©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 5/22/90-05220-7 (E)IS...THE FUEL FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Art Schneiderman Analog Devices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 ADI QIP GOALS (IC OPERATIONS) METRIC1987 HALF-LIFE 1992 On time delivery Lead time* Manufacturing.
Advertisements

Quality Management Training Quality circles Bench Mark Kaizen.
Jidoka for Quality Improvement Lean en France, 20 May 2011 Yves Mérel, FCI Group Lean Director.
©1987, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 QIP Strategic Plan Presentation c. August 1987 Arthur M. Schneiderman Title.
© Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 Strategy Map Evolution of the Analog Devices Strategy Map ( )
Total Quality Management
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints Chapter 19.
Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints
Chapter 6 Total Quality Management Chapter Outline Quality imperative.
4. Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategy
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
IE673Session 4 - Customer Relationships1 Customer Relationships (The Voice of the Customer)
Managing Quality 12 July Introduction What: quality in operations management Where: Quality affects all goods and services Why: Customers demand.
ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Ryan Loughlin Gustavo Rayo Shannon Villarroel Khoung Nguyen HTM 304 Professor Fang Fang May 10 th, 2007.
Hilton Maher Selto 7 Managing Quality and Time to Create Value McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Functional-Level Strategy
21 June, EVOLUTION OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS MIL-Q-9858 (9 April 1959) 1960’s and 1970’s “IF JAPAN CAN, WHY CAN’T WE ?” 1987 ADVANCED PRACTICES.
Cost Management. learning objectives cost/volume/profit (CVP) relationships and break-even analysis break-even chart – low fixed costs, high variable.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Slide Chapter 19 Cost Management: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints.
MANAGING QUALITY SIX SIGMA SPC
April 10–12, 2006 Hyatt Regency Atlanta Atlanta, GA NCMA World Congress 2006 : Achieving High Performance in Global Business: Leadership, Outsourcing,
Chapter 1 Enterprise Wide View.
© Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 APICS/Babson College Presentation January 17, 1989 Arthur M. Schneiderman Title.
©1986, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 QIP Strategic Plan Proposal c. October, 1986 Arthur M. Schneiderman Title.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
Quality Prepared By: Ali Siddiqi.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Driving and Sustaining Quality & Innovation in Manufacturing Processes Thursday, January 19, 20121Quality Presentation - EFY.
Unilever Organizational Change on CRM Organizational Change Management Hanoi, 16 August
Cost of Quality - COQ MGMT-5060 Operations Management.
4. Establishing goals to guide & Measures to track.
Energy efficiency and reliability INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND LEARNING IN ACTION. AH BEE GOH 3 OCT
© Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. 6/11/ GOALS METRICS SOLVING IS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS culturescorecard projects PROBLEM.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Costing and the Value Chain Chapter 18.
CHAPTER 4 Strategic Management of Costs, Quality, and Time
Course Title: Production and Operations Management Course Code: MGT 362 Course Book: Operations Management 10th Edition. By Jay Heizer & Barry Render.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
Introduction and Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM)
PRIMO Limited & 6 Sigma By HKU SPACE 6 Sigma Consultant Firm 30-May-2006.
Chapter 11 TQM & Quality Tools. Management 3620Chapter 11 TQM and Quality Tools11-2 Total Quality Management A philosophy that involves everyone in an.
© Arthur M. Schneiderman. All Rights ReservedSlide 1 QIP Strategy Presentation c. March, 1988 Arthur M. Schneiderman Title.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
© Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 title PILOT Demo c. September 1990 Arthur M. Schneiderman Next.
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved Chapter 4 1 Management’s Commitments to Quality and Productivity.
CMMI ® – The Current State Presented by Gregory Shelton Corporate Vice President Engineering, Technology, Manufacturing & Quality 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology.
©1988, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 Goals Deployment January 24, 1988 Arthur M. Schneiderman Title.
Checking Inventory. Fax IBM PC Mac II PC & Mac Mainframe (UVX 2000) Manual labor Mainframe, Pencil.
Performance Measurement. 2 Performance measures recently introduced or being considered for introduction Balanced Scorecard Approach Economic Value Added.
© BMA Inc All rights reserved. Lean reporting & control Performance Measurements.
Quality Management and Measurement 13. The Role of Management Information Systems in Quality Management OBJECTIVE 1: Describe a management information.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS
Best Practices in using a Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints
Internal Control Systems
Hilton • Maher • Selto.
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (TQM)
Designing Effective Supply Chains Chapter 12
Benchmark Planning Proposal August 20, 1987 Arthur M. Schneiderman
Management Information Systems
ADI QIP GOALS METRIC 1987 HALF-LIFE 1992 (IC OPERATIONS) EXTERNAL
Management Information Systems
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Use with Management and Cost Accounting 8e by Colin Drury
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Chapter # 1 Overview of Software Quality Assurance
Performance Management II
Comments on Cost of Prediction Error (or Value of Perfect Information)
Six Sigma Introduction 1 1.
Presentation transcript:

