Rare Species Habitat Conservation Priorities Florida Natural Areas Inventory August 2014 Work funded by:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
PARCC project: moving from models to planning and application Neil Burgess.
2C1Forest and Science-based Conservation: Overview of Phase 1 Accomplishments Justina C. Ray, WCS Canada.
Landscape Level Conservation Planning for prioritizing conservation action in Mozambique Bruno Nhancale, PhD Conservation Science workshop, 21 st April.
The Florida Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Geodatabase A Cooperative Project between the Florida Forest Service and Florida Natural Areas Inventory.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Applied GIS Nat Sci Terrestrial Wildlife Modeling in GIS RESM 493q Wed Nov 18.
WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Lecture 06 – Endemism and Biodiversity Hotspots WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Lecture 06 – Endemism and Biodiversity Hotspots This.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Biodiversity in Vietnam
MAPPING INDICATORS OF EXPOSURE AND VULNERABILITY: ECOLOGICAL FACTORS Center for Environmental Geomatics Climate Studies Division Manila Observatory Dissemination.
Biological Basis of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.
10. 2 Objectives Define and give examples of endangered and threatened species. Describe several ways that species are being threatened with extinction.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Gap Analysis: GIS, maps and a new view of regional conservation Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004,
Biodiversity and Conservation
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
Biological Resource Management Division Science and Conservation in National Parks Loyal A. Mehrhoff.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Conservation Action Planning Process (CAP) Framework Project Scope & Targets.
Scale and Conservation Planning The scale of investigation may have profound effects on the patterns that one finds the obvious patterns of scale perceived.
Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research and Science Presented by: Jessica Stubbs, Natural Resources Specialist.
Endangered Species Objectives: Explain how fish and wildlife become extinct, rare, endangered, or threatened. Discuss recovery strategies used to manage.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
An Introduction to the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NHDE) Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program North Carolina.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Specifically inform ARC project ranking SURFACE WATERS Florida Forever Data and Analyses Developed and maintained by Florida Natural Areas Inventory Florida.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Dr. Kenton Miller Chair, IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas The State of the World’s Parks and Protected Areas The State of the World’s Parks and.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Trail Restoration and Closure of Unauthorized Trails Emma Long Metropolitan Park Motocross Trails.
ECOSYSTEMS AND WILDLIFE OF FLORIDA ARE DEFINED BY THE STATE’S GEOLOGY ECOSYSTEMS AND WILDLIFE OF FLORIDA ARE DEFINED BY THE STATE’S GEOLOGY FLORIDA SITS.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
The Grow-A-Tree Program Grade 6
Paving Over Paradise.  Fragmentation of Conservation Landscape  Degradation of Conservation Potential of lands  Barrier to Wildlife Movement  Sink.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Wildlife What causes some species to become rare or extinct? How does management of rare, threatened, & endangered species.
Biodiversity. Bio = Life Bio = Life Diverse = consisting of different things Diverse = consisting of different things Refers to the variety of species.
Habitat suitability based landscape optimization vs. expert rules in agricultural landscapes Lutz Tischendorf Elutis Modelling & Consulting Inc. January.
Integrating remotely sensed data and ecological models to assess species extinction risks under climate change Richard Pearson (AMNH) Resit Akçakaya (Stony.
Washington Comprehensive Fish & Wildlife Conservation Strategy Federal mandate required states to complete Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies.
AREAS OF CONSERVATION EMPHASIS ACE-II Photos courtesy of USFWS National Image Library Melanie Gogol-Prokurat California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Biodiversity What is Biodiversity? The number and variety of different species in a given area.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
BIODIVERSITY Source: orgs.unca.edu/tulula/images/biodiversity.jpg.
Endangered Species Research Presentation Due: Thursday, February 5th.
PRIME WETLAND STUDY OF FITZWILLIAM – INITIAL FINDINGS Dr. Rick Van de Poll Ecosystem Management Consultants Sandwich NH.
Ecosystem Management And Preservation. Reserves Reserves – any natural or semi-natural ecosystem that is protected from most forms of human use - however,
Figure 1. Infrastructure map. Figure 2. Upland-lowland interfaces.
South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Conservation Opportunities and Partnerships in Collier County Endangered Species Protection through.
9th WGEA Meeting, Brasilia1 Biodiversity: Some Key Trends Worldwide by Carolle Mathieu 9 th WGEA meeting, Brasilia 31 May, 2004.
3rd EIONET workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation EEA, 30 June 2009 SEBI 2010, climate change and connectivity Katarzyna Biała.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Succession + Change in Ecosystems and Environmental Monitoring.
Panther Reviews and Habitat Conservation Trust Resources South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Spencer Simon Trust Resources Supervisor.
Options and Starting Points for Developing for Multi-Species ESA Conservation Programs Specifically for Threats Resulting in Habitat Loss Sean Kyle WAFWA.
InVEST Biodiversity: Habitat Quality
Lancaster County Conservancy Long Range Protection Plan
Sustaining Biodiversity: The Species Approach Pgs
IUCN and Biodiversity Assessment
The Everglades.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Variation and Classification
Conservation blueprint
Assisted Migration as a Response to Climate Change: Should we be doing this with plants, and if so how and under what constraints. Robert Popp, Robert.
The Everglades.
Potential Process and Decisions for Conn. River Watershed Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Rare Species Habitat Conservation Priorities Florida Natural Areas Inventory August 2014 Work funded by:

Previous Model 248 species: 142 plants 42 invertebrates 64 vertebrates

New Model (version 4.0) 281 species (+33): 151 plants (+9) 64 invertebrates (+22) 66 vertebrates (+2)

