The philosophy of Direct Democracy - why we need it in order to democratize Democracy and what has been achieved so far in Europe Contribution to the seminar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Legitimacy of the parliament: an ongoing challenge, effort and process by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE)
Advertisements

« La démocratie représentative s’est imposé dans son principe au moment où elle s’est fragilisée dans son fonctionnement » Pierre Rosanvallon, La démocratie.
Peace in Europe - the role of the Council of Europe in comparison with the two other institutions OSCE/EU A contribution to the VI. Political Academy on.
Minority(s) representation and recognition through intensive participation in a Direct Democracy A presentation to the JEF&YES’ European Seminar “Majorities.
Chechnya, A tragedy for Europe and Russia : How to make Human Rights also respected in Chechnya 11 propositions for reflections and discussions by Andreas.
C OUNCIL OF E UROPE F ORUM FOR THE F UTURE OF D EMOCRACY Y EREVAN, A RMENIA, O CTOBER 2010 Theme 2: Institutions and Democratic Governance Democracy.
Is there a clash between the individual citizen and democracy? Keynote speech for the JMK/FES - Conference on “Values of Social Democracy yesterday, today.
Human Rights in the post-Soviet space: Russia and the Council of Europe 9 hypotheses for reflexions and discussions by Andreas Gross (Zurich) (Political.
The European Integration process as a source of inspiration for East - Asia Overcoming nationalisms for gaining more (popular)sovereignty Andreas Gross,
The EU Constitution - a more social Europe? Kathleen Spencer Chapman, 26 th October 2004.
Deliberation is the soul of Direct Democracy (DD) The design of the Referendum process determines the quality of DD - well designed it helps to contribute.
The role of parliamentarians in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing citizens power makes representative.
Constituting transnational Democracy as the main challenge for European Integration An introduction to a debate at the Europe Institute of the University.
Direct Democracy-Reform in the center of the making of the new constitution of Zurich by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) Director of the Scientific Institute.
« La démocratie représentative s’est imposé dans son principe au moment où elle s’est fragilisée dans son fonctionnement » Pierre Rosanvallon, La démocratie.
Human Rights and Democracy: An ongoing and never ending individual and collective learning process An introduction to the Swiss Helsinki Committee Youth.
The role of politics for social responsibility in a globalising world New and old forums of expression and actors Andreas Gross, Switzerland, M.P./C o.
Brahe/Compton Global Studies Chapter 4, Section 3.
T HE CHALLENGE OF A E UROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE : D ELIBERATION AND THE ROLE OF ICT S. Dr. Georgios Papanagnou.
Strengthening democracy by increasing citizen participation would catalyze ecological change The way individuals think about and act in nature reflects.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.
The Weimar Government. Aims: Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the Weimar Constitution. Identify the main political parties in Weimar Germany.
Direct Democracy in foreign policy: Switzerland and Europe A contribution to the 43rd Otago Foreign Policy School “Power to the People ? Public Participation.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for southkorean.
Lessons from the history of the Swiss Democracy for the Making of a European Constitution Budapest Forum “Towards a More Democratic Europe” November 20.
European transnational campaigning - ‘citizens initiative’ in the new EU- treaty (Art.11.4) National Democracies & transnational structures + Democracies.
150 years of experiences with Direct Democracy Insights and lessons which might be learned from the national, regional and local level in Switzerland Workshop.
“ Ensuring the integrity of Elections”: A common effort ! Some thesis for deliberations to the OSCE Chairmanship Expert Seminar on Electoral Management.
Federalism redefined Please define in one sentence, what European Federalism means to you.
The double crises of today’s democracies: Too indirect and too national - we need more direct and more transnational democracies An introduction to a debate.
Creating legitimacy and integrating diversity by empowering citizens The challenge of election law design for Democracy and Democracy building Workshop.
The quality of a referendum process depends from it’s design In order to create a dynamic relation between citizens and the political system (Direct) Democracy.
”E-Democracy” is only a tool we need - To overcome the double crises of Democracy we have to realize serious constitutional reforms which provides citizens.
Visions for the future role of DD in the EU: Europe‘s DD-Utopia Andreas Gross, Political Scientist Atelier pour la Democratie Directe (ADD)
The role of citizens, MP’s, Rule of law and Separation of Powers in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing.
Direct Democracy as a opportunity for collective political learning The Swiss foreign policy as a ambivalent example An introduction to a debate at the.
Jeopardy Power & Govt.Comparing Govts. History of.
Diversity and Integration as challenges for Democracy Ten hypothesis to be discussed concerning the question, if Switzerland and Hannah Arendt might be.
Chapter 1.3 Foundations of Democracy Today, t here are more democratic forms of government in the world than any other style of government? Why?
History, culture, practise and design of Direct Democracy in Switzerland a short introduction from Andreas Gross (MP/Pol.Scientist/ADD)
“The role of political parties in electoral processes”: What parties might do to build and strengthen democracy Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross.
Ways to Direct Citizen Participation in the political decision making of the European Union Some hypothesis and impulses from Andreas Gross, MP/Political.
An Introduction to Democracy. Two key questions will guide our study of American democracy: Who governs? –Those who govern will affect us. To what ends?
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.
The creation of the Canton Jura: Looking from the outside with a special focus on federalism and (republican) democracy A contribution for a Discussion.
What may inspire the EU from I&R experiences in Switzerland ? Some discussion points from Andreas Gross at the Meeting “Options and limits.
FEDERALISM. Key Characteristics of federalism Rule of Law Democracy Subsidiarity Freedom Equality.
The political system of Switzerland: ”Built and driven by the society and the sub-national societies” 7 hypothesis as a contribution to the Training program.
Conceptual considerations for entering the Crises Exit by Andreas Gross (Zurich / St.Ursanne) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE) in the NISC 2006 of the GCSP.
Chapter 1 The Study of the American Government The Study of the American Government.
Chapter One The Study of American Government. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.1 | 2 American Government, Chapter 1 The view.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.
The Role of the Political Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.
Competence Sharing in a Federal State
Political representation and democracy
How would you feel about changing the drinking age? Would you argue for it or against it? Why? Tie your arguments to concepts we have learned.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy and engine for Nation building
Introducing Government in America
Legitimacy deficit and Direct democracy: Bulgaria and the EU The design determines the quality of DD - a good design focuses on deliberation, participation.
Challenges of local Direct Democracy in Albania after the administr
Shaping Society Together
by Andreas Gross , Dr.h.c. (Switzerland)
The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for Dutch MP’s.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy: Role and Responsibility of the Parliamentary majority and opposition in policy making by Andreas Gross, Dr.h.c.
Challenges of the Democratisation of Democracy from the ECI to local Direct Democracy- “in a non-successful 3rd wave democracy” by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
Decision Making Systems
Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
The freedom potentials of Direct Democracy (DD) might still be improved - by more and better DD, not less DD ! DD as a modern achievement and an important.
Presentation transcript:

