Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M 1 and M 2 – Masses of the two objects [kg] G – Universal gravitational constant G = 6.67x N m 2 /kg 2 or G = 3.439x10 -8 ft 4 /(lb s 4 ) r – distance.
Advertisements

Solomon William KAMUGASA
SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Gauging Devices.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
A Laser Based Alignment System for the CLIC project
JINR: J. Budagov, V. Glagolev, M. Lyablin, G. Shirkov CERN: H. Mainaud Durand, G. Stern A laser based fiducial line for high precision multipoint alignment.
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
Measurement report of Boostec girders Control after receipt Sylvain GRIFFET, 13/12/2010 Measurements performed on the 1 st and 2 nd of December 2010 with.
Geometric Dimensions and Tolerances
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Dmitry Gudkov BE/RF/PM CLIC Module Working Group PROTOTYPE TWO-BEAM MODULES (CLEX) Supporting and positioning system for CLEX modules main conclusions.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
DBQ support – motorization and performance upgrade Mateusz Sosin EN/MEF-SU.
A.Ostaptchouk AMS Meeting at CERN, 16 July Measurements of Octagon Walls with 3D CMM Characteristics of 3D CMM Measurement program Results of insert.
RUDE Vivien With the help of Hélène MAINAUD-DURAND And Mateusz SOSIN BE/ABP/SU CLIC MODULE September 19, 2011 Présentation REPORT OF THE CURRENT TESTS.
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Dmitry Gudkov BE-RF-PM CLIC Module Working Group Engineering design of the adjustable supporting system for DBQ.
Definitions and Symbols © 2008 Mr. Brewer. A flat surface that never ends.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
Splash Screen. Concept Label your diagram with the following new points: D E F G.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
1.7 Introduction to Perimeter, Circumference, and Area Geometry.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Magnetic Metrology of SOLEIL Synchrotron S.R. Multipoles IMMW 14, A. Madur Magnetic Metrology of SOLEIL Synchrotron Storage Ring Multipoles A. Dael, P.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
1 DFS Studies on the Main Linac with Rnd-walk-like motion (preliminary) Accelerator Physics Meeting 02 october 2007 Freddy Poirier.
1 DFS Studies on the Main Linac with Rnd-walk-like motion LET Beam Dynamics Workshop 12 th December 2007 Freddy Poirier.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
Jean-Christophe Gayde CERN-EST/SUEDMS Id: Juin 2003 ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER PRE-ASSEMBLY SURVEY DATA ANALYSIS CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM DEFINITION 11.
Procurement for the Supporting Systems
VELO Integr - Jan06Jean-Christophe GAYDE TS/SU EDMS n° SURVEY FOR VELO INSTALLATION 1.SURVEY AT GROUND FLOOR - FIDUCIALISATION 2.SURVEY FOR INSTALLATION.
X-Y Geometry Check Solid steel fixture used as template Saddles in fixture are precisely machined to within +/-.005 in one setup in a large CNC machine.
1) News on the long scale length calibration 2) Results of the two surveys performed on plane 7 Set 1: morning of 12/11/2004 Set 2: morning of 19/11/2004.
Measurements of DB supporting systems Fiducialisation Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements performed in February and early March /13 EDMS n°
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole update 27 th January 2011 Mechanical Engineering status update N. Collomb1.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND Studies on active pre-alignment for the CLIC project.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
Stave 4008 Z rubyballs coordinates
TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system
Alignment methods developed for the validation of the thermal and mechanical behavior of the Two Beam Test Modules for the CLIC project Hélène MAINAUD.
ob-fpc: Flexible printed circuits for the alice tracker
Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN
TBL quadrupole mover prototype development
Towards a common mechanical interface
Outer Tracker Nominal Position
Length of Plant Life in Weeks
Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement
Presentation transcript:

Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500 EDMS n°

Plan INTRODUCTION Tolerances to be checked Coordinates system Summary 3079 girder 3069 girder CONCLUSION Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 2/13

INTRODUCTION The objective of the measurements is to perform the dimensional control of the 2 Boostec girders on site before receipt at CERN. We measured this girders according to Nicolas Chritin plans and tolerances (EDMS n° ) using the Laser Tracker Leica LTD500. Measurement conditions were good: temperature stability of 20.5°C to 20.8°C during the day. We will present measurement results with an accuracy of about 10 µm rms for the flatness and coaxiality and of about 20 µm rms for the positioning. Measurement report of Boostec girders 3/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Tolerances to be checked Measurement report of Boostec girders 4/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Reference A Reference D Reference E Reference C Reference B Reference F (Idem B) Reference G Reference H Reference I Reference A REFERENCE A POSITIONING 319 mm PERPENDICU LARITY POSITIONING 529 mm Reference D POSITIONING 210 mm PERPENDICU LARITY Reference E REFERENCE E POSITIONING 1946 mm* PARALLELIS M PERPENDICU LARITY Reference C REFERENCE C PERPENDICU LARITY Reference B MEDIAN PLAN mm POSITIONING 65 mm Reference F (idem B) MEDIAN PLAN mm POSITIONING 65 mm Reference G AXIS POSITIONING 65 mm POSITIONING 65 mm PLANEITY OR COAXIALITY YES General tolerances of ± 0.01 mm, *Tolerances of ± 0.1 mm

