CSS Implementation CEOS Essential Questions. Response: CEOS Essential Questions Timeline: * White paper circulated and questions identified-SIT-27 * Questions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Advertisements

Bryan Roach Chairman Crime Stoppers Australia. Strategic Planning The process for defining strategy (direction) and decision making For Crime Stoppers,
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Interpersonal skills & Communication Edina Nagy Lajos Kiss Szabolcs Hornyák.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
Objective Explain What is the Balanced Scorecard
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
MAFMC 5-Year Strategic Plan Public Comments August 14, 2013.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate John Bates, NOAA SIT-30 Agenda Item #11 Climate Monitoring, Research, and Services 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters,
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Asset Management January 15, 2013.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Foundations of Planning
28 th CEOS Plenary Session Position Paper and Recommended Way Forward for the LSI-VC Thomas Cecere, USGS Jonathon Ross, GA CEOS Plenary, Agenda Item 19.
WGClimate John Bates NOAA SIT Workshop Agenda Item #8 WGClimate Work Plan progress & Issues CEOS SIT Technical Workshop CNES, Montpellier, France 17 th.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
COALITION: Lessons Learned Presentation by: Joel L. Phillips EMT 391 S. Lexington Dr., Suite 110 Folsom, CA
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Community Energy Strategic Planning Sarah Zaleski March 30, 2012 INSERT SEVERAL PROGRAM-RELATED PICTURES.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 4 Structured Systems Analysis and Design This material was developed by Duke University,
Quality Management Theory Terms, Concepts, & Principles.
United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Labour and Social Policy Local Public Private Partnerships THE BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
CEOS Essential Questions. “The most serious mistakes are not being made as a result of wrong answers. The truly dangerous thing is asking the wrong questions.”
CEOS Self-Study Preliminary Ideas on Implementation: Toward a Refined CEOS Michael H. Freilich Incoming Chair, CEOS-SIT
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015 CEOS and GEO.
Chapter 1 The Knowledge Context
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
GEO Implementation Mechanisms Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
TSMO Program Plan Development
MGT 498 TUTORIAL Lessons in Excellence -- mgt498tutorial.com.
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Return to First Principles
International Financing Institutions (IFI) Engagement
Thomas Cecere & Jonathon Ross USGS and Geoscience Australia
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
SIT Chair Priorities and SIT-33 Objectives
Discussion Virtual Constellations
North Iowa Community Action
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
CEOS Organizational Matters
VC Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
WG Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
Presentation transcript:

CSS Implementation CEOS Essential Questions

Response: CEOS Essential Questions Timeline: * White paper circulated and questions identified-SIT-27 * Questions adopted -Plenary 2012 * Input gathered for answers and draft answers circulated-Nov 2012 – Feb 2013 * Discussion and decision-SIT-28

CEOS Essential Questions  The CEOS Essential Questions are a tool used to help refresh CEOS’s mission statement and strategic objectives.  Initial Essential Questions were proposed at the 2011 CEOS Plenary.  Additional Essential Questions were proposed by CEOS members and associates at and after SIT-27.  The final list of Essential Questions was approved at the 2012 CEOS Plenary.  Draft answers to the questions were developed and circulated prior to SIT-28, using input from CEOS members and associates and from the original CSS.  These answers are presented for discussion and approval at SIT-28.  The answers to the CEOS Essential Questions will inform the development of the CEOS Strategic Documents.

Today’s Process There are six Essential Questions. The EQs will be handled one by one, in sequence. For each Essential Question, we will present the draft response derived from CEOS input. The response will be opened for discussion. The attendees assembled in this room will be asked to decide whether each response is accurate in capturing CEOS’s mission and goals for the coming years (~10 years) at the strategic level.

Essential Question #1: What are CEOS’s scope and purpose? Does CEOS conduct sustained, long-term, routine data provision, or does it demonstrate feasibility of space measurements and spin off long-term operations to other groups? CEOS does both, insofar as is possible within the constraints of available resources. Both are integral components of the work done in working groups and virtual constellations. Does CEOS develop actual “CEOS Satellites” as opposed to its coordination role in developing requirements, Virtual Constellations and providing multi-lateral coordination of sa tellite systems? CEOS does not develop actual “CEOS Satellites,” but instead leverages the capabilities and assets of individual CEOS member agencies through the mechanism of the Virtual Constellations.

