Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Elementary School Counselor
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
1 9/14/12. Core Principles of OIP (SPDG)  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership Team (district & building)
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Timberlane Regional School District
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
“Commitment to Children” Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team L IMESTONE C OUNTY S CHOOL S YSTEM.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module page:  OIP Four Stage Graphic  DLT/CSLT-BLT-TBT Cog Graphic  Poster Paper and/or projector Time Needed: 20 Minutes to watch video You may want to stop the video at certain points to discuss the information provided and/or clarify important points.

Introduction to The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) for Superintendent Board of Education District/Building Administrators

OLAC Leadership Framework Provides Foundation for the Ohio Improvement Process

OIP is the enactment of Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework

Seven Core Principles of OIP 1.A focused plan aligns vision, mission, and philosophy. 2.The process is continuous and recursive, and the plan is a dynamic document. 3.The process relies on quality data interpretation. 4.All leadership teams use a collaborative, collegial process. 5.An efficient communication approach ensures all stakeholders are consistently informed of progress at each stage. 6.The process produces one focused, integrated plan that directs all work and resources. 7.The process expects substantive changes in student performance and adult practices as a result of implementing, monitoring and evaluating the process and plan.

PREPARING FOR THE OIP Define Leadership in Terms of Practice  Individuals and Board  Collaborative Teams We are all leaders!

Roles and Responsibilities of the Superintendent in the OIP Oversee the OIP and establish systems, structures and supports to implement the process with a primary focus on instructional improvement for all students Select the DLT; set direction and expectations for the DLT Be present and practice shared leadership with the DLT Ensure that teacher based teams are fully implemented across all buildings and grade levels Engage staff and community in the planning process Create collaborative structures to ensure plan development, implementation and evaluation Approve a single focused, data-driven plan, research-based plan Ensure data is shared across all levels (DLT, BLTs, TBTs) Budget the plan Monitor plan development Hold participants accountable for results

Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Education in the OIP  Create and adopt planning policy  Approve goals prior to full plan development  Adopt focused plan/budget  Monitor plan results (adult and student indicators)  Communicate goals, progress and expectations to community

Roles and Responsibilities of Central Office Administrators in the OIP  Share roles with other central office administrators in support of all students  Be a learner in the district attending trainings and high leverage workshops that focus on improved teaching and student learning  Work with BLTs and TBTs to develop supports based on needs versus isolated funding mechanisms  Provide support to building principals to move to a service delivery model that unifies support for all students  Develop focused PD plan that aligns to OIP plan goals and strategies, and supports TBTs in their differentiated training needs

Roles and Responsibilities of the Building Administrator in the OIP -Be the lead learner in the building by modeling the use and application of data to inform instructional effectiveness, as well as fostering a learning organization throughout the building -Ensure time for the BLT and TBTs to meet on a regular basis -Select the BLT; set direction and expectations for the BLT -Be present and model shared leadership with the BLT -Prepare TBTs on their roles and responsibilities -Monitor plan action development and provide support for TBTs -Ensure data is shared across levels (DLT, BLTs, TBTs) -Engage staff and community in planning process -Approve/support a single focused, data-driven, researched-based plan -Align resources to the school plan with a focus on improved instructional improvement for all students -Hold participants accountable for results

Roles and Responsibilities of the OIP Facilitator  Serve as a critical friend who is a trusted partner, advocates for the success of the work, asks thought-provoking questions, ensures responses are open and honest, and provides constructive feedback  Manage and direct meeting processes using a range of facilitation strategies  Understand meetings and make decisions affecting meeting dynamics  Keep the group focused on outcomes

Shift focus from single individuals to teams that can function as purposeful communities Distribute key leadership functions Align work system-wide while focusing on a limited number of data-based district goals Ensure effective leadership is exercised at all levels of the system Engage in all four stages of the OIP for the long-term Collaborative Leadership Team Structures in the OIP