Tolerances to be checked Measurement report of Boostec girders 5/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Tolerances to be checked Measurement report of Boostec girders 6/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Coordinates system In a first time: _ Y axis = mean cylinders axis _ Z axis = perpendicular to the mean plan A _ System origin O = intersection of Y with the mean plan C However: _ The cylinder diameter is not exactly 120 mm long but mm (LTD measurement) After checking of the V-supports geometry, the following coordinate system was chosen: _ Y axis = mean cylinders axis corrected by the offset of √2*Δφ/2, so mm _ Z axis = perpendicular to the mean plan A _ System origin O = intersection of Y with the mean plan C Measurement report of Boostec girders 7/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Summary Measurement report of Boostec girders 8/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder The only significant flatness faults for the 3079 girder are the following: Definition of the upper plan D global: 15 µm rms. This fault has no impact because of the choice of the independent DBQ adjustment. The local fault on the D plan on the girder centre: 49 µm rms, range of mm to mm. The concerning location is not essential to the DBQ adjustment.

Summary Measurement report of Boostec girders 9/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder Positioning fault: The side plan F, B, H and I are not correctly located with respect to the median plan: offsets of the order of 0.15 mm whereas the tolerance is ± 10 µm. We propose that Boostec will machine the girder where there is too much material and for our part, we will define shims from CMM measurements to wedge where there is a lack of material.

3079 girder The location of the D(entry) plan with respect to the beam axis is mm instead of -210 mm. There is no impact because of the DBQ adjustment. The distance between the lower plan A and the beam axis is too short of about 30 µm. The CMM measurement will permit to determinate with a better accuracy this fault and its impact. No problem of perpendicularity. Summary Measurement report of Boostec girders 10/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Summary Measurement report of Boostec girders 11/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder The only significant flatness faults for the 3069 girder are the following: Definition of the upper plan D global: 19 µm rms. Like for the first girder this fault has no impact. The local fault on the D plan on the girder centre: 43 µm rms, range of mm to mm. The concerning location is not essential to the DBQ adjustment.

Summary Measurement report of Boostec girders 12/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder Positioning fault: The side plan F, B, H and I are not correctly located with respect to the median plan: offsets of the order of 0.10 mm whereas the tolerance is ± 10 µm. In addition the girder is too narrow of approximately 50 µm. We propose the same solution as for the first girder : machining by Boostec and wedging by CERN. The location of plans D, entry and exit, with respect to the beam axis are respectively mm and m instead of -210 mm. There is no impact because of the DBQ adjustment. No problem of perpendicularity.

CONCLUSION According to the results and accuracy of LTD500, we can say that the Boostec girders don’t respect all the tolerances defined by Nicolas Chritin. The positioning faults seem to come from a mistake on the drawings instead of a lack of know-how However, following the «Dimensional control and fiducialisation » meeting of November the 9 th, we think it will be possible to correct the faults if the girders are machined on the side plans. These corrections are possible because there are only two Boostec girders, but for the future of CLIC, when we speak of thousands of modules, it will be necessary to better translate our expectations into drawings. Measurement report of Boostec girders 13/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010