Essential Question #2: What is the value of CEOS to others, and how do others view, support, and engage with CEOS? Internally, what benefits, tangible or otherwise, does an organization gain through active CEOS membership? CEOS provides opportunities for participation in multilateral coordination, individual career growth and agency growth through opportunities to lead, and the potential for agencies to more easily identify partnership opportunities through which they can share development and operational costs. Externally, what benefits, tangible or otherwise, do governments, society, and users/partners gain through the existence of CEOS? External partners/users rely upon CEOS to represent and promote interaction among space agencies, to promote open data policies, and to provide high-quality Earth observations that result in societal benefits across a wide variety of topical areas. In both cases, how does CEOS ensure that those benefits are commensurate with the level of investment (in time, human capital, financial commitments)? CEOS ensures that benefits are commensurate with investment when its activities are productive and reflect awareness of the value of member resources and constraints. The level of participation in activities is a key measure of whether CEOS is succeeding in keeping an appropriate balance.

Essential Question #3: What are CEOS’s essential outcomes and relationships ? What are the most valuable external relationships that CEOS maintains or should maintain? Key external relationships include those with GEO, GCOS, SBSTA, and UNFCCC. What are the most valuable outcomes that CEOS provides and/or enables for its user communities? Data democracy and open data access are among the most valuable outcomes that CEOS provides. Other very highly valued CEOS outcomes include the reduction of observation gaps, easy access to data, lessons learned for data management, and the demonstration of data utilization for specific applications with direct societal benefit. How would CEOS’s mission & goals be affected if key stakeholders or partners were substantially changed, or if they ceased to exist? The value of CEOS is highly dependent upon strong stakeholder engagement. Given the rising importance of Earth observations for key environmental needs, if those stakeholders were not present, it would be necessary for CEOS to define new goals and find new customers. It is, however, likely that other international coordination mechanisms and intergovernmental organizations would instead seek CEOS engagement.

Essential Question #4: How does CEOS define and measure success in meeting its objectives? How does CEOS evaluate its own progress? CEOS evaluates its own progress through such means as the Self-Study, through the leadership responsibilities given to the Troika and Secretariat, and through feedback provided by key stakeholders. What are the criteria CEOS uses for deciding that a CEOS activity is successful or unsuccessful? The criteria that CEOS should use to determine success should include participation, commitment levels and the support of key participating agencies, and achievement of anticipated results. Long-term, ongoing activities will require different criteria than will short-term projects. How does CEOS decide whether an activity should be continued or ended? Activities that are productive, that have important outcomes, and that have sufficient financial and human resources from CEOS members are candidates for continuation. Activities that do not show progress, that do not provide outcomes of value, or that lack interest or resources from key members, should be refocused or discontinued. Activities should not be viewed in isolation, but rather as part of the overall CEOS portfolio in assessing costs and benefits.

Essential Question #5: What situations or conditions pose the greatest risks and opportunities for CEOS? How does CEOS ensure that its activities are sustainable? CEOS must ensure that its activities are commensurate with both financial and human resources. CEOS should remain organizationally lean enough to be seen as both affordable and high value to members, and it must maintain high relevance to stakeholders. CEOS should be cautious about initiating new activities in times of austere budgets, and should be decisive in reconfiguring or adjusting activities when necessary to ensure sustainability. What factors or elements are absolutely essential to ensure that CEOS remains vital? The continued full engagement of its membership is the single most critical element required to ensure that CEOS remains vital. What internal or external conditions would most severely stress CEOS? The greatest stressors that CEOS could face would include loss of interest by key members who provide resources to activities, serious loss of continuity in key leadership roles, loss of key external stakeholders, or the emergence of other organizations to take on roles and relationships that CEOS has traditionally occupied.

Essential Question #6: Ten years from now, what concrete major goals does CEOS want to have achieved? CEOS should remain the leader for internal coordination of space-based Earth observations. CEOS should be the place to go for use of space observations for societal needs. CEOS should have a demonstrated body of work in which coordinated Earth observation satellite data have provided real societal and/or scientific benefit. CEOS should have closed important observation gaps through partnerships, membership growth and coordination, new launches, and leverage of existing member assets. CEOS should have reached out to form working partnerships with organizations responsible for in situ observations, resulting in better integration across the full range of Earth observations.

BONUS: Essential Questions vs. CSS “Big Questions” CEOS Essential QuestionsSelf-Study “Big Questions” EQ1. What are CEOS’s scope and purpose? Does CEOS have clearly-defined goals and objectives that are aligned with its mission? Are CEOS's objectives commensurate with the available resources (human, physical, fiscal, and informational)? EQ2. What is the value of CEOS to others, and how do others view, support, and engage with CEOS? What are CEOS’s most important successes? EQ3. What are CEOS’s essential outcomes and relationships? Are there activities that should be ceased? EQ4. How does CEOS define and measure success in meeting its objectives? How does CEOS measure and document progress toward goals? EQ5. What situations or conditions pose the greatest risks and opportunities for CEOS? What are the most important opportunities for improvement in CEOS over the next 3-5 years? EQ6. Ten years from now, what concrete major goals does CEOS want to have achieved? What are the most important new initiatives for CEOS to set for the next 3-5 years?