District/Community School Leadership Team Responsibilities : Develop, implement and monitor a district focused action plan based on critical data Build a system-wide foundation for data-driven decision making Facilitate the development and use of collaborative structures (DLT, BLTs and TBTs) Using the Ohio 5-Step Process, monitor adult behaviors against student performance indicators designated in the plan Ensure high quality, differentiated PD consistent with district goals and based on adult and student data at all levels

DLT/CSLT Membership Superintendent Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Special Education Director Building Administrators Other Stakeholders At least 50% Instructional Staff

Building Leadership Teams Responsibilities Develop, implement, and monitor the focused building improvement plans Build a school culture that supports effective data-driven decision making Establish priorities for instruction and achievement aligned with district goals Ensure conditions for, support and monitor Teacher Based Teams Monitor and provide effective feedback on adult implementation and student progress using the Ohio 5-Step Process Report building-level adult and student results to DLT and TBTs Make recommendations of resources, time, and personnel to meet district goals

BLT Membership Classroom Teacher Principa l Classroom Teacher Intervention Specialist ELL Specialist Instructional Coach Parent Liaison Guidance Counselor Other Stakeholder

Teacher Based Teams  Improve instructional practices by following the Ohio 5-Step Process:  Step 1: Collect and chart data to identify how students are performing and progressing  Step 2: Analyze student work specific to the data  Step 3: Establish shared expectations for implementing specific effective changes in the classroom  Step 4: Implement changes consistently across all classrooms  Step 5: Collect, chart and analyze pre/post data and determine effectiveness of instructional practices  Report results to the Building Leadership Team (BLT)  Share work and celebrate successes Responsibilities

Teacher Based Teams Grade Level Cross Content Vertical TBTs should include ALL instructional personnel, including Intervention specialists Subject Area

TBTs BLTs DLT/ CSLT

Stage 0: Planning and Preparing for the Ohio Improvement Process See Guide for DLT Membership, Timeline, and Orientation See Task Guide for Establishing BLT

The OIP: Four Stages of Continuous Improvement

STAGE 1: IDENTIFY CRITICAL NEEDS DATA -- ask and answer essential and probing questions to identify strengths, needs and causes DECISION FRAMEWORK

Student Academic Performance and Growth Instructional and Administrative Staff Data Curriculum and Instruction Assessment Processes Culture Discipline Attendance Graduation Drop-out Shared Leadership Practices Infrastructure and Systems Decision Framework

The Decision Framework: Student Achievement Trend Data 9/18/2015

The Decision Framework: Adult Implementation Data

The Decision Framework: Climate and Conditions 9/18/2015

DF District or Building Profile Results Select Limited Number of High Priorities High Priorities Become CCIP Needs Assessment Basis for OIP Plan to Improve Educational Outcomes for ALL Students

STAGE 2: DEVELOP FOCUSED PLAN Produce one focused, integrated plan that directs all district and/or building work and resources Goals Strategies Action Steps Indicators

Outcomes of Stage 2  Establish Adult Implementation and Student Performance Indicators for every Strategy  Create Action Steps and Tasks to support Strategies  Review, revise, and adopt OIP Plan  Develop 2-3 SMART Goals  Compose 2-3 Strategies for each Goal

Stage 3: Implement and Monitor the OIP Focused Action Plan Implementation Carry out the planned strategies and actions with fidelity Monitoring Ensure that both adults and students fulfill focused action plan expectations

Information Management and Monitoring Tool (IMM) Web-based tool Links automatically to CCIP Transfers CCIP Goals, Strategies and Action Steps into IMM School IMM linked to District IMM Generates valuable reports for monitoring progress –Goal Targets: Projected and Actual –Implementation Timeline –Communication

Stage 4: Evaluate the Improvement Plan and Process Identify and apply lessons learned Compare projected results with actual results Assess which adult practices impact student performance Identify strategies and actions with greatest impact Extend successes and eliminate unsuccessful practices Outcomes of Stage 4

Benefits of the Ohio Improvement Process Reduces Duplication of Effort Focuses on student success not programs Streamlines processes and procedures Promotes shared leadership and collaboration at all levels Builds personnel capacity Sustains entire system as learning organization