The meeting in Paris: The agenda has been built and optimized.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Double Chooz: Collaboration, Experimental concept, Detector, Physics Prospect, Status & Schedule, Summary.
Advertisements

NuSTORM March 2013 CERN Welcome and introduction.
Scoping Study Proposal: Physics Section Introduced by: Paul Harrison University of Warwick.
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Accelerator based Neutrino program around the world 1. Europe: Neutrino platform at CERN ESS second maximum? 2. Japan: T2K and HyperK status 3. USA: LBNF.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
ECFA-EPS Joint Session Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Neutrino Physics – Accomplishments and Future Challenges Dave Wark Imperial/RAL (but speaking only.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
Neutrino detectors for the future Neutrino Facility global numbers : next project ~ 600 M€ (NB NOvA, T2K = 200M$, OPERA=100MCHF, etc...) community between.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
Towards a Future Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Bob Wilson Colorado State University CERN Prototype/Beam Test Meeting CERN, 20 October 2014.
Toyota National College of Technology A.Takamura Collaboration with K.Kimura and T.Yoshikawa GLoBES 2007 Measuring the Leptonic CP Phase in Oscillations.
Accelerator activities Brian Foster (Uni Hamburg/DESY) 1 B. Foster - Hamburg/DESY - Orsay 11/13.
Future Accelerators at the energy frontier Peter Hansen february 2010 University of Copenhagen.
PINGU – An IceCube extension for low-energy neutrinos Uli Katz on behalf of the PINGU Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation.
ISS After One Year Peter Dornan Imperial College London.
European design study on Neutrinofacilities - Euronu within FP7.
ESSnuSB Project for Leptonic CP Violation Discovery based on the European Spallation Source Linac NOW 2014, 10/9E. Wildner, CERN 2 Elena WILDNER CERN for.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Alain Blondel NUFACT11 1 August Rhone route Shopping route Historic route count >> 30 minutes ! Boarding on ship Henri-Dunant at 19:15 CANT BE LATE.
Alain Blondel. AIDA-Neutrino meeting AIDA Neutrino detector studies 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA 3. Discuss.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
Neutrino Physics Opportunities for Fermilab Steering Group 6/12/07 Andy Lankford UC Irvine.
Pathways to Explore Neutrino Physics Fred Gilman NuFact03 New York June 5, 2003.
The ISS Peter Dornan Imperial College London. 16 March 2006P Dornan - MUTAC `atmospheric’`solar’ `cross/reactor’ Oscillation defined by 3 mixing.
J. Bouchez CEA/DAPNIA CHIPP Neuchâtel June 21, 2004 A NEW UNDERGROUND LABORATORY AT FREJUS Motivations and prospects.
Physics and Performance Evaluation Group NuFact 07 Okayama University, Japan August 6, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg for the executive committee:
Alain Blondel -- After the ISS -- What did ISS achieve? 1. Established a « baseline » for the accelerator study 2. Rejuvenated simulation and study of.
NUFACT’06 Summary of working group 1 Neutrino Oscillations Experiments Mark Messier Indiana University August 30, 2006.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
1 Neutrino detector test beam requirements 0. Disclaimer 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA and others.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.
NuFact2016 SPC Today’s goal Understand what is nufact Understand what are expected to be done by us Understand what did the last nufact looks.
Notes for the Scientific Strategy Discussion. Scope of LBNF To execute a world-class, deep-underground liquid argon neutrino experiment for long baseline.
BSM Group Activities DUNE Collaboration Meeting –ND Physics Jan. 14, 2016 Jae Yu Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Ionization Cooling for Muon Accelerators Prepared by Robert Ryne Presented by Jean-Pierre Delahaye MICE Optics Review Jan, 2016 RAL.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Neutrino oscillations: much interest since 1 st paper in extension required to.
CERN Neutrino platform 24 th July, 2014 S. Bertolucci CERN.
Goals of the consultation meetings From the ToR, the goals of the meeting in the first year should be: communicate that the panel exists; collect input.
ICARUS-LBNE project A. Guglielmi 1.LBNE-ICARUS Padova meeting 2.SPS-C C. Rubbia presentation.
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
The CERN Near Detector(s) initiative
LAGUNA and beyond GDR Neutrino at Orsay-PNO October 11th, 2010
Final Discussion THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR FUTURE NEUTRINO PHYSICS
NuFact2016 WG3 Program (for SPC meeting April 22)
(Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment)
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
nuSTORM: Neutrinos from STORed Muons
EU Institution Board 1 representative of each participating institute
Report from ICFA neutrino panel
UCLA High Energy & Astro-Particle (HEAP) Seminar
Future physics at nuSTORM
Precision era.
ICFA Neutrino Panel: Roadmap discussion document
IUPAP Neutrino Panel.
XVth International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Betabeams and Superbeams LAGUNA-LBNO Many thanks to D. Duchesneau, F. Di Lodovico, T. Patzak, A. Rubbia.
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
Poster session: Wednesday 6 June
Based on material presented at various meetings
Presentation transcript:

