Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility The most cost-effective suburban traffic reduction policy. A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bae Housing Nexus Study Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater, Largo and St. Petersburg Prepared by Bay Area Economics.
Advertisements

SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Virginia Housing Coalition 2013 Housing Credit Conference Deal Structuring, Fundamentals, and Financing and Legal Issues.
Traffic Reducing Housing (TRH) & Upward Mobility Steve Raney, Cities21, Palo Alto Rob Fredericks, Santa Barbara Housing Authority.
TYSONS THE AUDACITY OF CHANGE
HOUSING FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES: COMMITMENTS AND PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES Regional Conference on Housing Policy towards Sustainable Housing Development.
CRISIS IN URBAN AND HOUSING ISSUES
Conducted by: William M. Rohe Spencer Cowan Daniel Rodriguez Conducted for: The North Carolina Association of Community Development Corporations in cooperation.
Calabasas Housing Needs Karen Warner, AICP Calabasas Housing Affordability Workshop October 1, 2005.
Welfare Benefit Reform Veronica Dewsbury. Content Policy Intention Benefit Cap Size Criteria Social sector Social Fund Council Tax Support Government.
American free enterprise
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Cashing-Out Employer Paid Parking in Minneapolis - St. Paul Research partners: Minneapolis and St. Paul TMO Research funded by the US EPA (Market-based.
Outline Central Cities vs Suburbs Why Did Suburbs Grow? Decentralization of Employment and the Monocentric City Is Suburbanization Efficient?
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
CONGESTION PRICING Traffic Solution or Tax Scheme?
Environmental Policy. Population and The Environment A significant concern for policymakers is the rapidly growing world population population=
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist The Spatial Structure of Cities: Practical Decisions Facing Urban Planners Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning.
Supply Side policies AS Economics.
American Free Enterprise
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
K.O.R.E. Enterprises Workshop Urban Transportation Systems 10/15/08.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Local Government Perspectives on Siting Criteria for Localized Air Pollution Sources “How do cities balance the goals of creating housing and employment.
The Greater Boston Housing Challenge Barry Bluestone Center for Urban and Regional Policy Northeastern University WBZ “Attaining the American Dream” October.
Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility Steve Raney, Cities21 The most cost-effective suburban traffic.
slide 1 Transforming Office Parks into Transit Villages: Vision Less auto-dominated suburbs Assumes global warming & peak oil.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
Walk to Work Homes + Upward Mobility Walk to work apts/condos for tech workers The most cost-effective suburban traffic reduction.
Unemployment ● Causes of Unemployment ● The Phillips Curve ● Natural Rate of Unemployment ● Okun's Law.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
© Cornerstone Partnership 2013 Best Practices in Inclusionary Housing Policy Design.
Affordable and Accessible Housing: A National Perspective Regional Housing Forum November 13, 2002 Emily Cooper Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Efficient Cities: Easy on the CO 2 and H 2 O Less CO 2  less sea level rise, more wetlands Less driving  less breakpad dust,
Affordable Housing 101 Vermont Housing Conference November 18, 2008.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
April 12, 2013 University of Maryland School of Law The Fair Housing Act at 45: Actualizing the Duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing.
The Labour Market.
SROI Report Card: Year Ending March Renaissance: Social Mission Overview SROI Report Card: Year End 2005 GoalsMethodsSuccess Metrics Provide.
City-Scale Retrofit Programs Satya Rhodes-Conway COWS June 18, 2009.
KI 13-3 Why Do Inner Cities Face Distinctive Challenges?  Inner-city physical issues? Most significant = deteriorating housing (built prior to 1940) ○
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
 Subgoal 3A: Utilize HUD assistance to improve educational outcomes and early learning and development.  Subgoal 3B: Utilize HUD assistance to improve.
Housing in London - the current state of play Christine Whitehead London School of Economics Next steps for housing policy in London - supply, standards.
13 th – 15 March, 2006 New Perspectives in Real Estate Development In Port of Spain Welcome.
17 Major Employment Centers workersCitytypology HBP20,777 Pleasanton Mixed use edge city w/ sharp boundary SSF32,445 SSF Major employment center w/ sharp.
Johns Hopkins 2010 United Way Campaign Give Help for Today and Hope for Tomorrow.
Negative Externalities of Production By Sean Coupe.
Steve Raney Low Miles Community From U.S. Environmental Protection Agency suburban sustainability study (Bay Area focus)
LEO-Irabor Joshua Consequences of Economic Growth.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
04/2008Nucleus-International.net1 Considerations about the Membership Fee System of Business Associations and Chambers Nucleus-International.net.
Mixed-Use Development Challenges and Opportunities.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Portland Housing Bureau Budget Worksession Presentation Slide 1.
Sprawl and the law Michael LewynTouro Law Center.
19553 Blue Lake Loop Bend, OR Tel: 541/ City of Redmond Affordable Housing Plan Phase II: Affordable Housing Strategies November 14, 2006.
Chapter Ten: Inequality in Housing and Wealth By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Economic and Real Estate Market Outlook
ROBERT W. BURCHELL, Ph.D. Professor and Co-Director Rutgers University
FOLLOW UP WORK PLAN QUAN GIA BINH – VIET NAM
Transport Jacqui Cox OCC Simon Speller PBA
American free enterprise
Presentation transcript:

Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility The most cost-effective suburban traffic reduction policy. A  B (swap) Improvement on Employer Assisted Housing (purchase subsidy, etc) Acronym: PEAH+LIUM. (helium).

