DANSE Review – SNS/HFIR Update Steve Miller Scientific Computing Group Leader Neutron Scattering Science Division (NSSD) Spallation Neutron Source May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 The Neutron Science TeraGrid Gateway (NSTG) : A Requirements Driven View Presentation.
Advertisements

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Center for Computational Sciences Cray X1 and Black Widow at ORNL Center for Computational.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Handling Single Crystals in Inelastic Neutron Scattering Experiments Mark Lumsden Center.
Report from DANSE Workshop Sept. 3-8, 2003 Goals: 1) To explain DANSE to selected scientists and engineers who develop software for neutron scattering.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
Summary Role of Software (1 slide) ARCS Software Architecture (4 slides) SNS -- Caltech Interactions (3 slides)
The Data Management Requirements at SNS Shelly Ren & Steve Miller Scientific Computing Group, SNS-ORNL December 11, 2006.
Baseline Review The Path of ARCS from Science to a Project Brent Fultz California Institute of Technology.
Experimental Facilities DivisionORNL - SNS June 22, 2004 SNS Update – Team Building Steve Miller June 22, 2004 DANSE Meeting at Caltech.
The Role of DANSE at SNS Steve Miller Scientific Computing Group Leader January 22, 2007.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge August 15, 2006 SNS/HFIR Software Developments Steve Miller Analysis Software August 15, 2006.
Introduction to DANSE Brent Fultz Prof. Materials Science and Applied Physics California Institute of Technology Distributed Data Analysis Architecture.
SNS Update DANSE Workshop Steve Miller September 20-21, 2004.
Interfaces with the SNS Project for the ARCS Instrument Doug Abernathy ARCS Hardware Project Manager ARCS Construction Project Review DOE Germantown Aug.
A Feature-Based Analysis & Comparison of IT Automation Tools: Comparing Kaseya to Developed By: & Advisor : Dr. S. Masoud Sadjadi School of Computing and.
DAVE: Cooperative Development of Data Visualization and Analysis Software Rob Dimeo NIST Center for Neutron Research What is DAVE? The DAVE team Motivation.
HYSPEC Instrument: Status and Performance M. Hagen Neutron Facilities Development Division, SNS, Oak Ridge National Lab. W.J. Leonhardt and A. Ruga Condensed.
Department of Energy Review of the SNS Instruments –Next Generation (SING) Project HYSPEC Instrument: Status and Performance Mark Hagen Instrument Scientist.
Neutron Science TeraGrid Gateway Update Vickie Lynch, Meili Chen, John Cobb Oak Ridge National Laboratory AUS Technical Presentation October 8, 2009.
TeraGrid Gateway User Concept – Supporting Users V. E. Lynch, M. L. Chen, J. W. Cobb, J. A. Kohl, S. D. Miller, S. S. Vazhkudai Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Channel Archiver Stats & Problems Kay Kasemir, Greg Lawson, Jeff Patton Presented by Xiaosong Geng (ORNL/SNS) March 2008.
Microsoft Active Directory(AD) A presentation by Robert, Jasmine, Val and Scott IMT546 December 11, 2004.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge SNS INSTRUMENTS OVERVIEW R. K. Crawford Instrument Systems Senior Team Leader September 10, 2004 HYSPEC IDT Meeting.
Networking and Computing Technologies Division Becky Verastegui December 6, 2004 RAMS Workshop.
Nick Draper Teswww.mantidproject.orgwww.mantidproject.org Instrument Independent Reduction and Analysis at ISIS and SNS.
Course Presentation EEL5881, Fall, 2003 Project: Network Reliability Tests Project: Network Reliability Tests Team: Gladiator Team: Gladiator Shuxin Li.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy 1 Integrated Catalogue (ICAT) Auto Update System Presented by Jessica Feng Research Alliance in Math.
Educating Minds and Hearts to Change the World USFfiles Xythos at the University of San Francisco.
Mantid Scientific Steering Committee Nick Draper 10/11/2010.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
Brent Fultz; Co-PIs are Michael Aivazis, Ian Anderson; PM is Mike McKerns California Institute of Technology.
Nick Draper 05/11/2008 Mantid Manipulation and Analysis Toolkit for ISIS data.
Instrumentation of the SAM-Grid Gabriele Garzoglio CSC 426 Research Proposal.
14 Aug 08DOE Review John Huth ATLAS Computing at Harvard John Huth.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory Associate.
 SAP Public Sector and Education, 10/26/2015, Slide 1 The University of Tennessee Change Management Business Blueprint.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 SNS 2 Meeting Opening Remarks, Purpose Glenn R. Young Physics Division, ORNL August 28,
Presented by Scientific Annotation Middleware Software infrastructure to support rich scientific records and the processes that produce them Jens Schwidder.
Ted Fox Interim Associate Laboratory Director Energy and Engineering Sciences Oak Ridge, Tennessee March 21, 2006 Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
The Research Alliance in Math and Science program is sponsored by the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Office of Science, U.S. Department.
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
ESFRI & e-Infrastructure Collaborations, EGEE’09 Krzysztof Wrona September 21 st, 2009 European XFEL.
Mantid Current Development and Future Plans Nicholas Draper ICNS 2013.
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
1 Status of FNPB Geoff Greene / Nadia Fomin University of Tennessee.
1 Spallation Neutron Source Data Analysis Jessica Travierso Research Alliance in Math and Science Program Austin Peay State University Mentor: Vickie E.
1 NSF/TeraGrid Science Advisory Board Meeting July 19-20, San Diego, CA Brief TeraGrid Overview and Expectations of Science Advisory Board John Towns TeraGrid.
Mantid Stakeholder Review Nick Draper 01/11/2007.
TeraGrid Gateway User Concept – Supporting Users V. E. Lynch, M. L. Chen, J. W. Cobb, J. A. Kohl, S. D. Miller, S. S. Vazhkudai Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Copyright 2007, Information Builders. Slide 1 Machine Sizing and Scalability Mark Nesson, Vashti Ragoonath June 2008.
Experimental Facilities Division ORNL DAQ System Interfaces Neutron Science Software Workshop Oct 13, 2003 Rick Riedel.
Ray Plante for the DES Collaboration BIRP Meeting August 12, 2004 Tucson Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO DES Data Management Ray Plante.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge October 13-15, 2003 Data Visualization and Analysis Ian Anderson Director, Experimental Facilities October 13-15,
Reflectometry in DANSE Paul Kienzle 1 and John F. Ankner 2 1 NIST Center for Neutron Research 2 Spallation Neutron Source, ORNL.
September 10, 2004 Experimental Facilities Division SING Project Status HYSPEC IDT Meeting John Haines SING Project Manager September 10, 2004.
CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Neutrino Program (MINOS, MINERvA, General) Margaret Votava April 21, 2009 Tactical plan.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Project: Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U.S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Data Requirements for Climate and Carbon Research John Drake, Climate Dynamics Group Computer.
XAL based PV Browser Jeff Patton, Chris Fowlkes EPICS Collaboration Meeting – RDB SIG June 12, 2006.
Updates & Recommendations from Instructional Technology Committee Computers in College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee March 28, 2014 Meeting IT.
TeraGrid Arch Meeting RP Update: ORNL/NSTG 1 ORNL_RP_Update_ TeraGrid Arch Meeting RP Update: ORNL/NSTG August 1, 2008 John W. Cobb.
Data Management and Software Centre Mark Hagen Head of DMSC IKON7, September 15th 2014.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Status Report: Data Acquisition and Instrument Controls for the Spallation Neutron Source.
Mantid Scientific Steering Committee Nick Draper 18/06/2010.
ENEA GRID & JPNM WEB PORTAL to create a collaborative development environment Dr. Simonetta Pagnutti JPNM – SP4 Meeting Edinburgh – June 3rd, 2013 Italian.
Quarterly Meeting Spring 2007 NSTG: Some Notes of Interest Adapting Neutron Science community codes for TeraGrid use and deployment. (Lynch, Chen) –Geared.
Cooperative International Simulations with McStas Vickie Lynch, Meili Chen, John Cobb, Mark Hagen, James Kohl, Stephen Miller, Michael Reuter, Sudharshan.
XSEDE’s Campus Bridging Project
A Collaborative Environment
Data Management Components for a Research Data Archive
Presentation transcript:

