OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Advertisements

Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 2: Setting the agenda and running the routine meeting.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 1: Preparing for a routine: Self-assessment and calibration.
Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of State Support (OSS)
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Maximizing Effectiveness Using Positive Behavior Support Methods in the Classroom: Collaborative Teaming.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Building a Data-Driven School Hilary Shea September 26, 2006.
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 3: Ensuring routines are data driven.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Facilitator Training Program
Facilitator Training Program. Day One Agenda – Day One Welcome Getting Started Activity Course Objectives Overview of Facilitation Skills Facilitation.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Collaborative Data Teams
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
QS 702 Phase II: Encouraging the Integration of Technology Into Higher Education.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Examining Monitoring Data
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
1 Reading First Action Seminar Los Angeles Unified Schools October 28, 2004.
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
©2014 Renaissance Learning. All rights reserved. 1 STAR User Group June 5, 2015.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
1 Building Faculty Involvement. 2 Objectives Understand why staff need to be committed to decreasing problem behaviors and increasing academic behaviors.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
Module F Reviewing the Problem Solving Process Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
1 Building Faculty Involvement. 2 Objectives Understand why staff need to be committed to decreasing problem behaviors and increasing academic behaviors.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Literacy Team September Introductions and Roles Literacy Coach Roles Providing and demonstrating a variety of new literacy strategies monthly “Test.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Data to collect and questions to ask to understand the meaning of the data.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Instructional Leadership.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
MA DSAC Collaboration Institute for Special and General Education Leaders Session 2: November 15, 2011 Focus on Clear and Collaborative Relationships.
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Identifying Process Improvements for Better Customer Satisfaction
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Training Officers Consortium
Chicago Public Schools
Critical Element: PBIS Team
Presentation transcript:

OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education

1 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute EDI works with K-12 and higher education partners across the United States Our higher education practice involves… ▪ Systems of higher education ▪ Institutions of higher education ▪ Higher education nonprofits Red denotes both Our K-12 practice involves… ▪ State education agencies ▪ Districts ▪ Schools ▪ Education nonprofits

2 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Introductions Who do we have in the room today? What do you hope to get out of this workshop series?

3 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute We are going to improve our ability to answer all four of these questions during this workshop series “Delivery” (n.) is a systematic process through which school leaders can drive progress and deliver results. It will enable a system to answer the following questions rigorously: 1 What is our system trying to do? 2 How are we planning to do it? 3 At any given moment, how will we know whether we are on track? 4 If not on track, what are we going to do about it?

4 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute This workshop series will focus on improving the way we use data to monitor progress on campus 1.Self-assess our progress monitoring and begin planning for improvement. 2.Improving and practicing our process for coming to a shared view of progress with our own data. 3.Design and test our new progress- monitoring routine start to finish. 4.Plan to implement our new progress- monitoring process across campus.

5 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Here are our objectives for today ▪ Determine our progress monitoring routine of focus and assess its quality ▪ Learn about strategies to improve the way we monitor progress ▪ Begin to plan for improving our routine based on our self- assessment

6 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Here is our agenda TimeSession 9:00 – 9:50Welcome and overview 9:50 – 11:00Determining our progress monitoring routine of focus and assessing its quality 11:00 – 11:55Learning how to improve the way we monitor progress 11:55 – 12:00Workshop close and exit ticket

7 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute There are simple steps you can take to make the most of the workshop!  Choose a team leader/facilitator  Suspend disbelief!  Ask yourself, “What can we do now, with what we have?”  Try not to get caught up in the minute details  Leverage the expertise at the table

8 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute

9 Pulse check! Use cards and markers to answer these questions, then place your cards on the brown paper: ▪ What types of data do we use most often? ▪ What keeps our data from being more useful (or as useful as we want it to be)?

10 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Here is our agenda TimeSession 9:00 – 9:50Welcome and overview 9:50 – 11:00Determining our progress monitoring routine of focus and assessing its quality 11:00 – 11:55Learning how to improve the way we monitor progress 11:55 – 12:00Workshop close and exit ticket

11 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What’s going on here? Scenario: School Leadership Team Meeting ▪ A principal and her leadership team are reviewing last year’s formative assessment scores and observation results for each third grade teacher. They want to decide how to support each teacher this year. ▪ There is a lot of data and it’s tough for the team to agree on which assessment trends and observations are meaningful, so they conclude that they will keep their eyes peeled early in the year and assign support as soon as it’s clear who needs it the most.

