Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *systematically assessing.
RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
PROBLEM STATEMENTS IN PROBLEM-SOLVING, RtI PROCESSES FSSM Summer Institute, June 26, 2007 Charlotte Smith,
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
RTI Levels  Schools must organize their interventions into levels of increasing intensity.  Three Tiers – Tier I, II, III  Higher the need of the student.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Dana Martineau and Anita Rivers introducing Early Intervention Program.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Curriculum-Based Measurements The What. Curriculum-Based Measurements  Curriculum-Based Measurements (CBM) Assessment tools derived from the curriculum,
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Summer Copyright (c) 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. All names and data used in this presentation are fictitious.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
Response to Intervention The Implementation Process “Plans and Strategies” Part I.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
June 5, 2014 Michelle Burks - Elementary ELA Coordinator.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Considerations for Choosing Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures from K-12 Anne Foegen, Ph.D. Pursuing the.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Colt Early Childhood Education Center October 8, 2012
Response to Intervention
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Welcome to Eagleview RTI Reading & Math.
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System: RTI Assessment Julie Alonzo, Ph.D. & Gerald Tindal, Ph.D. July 2011.
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Response to Intervention Overview
Presentation transcript:

Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution

2 What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a 3-tier Progress Monitoring System based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment which is reported to students, parents, teachers and administrators via a web-based data management and reporting system for the purpose of determining response to instruction.

3 3-Tier Problem Solving Model TIER 1 BENCHMARK Universal Screening TIER 2 STRATEGIC MONITOR Monthly monitoring for students who are questionable or of concern TIER 3 PROGRESS MONITOR Intensive monitoring towards specific goals for at-risk students

4 AIMSweb systems include: Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) testing materials Web-based Progress Monitoring and RTI software

Curriculum-Based Measurement The Foundation of AIMSweb Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is the method of monitoring student progress through direct, continuous assessment of basic skills. AIMSweb testing is CBM

6 CBM testing materials developed for AIMSweb include … Test of Early Literacy (K-1) –Letter Naming Fluency –Letter sound fluency –Phonemic Segmentation Fluency –Nonsense Word Fluency Test of Early Numeracy (K-1) –Oral Counting –Number identification –Quantity discrimination –Missing number Reading-CBM (K-8) Oral Reading (English and Spanish) Maze-CBM (1-8) Reading comprehension Math-COMP (1-8) Computation/Facts Math-CAP (2-8) Application

7 Curriculum-Based Measurement How is CBM administered? AIMSweb CBM testing is administered ‘paper/pencil’ style Measures: 3-10 minutes to complete Testing is done individually or in groups, depending on the measure Scores are entered or uploaded into the AIMSweb Progress Monitoring and RTI Data system ReadingMath

8 Curriculum-Based Measurement Things to Remember About CBM ReliablevalidReliable and valid indicator of student achievement Research Based – Almost 30 years of research has produced consistent and meaningful evidence of its utility as a valid progress monitoring tool Simple, efficientshortSimple, efficient, and of short duration to facilitate frequent administration helps teachers plan better instructionProvides assessment information that helps teachers plan better instruction Sensitive to the improvementSensitive to the improvement of students’ achievement over time “indicators” importantDesigned to serve as “indicators” of general basic skills achievement: CBM probes don’t measure everything, but measure the important things Measures General CurriculumMeasures General Curriculum - Curriculum Independent

Progress Monitoring Data System

10 Tier 1 Benchmark All students assessed three times per year at grade level Organizes Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) for Benchmark Assessment Fall, Winter, and Spring Prepares Reports for Teachers, Principals, and Administrators on Individual Students, Classes, Grades, Schools, and School Districts Early Identification of Students At-Risk of Academic Difficulty Objectively Determines Rates of Progress for Individual Students, Schools, and NCLB Risk Groups Allows Evaluation at Multiple Levels of Comparison Prints Professional Reports for Parent Conferences and Other Meetings

11 Tier 1 Benchmark – Student Report Fall Benchmark Scores Identify At-Risk Students Early

12 Tier 1 Benchmark – Student Report Winter Benchmark Scores Benchmark Report Can Confirm Significant Improvements Have Been Made, Such as Response to Intervention (RTI)

13 Tier 1 Benchmark – Student Report Spring Benchmark Scores Data to Know that Changes Made a Difference

14 Tier 2 Strategic Monitor Monthly assessments at grade level Increase assessment frequency for students who have been identified as questionable or at-risk in the Benchmark process Monthly assessment intervals provide more frequent opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional changes

15 Tier 2 Strategic Monitor Individual Student Report Allows for More Frequent Evaluation of Progress for Both Individual Students and Programs Designated to Impact Achievement for Those At Risk

16 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Frequent assessment towards goals using goal level assessments Frequently assess students in need of intensive instructional services, including “Best Practices” IEP goals for students who receive special education services Translate annual IEP or any goals into expected rates of progress (Aim lines) automatically Monitor progress (Trend lines) towards goals Document the effects of intervention and instruction Print professional reports for periodic and annual reviews

17 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Student Report Once Data are Entered, a Graph is Updated Automatically, with: –Trend Line –Calculation of Rate of Progress –Interpretation of Progress

18 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Student Report Necessary Revisions are Identified and Documented Graphically

19 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Student Report Revisions can be evaluated to determine response

20 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Student Report And Revised as Necessary!!

21 Tier 3 Progress Monitor Student Report Successful Revision and Adequate Progress Documented

Response to Intervention Organize and evaluate the process of RTI for the purpose of determining special services eligibility

Response to Intervention RTI’s purpose is to determine intensity of instruction based on NEED through DATA for ALL students

24 Response to Intervention (RTI) Overview AIMSweb Response to Intervention provides a "best practices in problem-solving approach" to the RTI process including scientifically designed progress monitoring: –Benchmarking to assess current educational need –Intensive Progress Monitoring to assess response to specially designed, high quality intervention