Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jerry Gordon Lead Systems Engineer, AAI Corporation.
Advertisements

Office of Aviation Safety Customs and Border Protection Predator B Accident Nogales, Arizona April 25, 2006.
Casa RPAS regulatory Development
Flight Testing Advanced Unmanned Aircraft Michael McDaniel - AIR Naval Air Systems Command NAS Patuxent River, MD, USA DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A:
Interfacing with Computer Associate Degree in Education (ADE) Lecture 04 Sajid Riaz.
SPX Improving the safety of high performance single pilot aircraft operations.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Microsoft Windows Vista Chapter 6 Customizing Your Computer Using the Control Panel.
NexGen ATM System A Perspective National Workshop on Aviation Software Systems: Design for Certifiably Dependable Systems October 5-6, 2006 Presented by.
Exploring the Basics of Windows XP. Objectives Start Windows XP and tour the desktop Explore the Start menu Run software programs, switch between them,
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Design of a Certifiably Dependable Next- Generation Air Transportation System Stephen A. JacklinMichelle M. Eshow Michael R. LowryDave McNally Ewen Denny.
Page No. 1 6/27/2015 On The Need for Lunar Lander Simulations: A Human Factors Perspective Robert S. McCann Human-Systems Integration Division NASA Ames.
The Settings Menu. Click here to open the Settings menu.
Survival guide Garmin G500 / GTN650 An introduction to “new generation” avionics. Royal West Aviation Club – 30 May 2015.
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 4 Flight Preparation.
Pilotless Aircraft / Remotely Piloted Aircraft Instructor Seminar August 2011.
Operating Systems Day 3. Changing Date & Time 1.Double click on digital clock on the notification area of a task bar (Click start button, Click control.
Airbus flight control system  The organisation of the Airbus A330/340 flight control system 1Airbus FCS Overview.
Airbus flight control system
A New Method for the Tele-operation of Aircraft Dr. Paul Oh James Hing.
Special Topics Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Dr. Mark Askelson | 4149 University Avenue Stop 9006, Grand Forks, ND phone | fax Ganged Phased Array Radar – Risk Mitigation.
May 2010Approval of Experimental Aircraft for Instrument Flight APPROVAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT FOR INSTRUMENT FLIGHT Richard L (Dick) Newman (M) and.
Cirrus Transition Course
Office of Aviation Safety Customs and Border Protection Predator B Accident Nogales, Arizona April 25, 2006.
September1 Managing robot Development using Agent based Technologies Dr. Reuven Granot Former Scientific Deputy Research & Technology Unit Directorate.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
WINDOWS Part 1 – Start Up Basics
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
XP 1 Microsoft Word 2002 Tutorial 1 – Creating a Document.
XP New Perspectives on Windows XP Tutorial 1 Exploring the Basics.
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Introduction to Windows Chapter 2.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
NextGen Current System Primary Radar – Creates blip on Radar Screen Secondary Radar – Aircraft encodes identifier and telemetry data VHF Radio – Voice.
WILDFIRE UAS Concept of Operations US Forest Service Fire & Aviation Management DRAFT.
1 IE 590D Applied Ergonomics Lecture 26 – Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Automation Vincent G. Duffy Associate Prof. School of IE and ABE Thursday April.
Vyew - Basic Tools Basic whiteboard tools are located on the left side of the window. Click on the “A” to type on the screen. Click on the yellow sticky.
Situation Awareness & Levels of Automation David Kaber and Kheng-Wooi Tan Mississippi State University.
SVDM ConOps 18 May 2010 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management ConOps Presentation to COMSTAC Space Transportation.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
Ground Control Station Flight conTrol
Single Pilot Resource Management (SRM) And The CFI
Air Line Pilots Association, International Shared Skies: Safe Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Captain Sean Cassidy 1 st Vice President National.
Computing Fundamentals Module Lesson 7 — The Windows Operating System Computer Literacy BASICS.
UNMANNED AVIATION QUALIFICATION FLIGHT SKILLS TEST BRIEFING UAVAirways Limited | Registered in England No: | UAQ Skills Test v1.0.
Human Factors An Overview
Human-Centered Systems Background People play a critical role in the safety, reliability and performance of NASA systems. Their creativity, adaptability.
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION HUMAN FACTORS. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED TO PREVENT FUTURE ACCIDENTS A. TRAINING B. TESTING.
XP New Perspectives on Microsoft Windows XP Tutorial 1 1 Microsoft Windows XP Creating a Web Site Tutorial 1.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Rotorcraft VFR Part 91 Operations Pilot Certification & Operating Rules Aircraft Electronics Association.
Intelligent UAS Situation Awareness and Information Delivery Qian Hu & Chris Jella MSR Disclaimer The contents of this document reflect the views of the.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
Customs and Border Protection Predator B Accident
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Bomgar Remote support software
UA.I.A.K2.
Customs and Border Protection Predator B Accident
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
New Entrants, Commercial Space and Changing Airspace Management
Unit 4 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center