Co-Location Influence “good” location decisions  “co- locate” job & home (walk to work). Minimize SOV mileage. For each human, minimize the distances in the triangle below. Job Home equals 7,500 miles per year. Home Job Activities

3 Steps for Housing Preference 1) a city agrees to a preference scheme designating: –a) qualifications for entering households to achieve preferred status and –b) financial incentives for developers who adopt such schemes 2) applicable rental/for-sale housing units are priced to ensure high demand (must have a waiting list) 3) preferred people are granted priority for those housing units “Handcuffs” incent continued co-location NOT: teacher / police preference –INSTEAD IT IS: “commute impact.”

PEAH for Suburban Office Parks Best: Suburbs w/ congestion + expensive housing Potential: 1M new condos and apts in largest 200 office parks. (jobs/hsng) –Private sector: density bonus, reduced pkng, small units.

Most cost-effective congestion reduction Tumlin: “most cost-effective peak hour trip reduction: provide housing for workers.” GUP: 0 new net trips Cross-disciplinary topic, so tricky when dealing with “housing-only” or “transportation-only” specialists Anthony Downs (Still Stuck in Traffic): a) learn to cope with traffic congestion in the short run, b) in the long run, jobs and housing will eventually co-locate Cervero: co-location hasn’t been happening. "Average journey to work distance has been increasing, jobs/hsng continues to exacerbate" Thus, co-location is crucial, and PEAH is needed.

Win 4 – cities, workers, employers, developers Decrease commute time, emissions, auto mileage, gas use Allow workers to walk and bike to work Reduce the cost of living for co-located folks via reduced auto costs. Note also that location efficient mortgages are enabled Reduce regional pressure to grow outside the inner-ring. Increase the profitability of in-fill development by reducing mitigation fees and parking construction costs Enable land-constrained cities to meet state mandated "fair share" housing production goals Reduce employee turnover by providing better quality of life because of more free time caused by shorter commutes –Employee retention economics: Turnover is 20% to 50% per year. $100K to replace a tech worker (headhunter, job training, lost productivity, time spent interviewing). 20K workers per big office park. 1% of workers = 200. Reduce turnover by 1% = $20M Improve areas afflicted with jobs/housing imbalance.

PEAH Implementation: Handcuffs, etc. Gate: good commute hurdle to enter housing –Tiered preference: 1 mi commute, 2 mi, 3 mi, non- SOV Handcuffs. Monthly $100 price Δ between good and bad commutes. Condo assn fees or personal commute mitigation tax –Stanford West Apts: annual re-qualification with eviction for bad commutes –Condo deed restriction to re-sell to good commuter.

??? Give the “Haves” a break ??? Two tier suburban society. Educated folks => high income. Historical discrimination and segregation –Hsng affordability crisis  increased segregation –Katrina: third world city in first world country Silicon Valley: Haves: white & Asian, HaveNots: Latino (growing) & African American CA Guv: “each community should house its own” Must mitigate. Is inclusionary zoning / affordable housing production sufficient? (> 5K DUs?) LIUM should be added: {package deal: job, home, job training, better schools for kids, more family time.} Boost up the ladder –Not just “sink or swim.”

LIUM {package} details ZERO suburban hsng affirmative action programs U MI law school admissions: {disadvantaged background, low income, race/ethnicity, etc} Targeted marketing to low income communities WELCOMING: Latino themed architecture. Buttress grocery ethnic sections. Latino-serving first floor retail & community services. Cultural events Employer coalition: job placement & mentoring –Temps, contractors, & “first floor” jobs count too –Employer pays LIUM $ to reserve PEAH DUs I Have a Dream Foundation, after school programs Pilot projects with measurement & mid-course adjustments. Propagate effective programs & set measurable goals –Employees volunteer (within walking distance).

Economic theory Bad location decision creates “negative economic externality” for society. PEAH “internalizes” the cost, creates a more efficient housing market Reduced labor mobility (but that’s exactly the point for employers: increased employee retention)

1M DUs - Thumbs up/down? Feasible or implementation issues? –How will schools be funded? –Will it pencil out? –Will NIMBY’s resist? Good idea or bad idea? –Are handcuffs, etc objectionable?.

END PEAH+LIUM Active research project Upcoming “roundtables” in Bay Area and DC –Hopefully in SoCal at some point.

Culture: Low Mileage Community Non auto-centric culture Good Samaritan-ism (make it easy. Comes out in TDM interviews) EBay’s online community phenomenon –Make friends, achieve social status –Self polices bad behavior.

Low Mileage Scheme New 100 DU residential complex Everyone signs low mileage pledge –Entry condition Manufacture a tipping point – it’s cool to be green –Currently, it’s often dumb to be green –Peer pressure Problem-solving think tank. Online & in person –Carpool to grocery store –Ex: Biking learning curve: route, gear, defensive People love to share such self-discovered expertise –Delivery services, etc.

END Culture. Not covered: Superblock transformation into new urbanist, walkable with PRT to span arterials Bowling alone Small murphy bed housing Gated, automated, paid smart parking grocery carts shopping Homeless Evil office facilities managers Kitchen sink: green construction, gray water recycling, etc..