Agenda Item 1 Current situation: Market trends. Beef and veal consumption robust at around 300,000 tonnes each year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EBLEX Beef R&D Mary Vickers. Priority areas Genetic improvement of beef and sheep 2.Health and welfare 3.Beef & sheep nutrition 4.Climate change.
Advertisements

Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
British Limousin Cattle Society Alison Glasgow. What’s been going on? Database development ~ Registrations & Perf. Recording Addition of Online Census.
"Single CMO" Management Committee 19th January 2012 Review of the situation on the EU Beef and Veal Market.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. What is the objective... ?  To produce a more efficient dairy animal  Milk producers want healthy cows, acceptable.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand the reproduction cycle  Assess herd reproductive efficiency  Understand the decisions involved.
1.8 Management Heat Stress 1.9 Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows 1.10 Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice By: Mohammed Sabah 2014 Ch.1 Dairy cows.
CAPRI EU GHG Monitoring Workshop, 27th-28th February 2003, Copenhagen Projections of herd sizes with the CAPRI system - Wolfgang Britz - Institute for.
Sprayfo Life Start validation
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
AI Promotion Breeding Future Profits. Breeding Workshop for Stakeholders. March 2006.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
JAMES EVANS PARTRIDGE FARM, BISHOPS CASTLE. WALCOT FARM J. W. EVANS AND SONS South West Shropshire Family Partnership Walcot Farm 760 acres Partridge.
Asda CalfLink Catherine Matthews ASDA CalfLink Coordinator.
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Exploring the Beef Industry
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
December 2014 Proof Changes
 2011 Calf-ETERIA Study Benchmarking Ontario dairy calf and heifer raising practices Dairy Farmers of Ontario Dairy Research Communication Extension Event.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
JAMAICA HOPE A Solution to Your Needs for Tropical Dairy Cattle Genetics
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
OARI-BARC ANNUAL RESEARCH ACTIVITIES REVIEW FEBRUARY, 2015 BARC Demonstration of Dairy Technologies in Peri-urban areas of Nekemte, Bako and Gimbi towns,
 Selection & Culling Strategies Mario S. Mongeon; OMAFRA.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
 Heifer Benchmarks Ian Rumbles – CanWest DHI. Deck of Cards What would you build with a deck of cards?
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Teagasc Presentation (Beef Round Table) Tuesday, 3 rd June 2014 Professor Gerry Boyle Director, Teagasc Pearse Kelly Head of Drystock Knowledge Transfer,
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Beyond Calf Export Forum Andy Dodd March UK Diversity.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.
1 Genetic Improvement in Beef Cattle - What is Possible? Brian Wickham.
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Beef Farming in Ireland
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
ICBF Beef & Dairy Industry Meeting. 22 May 2015.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
Genetics – Applications to Agriculture
The Dairy Research Foundation 2017 Symposium Ian Halliday July 2017
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Exploring the Beef Industry
Lifetime Performance of Dairy Cows in Northern Ireland
Predicted economic and greenhouse gas benefits from using improved maternal genetics in UK beef cattle Cheryl Quinton1, Peter Amer1, Tom Kirk1 & Eileen.
WP Leader: SRUC (Georgios Banos) INIA, AUTH, UNIVPM, CSIC, AHDB
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
SusCatt Increasing productivity, resource efficiency and product quality to increase the economic competitiveness of forage and grazing based cattle.
Strategic Dairy Farm Autumn Block Calving
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Item 1 Current situation: Market trends

Beef and veal consumption robust at around 300,000 tonnes each year

Veal production has increased

Exports of beef and veal have increased since 2006 Source: GTIS

Imports somewhat level Source: GTIS

Self-sufficiency in beef and veal %

Agenda Item 2 Male dairy calves

Live exports at a low level Dutch farmers boycotted UK calf trade mid 2008 following detection of bTB

almost half to Spain

Dairy calf registrations since 2006 – male & female Source : BCMS

Use of sexed semen Apr 2011 – Mar 2012 (DairyCo survey of breeding companies )

Destination of male calves (000’s) Female Registrations Male Registrations Estimated no. males born * Estimated no. disposed on-farm Live exports Estimated no. retained in GB From 2008 onwards, applying a 1% year on year increase in the number of heifers born due to the use of sexed semen

Destination of dairy male calves

Link between feed costs and registrations evident

Rearing calf prices volatile since 2006 – but have moved up £ per head Source : AHDB/EBLEX Ho/Fr heifers Ho/Fr bulls

Upwards evolution in finished cattle prices continues

Evolution of compound cereal prices since 2006

Dairy male calf registrations/beef and veal imports - a stable relationship

Economic prospects Tighter global & domestic supply will tend to support beef prices Margins possible for better quality animals Highly dependent on input prices Domestic market for veal still underdeveloped What value provenence ?

