“Count Us In” 2007 Provincial Itinerant Conference Friday, April 20, 2007 Mary Ann Bibby with thanks to Perry Leslie for his valuable input.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

1 Hearing Services Program Department Revised July 2010 Building Inclusive Catholic Classrooms I will teach them to listen to Gods Voice; for it is everywhere.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
1  All students in grades K, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, ungraded, all newly admitted students, and all students referred are given hearing screenings by the school.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Campus Improvement Plans
Individualized Education Plans VS. Response to Intervention EEX 5051 Nelson & Rocha.
Understanding the IEP Process
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Consistency of Assessment
What School Nurses Need to Know Karen Erwin, RN, MSN Education School Nurse Consultant July, 2014.
Extended School Year Decision Determination Process February 3,
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
National Cochlear Implant Programme Beaumont Hospital & Children’s University Hospital, Temple Street Bilateral Cochlear Implants Jennifer Robertson, Clinical.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
An Introduction to Special Education Services In BC Pamela Cameron Pamela Cameron Vancouver Island University Fall 2011.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
A Child with a Hearing Impairment, Including Deafness ECEA Disability Category, Definition and Eligibility Criteria CDE Eligibility Training Slides March.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Learning Support Services October 5, START WITH WHY It’s not what you do, it’s why you do it that matters. Simon Sinek.
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
A Career in Teaching Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Structure of Special Education A Quick Guide By: Edward Desanti.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
 range in severity and may interfere with the progress and use of one or more of the following: Oral language (listening, speaking, understanding) Reading.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Writing IEPs for Student’s with Hearing Loss Carrie Spangler, Au.D., CCC-A Kirsten Marconi-Hutkay, Au.D, CCC-A Stark County ESC.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Special Education Procedures Information from Illinois Rules and Regulations Part 226 Special Education
Lindy Kralicek EDUC533 Final Presentation HEARING IMPAIRMENT AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT.
Mountain BOCES. Definition of APD A deficit in the processing of information that is specific to the auditory modality. The problem may be exacerbated.
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS AND DISABILITIES UPDATE MEETING FOR PARENTS December 2014.
Deaf Education in Cyprus 1 Vasiliki Tittoni Speech and Language Pathologist.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Supporting the achievement of deaf children Assess Plan Do Review.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
“Parent’s Guide to Special Education Services” Consultation Group
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Individual Education Plans
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
National Schools and additional needs support allocation. (Summary)
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Presentation transcript:

“Count Us In” 2007 Provincial Itinerant Conference Friday, April 20, 2007 Mary Ann Bibby with thanks to Perry Leslie for his valuable input

Background Information Audit training session - January, 2007 People involved: audit contractors, district reps, ministry personnel Category Checklists - January 2007 Special Education Services Manual of Policies, Procedures and Guidelines, July, 2006.

Purpose of this presentation Review Ministry procedures and guidelines dated January, 2007 Highlight important changes Highlight special considerations and things to watch for Obtain feedback from the field

The Ministry of Education wants to provide good service to students, and wants to be able to provide evidence that this is being done. We can be helpful in achieving that goal.

Guide to indicators in this presentation  This indicates that the statement is taken directly from the BC Ministry of Education Category Checklist, January, 2007 This highlights some of the important statements taken from the Manual: ( E.10 Deaf or Hard of Hearing; pp ) but does not include everything This indicates that these are important things to remember

Deaf or Hard of Hearing Level 2 Funding Allocation 1701 Code F  Definition: Medically diagnosed (audiological assmt) No more than 2 yrs old for bilateral conductive/mixed losses A) significant bilateral B) unilateral with significant n delay, or C) cochlear implant Difficulties must be educationally significant Loss results in substantial educational difficulty (Central) Auditory Processing - not included unless student also has hearing loss

Assessment information  Indicates substantial educational difficulty due to hearing loss and identified by audiological assessment dB loss is not the sole criterion for determination of need for ed. intervention Other assessment ( usually done by a TOD): standardized ( ability and achievement); CBA and observation; teacher reports etc. Districts must determine method of communication ( most enabling language(s) and/or technology supports) for access to the curriculum

Services Specification of regular ( frequent and direct) service from the TOD According to documented need Learning activities are directly related to needs associated with hearing loss

Programming and Implementation (IEPs) Areas: language, speech, speech reading, auditory management; sign language, deaf culture etc. - all where appropriate Should also address social/vocational needs Provides a variety of services ( regular, resource, self-contained, individual etc) Must be individualized ( be aware of computerized statements) and must show change over time

Unilateral Hearing Loss  Unilateral loss is “moderate to profound” must be a significant hearing loss in the affected ear ( ave. 50 dB or greater Hz)  Student has “educationally significant problems directly attributable to hearing loss”  Must have significant speech/language (or other documented) delay

Unilateral Hearing Loss  Must have an annual assessment (by qualified personnel) that: Provides evidence that the hearing loss seriously impacts the student’s education Should have evidence of need for/receiving support from a qualified professional Typically includes audiology, speech. language, communication and/or social skills development The manual states that “in general, the needs of these students can be managed by classroom adaptations”.

Cochlear implants Students are receiving services on a regular basis from a qualified educational professional with special training  A qualified teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing provides the services

Documentation ( for all categories)  Documentation is absolutely essential  “to support that the student has been appropriately assessed and identified by the school district as meeting the criteria of the special education category” To monitor progress To build a case for need for appropriate and adequate services and interventions

IEP  Current - dated after September 30, previous school year  Contains goals, measurable objectives, adaptations/modification, strategies  Goals correspond to deaf/hh category; relate to identified needs  Student is receiving special education services on a regular basis;

IEP  Student is being offered learning activities in accordance with the IEP  IEP outlines methods for measuring progress in relation to IEP goals  A parent was offered the opportunity to be consulted about the preparation of the IEP

Personnel & Staffing  A qualified teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing provides the services (CAEDHH Certification) District responsible for providing staff with the qualifications to meet the specific communication needs of the individual students Visual language interpreters

Personnel & Staffing Supporting CI specialists ( should have “appropriate qualifications to support students after they have had surgery for a CI)” TAs

Important Points New focus - unilateral losses, progress measuring and annual evaluations Accountability and documentation ( but “don’t need to go crazy about it!” P.L.) Assessments must show professional judgments as to appropriateness and adequacy Teachers must demonstrate that the student is behind and build a case: that difficulties are due to chronic unilateral loss

Important Points Not enough to have goals and objectives - must also be able to measure progress; show that it is a result of intervention “observation” is not enough; can effectively be included but must also have documents that show measurable outcomes Teachers of the deaf/hh will be observing and monitoring performance and are the ones who are accountable Note that there is need for expertise in working with students who have CIs

Resources PERCD ( provincial education review committee for deaf students) Auditory training equipment ( sound field systems) Provincial Outreach Program Resource Centre

BC Ministry of Education :Special Education Audit Team Member, 2007 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education and Deafness, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta