ASA 1/26/2006 A CHIEVING THE D REAM SM Student Success February 1, 2006 Integrating the Project into the Core College Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background and Data Student Success Committee. MECC Definition of Student Success Retained Complete 2/3 of credits With 2.0 GPA or higher.
Advertisements

Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Faculty Council October 6, Sub-Goal 1.A. Increase enrollment of Clinton County adult learners (25 years and older).  1.A.1. Increase enrollment.
High Risk Factors for Retention Freshman Year Experience Review of the Literature Review of Preliminary Data.
UMCP Study on Defaults A Study of Ten Year Default Rates of Undergraduate Students Who Borrowed Any Loan in /6/2012UMD Office of Student Financial.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.
Engaging Faculty in Using Data to Increase Student Success Dr. Karen Stout, President Leon Hill, Director of Institutional Research David Whalen, Instructor.
Students Speak! Are We Listening? NISOD % …of traditional-age entering students responding to the Survey of Entering Student Engagement say they.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team October 10, 2007.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team January 11, 2008.
Achieving the Dream Using Data at SFCC Developing a Culture of Evidence Presentation to the Retention Committee February, 2006.
Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
Dual Enrollment Opportunities
Why I-BEST In Washington state, over half of the students come to our community and technical college system with the goal of getting to work. SBCTC research.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
1 Institutional Data: Where We Win, Where We Face Challenges Dr. Kenyatta Phelps Brailsford College of Arts & Sciences Mr. Anthony Adam Office of Institutional.
 Gregory Schutz Rion McDonald Chris Tingle TASSR Fall Conference October 24, 2013.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
Higher Education Conference on Enrollment Management February 29, 2008.
MSJC Assessment Scores FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC R&D Dept.- C. Hawkins / IT MIS WO# XBRO.BSI.
Developmental Math, English and Reading Data Team Subcommittees Reports January 2011.
Kilgore College’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  The centerpiece for reaffirmation of our accreditation  Must change the learning environment  Must be.
Welcome to the Fall 2008 Meeting Community College Equity Officers ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL EQUITY ACT UPDATES.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
LEADERSHIP COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Update on Curriculum Enrollment, Student Characteristics & Student Success.
Achieving the Dream Baseline Data – What does it tell us? Presented by the ATD Data Team February 24, 2015.
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Improving Four-Year Graduation Rates – Why It is Important Susan Powers, AVP for Academic Affairs Josh Powers, AVP for Student Success The Pathway to Success.
De Anza Math Pilot Results, Evaluating a NonRandomized Trial: A Case Study of a Pilot to Increase Pre- Collegiate Math Course Success Rates Andrew.
How does academic selectivity impact student dropout?: Evidence from an elite Russian university Elena V. Kolotova, Maria Dobryakova National Research.
MSJC BSI Baseline Measures using FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Prepared for Instructional Services Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC.
The Impact of Non-Traditional Students on Student Needs.
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
Mobile County Public Schools is the Largest System in Alabama.
Preparing students for college-level reading and writing. Developmental Redesign and Institutional Vision.
One System…One Mission Florida’s Student Success Dashboard 2011 American Association of Community Colleges John Hughes, Ph. D.
Predicting Student Retention: Last Students in are Likely to be the First Students Out Jo Ann Hallawell, PhD November 19, th Annual Conference.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.
Achieving the Dream: Alexandria Campus Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report No
 Student supports and interventions  Dropout prevention  Literacy  Transitions – to and from high school  Senior year  Teacher quality and professional.
PRESENTED TO BASIC SKILLS COMMITTEE PRESENTED ON MAY 29, 2008 PRESENTED BY NATHAN R. DURDELLA, Ph.D. CAROLINE Q. SHELDON, Ph.D. OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL.
Ken Gonzalez, University of San Diego and Mary A. Millikin, Tulsa Community College 89th Annual AACC Convention April 5, 2009 Focus Groups: Putting the.
Pierce College Students: Who They Are & How They’re Doing Carol Kozeracki Student Success Mini-Conference February 9, 2007.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
Comparative Analysis of Aggregate Educational Data Between Children in Foster Care and the General Population Florida Department of Children and Families.
On-line Instruction in the Los Angeles Community Colleges George Prather, Ph.D. Stanislav Levin, M.S. Edward Pai, Ph.D Office of Institutional Research.
The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Online Education Dr. Patrick Wilson.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
African American/Black Student Enrollment Data
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Educational Master Plan
Dissertation RESULTS by Erin E. Cooper
Analysis of Statewide Developmental Education Reform (ASDER)
SVC Students: Who are they
Student Success Data.
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Hard-blocked Placement Prerequisites
Student Demographics and Success Trends
Achieving the Dream: Loudoun Campus Baseline Data
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

ASA 1/26/2006 A CHIEVING THE D REAM SM Student Success February 1, 2006 Integrating the Project into the Core College Operations

QEP Components It must target the improvement of student learning It should have specific, well-defined goals that lead to measurable results It should address critical issues essential to the institution

QEP Components It should include evidence of careful analysis of the institutional context It should include a viable implementation plan that includes the necessary resources It should include a fully developed evaluation plan

Why course completion? Basic student retention data must account for at least 2 important variables: –Student intent to persist –Environmental variables Course completion data accounts for student intent. Course completion leads to retention which leads to graduation.