Financial performance (May-Apr)

Higher prices through 2011 and 2012 filtering through to improve returns, but still negative margin for many

Agenda Item 3 Health and welfare of dairy calves

Dairy calf health and welfare Calf survival a continuing focus of attention –Perinatal mortality –Early stage nutrition –Control of disease Dearth of robust industry data Specialist rearing units more switched on to best practice ? Outcome based welfare measures for dairy cows

Colostrum (volume and quality) Too much milk does not cause scour Well fed calves develop higher immunity 60% calves have inadequate colostral immunity Recommendation for 10% of body weight in critical first 6hrs £14/calf added cost feeding saleable milk Reinforcement of strategies/best practice Needs agreement on protocol from all parties

Emerging results from DairyCo funded CASE studentship Perinatal mortality –Mean 5.4 % (Range 1% to 13.9%) Differences in feeding regime for male calves –Yes:34%, No:66% Recorded examples, males given –increased volume of milk to prepare for sale –waste milk, often in significant volume –milk powder, while heifers given fermented whole milk Proportion of bull calves disposed of on farm –6.3%

Nutrition up to weaning A system based on feeding: –10% of bodyweight (45 kg calf gets 4.5 litres) –10% concentration of powder g powder) Whereas feeding: –2.5 % of bodyweight (45 kg = 5.5l) –5% concentration of powder (5.5 15% = 825 g powder) Little more than maintenance Maximum growth, when calf is biologically most efficient

Disease Risk/Effect on Yield

Calf health & welfare workshop Royal Vet College, 23 July 2013 –DairyCo Research Partnership (Health, welfare & nutrition) Aim to identify –best practice guidelines for calf rearing –gaps to be addressed in current knowledge Four themes –health, welfare, housing and production economics Cross sector representation –Farmers, vets, researchers, legislators

Agenda Item 4 Developments in breeding

Reducing heifer losses Average heifers calving down at 28 months Attrition rate of heifers during rearing period still too high Higher losses of dairy progeny from heifer calvings Management during first lactation Targetting better performance –DairyCo PD+ blueprint –Benchmarking (e.g. Milkbench+) –PhD study: Economic analysis of heifer rearing and breeding selection in UK

Current purebred genetic evaluations DairyCo provides evaluations for major dairy breeds Pursuit of fitness traits tends to select for animals with better conformation UK genetic ranking encourages use of fitness traits –Longevity, Fertility, Mastitis, Lameness Genetic trends in all 4 areas are in a positive direction Since 2012, information available on farm’s herd genetic reports HUK introduced Body Condition Score indexes

Sire usage for combined fitness (Note; 2007 saw major change in £PLI) Current PLI review likely further emphasise fitness traits, and include a Live weight component

Use of sexed semen DairyCo survey of breeding companies indicate that sexed semen accounted for 13% of sales in 2011/12 Resulting in approx. 5% skew towards female progeny Constraints to greater adoption of sexed semen –Reduced conception rates –Less attractive to block calving systems –Lack of semen availability from elite bulls –Price ?

Cross breeding Since 2010, DairyCo also evaluates cross-bred animals Andy – some words on cross breeding and impact on calf price? Dairy systems modeling (Moorepark economic model)

Make it easier to choose semen Industry KT events on-going to educate farmers on use of the indexes on a pure and cross-breed basis DairyCo and Holstein UK both have websites that allow farmers to select the bulls that suits them Genomic selection

Extended lactations Industry trend towards increasing lactation length Modern genotypes can still be yielding significantly beyond 305 days Theoretical advantages of 18 (or 24 month) lactations –Fewer progeny –reduced metabolic stress and increased longevity –insemination costs –reduced number of dry days within the cow's lifetime

Extended lactations Evidence to date indicates Feasible, but yield level and persistency of lactation are key Different cows and sire groups react differently to delayed breeding Potential for cows to get too fat, compromising subsequent lactations Economics not sufficiently proven Block calving systems more challenging, need 24 month system Further information needed to on interactive effects of lactation pattern, diet and management before any wider recommendations

Development of Carcass EBV’s DairyCo/EBLEX funded study to evaluate potential of combining abattoir data with BCMS data Alternative approach in absence of beef progeny test Feasibility study indicated –Heritability estimates for net carcass weight, conformation & fat class: 0.31, 0.24, & 0.14 –Data challenges, registration EBLEX in discussion with breed societies regarding funding of potential implementation phase