Descartes’ Meditations. Descartes’ Meditations I exist (as a thinking thing) God exists C & D perceptions are accurate ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Advertisements

What is it like to be me? Trying to understand consciousness.
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
I move, therefore I am Physical Literacy June 2013 Jens E. Birch Oslo University College
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
LECTURE 24 THE NATURE OF PERSONS PHYSICALISM AND DUALISM (“WHAT AM I?)
Meditations on First Philosophy
Introduction to the philosophy of mind. epistemology episteme knowledge.
Philosophy 1010 Class 7/17/13 Title:Introduction to Philosophy Instructor:Paul Dickey Tonight: Finish.
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Chapter 10: What am I?.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Descartes on scepticism
The Mind-Body Relation Dualism: human beings are composed of a material body and an immaterial mind which are distinct from each other (Descartes) Problem:
1. FOUNDATIONS (Dualism, Behaviorism, Central-State Materialism) (G. Ryle, ‘Descartes’ Myth’)
The Egocentric Predicament (pg 194); term coined by Ralph Perry  Egocentric: the Individual self is at the center of all our experience.  Predicament:
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Descartes argument for dualism
Doubting Mind-Body Dualism
Mind-Body Problem Unit 1: What Is A Person Mr. DeZilva Grade 11 Philsophy.
Revelation vs. Discovery. Big Questions Every person is a religious being. A religious being asks the “big questions” Are we (humans) alone, or is there.
Descartes’ Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Epistemology Revision
Descartes’ Meditations. I exist (as a thinking thing) God exists C & D perceptions are accurate Math Geom. Phys obj’s exist Descartes’ Meditations Mind.
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Ethics Demonstrated in Geometrical Order
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
PHL105Y November 1, 2004 For Wednesday, read Descartes’s Third Meditation. Brace yourself: it is very hard. The final version of your first essay is due.
Human Nature 2.3 The Mind-Body Problem: How Do Mind and Body Relate?
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Learning objective: To be able to explain the claim that the mind is ontologically distinct from the body; To understand Descartes’ conceivability argument.
Owen Flanagan James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience Co-Director Center for Comparative Philosophy Duke University.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Mind: Theories of self / personal identity: REVISION Body & Soul - what makes you you?
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Descartes’ divisibility argument
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
Rene Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
METAPHYSICS The study of the nature of reality. POPEYE STUDIES DESCARTES.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Substance and Property Dualism
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Minds and Bodies.
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
The view that mind and body are distinct and separate entities.
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Get Yourself Thinking…
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Descartes -- Meditations Three
The study of the nature of reality
Dualism.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Descartes’ Meditations

Descartes’ Meditations I exist (as a thinking thing) God exists C & D perceptions are accurate ?

What else do I clearly & distinctly perceive? Truths of mathematics & geometry (p. 44) Corporeal things exist (p. 52). –Though I may be wrong about (some of) their qualities. I am distinct from my body (p. 51).

I exist (as a thinking thing) God exists C & D perceptions are accurate Math Geom. Physical objects exist Descartes’ Meditations

I exist (as a thinking thing) God exists C & D perceptions are accurate Math Geom. Physical objects exist Science

Descartes’ Dualism Mind MatterReality is made up of two different kinds of stuff (“dualism”) --Mind and Matter. Opposed to a more scientific view: Reality is made up of only one kind of stuff (“Monism”)-- –Matter –Matter: “Physicalism” or “Materialism”. –Mind is just a complicated arrangement of matter, not different in kind.

Descartes’ Dualism How could Descartes show there are two kinds of stuff? Descartes proves that mind is distinct from body. In Meditation 2, proof of his own existence as a “thinking thing” makes no reference to matter. But are they really distinct?

Descartes’ Dualism First proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 51): Mind is essentially thinking & non-extended. Body is essentially non-thinking & extended.  Mind  Body. And I can exist without my body! (Immortality)

Descartes’ Dualism First proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 51): Mind is essentially thinking & non-extended. Body is essentially non-thinking & extended.  Mind  Body. Is it valid?

Leibniz’s Law Gottfried Leibniz ( ) If this and that thing are really the same thing, then they have to have all the same properties. If this and that have different properties, then they are different things.

Descartes’ Dualism First proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 51): Body is essentiallyextendedBody is essentially non-thinking & extended. What does that mean? location take up spacePhysical things necessarily have a location and take up space. True by definition? Do we know body is essentially non-thinking? Could computer-robots think?

Alan Turing ( ) Inventor of computers

Could computers think? “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” (1950) The Turing Test (a guessing game): –By just asking questions and receiving typed answers from a computer and a person hidden from view, could you tell which was which within a certain time limit? If not, the computer passes the test for thinking.

Descartes’ Dualism First proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 51): Mind is essentially thinkingMind is essentially thinking & non-extended. True by definition? Do we know mind is essentially non-extended? Can we tell just by reflection?

Descartes’ Dualism First proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 51): Mind is essentially thinking & non-extended. Body is essentially non-thinking & extended.  Mind  Body. What is true in the premisses doesn’t validly lead to that conclusion.

Descartes’ Dualism Second proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 56): Mind is essentially indivisible. Body is essentially divisible.  Mind  Body.

Descartes’ Dualism Second proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 56): “Mind is essentially indivisible.” Is this true?

Split-Brain Patients

Freud’s Psychoanalysis Three parts of the soul: Ego, Id, and Superego Conscious/Unconscious Psyche = Soul/Mind Analysis = Break into Parts.

Multiple Personalities? Not aware of each other. Mind has separate parts? There are separate minds in the same body? Ron Bloomberg “Split Personality” 1948

Descartes’ Dualism Second proof that mind & body are distinct (p. 56): Body is essentially divisible. Is this true? Are time and space infinitely divisible? Conceptually? Yes. Experimentally/Physically? We don’t know.

Descartes’ Dualism My proof that Water & H 2 0 are distinct: Water is essentially homogeneous. H 2 0 is essentially non-homogeneous.  Water  H 2 0. Can I figure these things out just by thinking about it? Just because I conceive these as being different doesn’t mean they are different.

Descartes’ Dualism Can we tell matter is essentially non- thinking just by “thinking about it”? Perhaps my thinking self (mind/soul) depends on my physical self (brain/body) just like the characteristics of water depend on its being H 2 0.