1 Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model
Advertisements

October 19, 2010 State Growth Model Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Why PARCC in 2015? Key Training and Decision Dates Field Test vs. Operational Test Holding Districts “Harmless” 2015 PARCC MCAS CHOICE.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Overview of Next-Generation Learners Part 2 (Growth) Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Office of Assessment and Accountability Kentucky Department of Education.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Development of a Revised Accountability Framework.
San Marino Unified School District World Class Schools Academic Accountability Measures.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.
Including a detailed description of the Colorado Growth Model 1.
Educator Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities
Prepared by: Scott R. Morrison Director of Curriculum and Instructional Technology 11/3/09.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Hull Public Schools MCAS Presentation Kathleen I. Tyrell, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools October 7, 2013 mko.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2012 MCAS Presentation October 30, 2012.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
MCAS Results Merrymount Elementary School “The toughest thing about success is that you’ve got to keep on being a success.” -Irving Berlin.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO MCAS Presentation November 10, 2015.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.
STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE Measuring Student Learning Growth and Interpreting the Teacher Report Diane Fiello, Vice President of TCRP Harris Luu, TCRP Leadership.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
Georgia Student Growth Model Training Webinar Welcome! Please use the Audio Setup Wizard in the Tools Menu to configure and test your audio settings before.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
INVEST An Outcome Based Model
Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model
SGP What is it and where did it come from?.
Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Presentation transcript:

1 Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model

2 List of Slides: Overview What is growth Why measure Growth? Use of growth Data Student Growth Percentiles Growth to grade students – Gina Growth to grade 7 – 3 students – Harry Growth to grade 7 – 3 students – Ivy Growth to grade 7 – 3 students – Gina, Harry, Ivy Growth to grade 7: Three students – ELA ChartGrowth to grade 7: Three students – ELA Chart Interpreting student growth percentiles Key concepts Growth for Groups Median student growth percentile Using median student growth percentiles: growth by achievement for schools – ScatterplotsUsing median student growth percentiles: growth by achievement for schools – Scatterplots Growth distribution charts Rules of Thumb Growth Model Pilot New insights: Impact of a new K-5 curriculum – MUST SEE New insights: Impact of a new K-5 curriculum – MUST SEE New Insights – Growth v. Achievement New Impacts – Changes in Pilot Districts What data are available? Next steps Next steps For more information For more information

3 Overview What is growth? Why are we doing this? How do we measure growth for students and groups? What have we learned so far? What will be available this fall? Return to Index

4 What is growth? MCAS shows how each student is achieving relative to state standards –Is John proficient in 6 th grade mathematics? –Cannot compare John’s scaled scores from year to year Growth measures change in an individual student’s performance over time –How much did John improve in mathematics from 5 th grade to 6 th grade? Did John improve more or less than his academic peers? Return to Index

5 Why measure growth? A way to measure progress for students at all performance levels –A student can achieve at a low level but still improve relative to his academic peers –Another could achieve well but not improve much from year to year Provides evidence of improvement even among those with low achievement Gives high achieving students and schools something to strive for beyond proficiency Return to Index

6 Uses of growth data Reconceptualizing performance Performance = achievement + growth Identifying strengths and weaknesses in student performance beyond traditional achievement data Targeting assistance Conducting program evaluations Eventually, making accountability decisions Return to Index

7 Student growth percentiles Each student’s rate of change is compared to other students with a similar test score history (“academic peers”) The rate of change is expressed as a percentile. –How much did John improve in mathematics from 5 th grade to 6 th grade, relative to his academic peers? –If John improved more than 65 percent of his academic peers, then his student growth percentile would be 65. Return to Index

8 Growth to grade 7: Three students Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/Failing 80 to to to to 39 1 to 19 SGP Gina  % 65% SGPs between 40 to 59 are typical Return to Index

9 Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/Failing Growth to grade 7: Three students Harry  % 75% Return to Index

10 Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/Failing Growth to grade 7: Three students Ivy  226 8% 92% Return to Index

11 Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/Failing Growth to grade 7: Three students Gina, Harry, and Ivy Harry Gina Ivy Return to Index

12 Growth to grade 7: Three students Ivy Harry Gina SGP 2008 Grade Grade Grade English language arts Return to Index

13 Interpreting student growth percentiles Gina’s SGP was 35. This means her SGP in grade 7 was higher than 35 percent of her academic peers (and less than 65 percent). –Is that amount of growth typical? 35 Percent of students Lower growthHigher growthTypical growth Return to Index

14 Key concepts Growth is distinct from achievement –A student can achieve at a low level but grow quickly, and vice versa Each student is compared only to their statewide academic peers, not to all students statewide –Others with a similar test score history –All students can potentially grow at the 1 st or 99 th percentile Growth is subject-, grade-, and year-specific –Different academic peer groups for each subject, grade, and year –Therefore, the same change in scaled scores can yield different student growth percentiles The percentile is calculated on the change in achievement, not the absolute level –Differs from more familiar norm-referenced measures Return to Index

15 Growth for groups How to report growth for groups of students? –Districts, schools, grades, subgroups, classrooms Median student growth percentile –The point at which half of the students in the group have a higher growth percentile and half lower Growth distribution charts –The percentage of students in the group growing less than, similar to, or more than their academic peers Return to Index

16 Median student growth percentile Last nameSGP Lennon6 McCartney12 Starr21 Harrison32 Jagger34 Richards47 Crosby55 Stills61 Nash63 Young74 Joplin81 Hendrix88 Jones95 Imagine that the list of students to the left are all the students in your 6 th grade class. Note that they are sorted from lowest to highest SGP. The point where 50% of students have a higher SGP and 50% have a lower SGP is the median. Median SGP for the 6 th grade class Return to Index

17 Using median student growth percentiles: growth by achievement for schools Higher achieving Lower growing Lower achieving Lower growing Higher achieving Higher growing Lower achieving Higher growing Return to Index

18 Growth distribution charts Percent of students Lower growthHigher growthTypical growth median Return to Index

19 Rules of thumb Typical student growth percentiles are between about 40 and 60 on most tests. Students or groups outside this range has higher or lower than typical growth. Differences of fewer than 10 SGP points are likely not educationally meaningful. Return to Index

20 Growth model pilot Tested data, reports, and materials with nine districts, April to July 2009 –Community Day Charter School, Franklin, Lowell, Malden, Newton, Northampton, Sharon, Springfield, Winchendon Suggestions were incorporated into this fall’s statewide rollout Return to Index

21 New insights: Growth vs. achievement Higher achieving Lower growing Lower achieving Lower growing Higher achieving Higher growing Lower achieving Higher growing Grades 4, 5, 6 mathematics – All elementary schools in one district Return to Index

22 New insights: Impact of a new K-5 curriculum Return to Index

23 New insights: Changes in pilot districts One discovered that its median student grew at only the 15 th percentile from grade 3 to grade 4 Reconfiguring schools to avoid building transition in grade 4 One found that buildings with full-time math coaches had stronger growth than buildings with part-time coaches Revised coaching jobs to ensure full-time coverage One implemented training on growth for all principals district-wide Return to Index

24 What data are available? Grades 4 through 8, ELA and mathematics –2008 and 2009 Grade 10, ELA and mathematics (measures the change from grade 8 to grade 10) –Only available for 2009 Return to Index

25 Next steps Data were released to districts on Oct. 2 nd in the Data Warehouse Public release of aggregate data on Oct. 27 th Web site, written materials, workshops, and other communications and PD to help district staff understand and use the measure Return to Index

26 For more information Technical Questions (Accessing Data) or Growth Data Interpretation Questions Return to Index