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 1 5/22/ (E)IS...THE FUEL FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Art Schneiderman Analog Devices Analog Devices at a Glance The Quality Improvement Process (TQM) Linking Performance Measurements to Corporate Goals The "Half-Life" Concept ADI's 1992 QIP Goals The Quarterly "Scorecard" ADI's Executive Information System An Example: Customer Service Lessons Learned May 22, 1990

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 2 c PREZ-1 Analog Devices at a Glance Headquartered in Norwood Massachusetts Publicly Held (NYSE Symbol ADI) $453 Million in Sales (FY1989) 48% of Sales Outside United States 5200 Employees Worldwide

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 3 c PREZ-1a ANALOG DEVICES AT A GLANCE Products: ICs, assembled products, subsystems Applications: precision measurement & control Markets: data acquisition Integrated supplier (cont) 40% industrial/instrumentation 30% military/avionics 13% computer 17% other design manufacturing (8 locations) direct sales (100 locations)

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 4 c PREZ Top Customers Worldwide CustomerBookings $M Cumulative % IBM (US, Japan & France) GE/RCA Fuji (Japan) HP (US, UK & Germany) Honeywell (US, Germany) General Dynamics (US) Raytheon (US) Siemens (US, Germany) TI (US) Mitsubishi (Japan) Fujitsu (Japan) Toshiba (Japan) Marconi (US, UK) Hughes (US) Rockwell (US) Hitachi (Japan) Westinghouse (US) Philips (US, Europe) Motorola (US) DCASR (US)

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 5 2/14/ rev 2/16/90 TOP 10 MIXED SIGNAL IC SUPPLIERS Source: VLSI Research ADI NEC National TI Philips Toshiba Hitachi Matsushita Sanyo Motorola Sales $M RMS=1.4

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 6 4/12/ t.doc Financial Model FY 1987-FY 1992 Sales Growth20-25 %/yr Operating Profits17 % Profit after Tax9.4 % Return on Capital15.0 %

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 7 4/8/90-QIP-15a ADI CORPORATE QIP COUNCIL Jerry Fishman Kozo Imai Larry LaFranchi Bill Manning Art Schneiderman, Chairman Ray Stata Tom Urwin MEMBERS: CHARTER: QIP Goals Deployment QIP Organization priorities Training Juran Monitoring metrics Incenting/Rewarding Suzanne Thomson Executive VP VP, Japanese Operations Operations Controller Division GM VP, Quality/Productivity Improvement Chairman of the Board and President VP, European Operations Director, Training & Development Doug Newman VP, Sales and Marketing Goodloe Suttler Division GM

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 8 4/8/ culture GOALS IS scorecard projects METRICS SOLVING PROBLEM THE QIP CULTURE We each have a dual function daily jobSDCA cycle process improvementPDCA cycle We are committed to improving customer satisfaction We are dedicated to continuous improvement (kaizen) We are part of a parallel organization: functional and cross-functional We are a continuously learning organization

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 9 3/11/ rev 4/8/90 GOALS METRICS SOLVING IS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS culturescorecard projects PROBLEM