The meeting in Paris: The agenda has been built and optimized with the help of many people mostly from the Program committee of the previous 2012 Neutrino Town Meeting ! Many thanks to all. Main guidelines: Should focus on European activities and projects Put the emphasis on accelerator based experiments and projects Get a clear picture of the European activities (short and medium terms) Collect inputs from individuals or groups and call for presentation proposals Have specific presentations /reviews Leave time periods for discussions Dominique Duchesneau CNRS/IN2P3, France Michele Maltoni IFT UAM/CSIC, Madrid, Spain Mauro Mezzetto INFN Padova, Italy Jan Sobczyk Wroclaw University, Poland Morgan Wascko Imperial College London, UK European panel members: 1 Meeting of the European neutrino community

Main structure of the agenda 2  Phenomenology/theory talks on neutrino physics for the topics linked to the European projects presented in this meeting o Oscillation review o Importance of CP violation discovery in leptonic sector o Sterile neutrinos in a global picture  The Mass Hierarchy  Experimental methods, how to assess the statistical significance in future projects  CP violation: Experimental aspects, baselines, statisctics versus systematics o Current experimental reports and prospects on MNSP and MH in coming 5 years o Running accelerator experiments o Sterile neutrino search experiments o Neutrino cross-sections and hadroproduction 1 st day: Reviews and status of knowledge

Meeting of the European neutrino community Main structure of the agenda 3  European studies on future neutrino facility options  ESSnuSB  NuStorm  LBNO  Other neutrino facilities in the world and European involvements  LBNE  HyperK  Detector R&D for European projects  Liquid Argon  Water Cerenkov  Liquid Scintillator  MIND / NESSIE  Accelerator R&D in Europe  MICE  High power beam and target R&D 2 nd day: reviews of activities and projects in Europe  Session on dedicated R&D projects and CERN Neutrino oriented activities o Discussion and Round table : 3 rd day: reviews of activities and projects in Europe (contd.)

Meeting of the European neutrino community Wishes for the end of the European consultation meeting: Provide some summary for the 3 following items (listed in the Panel’s ToR) 4 1) The present status of the neutrino-oscillation programme and the developments that can be expected on a 4–7-year timescale:  Project A => precision on oscillation parameters…  Project B => sterile experiment results…  Etc 2) The opportunities for discovery for which the accelerator-based neutrino-oscillation programme must be optimised on the 7–25-year timescale  Project alpha => MH precision reached at xx sigma  And/or Project beta => CP phase precision reached at yy sigma  Etc

Meeting of the European neutrino community Wishes for the end of the European consultation meeting: Provide some summary for the following items (listed in the Panel’s ToR) 5 3) The measurements and R&D (including software development) that are required for the near-term (4–7-year) and medium- to long-term (7–25-year) programmes to fulfil their potential.  R&D Project alpha => Detector technologies  R&D Project beta => accelerator technologies  Hadroproduction and/or neutrino cross section experiment  Simulation and Reconstruction Tool development activities….  Etc…. It would be very interesting to end up also with a global schema (even with some timescale) showing the European role and place in the Neutrino Oscillation Physics programme.

Meeting of the European neutrino community Wishes for the end of the European consultation meeting: 6 Let’s have a fruitful and constructive Meeting Leave place to physics, discussion, ideas ….