Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1, 20101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

21 st Century Task Force Recommendation Go OHIO Transportation Futures Plan will deliver a detailed blueprint for transforming Ohios vast road, rail,
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
Chip Millard FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 15, 2013.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.
Freight Transportation in the Upper Midwest Transportation Border Working Group Calgary, Alberta Mr. Travis Gordon Midwest Regional University Transportation.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Office of Freight Management and Operations (HOFM) - Status and Future Directions Tony Furst, Director.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
MAG New Generation Freight Model SHRP2 C20 IAP Project Vladimir Livshits, Ph.D AMPO Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA October 23, 2014 Freight Session.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Freight and Transportation Planning Workshop- Executive Summary Presented by the Federal Highway Administration Date Location.
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning An Executive Overview Presented by the Federal Highway Administration January 16, 2007 TX Border Partnership.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Randy Mullett Vice President - Government Relations & Public Affairs, Con-way Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Webinar February 16, 2011 Riding the U.S. and Global.
Maine Department of Transportation Office of Freight Transportation 16 State House Station Augusta, Maine (207)
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Freight Demand Modeling: Tools for Public-Sector Decision Making First National Conference September 25-27, 2006 Washington D.C. Sponsored by TRB FHWA.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Federal Highway Administration,, US DOT Freight Modeling Research, Funding, and Collaboration Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE Office of Freight Management and.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Freight Issues and Policy Options Memphis Freight Planning Conference October 2, 2001 Gary Maring, FHWA.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Supply Chains and Private Sector Dynamics Major trends in freight logistics Supply chains basics Implications for planning Agenda.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
Technology and the National Freight Action Agenda U.S. Department of Transportation Richard M. Biter Deputy Director US DOT, Office of Intermodalism November.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions Freight Advisory Committee (FAC) Freight and Land Use: Making the Connection December 15, 2010 Ms.
DRIVERS OF INTERMODAL RAIL FREIGHT GROWTH IN NORTH AMERICA European Transport Conference 2007 Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands Session I International Rail.
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
U.S. Freight Railroad Infrastructure: Current and Future Issues Craig F. Rockey Vice President - Policy and Economics Association of American Railroads.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Authorization of a new Surface Transportation Act.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Office of Freight Management and Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C FHWA Freight Intermodal.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Patricia McDonald, Secretary Vermont Agency of Transportation
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Freight Shuttle Partners
Presentation transcript:

Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1, 20101

 Introductions  FHWA Video: Planning for Progress FHWA Video: Planning for Progress  Freight Planning  Where have we been?  Where are we going?  Stakeholders  Freight Modeling  Overview  Data Sources & Methods  Application  Conclusion Wednesday, December 1, 20102

 Majority of freight moves on facilities owned by State and Local governments  Prior to 1970’s – All interstate transportation subject to Federal economic regulation  1980s – Deregulation  Aviation Deregulation Act 1978  Motor Carrier Act 1980  Staggers Rail Act 1980  Ocean Shipping Act 1984 Wednesday, December 1, 20103

 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)  Added freight as a factor for states and MPOs to consider during their transportation planning efforts  Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21)  Encouraged states and MPOs to include shippers and freight service provides in the transportation planning process  Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of the 21 st Century (SAFETEA-LU)  Works to enhance the freight planning efforts in ISTEA and TEA-21 Wednesday, December 1, 20104

5

6

7  114,740 miles of roadways  3,947 miles of railways  491 miles of navigable waterways  29,489 miles of pipelines

Wednesday, December 1, 20108

9 Mode Trend Truck Rail Water Air > 0.0 Multi Modes & Mail Pipeline Other & Unknown 0.2

Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,  Public Sector  Federal, state, local transportation planning agencies  Economic development and trade organizations  Federal, state, local law enforcement  Non traditional federal, state agencies  Private Sector  Shippers and receivers of freight (businesses)  Freight transportation service providers  Owners and operators of freight facilities  Neighborhoods and communities affected by freight transportation

Wednesday, December 1,  Infrastructure Condition and Capacity  Funding  Federal Livability Initiative  Climate Change / Air Quality  State’s Smart Planning Initiative

Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,

“The economic competitiveness of our state is directly linked to how, why and where our businesses move their goods. Understanding these freight movements enables us to target policies and resources at highway, rail, water, and air corridors that will improve the State’s competitive position.” - Elwyn Tinklenberg, MN DOT Commissioner of Transportation Wednesday, December 1, Source: 2000 MN DOT Statewide Multimodal Freight Flows Study

 Factors affecting freight demand  Freight Transportation Modes  Air: cargo jets (Modal Characteristics Graphic)Modal Characteristics Graphic  Road: commercial vehicles (CV) or semi-trucks  Rail: freight trains  Water: barges and ships (Compare Graphic)Compare Graphic  Data Sources & Methods  Application Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1, Source: 2007 QRFM II: Incorporating Freight into “Four-Step” Travel Forecasting

 Factors affecting freight demand  Freight Transportation Modes  Air: cargo jets (Modal Characteristics Graphic)Modal Characteristics Graphic  Road: commercial vehicles (CV) or semi-trucks  Rail: freight trains  Water: barges and ships (Compare Graphic)Compare Graphic  Data Sources & Methods  Application Wednesday, December 1,

 Factors affecting freight demand  Economy (volume of goods produced vs. consumed)  Industrial Location Patterns (spatial distribution)  Globalization of Business  Just-in-Time (JIT) Inventory Practices (Inventory and Production in sync)  Centralized Warehousing (Increased use of 3PLs)  Fuel Prices  Truck Size & Weight Limits (Increased payload requires less trips and in return lowers operating costs)  Congestion  Technology Wednesday, December 1, Source: Quick Response Freight Manual. FHWA pp. 2-3 to 2-10.

 Data Sources (many available….sort of! ) ▪ Carload Waybill Sample ▪ Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) ▪ Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) ▪ LTL Commodity and Market Flow Database ▪ National Transportation Statistics (NTS)  Limitations ▪ Emphasis toward national and statewide ▪ Frequency of data ▪ Potential bias due to survey methods, unreliable estimates, or lack of freight modal coverage Wednesday, December 1,

 Methods  Simple Growth Factor  Incorporating Freight into “Four-Step” Model Process  Commodity Models  Hybrid Approaches  Economic Activity Models Wednesday, December 1, Source: Quick Response Freight Manual II. FHWA

 Truck sub-model  Trip Generation  Stratify Employment by Industry Classes (NAICS) ▪ Agriculture, Mining, & Construction ▪ Manufacturing, Transportation, Communication, Utils, &Trade ▪ Retail Trade ▪ Office & Services  Determine appropriate truck classes (Small, Medium, & Heavy)  Calculate attractions by TAZ and set productions equal Wednesday, December 1,

 Trip Generation  Trip Rates Wednesday, December 1, Truck Trips Rates Source: Quick Response Freight Manual. FHWA p. 4-4.

 Trip Distribution  Gravity Model  Friction Factors (shortest path time adjustment) Wednesday, December 1,

 Traffic Assignment  Preload with All-or-Nothing method  Model Validation  Many tests similar to auto model validation.  Each step of process (Trip Gen, Distro,…etc)  Compare observed data to modeled output  Compute statistics…. ▪ And compare to other regions of similar size ▪ By varying levels of area type, geography, or truck type  Scenario Tests & Performance Measures Wednesday, December 1,

 FHWA Talking Freight Seminars   Freight Model Improvement Program (FMIP)   Freight Analysis Framework (FAF)   Quick Response Freight Manual II  Wednesday, December 1,

Wednesday, December 1,  Iowa DOT Projects  FRA Grant to update the Iowa Statewide Model  Rail Plan Update  Internal Freight Working Group  Iowa DOT/Iowa DED Moving Iowa Forward Conference  Freight Report Freight Plan  Freight Performance Measures  Iowa DOT Freight Advisory Committee  Multi-state Corridor Planning  NASCO  Mid-America Freight Coalition (MAFC)

Wednesday, December 1, Adam Shell Craig O’Riley Office of Systems Planning Iowa Department of Transportation