12 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What happens at your school? What has to happen for you to feel like you had a productive conversation using data at your school?

13 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Conversations about progress need to feel productive in order to drive improvement From ▪ Discussing the definitions of the data and who is or is not included ▪ Questioning whether the data are reliable enough to answer our questions ▪ Using the data to admire the problem ▪ Disagreeing about the conclusions to be drawn from the available data Changes in our conversations about progress To ▪ Discussing the trends we see in the results ▪ Using data that are relevant to the work we are doing to hit our goals for students ▪ Using the data to solve the problem ▪ Reaching consensus in order to make decisions based on what the data say

14 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The rubric uses our four defining characteristics of good data routines Strong execution Regularity Focus on performance Action on performance All good meetings Good routines

15 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The rubric uses our four defining characteristics of good data routines Strong execution ■ Buy-in to purpose and preparedness? ■ Clear roles and responsibilities? ■ Participants come prepared? ■ High-quality materials? ■ Well facilitated? ■ Clear next steps? Regularity ■ Happens regularly enough? ■ Right people present? Focus on performance ■ Clear area of focus? ■ Shared view of performance? ■ Focus on most important aspects? Action on performance ■ Helps identify most critical barriers? ■ Tough questions asked? ■ Creative problem-solving? ■ Encourages learning?

16 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Remember, it’s an iterative journey “The meetings did not always go well.” Instruction to Deliver, p.95

17 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute How can we get to a point where our conversations about progress look like this all the time? Using self-assessment rubric, we can pinpoint where our routines need strengthening:

18 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Exercise: our routine self-assessment WhatHowMaterialsTime ▪ Determine which routine you will reflect upon − The “name” of routine − What do we assess during the routine? − How frequently does it occur? − What data do we use? ▪ Using the rubric, reflect on your routine and rate it against each category ▪ Compare ratings and come to consensus, recording your responses on cards and placing them on brown paper ▪ School teams ▪ Individually ▪ School teams ▪ Flipchart ▪ Rubric ▪ Brown paper ▪ Cards ▪ Markers ▪ 10 minutes ▪ 20 minutes

19 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Here is our agenda TimeSession 9:00 – 9:50Welcome and overview 9:50 – 11:00Determining our progress monitoring routine of focus and assessing its quality 11:00 – 11:55Learning how to improve the way we monitor progress 11:55 – 12:00Workshop close and exit ticket

20 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Progress monitoring activities in key aspects across schools Progress monitoring conversations look different across schools depending on their purpose. Key differences include: ▪ Data used ▪ Frequency ▪ People involved ▪ Outcome (or objectives)

21 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Oregon turnaround schools assess progress on the key interventions occurring on campus Progress monitoring three key interventions in an Oregon school ▪ Data used – Quarterly formative assessment results – Qualitative ratings and conversations with principle coaches – Planning and financial data ▪ Frequency – Varies; at least quarterly ▪ People involved – School leadership team – Turnaround coach ▪ Outcome – Concrete next steps at the school and support requested from the ODE Department of School Turnaround

22 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute In order to assess progress, schools needed to complete a “strategy profile” and clarify their goals Strategy profile template for Oregon schools

23 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A BIE school in South Dakota is focusing specifically on K-2 literacy ▪ Data used – Regular Journeys formative assessment results (at least bi- weekly) – Observation data from coaches and assistant principal ▪ Frequency – Very regular (weekly or bi-weekly) ▪ People involved – Assistant principal – Teacher – Instructional coach ▪ Outcome – Interventions to be put in place immediately ▫ Students ▫ Teacher ▫ Support staff K-2 literacy progress monitoring in a BIE school

24 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Exercise: beginning our plan for improvement WhatHowMaterialsTime ▪ Based on your greatest areas for improvement, discuss: − What are the 2-3 biggest challenges you face in improving your progress monitoring routine? − What is one thing you could do tomorrow to address each challenge? − What could you start doing within the next 2 months to address each challenge? − What are your next steps to make these things happen? ▪ School teams ▪ Brown paper ▪ Cards ▪ Markers ▪ 30 minutes

25 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Here is our agenda TimeSession 9:00 – 9:50Welcome and overview 9:50 – 11:00Determining our progress monitoring routine of focus and assessing its quality 11:00 – 11:55Learning how to improve the way we monitor progress 11:55 – 12:00Workshop close and exit ticket

26 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Exit ticket! What do you want to get out of the next three workshops? What support do you need to reach this goal?

Thank