Frameworks and Standards and Benchmarks…. Science Education Reform: A Brief History.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting it Together ….Student + Teacher Standards = ?
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Southern Regional Education Board ALPHABET SOUP Using HSTW to Meet the Goals of NCLB Scott Warren Director of Contracted Services High Schools That Work.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act Ben, Eric & Shawn.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
SECONDARY ASSESSMENT Middle School  Acuity Predictive  SMART Goal Assessment  Common Assessment  SRI ( Communication Arts)  STAR Math.
Expanded MAP Spring 2008 PowerPoint Presentation Prepared by The Assessment Section, DESE Revised February 22, 2008.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Oregon State Board of Education October 2012
Highly Qualified Teachers & Paraprofessionals No Child Left Behind Archived Information.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
No Child Left Behind and School Improvement Ivana Beeman Southern Utah University.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Oregon Department of Education Agency Overview Susan Castillo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick Burk, Deputy Superintendent Mike Greenfield,
Bundling Middle School Rationale Elementary Considerations K-12 Alliance/WestEd 2014.
The Federal Government
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Common Core State Standards in ELA: A Parent’s Perspective Love K. Foy Coordinator, Secondary ELA and Reading.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Update on Science Curriculum Connie.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Sustainability Education and the Next Generation Science Standards.
LPSA Zone Leaders Meeting Illinois Science Teachers Association (ISTA) Illinois Section of the American Association of Physics Teachers (ISAAPT) Illinois.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Sadker/Zittleman, Teachers, Schools, and Society: A Brief Introduction to Education. © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. What is.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Hosted by Michelle Ferro & Wendy Shelden Document Overview Big Ideas Bodies of Knowledge Benchmarks
STEM is gathering Steam!!!
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
Louisiana Learning Standards WHAT DO YOU THINK? In the area of science, what should your students... know? be able to do? be like?
Leslie Hicks SHAPE America Physical Activity Council Academic Coach Chandler Unified School District (Arizona)
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
Comparing Old to New Science Standards How Have they changed?
CmapTools Facilitates Alignment of Local Curriculum with State Standards: A Case Study Jane Heinze-Fry, Ph.D. Fran Ludwig, M.S.
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
STANDARDS FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: LIMITS AND POSSIBILITIES
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Annual Title I Meeting & Curriculum Night
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Presentation transcript:

Frameworks and Standards and Benchmarks…. Science Education Reform: A Brief History

A turning point… “Our Nation is at risk. Our once unchallenged preeminence in commerce, industry, science, and technological innovation is being overtaken by competitors throughout the world.” National Commission on Excellence in Education, April 1983

5 Major Recommendations Content – Strengthen graduation requirements and curriculum content Content – Strengthen graduation requirements and curriculum content Standards and Expectations – Adopt more rigorous and measurable standards and higher expectations Standards and Expectations – Adopt more rigorous and measurable standards and higher expectations Time – Devote significantly more time to instruction including longer school day and school year Time – Devote significantly more time to instruction including longer school day and school year Teaching – Improve the preparation of teachers and make the profession more rewarding and respected Teaching – Improve the preparation of teachers and make the profession more rewarding and respected Leadership and Fiscal Support – Citizens hold educators and elected officials responsible for leadership to achieve the reforms and provide fiscal support and stability that is necessary Leadership and Fiscal Support – Citizens hold educators and elected officials responsible for leadership to achieve the reforms and provide fiscal support and stability that is necessary

A bit of history… 1989: Bush (Sr.) Administration National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP) calls for establishment of challenging national achievement standards National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP) calls for establishment of challenging national achievement standards National Council of Education Standards and Testing (NCEST) formed National Council of Education Standards and Testing (NCEST) formed

A bit of history… 1994: Goals 2000 President Clinton signed the Educate America Act, creating a special council to certify national and state standards and state assessments President Clinton signed the Educate America Act, creating a special council to certify national and state standards and state assessments

The Problem… 82% of 12 th graders performed below the proficient level on the 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress 82% of 12 th graders performed below the proficient level on the 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress Student performance is progressively worse from 4 th through 12 th grade, as compared to other nations (1995 TIMMS) Student performance is progressively worse from 4 th through 12 th grade, as compared to other nations (1995 TIMMS)

2000 No Child Left Behind President Bush signs the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which calls for extensive implementation of state educational standards addressing national criteria tied to federal funding.

NCLB and Science Education Calls for “highly qualified teachers” who use research- based teaching methods Calls for “highly qualified teachers” who use research- based teaching methods Limits federal funding to programs backed by evidence Limits federal funding to programs backed by evidence Requires states to measure progress in each grade span (3- 5, 6-9, 10-12) annually by 2007 Requires states to measure progress in each grade span (3- 5, 6-9, 10-12) annually by 2007

Science Education Reform 1990: Science for All Americans (AAAS) 1993: Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS) 1996: National Science Education Standards (NRC)

Science Reform in Missouri Show-Me Standards Knowledge Standards Science Standards Curriculum Frameworks Grade Level Expectations Performance Standards Goals 1, 2, 3, 4

Show-Me Knowledge Standards: Science 1. Properties and principles of matter and energy 2. Properties and principles of force and motion 3. Characteristics and interactions of living organisms 4. Changes in ecosystems and interactions of living things with their environments 5. Processes and interactions of Earth’s biosphere, atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere 6. Composition and structure of the universe and the motion of objects within it 7. Processes of scientific inquiry 8. Impact of science, technology, and human activity on resources and the environment

Grade Level Expectations (GLES) for Science Specific to each grade level (rather than K-4, 5-8, 9-12) Specific to each grade level (rather than K-4, 5-8, 9-12) Standards 1-8 addressed individually Standards 1-8 addressed individually Concepts within each standard are articulated Concepts within each standard are articulated Expectations (objectives) are provided for each concept Expectations (objectives) are provided for each concept

Let’s take a closer look… Benchmarks for Science Literacy Benchmarks for Science Literacy National Science Education Standards National Science Education Standards Missouri Grade Level Expectations for Science Missouri Grade Level Expectations for Science