The philosophy of Direct Democracy - why we need it in order to democratize Democracy and what has been achieved so far in Europe Contribution to the seminar « participacion ciudadana y democracia » of the gobierno vasco by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) Directeur de l’Atelier pour la Democratie Directe à St.Ursanne /CH Political Scientist, Swiss MP & Leader of the Socialists in the PACE Bilbao, 21 st of January

Structure of my presentation on Direct Democracy (DD): I.5 keystones of the philosophy II.5 central elements of a good design III. The most important effects (New political culture) IV.Still a European and global exception V.Why DD is so important to overcome the crises of Democracy

1. Democracy is a ongoing, never ending process. - No Democracy is perfect, every Democracy is unfinished - The process of democracy has always a beginning, but never a end: It started in town, went on to regions, states... It started in Assemblys, went on to Representation, does not have to end here...

2. Citizens are subjects, not objects of Democracy - “Empowerment” turns the problem upside down: Those who have it, should get it back, should be able to keep more of it. - The idea of Democracy is to enable freedom: More than a choice, not possible to consume - The idea of Freedom: Life is not a destiny, we should be able to organize it as we think it’s right !

3. DD is no alternative to representative Democracy: It makes it more representative ! - Democracy is just more than representative Democracy only ! - Representatives just do not have the monopole of Democracy and Politics: Otherwise you have a Representocracy and a Partitocracy ! - Representation is important, but not the only possible Democracy

4. In a Direct Democracy the power is really shared - Nobody has so much power, that he does not has to learn from time to time. - The more you organize the participation of citizens the more they learn and feel part of the decision making process. - The more you can also make use of the creativity and the cultural richness of the society

5. The more and better DD you have, the more you can integrate diversity and unity - Modern societies are all diverse and pluralistic: You have to establish a decision making process which respects this diversity and enables unity on the basis of the highest possible legitimacy ! - DD is the sister of federalism and decentralisation of power.

II.Five central elements of a well designed Direct Democracy 1. Every constitution and law has to open for citizen participation 2. A referendum is a option for few citizens (1-2%/6-18 months of collection time) enabling all citizens to participate 3. Free signature gathering 4. No quorums for participation and validation 5. Fairness rules for campaigning and public access

III. A well designed DD produces cornerstones for a new political culture 1. Politics become softer and more communicative: more reflection, more deliberation, more understanding, less alienation ! 2. Politicians and parties do not only speak, they also have to listen and learn. 3. The distances between citizens and institutions get smaller. 4. Citizens become more responsable

IV. A well designed DD is still a exception in Europe 1. Only 9 out of 47 countries in EU have a rich DD experience (Uruguay and Palau too) 2. Italy: Quorum kills; DK: Europe only; Ireland: Constitution only; Baltics/Hung/Slovakia: Too exclusive; Slovenia:Law only;F: Plebiscites only; CH: No financial fairness; Liechtenstein: Hegemony of the Kaiser Since 1972: 50 European Referendums on European Affairs ! 4. Too elitist, too occasional and too difficult !

V. To overcome the one element of the Crises of Democracy is the condition to overcome the second ! We have today a double crises of Democracy: Too representative and too national : In order to civilize markets we also need transnational democracy: A real European constitution with a double power sharing (Italian Referendum 1989) and a global democratic polity !