How the data were analyzed Student success rate Withdrawal rate Compare student success by: –Courses taught by full-time faculty vs adjunct –By campus –Online vs traditional –“Early-term” vs “Longer-term” students –Student age groups, gender, race

Data analysis - continued Institution-wide By campus Developmental English and Math Gatekeeper English and Math Online

College Credit Course Success By Race Fall 2004 White African- AmericanOther MinorityTotal Number% % % % Success % % % % Nonsuccess % % % % Withdraw % %6039.4% % Total % % % %

College Credit Course Success Fall & Under* & OverTotal Number% % % % % Success % % % % % Nonsuccess % % % % % Withdraw1065.0% % % % % Total % % % % % By Age * 39% (N=830 grades) of the 2,104 grades attributed to dual enrolled high school students. Success rate less dual enrolled students = 71%.

Observations College Credit Courses The success rate for adjuncts (77%) is slightly higher than that of FT instructors (71%). The success rate for online courses (67%) is lower than that of traditional courses (76%). The withdrawal rate for online courses (14%) is higher than that of traditional courses (8%). The success rate for year old students (69%) is less than that of (76%) and students 30 and older (82%). The success rate for African-American students (70%) is lower than that of white students (77%). The fewer credits accumulated, the lower the success rate. Students with less than 16 accumulated credits have the lowest success rate m (70%) compared to credits (77%) and 31+ credits (81%).

By Campus Developmental ENG Fall 2004 ChesapeakeNorfolkPortsmouthVa BeachTotal Number% % % % % Success % % % % % Nonsuccess7415.8% % % % % Withdraw194.1%9213.2%5812.2%937.5%2629.1% Total % % % % % Developmental MTH Fall 2004 ChesapeakeNorfolkPortsmouthVa BeachTotal Number% % % % % Success % % % % % Nonsuccess % % % % % Withdraw669.8% %315.4%2458.1%4939.4% Total % % % % % Developmental Course Success

By Race Developmental ENG Fall 2004 WhiteAfrican-AmericanOther MinorityTotal Number% % % % Success % % % % Nonsuccess % %7824.9% % Withdraw978.6%1389.6%278.6%2629.1% Total % % % % Developmental MTH Fall 2004 WhiteAfrican-AmericanOther MinorityTotal Number% % % % Success % % % % Nonsuccess % % % % Withdraw2508.7% %599.5%4939.4% Total % % % % Developmental Course Success

Observations Developmental Courses ● The Chesapeake Campus success rate in dev. ENG (80%) is more than 10 percentage points higher when compared to the other three campuses. ● The Portsmouth Campus success rate in dev. MTH is more than 10 percentage points higher when compared to the other three campuses. The Va. Beach Campus has an unusually high dev. MTH nonsuccess rate (42%) compared to the other three campuses. ● When examined by FT faculty, dev. ENG success rates range from a high of 77% at Chesapeake to a low of 44% at Portsmouth. ● When examined by FT faculty, dev. MTH success rates range from a high of 69% at Portsmouth to a low of 47% at Virginia Beach. ● Dev. ENG courses taught online have a lower success rate (58%) than traditional delivery courses (66%). Dev. MTH courses taught online have a lower success rate (45%) than traditional delivery courses (53%).

Observations Developmental Courses – continued ● The withdrawal rate for online dev. ENG courses (17%) is about twice that of traditional dev. ENG courses (9%), and the online dev. MTH withdrawal rate (27%) is three times the rate of traditional courses (8%). ● Less than 50% of minority students enrolled in dev. MTH are successful. ● For males, the success rate (46%) and nonsuccess rate (45%) are almost identical in dev. MTH. ● The success rates for dev. ENG (64%) and dev. MTH (48%) are lowest among the year age group and highest for those 30 and older. ● The success rate for developmental courses is lowest for students with 15 or fewer accumulated credits.

Gatekeeper Course Success By Campus Gatekeeper ENG* Course Success Rate By Campus Fall 2004 ChesapeakeNorfolkPortsmouthVa BeachTotal Number% % % % % Success % % % % % Nonsuccess %7121.6% % % % Withdraw386.4%4914.9%5614.0%1578.6%3009.5% Total % % % % % *Gatekeeper ENG = ENG 111 Gatekeeper MTH* Course Success Rate By Campus Fall 2004 ChesapeakeNorfolkPortsmouthVa BeachTotal Number% % % % % Success % % % % % Nonsuccess8830.3%6528.4%4323.4% % % Withdraw4615.9%2611.4%126.5% % % Total % % % % % * Gatekeeper MTH = MTH 158, MTH 163

Observations Gatekeeper Courses ● Similar to statistics for developmental ENG and MTH, the Chesapeake Campus has the highest success rate for gatekeeper ENG (75%) and the Portsmouth Campus has the highest success rate for gatekeeper MTH (70%). ● The gatekeeper ENG success rate is lowest for the year age group (64%) and those with less than 16 accumulated credits (70%). ● About 27% of students enrolled in gatekeeper MTH courses are unsuccessful, and 13% withdraw. ● The gatekeeper MTH success rate for males (53%) is much lower than for females (65%). ● The gatekeeper MTH success rate is lowest for the year age group (56%) and those with less than 16 accumulated credits (57%).

Common Threads ● Students with less than 16 accumulated credits and in the year age group tend to have a lower success rate. ● Online courses tend to have higher withdrawal rates, particularly in dev. MTH and ENG. ● Males and minorities tend to have a lower success rate in MTH (both dev. and gatekeeper). Observations