DANSE Review – SNS/HFIR Update Steve Miller Scientific Computing Group Leader Neutron Scattering Science Division (NSSD) Spallation Neutron Source May 31, 2007

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 2 DANSE Review Overview  SNS/HFIR (NSSD) Facility and Software Updates  Feedback from Instrument Scientists  DANSE – SNS integration  Summary

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 3 DANSE Review SNS Neutron Scattering User Facility

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 4 DANSE Review SNS Target and Instrument Hall

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 5 DANSE Review Instrument Hutch Workplace for users Data acquisition system Analysis computer

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 6 DANSE Review Commissioning SNS Instruments

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 7 DANSE Review FY07 Operations Schedule

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 8 DANSE Review HIFR will run 3 cycles in FY07 Run cycles 408 and 409 are internal run cycles with collaborative users Run cycle 410 supports the full user program

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 9 DANSE Review General User Proposal Call Scheduled  Announce June 1, 2007  Use Integrated Proposal Management System  Accept proposals for  HFIR instruments  Ames Lab Triple Axis (HB 1a)  Triple-Axis Spectrometers (HB 1 and HB 3)  Residual Stress (HB 2B)  SANS (CG 2 and CG 3)  SNS instruments  Backscattering Spectrometer (BL 2)  Magnetism Reflectometer (BL 4a)  Liquids Reflectometer (BL 4b)  Accommodate requests for CNMS capabilities