Flatness and coaxiality 3079 girder _ Plans flatness : A : 9 µm rms D (entry) : 9 µm rms D (exit) : 10 µm rms D global (entry + exit) : 15 µm E : 2 µm rms C : 7 µm rms Bg : 5 µm rms Bd : 5 µm rms Fg : 9 µm rms Fd : 2 µm rms H : 8 µm rms I : 4 µm rms For all plans, the measurement flatness is of the order of the LTD accuracy, except for the D global plan. In addition, there is a local fault on the D (entry) plan, located on the solder, at the center of the girder: flatness of 49 µm rms. _ Axis coaxiality for the cylinder locations: 10 µm RMS Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Flatness and coaxiality 3069 girder _ Plans flatness : A : 13 µm rms D (entry) : 7 µm rms D (exit) : 8 µm rms D global (entry + exit) : 19 µm E : 2 µm rms C : 7 µm rms Bg : 6 µm rms Bd : 7 µm rms Fg : 10 µm rms Fd : 1 µm rms H : 8 µm rms I : 4 µm rms For all plans, the measurement flatness is of the order of the LTD accuracy, except for the D global plan. In addition, there is a local fault on the D (entry) plan, located on the solder, at the center of the girder: flatness of 43 µm rms. _ Axis coaxiality for the cylinder locations: 10 µm RMS Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Positioning 3079 girder _ Positioning of C with respect to E (along Y), distance between mean plans : mm or 89 µm of offset with respect to the nominal length. _ Positioning of A with respect to Y axis (along Z): distance from the mean plan A to the Y axis of mm or an offset of 28 µm. _ Positioning of Bg with respect to the median plan: mm instead of -65 mm Positioning of Bd with respect to the median plan: mm pour 65 mm Positioning of Fg with respect to the median plan: instead of -65 mm Positioning of Fd with respect to the median plan: mm instead of 65 mm The girder width is good but the distances to the median plan are not respected. Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Positioning 3079 girder _ Positioning of D plans: D(entry) without fault: mm instead of -210 mm, or an offset of 86 µm. D(entry), on the fault location, is located between a lower plan at mm and an upper plan at mm.  the fault does not exceed the girder. D(exit): mm instead of 210 mm _ Positioning of H with respect to Y axis (along X): mm instead of 65 mm _ Positioning of I with respect to Y axis (along X): instead of 65 mm H and I are consistent with the Bd and Fd plans: there is an offset of mm with respect to the median plan. Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Positioning 3069 girder _ Positioning of C with respect to E (along Y), distance between mean plans : mm or 75 µm of offset with respect to the nominal length. _ Positioning of A with respect to Y axis (along Z): distance from the mean plan A to the Y axis of mm, or an offset of 8 µm. _ Positioning of Bg with respect to the median plan: mm instead of -65 mm Positioning of Bd with respect to the median plan: mm instead of 65 mm Positioning of Fg with respect to the median plan: mm instead of -65 mm Positioning of Fd with respect to the median plan: mm instead of 65 mm The girder is too narrow of approximately 50 µm and the distances to the median plan are not respected. Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Positioning 3069 girder _ Positioning of D plans: D(entry) without fault: mm instead of mm, or an offset of 85 µm. D(entry), on the fault location, is located between a lower plan at mm and an upper plan at mm.  the fault does not exceed the girder. D(exit): mm instead of -210 mm _ Positioning of H with respect Y axis (along X): mm _ Positioning of I with respect to Y axis (along X): mm H and I are consistent with the Bd and Fd plans: there is an offset of -0.1 mm with respect to the median plan. Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Supple mentary Slide

Perpendicularity Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder E with respect to A: offset of 10 µrad or 3 µm at 32 cm C with respect to A: offset of -49 µrad or 16 µm at 32 cm Bg with respect to A: offset of -346 µrad or 7 µm at 2 cm Bd with respect to A: offset of 361 µrad or 7 µm at 2 cm Fg with respect to A: offset of 227 µrad or 5 µm at 2 cm Fd with respect to A: offset of 438 µrad or 9 µm at 2 cm H with respect to D (exit): offset of 1203 µrad or 24 µm at 2 cm I with respect to D (entry): offset of -438 µrad or 9 µm at 2 cm Supple mentary Slide

Perpendicularity Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder Bg with respect to E: offset of -56 µrad or 3 µm at 5 cm Bd with respect to E: offset of -89 µrad or 5 µm at 5 cm Fg with respect to C: offset of -112 µrad or 6 µm at 5 cm Fd with respect to C: offset of 24 µrad or 1 µm at 5 cm C with respect to Y axis (around X): offset of -54 µrad or 17 µm at 32 cm C with respect to Y axis (around Z): offset of -51 µrad or 7 µm at 13 cm E with respect to Y axis (around X): offset of 19 µrad or 6 µm at 32 cm E with respect to Y axis (around Z): offset of 14 µrad or 2 µm at 13 cm Supple mentary Slide

Perpendicularity Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder E with respect to A: offset of -33 µrad or 11 µm at 32 cm C with respect to A: offset of -5 µrad or 2 µm at 32 cm Bg with respect to A: offset of -602 µrad or 12 µm at 2 cm Bd with respect to A: offset of -335 µrad or 7 µm at 2 cm Fg with respect to A: offset of 377 µrad or 8 µm at 2 cm Fd with respect to A: offset of 473 µrad or 10 µm at 2 cm H with respect to D (exit): offset of 24 µrad or 1 µm at 2 cm I with respect to D (entry): offset of 679 µrad or 14 µm at 2 cm Supple mentary Slide

Perpendicularity Measurement report of Boostec girders Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/ girder Bg with respect to E: offset of 31 µrad or 2 µm at 5 cm Bd with respect to E: offset of -61 µrad or 3 µm at 5 cm Fg with respect to C : offset of -220 µrad or 11 µm at 5 cm Fd with respect to C : offset of -23 µrad or 1 µm at 5 cm C with respect to Y axis (around X) : offset of -57 µrad or 18 µm at 32 cm C with respect to Y axis (around Z) : offset of -2 µrad or 0.3 µm at 13 cm E with respect to Y axis (around X) : offset of 43 µrad or 14 µm at 32 cm E with respect to Y axis (around Z) : offset of -35 µrad or 5 µm at 13 cm Supple mentary Slide