OPT 1 Decisive Points Analysis (Step 4B) DP 1. Lines of Ops, Decisive Points, S-COG and End States DP 3 : Belligerents’ & Terrorists’ freedom of action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Determine Prioritized Supporting Efforts Ops End States Stable & secured environm ent DP 7 : CTF Organised and Mission-Ready SE 17: Effective force composition.
Advertisements

Unified Land Operations
US Foreign Policy in the Age of Obama Renewal, Return, and Continuity Michael Baun Valdosta State University.
UNCLASSIFIED Campaign Assessment 9 Feb 12. UNCLASSIFIED DESIRED EFFECTS END STATES LINES OF OPERATION Baseline Campaign Assessment – (D+3, 9 Feb) R G.
The Federated States of Micronesia AND The United States of America.
NATO Response Force (NRF)  The Challenge  NRF Concept  Implementation.
CTF PACIFIC 3 Mar 07 Transition Plan for a Lead Nation CTF to a UN led Peace Operations UNCLASSIFIED.
AUSTRALIA’S INTERNATIONAL MANPADS INITIATIVE Mr Don Smith Executive Officer Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Canberra.
INTERNATIONAL LAW THE USE OF FORCE. THE PROHIBITION OF FORCE: Art 2 t 3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such.
Phase 3 to 4 Transition Assessment
Information Management for Refugees & Displaced Persons from Myanmar Lyndy Worsham Information Management Coordinator.
Campaign Planning Process 28 March 2006 Step 4A – Develop The Campaign Framework UNCLASSIFIED.
Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Mission Analysis Brief.
Situation Update 27 August 2007 CTF PACIFIC D+120.
SGTM 10: United Nations Civil–Military Coordination Slide 1 SGTM 10: United Nations Civil–Military Coordination.
Implementation of Humanitarian Strategy Executive Board Informal August 28, 2014.
Canada ’ s Foreign Policy. Economic Sanctions Canadian Economic Sanctions – The imposition of economic sanctions against foreign States and non-State.
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Open Briefing to Member States 27 July 2010 Conference Room 2 NLB.
US Foreign Policy and the Middle East The Struggle for Peace Carrie McDonough Senior Capstone Political Science.
Saferworld Working for the prevention of armed violence Latent Reconstruction/ Reconciliation Positive peace Conflict cycle Development humanitarian assistance.
The Black Sea Region: New Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Cooperation ( ANALYSES from Ukraine) prof. Grygorii Perepelytsia.
Mitigating the KFC. Stakeholders KFC MPAK MW Mestizo KUH Govt CTF IPM SIS Cadre Materials Sanctuary Public Face ? Terror Actions Incidental Attacks.
Palestine.. Dream for freedom. Nobel Laureate and Archbishop Desmund Tutu went to Palestine. He stood in Jerusalem on Christmas Day of 1989 and said.
Providing Security to Forced Migrants and Humanitarian Operations Lydia Mann-Bondat.
Protection of Women in Conflict Security Council Resolution 1820: Key to Implementation of Resolution 1325 UNDP/Norwegian Embassy Conference Sofia Conference,
SGTM 2: Structure of United Nations Peace Operations Slide 1 SGTM 2: Structure of United Nations Peace Operations.
Analyzing National Security Policy Strategic Policy-Making.
Chapter 9 Pursuing Security. Causes of War 1.System-Level Causes: wars may be caused by a number of factors related to the general nature of the world’s.
DP 3 : Hostile Groups’ freedom of action & sanctuary are denied SE 1a TGT/A Lead Supported (Supporting)EntitiesMOEsMOEIs Deny hostile groups’ movement.
Dealing with North Korea America’s Options. Threats from North Korea Direct nuclear attack on US forces or allies Sale of nuclear and missile technologies.
Objectives and Strategies for a Successful Middle East WMDFZ Conference, Finland Rebecca E. Johnson Ph.D, ICAN Vice-Chair The Peace Boat, 23 March.
Proliferation weapons of mass destruction © 2014 wheresjenny.com Proliferation weapons of mass destruction.
 Relationship between terrorism and political systems is multifaceted.
ACADEMICS Feb 2012 This brief is classified: UNCLASSIFIED As of: 31 Jan 12 CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT.
© Copyright Niels E. Hoffmann Today’s presentation 1.Foreign Policy of the EC/EU during the break-up of Yugoslavia 1.Introduction in the foreign policy.
CTF PACIFIC Date Course of Action Development Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
UN Mission in Eastern Pacifica UNMEP UN DPKO Plan 16 August 2007.
The President stands as the single strong leader of the executive branch Americans have looked to the President for leadership on complex issues As commander.
Basics for „Crises Management Operations“ Theresan Military Academy Institute for Basic Officer Training 2014.
1 Disengagement The Vision Creating a new chance to achieve peace. Restarting direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on the final status.
CTF PACIFIC 1 Mar 07 CPG 1 Course Of Action (COA) Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
The European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument DG RELEX UNIT ER-D-1 European Neighbourhood Policy Coordination – General Coordination.
US Fleet Forces US Marine Corps Forces Hostile Neutral / UndecidedFriendly Level of Influence More Less Garnet PHARM IDPs VEOS GOA PIA GOAL Criminal Elements.
INTELLIGENCEUPDATE (CAA hrs). Pocatello Mountain Home Kelowna Spokane Winnemucca Salt Lake City Provo Richland Wenachee Bend Yakima Panaca Milford.
Foreign Policy 1991-Today. After the fall of the Soviet Union No common enemy for democratic world governments to focus on. No common enemy for democratic.
UNCLASSIFIED National Defense University Center for Complex Operations An Initial Framework for Transitional Public Security Bernie Carreau SSE IPR Workshop.
Chapter 7.3 Making Foreign Policy. The President and Foreign Policy Foreign policy is a nation’s overall plan for dealing with other nations. The basic.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Chapter Seventeen.
C5 Cell Step 4 - Decisive Points (DRAFT). DP 1 : Hostility Between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased Ending Conditions Key Components Critical to successful.
Denying Sanctuary: A Strategic Analysis of OEF Greg Roberts, PhD CSA OEF Study Group AWC Strategic Landpower Conference December 2015.
EOA 2: OPERATION/CAMPAIGN Kosovo Operational Approach (Broad Actions) The Kosovo campaign utilized an advanced strategy of diplomacy, backed by the use.
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2.
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
The 9 th Track II Network of ASEAN Defence and Security Institute (The 9 th NADI Annual Meeting) Present by: Nem Sowathey Assistant to Minister of National.
Consent of the parties Impartiality Non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate.
The conflict in Donbas region: challenges, solutions Olga Reznikova, PHd Head of the National Security Research Department The National Institute for Strategic.
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566) Topic 1: Introduction.
Asia’s Transformation:
Foreign Policy GOVT Module 16.
Significance: UN and the Origins of the Cold War
 Korean War: (1950 – 1953) After WWII, the US and USSR agree to a temporary division of Korea along the 38th parallel (line of latitude) and allied occupation.
COALTITION TASK FORCE GOODWILL
International Law.
INTRODUCTION TO FOREIGN POLICY
Transatlantic Relations and the Obama Presidency
Significance: UN and the Origins of the Cold War
OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)
American Foreign Policy
“Ukraine’s OSCE Chairmanship in 2013 – contribution to strengthening security and cooperation in Europe” Lecture by H.E.Viktor Nedopas, Ambassador of.
President of the Russian Association of International Law
Presentation transcript:

