Minnesota Circles of Support & Accountability No More Victims MnCoSA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

HOMELESSNESS A CORRECTIONS CHALLENGE
A guide to local services. Sacro’s mission is to promote safe and cohesive communities by reducing conflict and offending.
END THE SILENCE. Bridging the Gap: Creating Effective partnerships to reduce sexual victimization The 10 th Interfaith Symposium on the Sex Offender in.
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,
Juvenile Justice system
Sex Offender Residency NYSCOPA Presentation for NYSAC.
Connecticut Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference Collaborative Partners Assisting Crime Victims During the Offender Re-entry Process August 20, 2010.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
DOC REENTRY SERVICES TEAM Reentry Services Director Gary Johnson Reentry Program Manager Tim Lanz Community Reentry Coordinator Farris Bell Facilities.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Probation A privilege granted by the court to a person convicted of a crime or criminal offense to remain with the community instead of actually going.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COLLABORATION WITH LANDLORDS, VICTIM ADVOCACY, AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
END THE SILENCE. MAKING OUR WORK COUNT PROFESSIONALS FROM THE SEXUAL INCIDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS SPEAK TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY ON THEIR WORK AND THE.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
SEX OFFENDERS AND VICTIMIZATION IN OUR COMMUNITY Awareness, Support and Prevention San Diego County Sex Offender Management Council
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
Minnesota Circles of Support & Accountability MnCoSA.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
History and Background Formed in 2006 as a joint collaboration of San Mateo County Courts, Probation Department, District Attorney Office, Sheriff’s Office,
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTRO TO CORRECTIONS. WHAT IS CORRECTIONS? Corrections is that portion of the criminal justice system charged with carrying out the sentences.
1 Alberta Association of Police Governance Calgary, Alberta May 1, 2010 Rev
Replicating the Concepts Behind Project HOPE Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator.
SEXUAL OFFENSES: BACKGROUND, CAUSES AND PREVENTION.
Practical Approaches for Engaging Youth Serving Organizations and Schools in Child Sexual Abuse Prevention.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
11/18/20151Sex Offenders Notes - Kuzyk Notes on recidivism among Connecticut sex offenders: Male offenders released in 2005 CT OPM – Criminal Justice Policy.
Risk Assessment and Community Notification Mark Bliven, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Wednesday, Dec 9, 2015 Special Committee on Sex Offenders Connecticut.
Chaperone Orientation Florida 4-H Program Bill Heltemes Florida 4-H Volunteer Recruitment Coordinator.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
The National Probation Service Who we are and what we do.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
Circles of Support and Accountability CoSA Saskatoon A Reintegration Program That Works Circles of Support and Accountability CoSA Saskatoon A Reintegration.
Criminal Cases YOU BROKE THE LAW! Now What?. Criminal Cases A crime is an act that breaks a federal, state, or city law A crime is an act that breaks.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Educational training on Voting Rights for people currently or previously involved in the criminal justice system.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Winters April 9 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
Learning with Purpose Sex Offender Policy and Practice in the United States Andrew J. Harris University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Thinking About A Risk-Based Registry. Sex offender risk assessments are most often employed in applied forensic settings for purposes of decision-making.
Domestic Violence Restorative Circles (DVRC) Program Men As Peacemakers.
 The CARE Program (CARE)— is an offender reentry program utilizing best practices in the prisoner reentry field, including comprehensive case management,
MN County Attorney Association’s Crime Prevention Tip The MCAA strives to bring current information regarding prevention topics to its members. The August.
Southern Ontario: the Early Days Established in 1994 High-risk sexual offender returned to Hamilton community after sentence Neighbourhood fears – police.
International Legislators Forum: Minnesota Criminal Justice Issues
The Introduction and Implementation of a system of Sex Offender Risk Assessment / Management in the Probation Service.
Learning Objectives Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process. Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase of the criminal.
CSOM Long Version: Section 2
Summit County Probation Services
7. Develop a plan to strengthen employer relationships
Sex Offenses & Sex Offender Registration Task Force
Chapter 10.
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Navigating the Justice System
Educating the Community About Sexual Assault and About a Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Sex Offenders in the Community.
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota Circles of Support & Accountability No More Victims MnCoSA

Welcome! Brief overview of Sex Offenders Sex Offender Risk Levels Mission & Purpose for MnCoSA Community Volunteers (students) in MnCoSA

The 411 on the SO Charged Convicted Sentenced to Probation Sentenced to Prison Released from Prison There are THREE categories of RISK levels. Level One, Level Two & Level Three.