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 10 4/8/ PROBLEM SOLVING GOALS METRICS IS culturescorecard projects SOLVING PROBLEM Participants: Cross Functional Problem Solving Teams (QIP Teams) Task Forces QC Circles Individuals Systematic Approach: Deming Cycle (PDCA) Tools: 7 QC Tools (fishbone, histogram,...) 7 Management Tools (KJ Method, affinity diagram,...) Design of Experiments (Taguchi, etc.) SQC (control charts) SPC (Cp, Cpk) Quality Cost (failure, prevention, appraisal) QFD Hoshin Kanri SMED TPM EI JIT/Kanban (cycle time, WIP reduction)

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 11 5/22/ PLAN WHAT PERCEPTION OF PROBLEM EVALUATION OF WHY ANALYSIS OF CAUSES WHO WHEN WHERE HOW PLANNING OF IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTER-MEASURES EVALUATION OF RESULTS STANDARDIZATION SUMMARY & FUTURE PLANS DO CHECK ACTION CURRENT SITUATION COUNTER-MEASURES PROBLEM SOLVING GOALS METRICS IS culturescorecard projects SOLVING PROBLEM The Deming Cycle (PDCA)

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 12 c YHP Source: Kenzo Sasaoka, President Yokagowa-Hewlett-Packard 7/84 Process Quality Improvement (Dip Soldering Process) Counter Action I Counter Action III Counter Action II % ppm 0.4% Failure Rate Masking Method Improvement Omit Hand Rework Process 40ppm Dip Solder was made to one worker job Basic Working Guide Manual Revision of Manufacturing Engineering Standards PC Board Design Instructions 3ppm FY month

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 13 12/12/85-ZD4 YOKOGOWA HEWLETT PACKARD Failure Rate % months 10,000 1, PPM 50 % improvement each: 3.6 months Dip Soldering Defects

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 14 3/19/87-imp-9 rev. c hflf-2 PROPOSED HALF-LIFE MODEL VALUES PROJECT TYPE EXAMPLE S MODEL HALF-LIFEEXPECTED RANGE uni-functional cross-functional multi-entity operator errors WIP new product cycle time outgoing PPM vendor quality warranty costs to 6 6 to to 24 MONTHS

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 15 2/18/ Embodies the concept of KAIZEN Easy to understand Makes sense Data not negotiation based Accepted by line organization Works Hard to understand Doesn't reflect where we need to be Hard to use manual vs. computerized assumes instant startup assumes constant rate of learning focuses on results not process realistic "...the rate at which individuals and organizations learn may become the only sustainable competitive advantage..." Ray Stata Supporters Critics ADI RESPONSE TO HALF-LIFE CONCEPT

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 16 c. 1/17/89-?/3/12/ rev 4/8/90 CUSTOMERS EMPLOYEES partnershipgrowth return STOCK- HOLDERS ADI's BUSINESS OBJECTIVES capital ADI's CONSTITUENCIES METRICS IS culturescorecard projects GOALS SOLVING PROBLEM

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 17 c. 1/17/89-AMS-5 rev. 4/8/ METRICS IS culturescorecard projects GOALS SOLVING PROBLEM ADI QIP GOALS MARKET LEADERSHIP (RMS) REVENUE GROWTH PROFITABILITY BE RATED #1 BY OUR CUSTOMERS TOTAL VALUE DELIVERED PRODUCTS DEFECT LEVELS ON-TIME DELIVERY LEADTIME PRICE RESPONSIVENESS TIME TO MARKET PROCESS PPM MANUFACTURING CYCLE TIME YIELD BUSINESS OBJECTIVES: DRIVERS: EXTERNAL LEVERS: INTERNAL LEVERS: IN

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 18 c. 7/12/87-QIP-16/QS-16B rev. 7/25/87 ADI QIP GOALS (IC OPERATIONS, ESTABLISHED PRODUCTS) METRIC1987 HALF-LIFE 1992 On time delivery Lead time Manufacturing Cycle Time Yield Outgoing defect levels Time to Market EXTERNAL INTERNAL CORPORATE-WIDE COST MANAGEMENT WHILE AGGRESSIVELY PURSUING Process Defect Levels 85% 10 wks 500 PPM >99.8% <10 PPM <3 wks 15 wks 20% 9 9>50% 5000 PPM6 <10 PPM 4-5wks 36 mths 24 6 mths

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 19 C. 1989

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 20 5/22/ GOALS IS culturescorecard projects METRICS SOLVING PROBLEM PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT does not mean measurement improvement If you don't measure it, it will not improve.

