Every Child Deserves a Champion HB555 Recommendations Committee on Urban Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The State of Ohio’s Ninth Graders Will they be in this picture? Ninth Grade Make-It or Break-It Year Retreat March 31, 2006 Presented by Kathy Shibley,
Advertisements

System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
Values (How must we behave to reach our vision?) Mission ( Why do we exist?) Vision (What must our school become ?)
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Our Next Chapter Dr. Candice McQueen Commissioner of Education Attendance Supervisors’ Spring Conference April 24, 2015.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Behavioral issues and supports within Cradle to College and Career April 2012IDEA Partnership1.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013.
Local Wellness Policy THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Office of Elementary, Middle, Secondary and Continuing Education School Operations and Management.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Parent Night August 26, 2014 WELCOME to Kelly Edwards Elementary Where Dreams Begin Proud to be a Title I School.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Transformation In Progress Rhode Island’s Phase II Race to the Top August 10, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
Every Child Deserves a Champion HB555 Recommendations Committee on Urban Education.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
A Mission of Restoration
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Mission To help Ohio’s school districts, community-based agencies, and families work together to achieve improved educational and developmental outcomes.
School Counselors & Assignments \ Elementary Schools Demographic Information.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Transformational Leadership Group of Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Performance of Disadvantaged Youth November 23, 2010 Brenda Steele, Co-Chair.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
K-12 School Counseling Program Review
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Beecher Hills Elementary School (Mays Cluster)
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Full Committee The purpose of the SSEAC is to promote the education of children with disabilities by providing advice and policy guidance based on input.
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Presentation transcript:

Every Child Deserves a Champion HB555 Recommendations Committee on Urban Education

Present Charge to SBOE from General Assembly - Section 4 of HB 555 Not later than August 31, 2013, the state board of education shall submit to the General Assembly under section of the Revised Code recommendations for a comprehensive statewide plan to intervene directly in and improve the performance of persistently poor performing schools and school districts.

For purposes of fulfilling the requirements of this section, "persistently poor performing schools and school districts" means any of the following:

A.Priority schools and focus schools as defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act waiver issued by the United States Department of Education under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001; B.Schools and school districts that have been in school improvement status as defined by the United States Department of Education for four of the five most recent school years;

C.Schools and school districts whose performance index score places them in the bottom five per cent of schools statewide for three of the five most recent school years; D.Schools and school districts that have a value-added progress dimension grade of "F" for three of the five most recent school years under section of the Revised Code, as amended by this act, or the equivalent measure.

Where are the HB555 Schools?

What are the demographics of Students in the HB555 Schools? Special Education –726 schools (75%) have greater than 14% Economically Disadvantaged –785 schools (81%) have greater than 50% Race/Ethnicity –56.30% - White, non-Hispanic –31.82% - Black, non-Hispanic –5.31% - Multiracial –5.29% - Hispanic

Our Vision The vision of the State Board of Education (SBOE) is for all Ohio students to graduate from the PK-12 education system with the knowledge, skills and behaviors necessary to successfully continue their education and/or be workforce ready and successfully participate in the global economy as productive citizens. Ultimately, all students will graduate well prepared for success.

WHAT IS THE GOAL OF HB 555? TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? IF SO, BY HOW MUCH? PREPARE OUR CHILDREN TO BE COLLEGE AND CAREER READY? TO PREPARE OUR CHILDREN TO BE SUCCESSFUL? TO CLOSE THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP? OR AS MANY ARE FEARING WITH PARCC, TO CLOSE THE ACHIEVEMENT SINKHOLE? WHAT DOES ALL OF THIS MEAN?

Information Gathering Process Research of data such as Special Education, Economically Disadvantaged, Discipline, Attendance Rate, Graduation Rate, Race/Ethnicity, District Typology, etc. Received Department Presentations on various topics Conducted Survey – provide number of responses

Information Gathering Process (cont.) Meet with various Stakeholder groups Traditional –Ohio School Boards Association –OFT/OEA Focus Groups –Met with School Leaders –SIG-funded Schools – Cohort 1 schools Non-traditional –Ohio Health Plans Association –Department of Health

Barriers to Student Achievement:

Academic Barriers –Resources –Ineffective Teachers –Building Leaders –Lack of Supportive Administration –Alignment with Standards –Instructional Practices –School Environment/Climate –System for Leadership –Professional Development –Data-Driven decisions

Non-Academic Barriers –Health & Wellness Physical, Dental, Vision, Mental Behavioral/Emotional Social Determinants –Poverty –Housing –Transportation –Food –Safety –Incarceration –Employment –Lack of Parental/Family Involvement –Hopelessness

HOPE SEES THE INVISIBLE, FEELS THE INTANGIBLE, AND ACHIEVES THE IMPOSSIBLE. -ANONYMOUS

An opportunity to redesign an “education system”/ “learning community” that are sustainable – what does that mean? What strengths do we have to ignite or support innovation? What strengths do we have to create sustainable value? What strengths do we have to inspire others such as our students, teachers, building/district leaders, communities, etc.?

HB555 Recommendations Phase I – August 31, 2013 Ohio’s System of Differentiated Interventions and Supports (ESEA Waiver & HB 555)

Phase I – August 31, 2013 Use the Decision Framework to create LEA and building needs assessments to develop one focused plan for the LEA. Institute and fully implement data driven goals (including subgroup performance data and non-academic barriers to student leaning) to form one focused plan including PD for teachers and technical assistance by State Support Team or Educational Service Center. Implement School Improvement Model (SIG models or Ohio’s Intervention and Improvement Model). Interventions are embedded in School Improvement Plan, including addressing non-academic barriers to student learning.

HB555 Recommendations Phase 2 – Beyond August… Appreciative Inquiry Summit internal stakeholders external stakeholders

CHAMPIONS BUILD ON POSSIBILITIES. What are SBOE’s strengths? What are ODE’s strengths? What are school buildings’ strengths? What are the State of Ohio’s strengths?

Internal Stakeholders (Traditional) Students (show video clip) Families Teachers Building/District Leaders Support Staff such as janitors, lunch aides, etc. Higher Education Legislators Governor’s Office Foundations External Stakeholders (Non-Traditional) Hospitals Community Health Centers Managed Care Organizations Mental Health Business Community Rethink our approach to Existing Interventions

Phase 2 – Beyond August… Organize and conduct an Appreciative Inquiry Summit, bringing together as many internal and external stakeholders as possible, with the goal to discover, dream, design and deploy a sustainable learning community that inspires its students to be successful.

Make a Commitment to Action. No Excuses. Whatever It Takes. “Anything is possible when enough people realize that everything is at stake.” -Norman Cousins