School-based Mental Health Services November 21, 2008 UMC Bede Ballroom, Crookston, MN Brenda Anderson, MSW, LICSW Tim Denney, MS, CRC Jessica Shockman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
MACCRAY Special Education Work-Based Learning Program Helping Students Climb the Ladder of Career Success By: Elyse Hagen, LD/DCD Special Education Teacher.
Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Self Study Orientation Community Living Burlington.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
PORTFOLIO.
Elementary School Counselor
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Congressional Black Caucus Community Health Centers Forum Lisa Cox, Assistant Director, Federal Affairs September 27, 2007 School-Health Financing: What.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
What do Paraprofessionals do…
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Promoting Head Start and Preschool Collaboration: The Full Utilization Process Monday, June 16 3:30-5:00pm Bill Buchanan.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
New York City Department of Education Bureau of Non Public Schools Reimbursable Services.
Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development General Introduction.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Identifying Effective Practice-Based Strategies for Engaging Families and Youth Bill Hobstetter & Carol Cecil Kentucky Partnership for Families and Children.
NW Minnesota Council of Collaborative’s: “Our Children Succeed Initiative” Overview 2/7/07.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Assisting Students with Disabilities
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
NYS HCBS Waiver. Services Process: NYS OMH solicited input from both children’s mental health services providers and families across NYS Sample of providers.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
© 2010 NATIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER FOR CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Expanded School Mental Health Services (ESMH) in Baltimore.
Building Infrastructures: Supporting School-Based Mental Health Services.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
ICCSD Learning Supports: Mental Health
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Autism Five -Year Plan Phase II Christie Reinhardt Governor’s Council on Disabilities & Special Education.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
The New Jersey Department of Children & Families Division of Children’s System of Care.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
From current process to future best practice how the government’s SEN&D reforms will transform services and support in Norfolk for children, young people.
NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING & LEARNING Subcommittee Process Map Guidelines for Effective Subcommittee Meetings SLC Subcommittee Member.
Seattle SBHCs “Reaching for Excellence” TJ Cosgrove – Public Health Seattle & King County.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
ROSIE D. V. ROMNEY Implementing the Court Order. The Court Decision 1/26/06: Court enters sweeping decision finding Massachusetts in violation of EPSDT.
Caring Across Communities Collaborative Empower ment Across Communiti es Portland, Maine Lead Agency: Multilingual and Multicultural Center Portland Public.
Housing First For Families Overview Prepared By: J.X. Gilmore Grant Compliance Officer.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK
MENTAL HEALTH MEDI-CAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
UPDATE ON A Strategic Plan for Linking EEC Funding Streams into a Coordinated System of Support for Children, Families and the ECE/OST Workforce This.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

School-based Mental Health Services November 21, 2008 UMC Bede Ballroom, Crookston, MN Brenda Anderson, MSW, LICSW Tim Denney, MS, CRC Jessica Shockman, LSW

School-based Mental Health Services Grant Overview Purpose: To increase accessibility of mental health services for children within their communities. Sustain existing school social worker positions. School is a key screening and service delivery point. Families are more likely to seek and maintain services if services are located in the community. The goals of the grant include better outcomes in – Academic performance – School attendance – Incidence of disciplinary referrals – Social and emotional functioning

School-based Mental Health Services: Research Base SBMHS determined to be effective at some level in 80% of cases if the following factors are associated with services: Consistent implementation Multi-component programs (child, teacher, parent included) Multiple approaches (consulting, skills-building, etc.) Specific behaviors and skills are targeted Developmentally-appropriate strategies are used Strategies are integrated into classroom curriculum Rones & Hoagwood 2000

School-based Mental Health Services and System of Care The SOC cooperative agreement is intended to change the overall system to a consumer-driven, coordinated, culturally competent service system The SBMHS activities are an enhancement to the overall system of care (SOC) Training for social workers will reinforce SOC values Social workers will have the improved SOC system as a support network for their work in the schools

School-based Mental Health Services and System of Care Other agencies are prepared to coordinate with SBMHS social workers Grant services will be delivered in a way that compliments the system improvement goals of the SOC –Consumer-driven services (family-driven, youth- guided) –Services for families will be coordinated between agencies –Services will be culturally sensitive to each family

The SOC “best practices” of consumer-driven, coordinated care are shown to improve outcomes for children and families Schools will be at the forefront of system improvement by means of the SBMHS project Family empowerment is growing across the region, and schools will be able to meet the demand for family-driven services. School-based Mental Health Services and System of Care

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts Purposes of the contractual arrangements: 1)Replace diminishing LCTS funding in order to sustain school social work positions in 18 Districts 2)Help fund school-based mental health workers employed by the NWMHC and contracted by 4 districts.