OPT 1 Decisive Points Analysis (Step 4B) DP 1

Lines of Ops, Decisive Points, S-COG and End States DP 3 : Belligerents’ & Terrorists’ freedom of action & sanctuary are denied 3 DP 7 : CTF’s Roles & Efforts Are Recognised 7 DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased 1 Strengthen KUH & SON commitment to the peace process Facilitate humanitarian assistance effort Curtail terrorist activities Ops End States Stable & secured environment DP 2 : Humanitarian Assistance (HA) is Rendered 2 DP 4 : External support for belligerent /terrorist activities is denied 4 DP 5 : Kuhistan’s Peaceful Nuclear & Chemical Programs are Verified 5 DP 6 : Territorial Integrity Is Restored 6 Establish CTF’s Credibility

Decisive Points (DP) 1 Analysis (Step 4B) DP 1 OPT 1 (By Lt Col Binaya Rana)

DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has ceased Supporting Effect (SE) Target& Target Audience (TGT/A) Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) Measure of Effectiveness Indicators (MOEIs) (1) Conflict resolution process established (1) Political leaders of Kuhistan, Sonora and Free Mojave. (2) Military leaders of Sonora. (3) Dissident leaders. (4) Int’l Community. (1) SRSG. (2) Peace Negotiators (Internal and external). (1) Renewal of diplomatic Relationship between leaders of Kuhistan and Sonora. (2) Positive World Opinion. (3) Decrease in conflict. (4) Kuhistan WMD capabilities under supervision IAEA & OPCW. (5) Foreign economic aid to Kuhistan & Sonora resumes. (6) IHC redeploys south and render HA operations. (1) Positive statements made by key leaders of Kuhistan and Sonora. (2) Positive media reports highlighting reconciliation efforts between Kuhistan and Sonora. (3) East Asia and SEA states resume and provide economic aid to Kuhistan. (4) Uninterrupted HA support to IDP and Refugee Camps.

DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased SE:Conflict Resolution Process Established MOE:Renewal of diplomatic relationship between leaders of Kuhistan and Sonora MOE:Decrease in conflict and Positive World Opinion MOE:Kuhistan nuclear programmes and activities confined to energy production only MOE:Foreign economic aid to Kuhistan & Sonora resumes MOE:IHC redeploys south and render HA operations Supporting Effect / MOEs / MOEIs

DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has ceased Supporting Effect (SE) Target & Target Audience (TGT/A) Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) Measure of Effectiveness Indicators (MOEI) (2) Armed Forces cease Conflict campaign (1) Key political and military leaders of Kuhistan and Sonora. (2) Local Support Mechanism. (1) CTF HQ. (2) Land, Air and Maritime Component Comd. (1) Sonora forces Commnece withdrawal from Kuhistan territory (inclusive Maritime and Air activities). (2) Missile attacks on Sonora ceases. (3) Decrease in Exodus of refugees. (1) Specific units in contact withdraws from Kuhiatsa (101 Armr Div, 102 Div, 111 Arty Bde & 121Mech Div Withdraws from Kuhistan. (2) Combat Ops between Sonora and Kuhistan ceases. (3) CTF forces deploy successfully and establish security border patrols.

DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased SE:Armed Forces Cease Conflict Campaign MOE:Complete withdrawal of Sonora forces from Kuhistan MOE:Combat Ops between Sonora and Kuhistan ceases MOE:CTF forces deploy successfully and establish security border patrols Supporting Effect / MOEs / MOEIs

Decisive Points (DP) 6 Analysis (Step 4B) DP 6 OPT 1 (By Maj Agoeng)

DP 6 : Territorial Integrity Is Restored Supporting Effect (SE) Target& Target Audience (TGT/A) Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) Measure of Effectiveness Indicators (MOEIs) (1) Sonora and Kuhistan comply peace agreement and re-deploy to their national territories (1) Key Political Leaders of Kuhistan & Sonora (2) Key military Leadership of both countries. (3) Local Support Mechanism / International Monitors (4) North-eastern Geographical border integrity between Kuhistan and Sonora, maritime and air Space. (1) SRSG and Peace Negotiators. (2) CTF CTF HQ, Land/Air/ Maritime Composition Comd (1) Sonora forces withdrawn to recognized International border. No breaches. (2) Decrease in Conflicts. (3) Increase in populace support for government. (4) Other entities do not subvert peace agreement in relation to border recognition between Kuhistan and Sonora. (5) Normal governmental functions restored i.e. Customs and Immigration System in place. (1) No Kuhistan and Sonora forces footprint within the zone of conflict. (2) CTF forces successfully deploy and implement security border patrols. (3) Positive statements made by Local and international media.

DP 6 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased Supporting Effect / MOEs / MOEIs SE: Sonora and Kuhistan comply peace agreement and re-deploy to their national territories MOE: Sonora forces withdrawn to recognized International border. No breaches MOE: Positive statements made by key leaders of Kuhistan and Sonora MOE: CTF forces successfully deploy and implement security border patrols

DP 6 : Territorial Integrity Is Restored Supporting Effect (SE) Target& Target Audience (TGT/A) Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) Measure of Effectiveness Indicators (MOEIs) (2) Non-state actors do not impede restoration of territorial integrity by Kuhistan and Sonora Govt (1) KFC, MPAK, IPM and MW. (2) Local populace (Pro- Mestizo). (1) Local Government. (2) Peace Negotiators, CTF HQ, Land component (CSOTF, CPOTF, CCMOTF). (1) Decrease in Insurgents / belligerents nefarious activities. (2) Effective collaboration between Kuhistan and Sonora Govt in curtailing insurgent activities. (3) Increase in Mestizo populace support for local government. (1) Decrease in attack on govt buildings and KINs. (2) Rise in ethnic Mestizo support on local government policies/initiative. (3) Decrease in footprint/signature of belligerent activities at border areas.

DP 6 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased Supporting Effect / MOEs / MOEIs SE: Non-state actors do not impede restoration of territorial integrity by Kuhistan and Sonora Govt MOE:Decrease in attack on govt buildings and KINs MOE:Rise in ethnic Mestizo support on local government policies/initiative MOE:Decrease in footprint/signature of belligerent activities at border areas

The End