Nogales Predator Accident

Emerging Issues 1.Transfer of risk 2.Teleoperation 3.Air traffic considerations 4.Transfer of control 5.The control station 6.Maintenance

Transfer of Risk UA collides with people or property on ground Other airspace user collides with UA

Public Tolerance of Risk Involuntary exposure Unfamiliar Radioactive waste Commercial aviation Skateboards Lead paint Pesticides Trampolines Water fluoridation Automobile accidents Smoking Nuclear weapons Familiar Voluntary exposure Genetically modified organisms Paul Slovic, 2000

Flight Termination Manned vs unmanned mindset Information requirements

Teleoperation Reduced perceptual cues Potential for reduced situational awareness Control/consequence incompatibility Latencies Link management

The Loop Human-in-the-loop – Manual – Via automation Human-on-the-loop Human-out-of-the-loop

Capability of on-board automation HOOTLHITL HOTL

Capability of on-board automation HOOTLHITL HOTL

Capability of on-board automation HOOTLHITL HOTL

Capability of on-board automation HOOTLHITL HOTL

Teleoperation + Automation “After take-off the unmanned aircraft began an uncommanded bank to the left. It then impacted the ground at full power in a nose down attitude approximately 60 feet from the launch site. Testing after the accident indicated that the ground station computer was running slow and the software was locking up. The computer was changed and the system returned to normal status”.

Automation Automation surprise Automation complacency Mode awareness & mode errors Engagement & workload Workarounds Data entry errors – Tunes out small errors – May increase probability of large errors

Teleoperation + Automation

Air Traffic Lack of out-the-window view Timeliness of response? Autonomous collision avoidance? Lost link? Impact on ATC workload and efficiency Voice latencies

Transfer of Control Between control stations, between consoles within control station, crew change, link change Complicating factors: – Off-duty crew may leave workplace – Geographical separation – High potential for mode error – Long duration flights

Transfer of Control

1 3 2

Control Stations

70 years of cockpit design experience ignored Inadequate feedback to crew on system state Multi-mode controls and displays Difficult to read fonts and colors Placement of critical controls next to non- critical controls Reliance on text displays Display proliferation

IFF transponder “IDENT” 1. Remove right hand from control stick 2. Move curser to tracker display 3. Click on TOOLS menu 4. Scroll to IFF 5. Click to open IFF window 6. Click “IDENT” button 7. Click “APPLY” Curser is accessed by trackball and Left/Right buttons Note: In manned aircraft, the pilot response to ATC-directed “IDENT” command is one step: 1. Push a button.

Fuel Heat Inhibit Disable / EnableF9 Turning on the fuel heat system. Note: This switch labeling has been changed to: “Fuel Heat: ON / OFF” On-screen menu items refer to Function Keys for control.

Human Factors in UAS Maintenance

UAS Maintenance Diverse skill and knowledge requirements Lack of direct feedback on aircraft performance Repetitive assembly and handling Maintenance while missions underway Lack of documentation Salvage decisions Maintenance and fault diagnosis of IT systems

Maintenance and Fault Diagnosis of IT Systems Ill-defined faults Consumer hardware and software Laptop use discipline

Maintenance and Fault Diagnosis of IT Systems “The desktop computer, which was serving as the ground control system, locked up while the unmanned aircraft was in flight. The only alternative was to re-boot the computer, and this took about two to three minutes before command- and-control was reestablished. The unmanned aircraft’s flight path, however, was already uploaded so there was no effect on the flight.”

Final thoughts Public perceptions may matter more than “equivalent level of safety” We need to get it right from the start We need to apply old lessons, and learn new ones There is an acute need to learn from UAS incidents and accidents