New Model (version 4.0) Global Rank Comparison: v3.3v4.0 G G28992 G33932 G431 G521

New Model (version 4.0) Acreage Comparison: Version 3.3 Version 4.0

Two Versions: Florida Forever & CLIP Florida Forever CLIP Spp. weighted by Grank & Srank only

New Standard Mapping Methods FNAIHAB version 4.0 August 2014 Work funded by:

Example Species Justicia cooleyi Cooley's Water-willow G2S2 Federally Listed Endangered Habitat: Mesic hardwood hammocks over limestone. Photo credit: Billy Boothe

Element Occurrences Subset of Justicia cooleyi element occurrences in Hernando County (north of Tampa) Natural areas fragmented by pasture and low density residential

Land Cover Basemap Cooperative Land Cover polygons outlined in yellow – basemap used for habitat selection

Land Cover Basemap Cooperative Land Cover polygons– basemap used for habitat selection

EO Buffers Applied Element Occurrence polygons (red) with Primary Buffers (pink) and Maximum Buffers (purple). Note that buffer distances vary based on size of EO polygon to normalize for EO spatial precision.

EO Buffers Applied Primary Buffers are determined by radius and EO size: <10 ac.= full radius; = 1/2 radius; = 1/4 radius; ≥ 1000 AND Rep Accuracy is High or Very High = 1/4 radius; >= 1000 AND Rep Accuracy is less than High = no buffer (1m radius)

EO Buffers Applied Max Buffers are also determined by radius and EO size: <10 acres = 4 X radius; ≥ 10 acres = 2 X radius; Max Buffers are considered a 'last resort' cutoff for habitat polygons.

Land Cover Clip Land Cover data clipped by Max Buffers

Suitable Habitat Suitable land cover types identified and dissolved. Those intersecting Primary Buffer are selected as final habitat map.

Suitability Score Habitat suitability scores are applied to each patch. Criteria include patch size, land cover type, EO rank, and spatial configuration/ fragmentation. Dark green are High Suitability, yellow- green is Medium Suitability (Low Suitability not pictured).

Non-Standard Mapped Species Aquatic species (fish, mussels, inverts)* Spring & cave species Keys species (islands are known extent) Indigo snake Black bear Panther FL scrub-jay Crocodile Mangrove fox squirrel RCW FL grasshopper sparrow MacGillivray’s seaside sparrow Wood stork Beach mice Sea turtles Piping plover Photo credit: Mike Orlando Photo credit: Katy NeSmith

Non-Standard Mapping Example Ursus americanus floridanus Florida black bear Rather than Element Occurrences, started with Primary and Secondary Range Zones identified by Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Photo credit: Mike Orlando

Non-Standard Mapping Example Suitable land cover types intersecting Range Zones were selected.

Non-Standard Mapping Example Suitability scored based on model of landscape integrity applied to Primary and Secondary Zones (10 is highest Suitability)

Future FNAIHAB Updates Current Target Species Criteria: Eligible Spp. All G1 species (excluding SH or SX)251 G2/S1-S2 species, unless 10+ EOs on MA at baseline (2001)170 G3/S1 species, unless 10+ EOs on MA at baseline46 All Federally Listed LE, LT species +3 No G4, G5 (unless fed listed) Scientist override (in or out) Total eligible species species in current version 4.0

Future FNAIHAB Updates Additional Eligible Targets (not currently in v4): Eligible Spp. Plants23 Invertebrates158 Fish3 Amphibians0 Reptiles2 Birds1 Mammals2 Total remaining189

Future FNAIHAB Updates Challenge: Practical limit is around 300 species Need to reconsider target species criteria Also want to re-evaluate species conservation needs weighting

Future FNAIHAB Updates Current Conservation Needs Weighting: Grank Points FF Hab Acres Points % Protected Points Large Area Requirement Bonus: G %10015 pts G2T , %95 G3T13121, , %90 G4T124010, , %85 G , M %80NO "true" G1 bonus G5T11241 Million - 10M %75(already factored into new Grank Pts) G3T2120>10Million %70 G4T %65 G5T %60 G %55 G4T %50 G5T %45 G %40 G5T %35 G % % % % % %5 100% 0

Future FNAIHAB Updates Potential Target and/or Weighting Criteria: Current criteria: (G-rank, habitat area, % protected) Habitat Loss – present vs. historical extent Federal/State Listing Phylogenetic/Taxonomic Distinctiveness Endemism Ecological Function/Role Life History Patterns Threats (development, invasive spp, climate change, etc.) Social Values (ecosystem services; charismatic/flagship spp. etc.) Potential for Successful Recovery Information availability/adequacy

Future FNAIHAB Updates Potential Target and/or Weighting Criteria: Current criteria: (G-rank, habitat area, # and/or % protected) Habitat Loss – present vs. historical extent Federal/State Listing Phylogenetic/Taxonomic Distinctiveness Endemism Ecological Function/Role Life History Patterns Threats (development, invasive spp, climate change, etc.) Social Values (ecosystem services; charismatic/flagship spp. etc.) Potential for Successful Recovery Information availability/adequacy ? ? ? ? ? ? ??

Future FNAIHAB Updates SIVVA: Standardized Index of Vulnerability and Value Developed by Josh Reece and Reed Noss at UCF Part of Statewide SLR Team (also UF, FNAI) Assessed vulnerability of 300 species 124 of those meet the current FNAIHAB Target criteria Includes measures for nearly all potential criteria noted