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 10 DANSE Review Scientific Computing Scope  Data lifecycle management – “packaging” of raw data, metadata cataloging, data storage, long-term data archive, data retrieval  Experiment support – live histogramming and data reduction  Data reduction and visualization (via desktop or portal)  Analysis and simulation software – DANSE plays a key role here  Support instrument commissioning  Provide support for all instruments at SNS and HFIR

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 11 DANSE Review NSSD Scientific Computing Software Team  NSSD Scientific Computing Group: Steve Miller, Pete Peterson, Michael Reuter, Jean Bilheux, Shelly Ren  CSMD Network and Cluster Computing Group: Jim Kohl, Sudharshan Vazhkudai, Jens Schwidder – 1.5 FTE total  UT Software Quality Research Lab: Tom Swain, Bradford Smith – 0.5 FTE  Tech-X: Mark Green – 0.25 FTE  Neutron Science TeraGrid Gateway: John Cobb, Greg Pike, Vickie Lynch, Meili Chen – NSF Funded  Room to grow? YES!!!

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 12 DANSE Review Overall Software Architecture

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 13 DANSE Review Computer Network Diagram Drawing Courtesy of Tom Swain

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 14 DANSE Review SNS Computing Resources Available for DANSE  Instrument Analysis computers  SNS compute and application servers  ARCS cluster now resident at SNS  Neutron Science TeraGrid Gateway (NSTG)  ORNL OIC clusters (future)  ORNL Super Computers (future)

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 15 DANSE Review Live Data Processing – Design Underway

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 16 DANSE Review Instrument Data Statistics 2007 YTD Magnetics Reflectometer Liquids Reflectometer Backscattering Spectrometer Number of Files Archived in Average Event File Size in MB Average NeXus File Size in MB Histogram Size in MB Histogram compression ratio 94.9%96.7%98.3%

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 17 DANSE Review Protection Zone Overview (target) Slide Courtesy of Victor Hazelwood

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 18 DANSE Review Benefits of an Open Research Enclave  Straight forward and centralized means for providing users computer accounts via the XCAMS system in place at ORNL.  XCAMS accounts can be used for both web applications AND for logging in to instrument analysis computers.  Remote desktop applications such as NX (VNC-like) can be supported.  Maintain the ability to centrally manage both user accounts and computer resources.  Users will have the same “look and feel” computing experience from instrument to instrument.  Data can be centrally located utilizing uniform access policies.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 19 DANSE Review Using NX Remote Desktop

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 20 DANSE Review Portal Based Data Reduction Operational

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 21 DANSE Review Data Portal for Browsing and Searching Data

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 22 DANSE Review Citrix – Windows Remote Application Server

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 23 DANSE Review Feedback from SNS Instrument Scientists  Instrument teams for next commissioning instruments desire to have DANSE software in place prior to first neutrons (the earlier the better for them).  DANSE diffraction software coming along well  To start with for SANS, SNS plans to produce data reduction software and utilize existing IGOR Pro software  CNCS can utilize similar software as ARCS  Analysis software for SNAP high pressure single crystal diffractometer less certain what is/will be available  Scientists keep an eye on software performance:  Execution speed  Handling of large data sets  Easy to install and use (many prefer windows platforms)  Easy to program, configure, or adapt  Reliable – both in stability and accuracy of results

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 24 DANSE Review Feedback - continued  NSSD Science Groups:  Low Q: SANS and Reflectometry  TOF Inelastic  Powder Diffraction  Single Crystal Diffraction  Triple Axis (HFIR instruments only)  Science group leaders are beginning to understand the DANSE project scope and are building their software plans based upon the level of support from DANSE.  Note that DANSE supports 3 of 5 science groups at SNS/HFIR, but provides less support for the single crystal diffraction and triple axis groups.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 25 DANSE Review Some Metrics for DANSE interactions SNS  Number of UCAMS (ORNL) computer accounts:  Currently 8 DANSE team members possess UCAMS (not XCAMS) accounts. These UCAMS accounts enable users to access SNS resources such as computers and repositories.  Eight is a reasonably good number of users given the current number of instruments on-line, and this number is likely to increase as more instruments approach commissioning.  It takes time to get a UCAMS account – especially for foreign nationals.  Number of DANSE applications in use at SNS:  Currently count two: ReflPak and PDFgui.  Note that we are still understanding the role of the ARCS cluster recently installed at SNS and DANSE software which may be available via that machine.  Number of visits between facilities:  DANSE developer’s meeting held at ORNL in January ‘07  Jiao Lin at SNS in November ‘06, January, and May ’07 to work at SNS  SNS personnel attended DANSE meeting at Caltech in August ‘06

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 26 DANSE Review Summary and Observations  SNS has developed the capability to produce software up thru data reduction and is in need of advanced analysis software produced by the DANSE project.  DANSE awareness at NSSD is rising and thought processes have transitioned from “if” to “what and how” – DANSE is taking root and we have some metrics to show this. Currently the most important metric for SNS is DANSE software in-use on-site.  SNS instrument teams have strong wishes to have DANSE software available before their users come. Some teams are already using DANSE software, and additional teams are actively planning and depending on using DANSE software.