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 21 4/8/ rev 5/13/90 GOAL: IMPROVE CUSTOMER SERVICE CUSTOMER SERVICE METRICS ON TIME % late % early % on time RESPONSIBILITY factory warehouse credit customer LATENESS/EARLINESS shipped late, how late? shipped early, how early? still late, how late? months to ship late backlog LEAD TIME customer requested lead time % CRD's matched excess lead time RESPONSIVENESS time to schedule an order GOALS IS culturescorecard projects METRICS SOLVING PROBLEM

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 22 4Q89-% Late ADS MED CLD IPD DSP MDL ADI ADBV On Time Customer Service Improvement Quarterly Data (1Q87 – 4Q89) Half Life In Months

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 23 5/22/ CREDITS Elizabeth Derwin Jim Doscher Wally Francis Ira Moskowitz Rich Lynch Holley Murphy Art Schneiderman Pilot Executive Software

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 24 1Q90-Scorecard-1 ? Analog Devices Scorecard ADI Qtr MetricActualPlanVariance% Variance QIP:.00 On Time Delivery % (To FCD) % CRDs Not Matched Excess Leadtime (Weeks) Employee Turnover % IC Outgoing PPM IC Process PPM IC Cycle Time IC Yield AP Outgoing PPM Plug In Yield AP Cycle Time Scrap/Rework Cost RetraceUtilities1989 ScorecardCommentaryReturn

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 25 1Q90-Scorecard-2 ? Analog Devices Scorecard ADI Qtr MetricActualPlanVariance% Variance NEW PRODUCTS:.00 Post 1985 Products Forecasted 3 rd Year Bookings FINANCIALS:.00 Sales Sales Growth (YTY) Contribution Margin ROA (Contribution Margin) RetraceUtilities1989 ScorecardCommentaryReturn

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 26 Apr 90-OTD CUSTOMER SERVICE METRICS – ON TIME/RESPONSIBILITY April 1990 Early %On Time %Not Late %Division %Warehse. %Credit % ADBV ADS CLD CTS DSP IPD MDL MED ADI ALL UtilitiesChange MetricsReturn

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 27 Apr 90-% Late Half Life (In months) Percent Of Lines Shipped Late (May 89 through Apr 90) ADBV ADS CLD DSP IPD MDL MED ADI NA NS NS NS N/A 8 NS NS

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 28 Apr 90-ADI half-life ADI Half-Lives by month 5/89 to 4/90 5/899 6/897 7/897 8/897 9/898 10/ / /8915 1/9047 2/9060 3/9060 4/90N/A Hlf Life May 89 JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan 90 FebMarApr

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 29 Apr 90-S&D-1 /ADITYPECUSTOMER Adi Ontime ? Print ResetMetricsViewsCalendarReturn Select label, composite, or new key field. TABLE: CSTB ENTITY ERY_SHIP_PCTON_TIME_PCTNOT_LATE_PCTDIVISION_PCT LATEST PERIOD(4/90) TOTAL ADI

