Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Charter School Summit| June 16, 2014 Diane J. Hernandez | Texas Education Agency Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Charter School Summit| June 30, 2015 Christopher Lucas| Texas Education Agency Department of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Overview 2016
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
2017 Beginning of Year DATA REFLECTION
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
TETN Videoconference #386|April 5, 2018
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Texas State Accountability
2013 Texas Accountability System
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015

Communicate with others as clearly as you can to avoid misunderstandings. Don Miguel Ruiz

There is a time to let things happen and a time to make things happen. Hugh Parker

/perfreport/account/2015 /index.html

Met Standard: Met performance index targets on all indexes for which they have performance data in Improvement Required: Did not meet one or more performance index targets.

To receive a Met Standard Rating all campuses and districts must meet the following accountability targets for: Index 1 OR Index 2 AND Index 3 AND Index 4 TargetsDistricts and Campuses Index 1: Student Achievement60 Index 2: Student Progress30 – Elem 28 – MS/JH 15 – HS 20 District Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 28 – Elem 27 – MS/JH 31 – HS 28 – District Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness12 – Elem 13 – MS/JH 57 – HS & District

The following snapshot table applies for accountability purposes:

2015 = Final Year (1.0 SD below Final Standard)

2015

Snapshot of performance across subjects, on both general and alternative assessments, at the satisfactory performance standard (Phase- in I Level II for 2015). Subjects: Combined over Reading/ELA, Mathematics (Algebra I only), Writing, Science and Social Studies. Student Groups: All Students only

Performance Standards: Phase-in I Level II (Satisfactory), meets or exceeds the ELL Progress Measure, or meets equivalency standard on Substitute Assessment STAAR Grades 3-8 English and Spanish (3-5) Spring 2015 (STAAR & STAAR L) EOC Assessments (best results: highest score) Spring 2015, Fall 2014, and Summer July 2014 (STAAR & STAAR L)

Measures student progress by subject and provides opportunity to receive credit for improving student performance independent of overall student achievement. Subjects: Reading, Writing (NEW) and Mathematics (Algebra I only) Ten Student Groups Evaluated: All Students Students served by Special Education English Language Learners (ELL) – Progress measure is used Seven Racial/Ethnic Groups: African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and Two or More Races

Three Progress Indicators: Did Not Meet Growth Progress Met Growth Progress Exceeded Growth Progress Points for progress in each subject are weighted: One point credit for each percentage of tests that Met or Exceeded progress One additional point for each percentage of tests that Exceeded progress

Emphasizes the academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity students groups. Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics (Algebra I only), Writing, Science and Social Studies Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity: Two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups on the campus or district (based on 2014 assessment results)

Points based on weighted performance: One point for each percentage of tests meeting the phase-in satisfactory performance standard or above on the STAAR assessment One additional point is given for each percentage of tests meeting the advanced performance standard on the STAAR assessment.

Emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for the rigors of high school, and the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training, or the military.

***Elementary & middle schools report only on STAAR results***

STAAR Postsecondary Readiness Standard: Percentage of students with STAAR test results at or above the final Level II performance standard on two or more subject area tests. 8 Student Groups: All & 7 Racial/Ethnic Groups

Graduation Rate Score: Reflects the highest number of points possible from the combined performance across graduation rates for grades (4-yr or 5-yr Grad Rate – Class of 2014 or Class of 2013) 10 Student Groups: All, SPED, ELL & 7 Racial/Ethnic Groups

Graduation Plan Score: Based on an a longitudinal cohort of students graduating under the Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program (RHSP/DAP). (Class of 2014) 8 Student Groups: All & 7 Racial/Ethnic Groups

Postsecondary Component: College and Career Readiness College-ready graduate meeting or exceeding the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) criteria in both reading/English language arts(ELA) and mathematics on the TAKS Exit-level test, SAT, or ACT Test. (Class of 2014) Completed and earned credit in at least two advanced/dual credit enrollment courses Enrolled in a CTE-Coherent Sequence of Courses 8 Student Groups: All and 7 Racial/Ethnic Groups

2015

With the performance index framework, poor performance in one subject or one student group does not result in an Improvement Required Rating. System safeguards are added to ensure that poor performance in one area or one student group is not masked in the performance index. Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) – District & Campus Leadership Teams & DIP/CIP Documentation

Submitted again

2015

Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA (campus only) Academic Achievement in Mathematics (campus only) Academic Achievement in Science (campus only) Academic Achievement in Social Studies(campus only) Top 25 Percent: Student Progress (campus only) Top 25 Percent: Closing Performance Gaps(campus only) Postsecondary Readiness (campus and district)

Distinction Earned No Distinction Earned Not Eligible ***All distinction designations for campuses are based on performance in the top quartile (Q1) of its comparison group***

Grouped with 40 other schools that are similar: campus size, grade levels, % Low SES, mobility rate, and % ELL “Each campus is assigned to a unique comparison group of Texas schools that are most similar to it” Q1 = Top 10 Released June 2015

HS = Must be in top quartile for 33% or more of their indicators JH & ELEM = Must be in top quartile for 50% or more of their indicators

HS = Must be in top quartile for 33% or more of their indicators JH & ELEM = Must be in top quartile for 50% or more of their indicators ***Exclusion of 3-8 math

HS = Must be in top quartile for 33% or more of their indicators JH & ELEM = Must be in top quartile for 50% or more of their indicators

HS = Must be in top quartile for 33% or more of their indicators JH = Must be in top quartile for 50% or more of their indicators

Awarded for outstanding student progress to a campus if it is ranked in the top 25 percent (Q1) of campuses in its campus comparison group for Index 2.

Awarded for outstanding performance in closing student achievement gaps to a campus if it is ranked in the top 25 percent (Q1) of campuses in its campus comparison group for Index 3

Awarded to campuses and districts for outstanding academic performance in attainment of postsecondary readiness. District = 70% of campus level indicators in Q1 HS = 33% of indicators in Q1 JH & ELEM = 50% of indicators in Q1

Important Dates:

TEC

We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are. Max De Pree

No longer a Chapter in the Accountability Manual

STAAR tests for Grades 3-8 Mathematics at grades 3-8 Reading at grades 3-8 Writing at grades 4 and 7 Science at grades 5 and 8 Social Studies at grade 8

STAAR EOC Assessments required to pass for high school graduation: English I English II Algebra I Biology U.S. History (Cohort 2011/2012 and Thereafter) The Class of 2016 will be the second graduating class under EOC Assessments.

87%

 Changes!

I am a member of a team, and I rely on the team, I defer to it and sacrifice for it, because the team, not the individual, is the ultimate champion. Mia Hamm

Thanks!

Lead4ward Quicklook School Year Updated (Revised) Texas Education Today, Oct. 2013, Volume XXVIII No. 1 Anderson, Mac. Motivational Quotes. Naperville: Simple Truths, LLC, Print Murphy, John. Pulling Together. Naperville: Simple Truths, LLC, Print TEA Final NCLB Waiver Submission (Sept ) Overview of Performance Index Framework (April 8, 2015) – TEA TEA One-Page Summary STAAR Scale Score Cuts for New Phase-in Schedule: TEA Student Assessment Division 2015 Accountability Manual – Chapters 1-10 and Appendices TEA Testing Calendar