CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combined Heat and Power as a Cost-effective GHG Mitigation Strategy Kim Crossman U.S. EPA CHP Partnership Presented to the 2006 Fuel Ethanol Workshop &
Advertisements

External Trade Trade and Environment The EU approach Paolo Caridi First Secretary, Delegation of the European Commission to Japan.
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) California Council on Science and.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
NIST MEP Green Suppliers Network E3: Columbus (E nergy, E conomy, E nvironment )
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
“One Minnesota” Conference January 14, 2009 Presented by Doug Henton Collaborative Economics, Inc. on behalf of.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
1 Moving Beyond Kyoto Ratification Presentation to the Senate Standing Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources April 3, 2003 Ottawa,
Ethics and Fairness Prof. Alice Kaswan University of San Francisco School of Law Conference on Carbon Politics and Finance Fordham University October 29,
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana Energy Association September 11, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
Setting a GHG Emission Reduction Target Asher Burns-Burg ICF International.
Climate Change... Risks and Opportunities Taylor Davis John Deere Public Affairs Worldwide October 16, 2007.
Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.
Financial Executives Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Canadian Environmental Policy This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual.
Page 1 AEM Board Meeting August 2007 Climate Change Calculations And Implications John T. Disharoon Sustainable Development Manager Caterpillar Inc.
Water Utility Carbon Footprint/GHG Emissions Workshop Janice Adair, Department of Ecology September 29, 2009.
California Transportation Plan Policy Advisory Committee June 17, 2014.
Climate Change Actions taken by the California Public Utilities Commission.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
Energy Forum Compensation arrangements for indirect EU ETS cost effects Presented by Vianney Schyns Brussels 9 June
C2es.org. 2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory,
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
New Mexico Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Programs April 2008.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
The New Balance: Environment and Energy Robert Ruddock The Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Law and Policy Committee July 9 th, 2009.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Cathy S. Woollums Sr. V.P. Environmental MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company NARUC Annual Convention November 12, 2007 U.S. Climate Policy: It Takes a.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY United The United States of America Schwartz, Swallow, and Wu Global Energy Consulting, Inc.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
 Introduction to the role of Government  The October 2008 “Bailout” Bill  The Federal Stimulus Package and Beyond  Case Study: Palm Desert  The Green.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
California Energy Commission IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop University of California, Irvine August 17,
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Convention of Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 Shaina Conners Period 6 4/30/2009.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
1 Public Meeting to Update the Board on Mandatory Commercial Waste Recycling October 21, 2011.
California to Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia and Beyond? Can Subnational Arrangements Fill the Gap? Professor Sharon Mascher Faculty of Law, University.
NS4054 Fall Term 2015 North America Energy Trilemma.
1 Louisiana: Our Energy Future 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act.
Introduction to Domestic Emissions Trading Warren Bell Associate, IIISD Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the Manitoba Business Sector March 14, 2003.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Florida Climate Action Plan Steve Adams Deputy Executive Director Governor’s Energy Office State of Florida December 2, 2008.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
Sustainability in the Supply Chain 5 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. SUPPLEMENT.
Likely Outcomes in the National Debate over Greenhouse Gas Emissions -a public policy analysis Maureen Coyle, University of Rhode Island Faculty Sponsor:
Presentation Overview EECAP summary Plan development process GHG inventory results Policy recommendations EAP implementation.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
STATE & LOCAL RIGHTS National Climate Legislation NACAA Spring Membership Meeting May 3-7, 2008 Tampa, Florida Andy Ginsburg Oregon Department of Environmental.
EFFICIENCY FIRST FOR MISSOURI’S ENERGY FUTURE Becky Stanfield, NRDC October 21, 2014 MPSC Statewide Collaborative Meeting.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
Butte County Climate Action Plan Contract for Services December 11, 2012 Butte County Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
PSC Guidelines and Recommendations
State GHG.
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Presentation transcript:

CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005

Californias greenhouse gas inventory over last ten years

Greenhouse gas reduction targets could have a chilling effect on new investment and plant expansions

California manufacturers face extremely high operating costs in the state, nearly 30% above the national average. In order to remain competitive, they have become the most productive and efficient manufacturers in the world. That means they produce more goods, with less inputs, including energy, than any other region. In this way, they are already helping to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Regulations that would cap existing emissions and force purchasing of emission credits would limit growth of manufacturers in the future. Competition is global, and adding new costs in California is not an option. California could lose high-paying, high-benefit manufacturing jobs to other, less restrictive, states or countries. Policies to address global issues should be the purview of the federal government. This would ensure that California companies are not disadvantaged compared to other companies in other states who do not have to comply with California rules. The federal government is also in the position to coordinate targets, compliance enforcement and regulations with other countries to protect the national economy. Concerns about regulations on manufacturers that could arise to meet the targets

CMTA Greenhouse Gas Emissions Principles 1.GHG programs must be structured to maintain a healthy economy in California and ensure the competitiveness of the states businesses. 2.Encourage energy conservation and efficiency 3.Support increased development, generation and use of cost-effective low GHG energy sources 4.Encourage investment in low GHG impact technology 5.Promote flexible, voluntary and incentive-based approaches to GHG reductions 6.Use staged approach to implementation