1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Supporting Participating Teachers Through the CCSS Transition
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN March, 2015.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
EQuIP Rubric and Quality Review Curriculum Council September 26, 2014.
Implementing Common Core Mathematics in Long Beach Unified School District Successes & Challenges Anne Oberjuerge K-5 Math Curriculum Leader Becky Afghani.
The Common Core State Standards A Districtwide Dialogue for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
FAME: Formative Assessment for Michigan Educators A speed dating version!
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library Brian Huff September 3, 2014.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
State Standards Professional Learning Secondary Mathematics Cycle 2 January 13- February 7.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
Principal Network Series Lisa Andrew, Ed.D Martha Martinez District and School Support Services.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Two: November 2, 5, 6, 7, 2013.
Rigorous Curriculum Design
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 Science
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
From Compliance to Commitment: Implementing a District- wide Portfolio Initiative Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist,
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session One: September 4-7, 2013.
Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
CORE California Office to Reform Education C ALIFORNIA E DUCATION P ARTNERS Summer Design Institute June 18-20, 2012.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
May 13, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS FALL MEETING -- OCTOBER 26, 2014 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 ELA January 13- February 7.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
May 14, May 21, or June 4 Lisa Arneson, Literacy Curriculum Specialist Julee Dredske, Curriculum Specialist/Title III 1.
History/Social Studies State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 January 22 and 24.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Getting Started  Role  Experience with Common Core 1 – Novice 5 – Preparing to lead this work  Agenda  Materials on Wiki – 
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
RUBRICS AND SCALES 1. Rate yourself on what you already know about scales. Use the scale below to guide your reflection. 2.
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
ELA VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Common Core Transition Training SY May 6, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC)
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Public Consulting Group - PCG Education Helping Florida Charter Schools Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards 1.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
What about the Assessment System?
SUHSD ELA/ELD CCSS Transition
CCRS Implementation
Common Core State Standards
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Presentation transcript:

1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014

Essential Questions  How do we develop as professional educators to prepare students for college and career? (CSTP 6)  How is planning for student performance different from planning for coverage? (CSTP 4)  What role should formative assessment play in planning?(CSTP 5)

Anchor Text “From Common Core Standards to Curriculum: Five Big Ideas” By Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins

“The Standards come to life through the assessments.”  Read Big Idea #5. “The Standards come to life through the assessments.”  Write about it. How is planning for student performance different from planning for coverage?

Professional Meeting Norms 5  Value the opportunity to learn by coming prepared and by being willing to participate with an open mind.  Keep side-bar conversations to a minimum. Put all questions on the parking lot.  Limit use of electronics:  Text/ s/phone calls at breaks  Step out if you need to text or make a phone call  Close laptops until collaboration work time  Start and end on time. Honor break and lunch times.  Stay for the entire meeting

CCSS Implementation Goals  Teachers will understand and implement the CCSS in ELA/Literacy, ELD and Mathematics to operationalize the instructional shifts  Teachers will understand, develop and implement CCSS-aligned formative, interim, and summative assessment practices  Teachers and leaders will understand and implement CSTP’s and FUSD Leadership standards in alignment with CCSS

Overarching Outcomes for the Year ~CCSS~  Teachers and leaders are able to articulate independently expectations for students found in CCSS each quarter.  Teachers and leaders are able to understand and utilize the Scope & Sequence to plan and deliver lessons and modules in CCSS each quarter.  Teachers and leaders use student work to drive planning and determine student growth for each quarter. 7

Commitments  Increase complex talk and complex tasks through reading, writing, listening and speaking in complex text.  Engage students in Common Core grade-level standards through the use of the Scope and Sequence in planning.  Engage students in higher levels of thinking using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) reaching levels 2, 3 and 4.

LEARN APPLY FEEDBACK  CCSS Training for K-6, 7-12 Core Content Areas three times during the year  Lead Teacher session aligned to content of the trainings  Following each training, OPTIONAL: Additional 4 Hours of AC time to apply the learning as a team  Administrator and Coaches trainings aligned to content of teacher P.L. 9

Session Three Objective By the end of the session, teachers will understand the role of assessment in planning instructional sequences. They will be able to develop formative assessment opportunities embedded in instruction.

Objective application Teachers will plan or revise plans for instruction with specific attention to  What do we want students to learn? (standards)  How will we know they’ve learned it? (formative assessment)

Foundations  Four Grounding Questions  What do we want students to learn?  How will we know they learned it?  How will we respond when they didn’t learn?  How will we respond when they already know it?  When addressing question #2 in your AC …  … what are you using to assess student learning?  … when in the instructional sequence are you assessing?  … what types of tasks/items are you including in assessment? 12

Achieve: Exemplar Modules

Unpack sample modules  What do we want students to learn? Identify standards  How will we know they’ve learned it? Identify opportunities for formative assessment  Discuss and share  Apply Consider your own module/unit

Teaching Channel

Definition of Formative Assessment Process Called assessment for learning, formative assessment is a deliberate process used by teachers and students during instruction. Formative assessments do not result in a grade but instead can be used in the following ways:  Teachers can adapt instruction on the basis of evidence, making changes and improvements that will yield immediate benefits to student learning.  Students can use evidence of their current progress to actively manage and adjust their own learning. Stiggins, Arter, Chappuis, & Chappuis 16

Two Dimensions of Assessment  Formative and Summative  Embedded and Transfer of Learning 17

Formative or Summative?  Formative  Intention – inform next steps for teaching / learning  During an instructional sequence (lesson, module, unit)  Feedback is descriptive  Not for grading/ accountability  Summative  Intention - determines status of learning  After instructional sequence  Evaluative feedback  Ok for grading / accountability 18

Embedded or Transfer of Learning?  Embedded Within the unit/lesson A part of the teaching/ learning  Transfer of learning Can students transfer what is learned through teaching to a new context, without teaching support? 19

Lunch One hour

CCSS Appendix C

Dylan Wiliam on Formative Assessment

Rubrics A rubric is an evaluation tool containing a set of criteria and a performance scale used to discriminate among different degrees of quality, understanding, or proficiency (McTighe, 2003)

Benefits of Rubrics Rubrics provide students with…  specific criteria for evaluating their own performance  a tool for identifying the qualities of strong (and possibly weak) performance  clear targets for goal setting  identification of each component of expected product

Types of Rubrics Holistic Task- Specific Analytic Generic

SBAC Performance Task 

Commitments  Increase complex talk and complex tasks through reading, writing, listening and speaking in complex text.  Engage students in Common Core grade-level standards through the use of the Scope and Sequence in planning.  Engage students in higher levels of thinking using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) reaching levels 2, 3 and 4.  Engage students in assessments that are standards-based and SBAC aligned with clear criteria for success defined by rubrics. ( )

Objective application Teachers will plan or revise plans for instruction with specific attention to  What do we want students to learn? (standards)  How will we know they’ve learned it? (formative assessment)

Closure  Feedback: How will formative assessment be applied to planning and to AC work?  Feedback: Online form in iACHIEVE

Online Feedback Form What: Professional Learning Feedback How: Online feedback form in iACHIEVE Why: Your feedback helps guide and improve future professional learning opportunities Privacy: Feedback is completely anonymous

Submitting Feedback 1. Use a computer or mobile device 2. Go to iachieve.truenorthlogic.com 3. Log in with your district account 4. Click ‘My Page’ 5. Under ‘My Surveys’ click ‘Start Survey’ 6. Complete the form and click ‘Record and Return to Menu’ Refer to the documentation on Completing Feedback Surveys