Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: 2007-2010 Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
1 Rhode Island School Counselor Evaluation Jean Greco, Patricia Nailor and Karl Squier RISCA Spring Conference Rhode Island Convention Center April 11,
Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities.
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Action Research Designs
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Reading First Evaluation in Georgia: A Multidimensional Approach Ken Proctor Reading First Director Georgia Department of Education Michael C. McKenna.
Assessing Financial Education: A Practitioner’s Guide December 2010.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
CONDUCTING PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Brooke Blair, ALSDE Mark Ward, ALSDE Erin McCann, SEDL Mary Lou Meadows, SEDL.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Assisting Students with Disabilities
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Field Test of Library/Media Specialist Evaluation System July 2000.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Maryland Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (ECMHC) Evaluation
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Evaluation Tools & Approaches for Engaging Stakeholders: The AREA Approach Presentation at the Canadian Evaluation Society Dr. Mariam Manley, Principal.
The Missouri Reading Initiative Spring 2008 Annual Participant Survey Results.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Cohort 9 Coach Meeting October 21 or October 23 Maplewood or Eagan
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Research QuestionHOW and WHEN the data will be collected; HOW data will be analyzed KIND of data needed to answer the question How the MSS strategy will.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
September 22, 2015 Shawanna Arnold Assistant Principal Annual Title I Meeting Gullatt Elementary School Review of Title I Plan.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Planning your evaluation This presentation provides.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Pathways Project Evaluation Objective #1: To change classroom pedagogy and improve the ability of faculty to effectively integrate Internet-based tools.
Strategies for Gauging Success Pre-Reform Assessment Survey Post-Reform Assessment Survey Pre-Reform Interview Post Reform Assessment.
Missouri State Reporting Understanding the Challenges and Processes Presented to Technology Action Team
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Incorporating Program Assessment into Your Annual Program Review June 29, 2006.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Reading Initiative Evaluation Plan: Goals, Activities, and Responsibilities

Overview Goals Who What When Roles and Responsibilities

Goals I.Measure Outcomes II.Monitor Program Implementation (Process) III.Provide Useful Information for Program Development : Schools and MRI

Who? MRI Staff University Interns School Personnel 5,000-7,000 Respondents: new schools 20,000+ students 1,500+ Teachers

What? Logic and Instruments Basic Program Logic: Step 1 ( Strategic Input): MRI provides instruction in Comprehensive Literacy... Step 2 (Strategic Objective): Classroom teachers change to (reinforce) Comprehensive Literacy practice resulting in... Step 3 (Long-Term Outcome): Improved levels of student achievement in communication arts.

Data Collection “Instruments” “Teacher Beliefs and Practices Survey”: Measures teacher beliefs and attitudes about learning styles, and how frequently they utilize certain practices in their classrooms. (Pre and Post)

Data Collection “Instruments” Annual MRI Questionnaire: Set of questions with scaled responses given at year-end to teachers, administrators and other participants that focuses on implementation process. Teacher/Administrator Interviews: Semi-structured interviews that ask about the strengths and weaknesses of various program elements. (Exit)

Data Collection “Instruments” Standardized Test Scores: MAP and school-based scores used to document student achievement. Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) scores: An assessment tool that measures individual student reading development; a component of MRI instruction. Create Baselines and collect as implemented

Data Collection “Instruments” Student data--- student age, gender, social and economic data (free/reduced lunch status, family type), ethnicity/race. Teacher data --- years teaching, length of service at school. School data --- size, percentage on free/reduced lunch, rural/urban. Document review --- collection, review, and analysis of documents relating to program design, budgets, implementation, school involvement, etc.

Timeline: Orientation: April-May 2007 Present evaluation plan and finalize evaluation roles and responsibilities Provide each school with a thorough orientation to the MRI program activities.

Timeline: Year I: ( ) September-December 2007 Conduct Pre-Teachers Beliefs & Practices Survey Collect student demographic data Collect baseline student achievement scores Collect baseline DRA scores Collect school information

Timeline: Year I: ( ) January-May 2008 Update Student Achievement Scores April-May 2008 Implement end-of-year questionnaire to teachers and administrators Update student demographic info. June-August 2008 Prepare site reports/1st year report

Timeline: Year II: ( ) September 2008-May 2009 Update standardized test scores as they occur Update DRA scores as they occur May 2009 Conduct end-of-year questionnaire (May) Update student demographic info. June-August 2009 Prepare site reports/2nd year report

Timeline: Year III: ( ) September 2009-May 2010 Update standardized test scores Update DRA scores March-May 2010 Conduct post-Teacher beliefs and Practices Survey Conduct exit interviews Collect final student achievement data Update student demographic info.

Timeline: Year III: ( ) June-August 2010 Prepare final site reports Fall 2010 Final Report

Roles and Responsibilities Schools Collect and transmit data; Test Scores Special Education Interviews Surveys Provide General information School Student Teacher Service MRI Support data collection Staff Set up systems Design Forms Data Entry Analysis Reports