Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: What we know and dont know? Pari Patel SPRU, University of Sussex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Jakob Edler: Internationalisation of Industrial R&D: Some Differentiation from a German Perspective 6 CP - Workshop, Helsinki, June 2004 Internationalisation.
Advertisements

Internationalisation of R&D The local level Session report Stefan Kuhlmann, Fraunhofer ISI / Univ. Utrecht.
University Industry Relation (in open innovation era) Kazuyuki Motohashi Professor, Department of Technology Management for Innovation, The University.
FDI AND EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS: Bad News, Good News, Surprising News Policies Issues for Developed, Developing Countries, and Multilateral Lending Institutions.
THE THEORY OF COMMON MARKET
PATLIB May, Palais des Congrès, Liège Patent based economic indicators : What do they tell us ? Michele Cincera and Bruno van Pottelsberghe.
Human Resource in Science and Engineering The Indian Case Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Trivandrum Kerala, India February.
Good Practice Pilot Action for Innovative Industries: Education, Training and Exploitation.
1 Sub-Saharan Africa and Europe in a restructuring world François Bourguignon and Pierre Jacquet Paris School of Economics and Agence Française de Développement.
Bogota, August 2011 Innovation surveys and innovation policy: the European experience Anthony Arundel UNU-MERIT, The Netherlands & University of Tasmania,
Competitiveness. Competitive Advantage of Nations Michael Porter Key to high productivity is the development of leading industries able to compete and.
Applying innovation policy and innovation theory in Small open economies Gulbenkian seminar Lisboa October 2003 B-A Lundvall, Aalborg University.
Science and Technology Policy I Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities? João Silva Ricardo Manso SPRU Electronic Working Papers.
Competitive Advantages in International Trade and International Business Frederick University 2012.
PORTER ’ S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OF NATIONS THEORY.
Tour Operations Management The evolution and growth of the Tour Operations sector Based on the UK case study (Morgan 2002)
© Suzanne Scotchmer 2004 from Innovation and Incentives Intellectual Property in the International Arena: E ntanglement of incentives and politics.
Globalization and International Business
Agenda for November 2 Review of Chapter 8 International Strategy
1 “European Innovation Scoreboard (2002) “European Innovation Scoreboard (2002)” Master in Eng. and Technology Management Science, Technology and Innovation.
The measurement of Innovation An historical perspective The “Frascati Manual” and the “Oslo Manual” S&T indicators Innovation indicators Some evidence.
Supporting technology transfer: The role of business incubators John Gabriel Goddard Knowledge Economy Forum VII Ancona, Italy.
E-Business Technology Adoption Assessing B2B and e-Procurement in Canada Sandra Charles Raymond Lepage Presentation for the OECD Electronic Commerce Business.
Master in Engineering Policy and Management of Technology, 8 th Edition - Science & Technology Innovation Policy 1 - By Keith Pavitt SPRU – Science Policy.
Copyright JCW 2005 The Association of Translation Companies John Wheen, Chair.
SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Lynda T. Carlson Division Director SBE Advisory.
Fabrice Hatem, AFII OECD Meeting 16/17th of november, 2006 Location of R&D centres in Europe : a new kind of competition between host countries.
“ Bioenergy Education and Training in Ireland – Experience and Future Priorities” IEA Bioenergy – Task 29, Streatley-on Thames, UK Thursday 19th June 2003.
WOOD - Lorraine Questionnaire performed on Wood sector in Region Lorraine - FRANCE STRATIN.C.
Facilitating FDI into Europe and Central Asia Working through consulting firms.
Human Capital and the Costs of Non-Research Alfonso Gambardella Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa, Italy Research policy - Incentives and Institutions.
Prof. Dr. Ing. Elena Horská Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra The Scope and Challenges of International Marketing.
Slide Eastern Finance Association Annual Meeting 2009Andreas Dietrich SME Credit Availability Around the World: Evidence from the World Bank’s Enterprise.
Master Programme “Governance of Science, Technology and Innovation” National Research University – Higher School of Economics (HSE) Institute for Statistical.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 6 GLOBAL2  PENG © Nadine Hutton/Bloomberg via Getty Images.
1 Building the Knowledge Base. 2 New Parameters In crossing international borders, a firm encounters parameters not found in domestic business. Examples.
The measurement of innovation Advanced Workshop “Science, Technology and Society” Lisbon, 24 November 1999 The measurement of innovation Giorgio Sirilli.
BELGIUM IN THE NEW GLOBAL ECONOMY Forum be.international A study commissioned by FEB-VBO and Deloitte Belgium.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Forest Management Determinants, fostering and impeding factors IP INNO-FOREST, 28 August 2007, Sopron Ewald.
FP7 - April The European Research Area in the Age of Globalisation Henri Delanghe DG RTD, C4 (Economic and Prospective Analysis Conference on Knowledge.
Chapter Four Copyright, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Chapter Four three Learning Concepts – Chapter 4 1. Identify the major payers in the international business.
Plan of Discussion Negotiations: Win -Win Game Who all are involved in technology Negotiations Levels in Technology What do they Negotiate How to they.
Designing the Future Design for Future Needs 28 th January 2002 at Design Council Stephen Aitken Foresight Co-ordinator for London
Knowledge Flows between Multinational Enterprises and National Innovation Systems 2 nd EUROFRAME Conference: Trade, FDI and relocation: challenges for.
Christian Le Bas (LEFI, Université Lumière Lyon 2) Workshop DIME Distributed Networks and the Knowledge-based Economy may 2007 The Multinationals’
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 GLOBAL2  PENG © DJ Dates/Alamy.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF GLOBALISATION Describe the key features of globalisation Evaluate arguments for and against globalisation Examine the challenges.
Going International – The Big Challenge Prof. Per Jenster Copyright © 2012 Nordic International Management Institute. All rights.
Economic Environment of Business Lecture Three: The Small Firm Sector.
MERIT1 Does collaboration improve innovation outputs? Anthony Arundel & Catalina Bordoy MERIT, University of Maastricht Forthcoming in Caloghirou, Y.,
Investment Climate and the role of Diaspora in economic development, financial and fiscal incentives for Kosovo Kreshnik Thaqi May, 2014.
Export and Productivity of Chinese Manufacturing Firms LU Jiangyong October 14, at CEFIR.
"Innovation-based Growth – the Development and the Future Challenges of the Finnish Innovation Environment” Timo Kekkonen Director, Confederation of Finnish.
Sandra Charles Raymond Lepage
Alliance 4 Universities
Globalization and International Business
JRC – Territorial Development Unit Petros Gkotsis 08 March 2017
Lesson 4 - Environmental Scanning: SWOT and PEST Analysis
INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
Globalization and International Business
ISSN: xxx-x-xxx-xxx-x
Knowledge Objectives Understand the 4 strategies for foreign expansion
International Factor Movements
International Strategy
Management 303 Mentoring Week 3.
To what extent should firms have one global strategy vs
RETHINKING INDUSTRIAL POLICY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CHALLENGES FOR EUROPE
Presentation transcript:

Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: What we know and dont know? Pari Patel SPRU, University of Sussex

Pari Patel22 Context.. internationalisation of R&D and technology is a phenomenon with many dimensions but with - after all - few available observations so far,... leaving ample room for uncertainty and speculation. Granstrand (1992) What have we learnt since then?

Pari Patel33 Outline Academic and policy relevance Measures: Sources, Strengths and Weaknesses Main Results: How Much? Where? In Which Technical Fields? Type of Activity? Future Research : What we don t know

Pari Patel44 Relevance Debates about the nature and importance of foreign R&D. Fears about Hollowing out. Fears about Free-riding by foreign firms. Management of technology within firms.

Pari Patel55 Purpose, Scale & Major Determinant of Foreign Technological Activities.

Pari Patel66 MEASURESTRENGTHSWEAKNESSESSources Research and development Regular and recognised data on main source of technology Lacks detail and Strongly underestimates design, production engineering, and software OECD NSF UK R&D Scoreboard Patents Regular detailed & long- term data available by firm, location, industry, technical fields Uneven propensity to patent amongst countries, sectors and companies; misses software US PTO EPO Innovation Surveys Systematic data on innovative activities of foreign firms Not all countries report nationality of company National Sources Other Ad Hoc Surveys Detailed data, e.g. on motivations for conducting foreign R&D Uneven coverageVarious Main Measures

Pari Patel77 Latest Results on Internationalisation of Technology:

Pari Patel88 Changes in Internationalisation of Technology: 1985 to 2000

Pari Patel99 Internationalisation of Technology by Industry:

Pari Patel10 Importance of Foreign Firms in National Technology:

Pari Patel11 Importance of Foreign Firms in National Technology:

Pari Patel12 Comparing Company Vs Host Country Advantages Analysis of 220 Firms at forefront of internationalisation, distinguishing between technical fields in which: Company is weak at home and the location is strong Company is strong at home and the location is weak Company is strong at home and the location is strong Neither a home advantage nor a locational advantage Main Results: in 75% of cases companies are engaged in foreign activities in technical areas where they have built up strength at home. largest increases (esp. for EU Firms) have been in technologies where there are complementary strengths between the company and the 'host' country.

Pari Patel13 Summary: Stylized Facts European firms (esp. those from smaller countries) more internationalised than US or Japanese firms. European firms greatly increased their foreign activities in 1990s, especially in the US. Foreign large firms are important contributors to European technology, esp. in Chemicals and Electronics. Japanese firms least internationalised & Japan least favoured location.

Pari Patel14 Summary: Stylized Facts (Contd.) Very little activity located outside Europe and the USA. Degree of Internationalisation is not positively associated with R&D Intensity of the Industry or the firm. Recent increases have been in technologies where there are complementary strengths between the domestic activity of a company and the host country.

Pari Patel15 Why do Firms Concentrate their Technological Activities at Home? Launching of a brand new product (when there is a great deal of uncertainty regarding product and process parameters) requires: Strong linkages with suppliers and customers Strong linkages with local basic research in Universities and other public sector institutes. Strong intra-corporate linkages between R & D, production and marketing Strong Home Country Biases in these linkages

Pari Patel16 Some Explanations for Increasing Internationalisation Constraint of Size of the country (lack of specific skills and of advanced users to test major innovations). Large firms need to master increasing range of technologies. Overcome weaknesses in the national science base. Increasing liberalisation leading to greater flows of FDI. By-product of other business strategies.

Pari Patel17 What we dont know Relationship between internationalisation and economic performance. Motives for EU firms conducting their R&D in the US. How much can be explained by M&A? Linkages between foreign firms and the National Science Base.