School-based Mental Health Services and Funding LCTS money is not a sustainable source for school social worker funding The SBMHS approach, utilizing both grant and MA funding, allows for sustainable funding via “fee for service” activities The SBMHS grant provides money for clinical supervision, allowing all schools to either begin billing now or move employees toward billing eligibility at no cost to the districts While “fee for service” billing is more paperwork, it is likely to be a more durable funding process for sustainability

School-based Mental Health Services and Funding SBMHS funding available equally to all districts for the three years: $ plus $ Crisis funding $ $11, Funds not billed for will be re-allocated in the Spring of each year. Funds not spent by grantees by 6/30 of each year are returned (“Use it or lose it”).

School-based Mental Health Services Overview SBMHS social workers (practitioner or professional) will be able to do these activities Diagnostic Assessments (Mental Health professionals) Individual and group skills-building activities (under clinical supervision or LICSW professional) Individual and group psychotherapy (LICSW professional only) Crisis screening, assessment, intervention, stabilization

School-based Mental Health Services Overview Billing for services depends upon a social worker attaining MH practitioner or MH professional status Until a social worker attains practitioner status, these services cannot be performed or billed to the grant or to MA. Crisis services money can still be accessed, and clinical supervision is provided toward practitioner status

School-based Mental Health Services Advantages Schools with practitioner or professional social workers… 1.Provide Children’s Therapeutic Supports and Services (CTSS) in schools, increasing the likelihood for improved student performance. 2.Provide these services with clinical supervision. 3.Provide these services along with other job duties as set forth in the local job descriptions. 4.Sustain the social worker positions by utilizing billable funding streams. 5.Access the larger SOC referral network for additional services.

School-based Mental Health Services Advantages 6. Schools will benefit from more highly skilled social workers. 7. CTSS activities will be supported by other agencies due to the SOC values being built into the entire system 8. Families are more likely to be actively engaged in service delivery due to locating of service in schools and SOC values behind the service delivery. 9. Instructional staff can be informed and active screeners for behavioral problems that underlie mental health difficulties.

School-based Mental Health Services Advantages 10. Grant funds will be redistributed in the Spring based upon under- and over-utilization, allowing for full use of funds. 11. Districts will receive regular reports on their own fund utilization. 12. Districts will receive on-site and phone-based technical assistance in implementing grant activities and providing CTSS at school.

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts District Hosted Position Agreement: –The Agreement establishes two relationships between parties including: District as provider of CTSS and MH Crisis services reimbursed by the NWMHC from grant and MA funds; Center as a provider of other mental health services that qualify as Special Education or MA Option 2 services.

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts –Reimbursement rates established: For Grant and MA funded services reimbursed by the Center (Attachment A) For Special Education and MA Option 2 services reimbursed by the District (Attachment B) Funding estimates and sources identified (Attachment C). Service description included (Attachment D) Special Education eligibility requirements included (Attachment E).

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts NWMHC Hosted Position Agreement –The relationship established in this agreement includes: The NWMHC as the provider of MA and grant funded CTSS services, grant funded crisis services, and Special Education/”related” services; The District as purchaser of Special Education Services and as requested by the District, “Option 2” MA funded MH services. Note: the agreement has been revised away from a “position funding” approach to a “service reimbursement” approach, for better compliance with Special Education requirements.

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts –Reimbursement rates established: For Special Education and MA Option 2 services reimbursed by the District (Attachment A) Service description included (Attachment B) Position Job Description included (Attachment C) Special Education eligibility requirements included (Attachment D) Funding estimates and sources identified (Attachment E)

School-based Mental Health Services Contracts Both Agreements: –Term of the Agreement identified. –Contract termination language included. –Client and service eligibility defined. –Responsibilities of both parties listed. –Ownership of clinical records described. –Responsibility for funding disallowances or paybacks delineated. –“Other Conditions” as required by State and Federal regulations listed.

School-based Mental Health Services Accomplishments Development of the Intake, billing, and quality assurance (QA) manual Initial training for school social workers complete Clinical supervision arrangements in place, providing ongoing supervision for each social worker Steering Committee meeting regularly to oversee the development and growth of SBMHS activities Special Education-Mental Health workgroup meeting to sort out billing and QA procedures The school social workers are ready to move forward with the new processes and procedures

School-based Mental Health Services The Future As LCTS money becomes less certain, the sustainability of the school social worker is improved with this funding system The LCTS funding is replaced with a fee-for-service model focused upon the grant and MA revenues Children with mental health disabilities in the school setting are more likely to be identified, to receive services, and improve by utilizing school-based services Student performance is likely to improve as underlying causes for problems are addressed Children can receive year-round services through mental health partnerships School staff can be trained in mental health screening, and mental health difficulties can be de- stigmatized.