2003 Supplementary Fund Max 90m SDR MC section 194 Max 203m SDR Size: ,5m SDR MC section 201 Max 750m SDR Size: 547 SDR MC section 201

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. Background (cont.) Norwegian legal sources. 1.Pollution Act (main legal source) - section 53: special legislation takes presedence 2. Maritime Code (special legislation) 3. Petroleum Act (special legislation)

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules: a) convention-based liability 1.Applies the 1992 CLC Protocol, the 1992 Fund Protocol and the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol. 2.Application (sections 191 and 206) a)Territorial application: section 206 (1992 CLC art II) b)Ships covered: section 191 (1992 CLC art I.1) ‘Ship means in sections any sea-going vessel and seaborne craft of any type whatsoever constructed or adapted for the carriage of oil in bulk as cargo (...) Provided that a ship capable of carrying oil and other cargoes shall be regarded as a ship only when it is actually carrying oil in bulk as cargo and during any voyage following such carriage unless it is proved that it has no residues of such carriage of oil in bulk aboard.’ c)Pollutants covered: section 191 (1992 CLC art I.5) ‘Oil means in sections any persistent hydrocarbon mineral oil such as crude oil, fuel oil, heavy diesel oil and lubricating oil, whether carried on board a ship as cargo or in the bunkers of such a ship.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) d) Pollution damage: section 191 (1992 CLC art I.6) ‘With pollution damage is meant: (a)loss or damage caused outside the ship by contamination resulting from the escape or discharge of oil from the ship...’ e) Warships excluded: section 206 (1992 CLC art XI.1) ‘The rules in sections shall not apply to warships or other ships owned or operated by a State and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercial service.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) Principal features: 1.Channeling of liability: a) Registered owners: section 191 (1992 CLC art I.3) ‘With owner is meant the person or persons registered as the owner of the ship. However in the case of a ship owned by a State and operated by a company which in that State is registered as the ship's operator, "owner" shall mean such company.’ b) Owners only: section 193 (1992 CLC art IV.4) ‘Claims for compensation for oil pollution damage can only be made against the owner of a ship according to the provisions of this Chapter.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) c) Cannot pursue the following: section 193 (1992 CVC art IV.4) ‘No claim for compensation for pollution damage under this Convention or otherwise may be made against: (a)the servants or agents of the owner or the members of the crew, (b)the pilot or any other person who performs services for the ship, (c)the ship operator (reder) or manager or operator of the ship, the charterer, the consignor, shipper, owner of cargo or consignee, (d)any person performing salvage operations with the consent of the owner or on the instructions of the public authority; (e)any person taking preventive measures; (f)all servants or agents of persons mentioned in subparagraphs (c), (d) and (e). unless the damage resulted from their personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such damage or through gross negligence and with knowledge that such damage would probably result.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) d) Registered owner’s limited right of recourse: section 193 (1992 CLC art III.5) ‘A recourse action cannot be brought against anyone listed in a, b, d, e, or f, unless the damage resulted from their personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such damage or through gross negligence and with knowledge that such damage would probably result. For other recourse actions the ordinary rules will apply.’ 2. Basis of liability: a) Strict liability: section 191 (1992 CLC art II.1) ‘Regardless of fault, the owner of a ship is liable for oil pollution damage.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) b) Liability not absolute (ie exceptions): section 192 (1992 CLC art II.2 and.3) ‘No liability for pollution damage shall attach to the owner if he proves that the damage: (a)resulted from an act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or a natural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character, or (b)was wholly caused by an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by a third party, or (c)was wholly caused by the negligence or other wrongful act of any Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance of lights or other navigational aids in the exercise of that function. If the owner proves that the injured party deliberately or negligently contributed to the damage, the liability can be abated according to the general rules governing damages.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) 3. Limitation of liability: a) Limitation: section 194 (1992 CLC art V (2000 amendment)) ‘The owner’s liability in terms of section 191 is limited to SDR for ships with a tonnage not more than tons. For ships with a tonnage of more than tons the limits of liability is increased with 631 SDRs per ton above tons. The limits of liability shall not exceed SDR.’ b) Incidence ‘The right to limit relates to all pollution liability as a result of the same occurrence, or series of occurrences having the same origin, which causes pollution damage.’

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) c) Breaking the limit: section 194 (1992 CLC art III.2) ‘The owner shall not be entitled to limit his liability if it is proved that the pollution damage resulted from his personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such damage, or gross negligence and with knowledge that such damage would probably result.’ d) Costs excluded: section 194 liability of interest and legal costs. e) Fund must be constituted: section 195 (1992 CLC art V.3) 4. The supplementary funds: section 201, 1992 Fund Cvn and 2003 Supplementary Fund Cvn a) The Fund Conventions applies as law. b) Restrictions on recourse actions.

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules a) convention-based liability (cont.) 5. Compulsory insurance: section 192 (1992 CLC art VII.7) a) Norwegian vessels, foreign vessels in Norwegian ports or the Norwegian side of the continental shelf. b) More than tons. c) Cover amount in section Prescription: section 503 (1992 CLC art VIII) a) Claims for compensation: 3 years within time of loss, damage or expense b) No more than six years after the incidence.

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules b) Non-convention-based liability Section 207: 1. Applies to: a) damage on continental shelf or high seas (if jurisdiction) and, if warship, in all maritime zones, (section 207, first para) and b) claims before a Norwegian court relating to damage in non- convention state (section 207, third para) 2. Two approaches: a) As to a) above: section 191 strict liability and section 192 exceptions apply b) As to b) above: the above is not applicable, a separate fund is created (compare section 209, third para) 3. Different level of Norwegian interest

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules c) Chapter 9 liability Section 208: 1. Applies to a) crafts not transporting oil as bulk cargo b) non-persistent oils 2. Territorial application: the Norwegian part of the continental shelf 3. Section 191 and 192 applies (ie strict liability and the exceptions) 4. Chapter 9 limitation applies (not a section 173 no 2 exception) 5. Chapter 10 does not apply

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 2. Norwegian Rules d) Liability in terms of the Petroleum Act Section The Petroleum Act of 29 November 1996 no 72 takes presedence, unless 1992 CLC duty 2. Overlap minimal

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 3. International developments a) The HNS Convention Not yet in force 2.Applies to a wide range of polluting substances 3.Two-tier liability: First tier: Shipowner is liable for a) vessels of no more than tons:SDR 10 million b) additional per ton from to tons:SDR per ton c) additional per ton of more than tons:SDR 360 per ton to a maximum of SDR 100 million. Second tier: Maximum of SDR 250 million.

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 3. International developments b) The Bunker Convention Not yet in force 2.Covers pollution damage from oil in bunkers 3.Modeled on CLC in terms of a)definition of ‘pollution damage’, b)territorial application, and c)compulsory insurance (over tons) 4.Direct action and financial security provision