Risk Level Distinctions Level One: Victims of & witnesses to the crime. Law enforcement exchange & anyone else id’d by the prosecuting attorney to receive the information. Level Two: Schools, daycares, organizations where victims of the offender may be found. Victim sensitive/vulnerable individuals at risk are notified by law enforcement. Information is not for re-distribution. Level Three: Requires broad notification usually through a public meeting. This also covers individuals cited in Levels 1 & 2 notifications, as well as utilizing the media & other distribution methods to convey information to the public.

What is MnCoSA? Organic community Assists with the day-to-day adjustments that offenders face once released from prison. Circles consist of 4-7 volunteers that work together with one offender. Volunteers support and hold a Level 2 sex offender accountable as they re- enter the community.

The Mission & Purpose To reduce sexual victimization To reduce sexual victimization –Volunteers help Core Members –Professionals are available to help Volunteers. –Staff support Professionals & Volunteers

WHERE did Circles of Support & Accountability come from? In 1994, COSA started in a Mennonite community to support a high profile mentally disabled pedophile in Hamilton, Canada. This offender had previously been denied parole & statutory release. No Community Supervision

COSA…Emerging May, 2004 the British Columbia hosted the first COSA Circle. In Great Britain, COSA is in its fifth successful year working with the Canadian model. In Minnesota, the model has been adapted from the Canadian Model under developer Andrew McWhinnie.

Who are the Core Members? Any LEVEL 2 Sex offender who: Is returning to one of the three piloted Counties: –Hennepin, Ramsey or Olmsted Is a Level 2 with no known “factors” to change (ECRC, Civil Commit) Can be male or female Participation is voluntary and not a condition of community supervision

Volunteer Qualifications Be at least 18 years old Complete an application and criminal background check Interview with MnCoSA staff Complete 30 hours of training Commit to 1+/- year of Circle involvement Abide by DOC policies and procedures

Why Volunteer Because you care about the safety of your community and you want to help someone Because you have a vested interest in preventing sexual victimization Because you believe that people can change

Am I Safe? 29 MnCoSA Circles have been started! –Volunteers start out with many questions & concerns –Training is comprehensive –Volunteer chats – Safety is a Priority ; Institution & Community. –You are entering a mentoring community –Ongoing support and respect

Training Process Training30 hours –Circle Process –Criminal Justice System –Human Sexuality and deviance –Long Term Institutionalization –Survivor and Community Concerns –Offender Discussion –Group Dynamics –Boundaries –Re-offense Prevention Facility visits15 hours Circle Meetings104 hours

Who Supports the Circle? Outer Circle: a group of community-based professionals –Law enforcement, treatment providers, supervision agents, social services, staff Maintenance Advanced Training –Conflict resolution –Employment issues –Housing issues –Chemical dependent issues –Mental health

Student Involvement Recruitment Efforts Community Service Learning Credit Classes/Subject & Topic Matter Bridging the Gap between students and older volunteers All student circles

MnCoSA Research Design Randomized Experimental Design –Meet With Eligible Offenders –Offenders Decide to Volunteer –Random Selection From Volunteers Experimental Group (MnCoSA) Control Group (No MnCoSA) Outcome Measures –Recidivism / Release Violations Process Measures –Survey Results (Offenders, Volunteers)

Basic Sex Offender Risk Management Sentencing: Probation or prison Treatment: Community or prison Prison release planning –Civil Commitment Screening (12 mos) –Risk Level Assigned (3-4 mos) –Conditions of release Intensive Supervised Release –Rules: Behavior, contacts, residence, employment, treatment, –Violation Restructure or return to Prison –Release Planning Starts Again Runs out of sentence time (expiration)

Since 1990, the sexual recidivism rate has decreased dramatically

Risk Level Assignment Risk Levels Assigned in 2008 (15 DHS not included)  Level 1 – %  Level 2 – %  Level 3 – % Total %

Community Notification Sample 1763 offenders were released from (1823 minus 60 committed before release). Re-arrest rate as of

Who will commit the next offense?

Residential Restriction Study Residential Restriction Study March ,166 offenders released from sexual re-offenses – analysis Residency restriction from school, park or daycare would have impacted none of the offenses

Three 90’s and Two R’s Approximately 90% of sex offenders do not sexually re-offend 90% of sex offenses are committed by ‘non-sex offenders’ 90% of sex offense victims know the offender (family, friend, acquaintance) It’s about relationship – not residence

Increase Safety? Or Risk? Residency restrictions Massive public websites –Accuracy –‘Hiding’ –Resource allocation Risk categories based on plea bargaining

Websites –Search Offender Records Search for level 3 offenders Offender Locator Search for non compliant offenders –CJIS Criminal history –MN. Trial Court Public Access

Contact Information Joann Dillavou MnCoSA Director Sarah Napoli-Rangel Service Learning