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 30 c CS Metrics ADI CUSTOMER SERVICE METRICS CANCELCLEARDONE ? Select label, composite, or new key field \/ END ASAP Number Of ASAP Orders Placed During The Period ASAP_PCT Percent Of Orders Received That Were ASAP AVG_SHIP Weighted Average Number of Shipments Per Period BACKLOG Total Number Of Unshipped Orders CRD_HOLD_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To Credit Hold CRED_REF_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To Credit Referrals CREDIT Number Of Lines Late Due To All Credit Causes CREDIT_HOLD Number Of Lines Late Due To Credit Hold Causes CREDIT_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To All Credit Causes CREDIT_REF Number Of Lines Late Due To Credit Referrals CUST_STOP Number Of Lines Late Due To Customer Stops CUST_STP_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To Customer Stops CUSTOMER Number Of Lines Late Due To All Customer Causes CUSTOMER_LT Average Customer Requested Lead Time CUSTOMER_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To All Customer Causes DISTRIBUTION Number Of Lines Late Due To All Distribution Causes DISTRN_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To All Distribution Causes DIV_WAREHSE Lines Late Due To Divisional Warehouse Error DIV_WE_PCT Percent Of Lines Late Due To Divisional Warehouse Error DIVISION Number Of Lines Late Due To All Divisional Causes

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 31 Apr 90-S&D-2 /ADITYPECUSTOMER Adi Ontime ? Print ResetMetricsViewsCalendarReturn Select label, composite, or new key field. TABLE: CSTB CUSTOMER ERY_SHIP_PCTON_TIME_PCTNOT_LATE_PCTDIVISION_PCT LATEST PERIOD Finished(4/90) CORPORATE KEY ACCOUNT DOMESTIC KEY ACCOUNT FOREIGN KEY ACCOUNT KEY ACCOUNT NON KEY ACCOUNT ADKK ALLEN BRADLEY AMOCO ARMCO ATT BEACKMAN BENDIX BETHLEHEM STEEL \/ END

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 32 Apr 90-S&D-3 /ADI /OEM/DIST Adi Ontime ? Print /HEWLETT PACKARD ResetMetricsViewsCalendarReturn Select label, composite, or new key field. TABLE: CSTB ENTITY CUSTOMER_LT LATEST PERIOD(4/90) TOTAL DIST – ADI – HEWLETT7.64 OEM – ADI - HEWLETT8.34

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 33 Apr 90-HP lead time DIST – ADS – HEWLETT PACKARD METRIC: CUSTOMER_LT (4/90) 5/89N/A 6/ / /89N/A 9/ / / / / / / / May 89 JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan 90 FebMarApr

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 34 Feb 90-Cust data base CUSTOMERS IN VENDOR RATING DATABASE ABB AFGA Allen Bradley Allied Signal Ametek Analogic Apollo AT&T Bendix Compugraphic Eaton Ford General Electric GEC Gould Hewlett-Packard Honeywell Hughes Kodak Loral Lucas M/A-COM Marquette Electric Masscomp Measurex Perkin Elmer Raytheon Reliance Electric Rockwell Sanders Siemens Sikorsky Tektronix Teledyne Teradyne Texas Instruments Trillium United Technologies Waters Associates Westinghouse

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 35 Feb 90-CMD ON TIME DELIVERY, CUSTOMER MEASURED %LATE%LATE Fe 1987 ApJuAuOcDecFe 1988 ApJuAuOcDecFe 1989 ApJuAuOcDecFe 1990 HALF-LIFE = 10 MONTHS QIP STARTED Actual Data (Ave: 21 C9ompanies per point) Trend

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 36 5/22/ HEWLETT-PACKARD VENDOR RATINGS yearADI ranktotal supplierscategory linear IC suppliers all IC suppliers linear IC suppliers all IC suppliers * * tied with one other supplier

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 37 5/22/ (E)IS LESSONS LEARNED May 22,1990 The system MUST be: driven by business needs user friendly graphical, colorful menu/mouse driven (no acronyms) logical,intuitive and efficient permit drilldown/consolidation accessible and responsive easy to get hard copy available in 3-6 months start with top management financials first, then metrics Be prepared for user proliferation top to bottom err on the side of open access Be prepared for information proliferation EIS to DSS

©1985, 2000 Arthur M. Schneiderman All Rights Reserved. Slide 38 5/22/ PRACTICE THE PRINCIPLES OF QIP Break down cross-functional barriers: "You define the needs; we'll decide the best way to meet them". vs. "Let's work together to determine the best solution to the problem". uncover latent needs innovate new solutions (E)IS, THE FUEL FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT